University of Zakho

College of Engineering
Petroleum Department

Methods (EOR)

Prepared By
Ahmed Haji Askandar

Supervised By
Mr. Shkar
Contents
ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY (EOR)......................................................................................................................3
Chemical Processes:..........................................................................................................................................4
Polymer Flooding:...........................................................................................................................................4
Surfactant Flooding:.....................................................................................................................................4
Miscible/ Immiscible Processes:......................................................................................................................4
Thermal Processes:........................................................................................................................................4
Steam Injection:..................................................................................................................................................6
Wet Combustion:...............................................................................................................................................6
MEOR, an Unconventional EOR Process:.............................................................................................................6
Points to ponder over EOR Processes:.................................................................................................................6
IOR Methods:.....................................................................................................................................................7
Reference........................................................................................................................................................11
ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY (EOR)

EOR and.lOR stand for Enhanced Oil Recovery and Improved Oil Recovery. As the names suggest, these
recoveries relate to oil that come at some advanced stage of exploitation as they either enhance or
improve upon the existing recoveries. Not many techniques are used for enhancing gas recoveries and
thus the present discussion will pertain to oil reservoirs only.

The general mechanism of oil recovery is movement of the hydrocarbons to production wells, due to a
pressure difference between the reservoir and the production wells. Enhanced Oil recovery processes may
be sub-divided into three major categories:

• Primary
• Secondary
• Tertiary or EOR / IOR

In the primary process, the oil is forced out of the petroleum reservoir by existing natural pressure of
the trapped fluids in the reservoir. When the reservoir pressure is reduced to a certain point where it is
no longer effective, producing wells may be put on suitable artificial lifts, namely gas' lift, SRP, etc.
Water is also injected to maintain the existing pressure in the reservoir. This is termed as primary recovery
stage.(Fig:16-01)
At this stage, pressure may further be augmented through water flooding using some existing wells or
newly drilled injectors. The recoveries achieved at this stage are referred to as secondary stage. The oil
recovered by both primary & secondary processes ranges from 20 to 50 % depending on oil and reservoir
properties. (Fig:16-01

This shows that still at this stage, a huge quantum of oil remains to be exploited in the reservoir and
thus clearly establishes the need and justification of designing and implementing new techniques to
harvest some additional oil. The recovery thus achieved will be termed as enhanced oil recovery and the
corresponding techniques termed as EOR processes. Since all the reservoirs are unique in nature, EOR
process has to be case specific. Further, EOR processes being cost intensive, proper selection/ execution
of the process becomes very crucial. (Fig:16-01)

The enhanced oil recovery processes can be divided into three major categories:

• Chemical
• Miscible/ Immiscible
• Thermal

Thermal processes have been used extensively for the displacement of heavy oils, whereas chemical
and miscible displacement processes have been employed for the recovery of light oils. Among the
various processes for oil recovery, thermal processes have the least uncertainty, and offer a promising
approach for about 70% of the world's EOR production. At present, surfactant flooding is the most
complex and, therefore, has the highest degree of uncertainty. However, if the surfactant formulation
for oil recovery is properly designed and controlled in the reservoir, it has a high potential for achieving
maximum oil recovery.
 Chemical Processes:

There are broadly two categories:

• Polymer Flooding
• Surfactant Flooding

Polymer Flooding:

Polymer flooding is very useful to control the mobility of displacing phase i.e water. The fingering
process is controlled and good amount of water free oil can be produced. In ONGC, polymer flooding
has been successfully implemented in Sanand field of Ahmedabad Asset.(Fig:16-02)

Surfactant Flooding:

The mechanism of oil displacement by surfactant is based on reducing the interfacial tension and is
useful in bringing into main stream the irreducible oil component which as such is not possible with water
injection alone. Addition of caustic injected into the reservoir reacts chemically with the fatty acids and
forms in-situ sodium salts of fatty acids. The formation of these surfactants results in ultra-low interfacial
tension which brings globules of oil back in continuous phase and pushes towards producers to enhance
recoveries. In ONGC, ASP (Alkaline Surfactant Polymer) flooding is successfully implemented in Viraj
field of Ahmedabad Asset.(Fig16-02)

Miscible/ Immiscible Processes:

The miscible displacement process involves the injection of a solvent such as alcohol, refined
hydrocarbons, condensed hydrocarbon gases, LPG, hydrocarbon gases and carbon dioxide gas etc.
which can dissolve in the reservoir oil. In ONGC, miscible gas injection has been used for GS-12 sand of
Gandhar field of Ankleshwar Asset. The results are highly encouraging and recoveries are expected to be
around 60%. Even immiscible gas processes also give good amount of additional recoveries.(Fig:17-03)

Thermal Processes:

When petroleum reservoirs contain a low gravity (less than 20 o API), highviscosity oil and have a high
porosity, secondary recovery methods are not effective for displacement of oil. For such reservoirs,
thermal processes have received the most attention. All the processes used basically reduce the viscosity
of the crude and thus lead to increased mobility of reservoir oil. Depending on the way in which heat is
generated in the reservoir, the thermal processes can be divided into three categories. (Fig: 16-04)
• In-Situ Combustion
• Steam Injection
• Wet Combustion
In-situ Combustion:

For in-situ combustion, the crude oil near the wellbore is ignited using chemicals, downhole electric
heaters or downhole gas burners. After completing ignition in the vicinity of the wellbore,
continuous air injection promotes movement in the burning zone toward the producing wells.
Propagation of a continuous burning zone results in almost complet
removal of all reservoir liquids and leaves behind hot, clean rock, which heats the injected air
before it reaches the burning zone ahead. In ONGC, in-situ combustion is successfully implemented
in Santhal & Balol fields of Mehsana Asset with highly encouraging results. (Fig:16-04)
 Steam Injection:

In steam injection process, steam is injected into the reservoir either continuously or in cycles.
Continuous steam injection involves both injection and production wells, whereas cyclic
injection involves one well only which serves as both injection and production well. For the
same pattern size, the response time is 25-50% lower than the response time for additional
production by in-situ combustion. Duri field of Indonesia is a classic case of steam injection
which is monitored rigorously with the help of 4-D seismics.(Fig:16-05)

Wet Combustion:

In the in-situ combustion process, a large amount of heat is left behind in the swept
formation as waste heat. The heat utilization and efficiency of the process can be improved
by water injection. Water is injected with the air. Superheated steam forms in an evaporation
front and travels behind the combustion front. The important advantage of this process is that
the amount of residual oil left to be burned as fuel by the burning front is considerably
decreased, which in turn displaces more oil and less air is required to burn a unit volume of
oil in the reservoir.

MEOR, an Unconventional EOR Process:

Microbial Enhanced Oil recovery process is known to the industry for long. However, some
recent advancement has been attempted for reservoirs having quite high temperatures. Micro-
organisms and their metabolic products stimulate oil production. The technique involves
injection of selected micro-organisms into the reservoir and the subsequent stimulation and
transportation of their in-situ growth products. Their presence aids in further reduction of
residual oil left in the reservoir after secondary recovery. MEOR process in unlikely to replace
conventional EOR processes because MEOR itself has certain constraints. In ONGC, MEOR
has been attempted in Kosamba (Western Onshore), Badarpur (Silchar) and very recently in
Charada field of Mehsana Asset.

Points to ponder over EOR Processes:

AS observed, EOR processes are very case specific and require large initial investments and
careful monitoring during application. The selection of appropriate process itself asks for a
rigorous study. The process is studied in laboratory and then taken to field on pilot scale. If
found successful and commercial, it is then implemented in the field. It is quite often observed
that even encouraging results at both laboratory and pilot scales do not yield good results at
field level. Handling of environment is also a big issue when using EOR processes.

Although these constraints to EOR processes cause hesitancy in their applications, yet the
lure of getting additional recoveries from established results remains a major point of
attraction. This gets still more importance keeping in minds the uncertainties in
international market and those days of discovering easy oil are gone.
IOR Methods:

As such all EOR processes are IOR processes. Whereas, EOR methods use one process or
the other being implemented on reservoir scale, IOR also covers augmentation of recoveries
through drilling of high tech wells. This as well makes use of infill wells to produce by-pass
oil which as such is not possible through existing wells. Mumbai High, a giant ONGC field
is making use of IOR process through drilling of high tech and infill wells to gain
additional recovery.

Fig: 16-01
Fig:16-02
Fig 6-03
Fig:16-04
Reference

 Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA (1999). "Enhanced Oil Recovery Scoping
Study." Final Report, No. TR-113836.
 Clean Air Task Force (2009). "About EOR" Archived March 13, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
 Hobson, George Douglas; Eric Neshan Tiratsoo (1975). Introduction to petroleum geology.
Scientific Press. ISBN 9780901360076.
 Walsh, Mark; Larry W. Lake (2003). A generalized approach to primary hydrocarbon recovery.
Elsevier.
 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 21st century technologies. 1998.
OECD Publishing. pp. 39. ISBN 9789264160521