Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PIL (Mayur Shrestha)
PIL (Mayur Shrestha)
(ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
W.P. No. _____/ 2023
BETWEEN
Mayur Shrestha
A concerned citizen of India
Residing at: Provident Wellworth City,
Dodballapura, Marsandra, Bengaluru
Karnataka- 561203 …PETITIONER
AND
Union of India & Ors (In Re: Issue of Comprehensive Plan for Air
Pollution Control) and Delhi-Alwar Regional Rapid Transport
System.
1. The petitioner, acting in the public interest, initiates this Public Interest
Litigation (PIL) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
addressing the severe environmental damages caused by Delhi – Alwar
Regional Transport System and Delhi State Transport Corporation
(DSTC)
3. This effect showed on the AQI Index of the state of Delhi on 2022. On
July 10, 2021 Delhi – Alwar Regional Transport System they got license
in a biding to conduct regional transport affairs in the state of Delhi and
NCR regions. This petition seeks redressal for the adverse
environmental impact caused by Delhi – Alwar Regional Transport
System, which necessitates judicial intervention.
GROUNDS:
9. Because the pollution of Delhi’s Air, and source methane taken from
particles suspended in the air it, raises concerns regarding the citizens'
fundamental right to access clean water, as protected by Article 21 of
the Constitution. Contamination of air not only impacts human heaths
as in comparison to smoking 5 cigarettes but also impacts the overall
well-being of the local community. Addressing this issue is imperative
to ensure the protection of the constitutional right to a clean and
healthy environment, emphasizing the need for remedial actions to
safeguard both the ecological balance of the lake and the rights of the
affected population.
18. Also, the Hon’ble Supreme has also made reference to the CPCB
Newsletter "Parivesh," published in September 2001, discussing air
pollution's impact on human health. The Court observed the necessity
of controlling air pollution and identified one measure, reducing diesel
usage, as a means to address this pressing concern.
21. That the Petitioners have not filed any other petition or preceding in
any court or tribunal throughout the territory of India regarding the
matter.
PRAYERS:
FILED BY:
PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
AFFIDAVIT
6. That the deponent has not preferred any similar or other petition in
the above mentioned matter.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
DEPONENT
VAKALATNAMA
In The High Court at NEW DELHI
District: _____________________
C Criminal Revisional .
Constitutional Writ Civil
Appellate Jurisdiction
-Versus-
Respondent
{ Opposite Party
_________________________________________________________________
AND I / we further hereby agree and undertake to pay the said Advocates
his or their fees as settled and all others sums that may be necessary to carry
out the requisition of the Court and otherwise to enable the said Advocates to
conduct the case properly failing which the said Advocates after notice to
me / us will be at liberty to withdraw from the further conduct to the case.
Name of Advocate :