Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BRM Assignment
BRM Assignment
Group Members
Health expenditure at the current and domestic levels refers to the financial resources
allocated to healthcare within a country. This encompasses expenses on medical
services, facilities, medications, and other health-related necessities. Current health
expenditure typically denotes the ongoing costs involved in delivering healthcare
services, while domestic health expenditure encompasses all health-related spending
within a country's borders, regardless of the funding source. Essentially, it represents
the investment a country makes in maintaining the health of its population, covering
everything from routine doctor visits to hospital stays and public health initiatives.
This variable reflects the proportion of a country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
allocated to healthcare. A higher percentage suggests a greater prioritization of health
within the national budget. A rise in this percentage typically indicates increased
investment in healthcare infrastructure, services, and personnel, potentially leading to
better health outcomes and increased access to medical care.
This metric measures the average spending on healthcare per individual in a country,
denominated in current US dollars. A higher expenditure per capita generally correlates
with better healthcare access, improved medical facilities, and a wider range of services
available to citizens. It indicates the financial resources allocated to each person's
health needs, which can significantly impact health outcomes and overall quality of life.
This metric indicates the proportion of total health expenditure that is covered by the
government. A higher percentage implies a larger share of healthcare costs being borne
by the government, which can alleviate the financial burden on individuals and
households. It reflects the extent of government intervention and support in healthcare
financing, which is crucial for ensuring universal health coverage and reducing
disparities in access to care.
The SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) region consists of
eight member countries, each with its unique socio-economic characteristics and
healthcare systems. Here's a brief overview of how these variables manifest across
SAARC countries:
Countries like Maldives and Bhutan allocate a relatively high percentage of their GDP to
healthcare, indicating a strong commitment to public health.In contrast, countries like
Afghanistan and Nepal may have lower percentages due to resource constraints and
other developmental priorities.
Maldives and Sri Lanka typically exhibit higher per capita health expenditures, reflecting
better healthcare access and infrastructure.Afghanistan and Nepal often have lower per
capita spending, indicating challenges in healthcare accessibility and service provision.
Countries like Bangladesh and India may have a higher share of government health
expenditure as a percentage of total health spending, suggesting greater government
involvement in healthcare financing.However, variations exist within the region, with
countries like Pakistan and Afghanistan relying more on private healthcare financing
mechanisms.
The review explores how healthcare spending (HCE), economic development, and
wellbeing outcomes (like life expectancy, infant mortality, and the proportion of elderly
people) are connected in South Asian countries (Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan,
India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka) from 1995 to 2010. It finds a long-term
connection between healthcare spending, economic growth, and wellbeing outcomes in
this region. However, it suggests that healthcare spending is considered a luxury in
these countries, as higher spending is associated with lower life expectancy and fewer
elderly people. There's also no significant link found between healthcare spending and
infant mortality, indicating it doesn't effectively reduce infant deaths. The study suggests
improving healthcare services' quality, utilizing the expertise of the aging population,
and implementing tax reforms and trade policies to address healthcare challenges in the
SAARC region.
Current health expenditure per capita (current US$) in India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka,
Maldives, Bhutan, Bangladesh and Nepal:
This study investigates what different government spending programs mean for
monetary development in agricultural nations, taking into account the issue of
concurrent impacts. Utilizing information from the World Bank, we find that Gross
domestic product development relies upon general wellbeing and training spending,
populace development, wellbeing consumption offer, and capital arrangement share.
These discoveries can direct policymakers in focusing on government spending to help
financial development. We use information from the World Improvement Markers (2008
and 2010) and a concurrent conditions model to break down the connections. Some
coefficient assessments may not line up with assumptions because of possible
collinearity among factors.
The review looks at the nexus between government spending and monetary
development in the seven SAARC nations, specifically Bangladesh, Bhutan, India,
Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, for the period 1970-2007. Utilizing board
cointegration and board causality, the paper finds that administration spending and
financial development is cointegrated, demonstrating the presence of long run harmony
connection between them. It additionally affirms the presence of bidirectional causality
between government spending and financial development, both in the short run and
long run, aside from Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The ramifications of this paper is that
expanded government spending is both reason and result of expanded financial
development.
Pakistan's economy faces instability due to reliance on foreign debts and unstable
political and legal conditions. Agriculture is crucial, contributing over a fifth to GDP and
employing half of the workforce. Poverty is closely tied to agricultural growth, which has
been inconsistent. This study focuses on poverty connections, particularly in rural
Sindh. Results suggest that increasing foreign investment in manufacturing and
agriculture boosts capital accumulation, while government spending on infrastructure
and rural development creates job opportunities, especially for unskilled labor in rural
areas. Safeguarding the country's integrity through robust measures is essential for
accelerating economic development. Asghar, N., Awan, A., & Rehman, H. u. (2012).
Title of the article.
This paper analyzes what government spending in India from 1980 to 2015 means for
financial development, utilizing fundamental relapse examination. It finds that
administration spending by and large lifts Gross domestic product development, with the
exception of Unfamiliar Direct Venture (FDI) development. During the monetary
emergency of 2008, government spending adversely affected Gross domestic product
development, yet during the change time of 1991, it had a positive effect. Tests show no
issues with information precision or connection among factors. The review recommends
zeroing in more on formative spending, especially in foundation, for better monetary
development. It additionally prescribes changes at the state level to oversee uses
better, remembering drawing certain lines for ensures and taking into account project
gambles.
The COVID-19 pandemic is severely impacting the South-East Asia Region, causing
both health and economic crises. Lockdowns and social distancing measures are
shrinking economies, leading to a projected 5.3% decrease in per capita income in
2020. This affects funding for healthcare, which is already low in many countries in the
region, and weakens preparedness for pandemics like COVID-19. To mitigate the
damage and improve healthcare, countries need to increase public spending on health,
especially on primary healthcare (PHC). They should focus on efficiency and equity,
directing funds towards the poor and vulnerable, reducing duplication of funding, and
cutting wasteful spending. The pandemic offers an opportunity to reevaluate and better
fund healthcare systems and PHC, which are crucial for both health outcomes and
economic recovery.
This paper explores the link between healthcare spending (HCE) and economic growth
in select South Asian countries. It analyzes data from 1995 to 2012 using statistical
methods like panel cointegration and causality analysis. Factors such as income per
person, workforce, literacy rate, and elderly population are considered. Findings
suggest that healthcare spending is influenced by economic growth, with evidence of
causality from GDP to HCE. Two-way causality is observed between GDP, workforce,
literacy rate, and elderly population. Additionally, there's a mutual relationship between
workforce, elderly population, and healthcare spending.
Conclusion:
The analysis of health expenditure variables and their implications across SAARC
countries provides valuable insights into the state of healthcare financing, service
provision, and public health outcomes in the region.
It's evident that health expenditure, whether measured as a percentage of GDP or per
capita spending, reflects a country's commitment to the well-being of its citizens. Higher
spending typically correlates with better healthcare access, improved infrastructure, and
enhanced health outcomes.
OECD & World Health Organization. (2020, November 27). [Health expenditure per
capita and in relation to GDP]. Retrieved from https://do.org/10.1787/714791b2-en
Hassan, S.A., Zaman, K., Zaman, S. et al. Measuring health expenditures and
outcomes in saarc region: health is a luxury?. Qual Quant 48, 1421–1437 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9844-2
Verslas: teorija ir praktika. (2017). [Issue 1]. Verslas: teorija ir praktika, 18, 25-32.
https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=586895
Tandon, Ajay1,; Oliveira Cruz, Valeria2; Bhatnagar, Aarushi3; Wang, Hui2; Haque,
Trina1; Jhalani, Manoj2 WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health 10(Suppl 1):p
S63-S72, February 2021. |
https://journals.lww.com/wsep/fulltext/2021/10001/Financing_health_care_in_the_WHO
_South_East_Asia.13.aspx
Khan, H.N., Khan, M.A., Razli, R.B. et al. Health Care Expenditure and Economic
Growth in SAARC Countries (1995–2012): A Panel Causality Analysis. Applied
Research Quality Life 11, 639–661 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-015-9385-z