evelopment i ECT fy a ma ve ces chop fealty of pevelopment at foie yopic : Human m on Index e WHat 1S pt is 2 OVERALL LAYOUT OF THE pROJECT Shay i 1. Teonomic Projet Fite 1" Shee) *e velopmne F Name of the Project (2% Shoot) eee 5. Acknowledgement (3% Sheet) ae 14 Centfcate (4" Sheet) aa 5. index = (5" SI Q (x) HDI aspects of India sets ma pjective of Choosing this Prejeet 1 ny nd is Lagsng in DP aoe (ji) Introduction iy What is the trend due to BDH? country Gil) What is HDI iy What are the advantages of wing county (ix) History of the HDI Concept Wg measure of Welfare? ‘The bh (@) Origin of HD} faivy What are the limitation ofthe sing expen (1) edicts of Us HDI rie Gage Study of Norway ism 2 i ao ce coms S (ix) Global HDI Ranking (Top and Lowest 10) (xvii) Bibliography ea nati the OBJECTIVE OF THE PROJECT = have chosen this project on the ‘Topic Human Development Index because of the following rese inc > To know about the real meaning of Human Development. a 2 i > To understand why per capita income on GDP is not enough to measure Human Developme, ry » To know about what lead to the origin of HDI. 1 i > So as to understand the different aspects of HDI of India. Also, to discuss about why India is so behind in HDI ranking. > f possible to being change in HDI likely of India in whatever way possible. INTRODUCTION Before we talk about what is HDI? What is its meaning, si called a growth and development, So basically growth is a quantitative term, it can be positive as well as negative w! ignificance. Let us first understand about 2 here as Goyal Brohers cysvelopment is qualititative 6 aspects whi y for instance. The po hich is always ities like housing, health, et cation ap Positive, ty grow but it fs not necessary seein ity of life, opportunities, fh = et ot spon ame er reedom ete there ore so many ay roduced by De. Malibab-ubeeq od he Geetaet ie ee Lhe and he described devel lopment as people's ess 10 resources, health and educatt tion of @ plac rhe © noice, a€° sr ow fets actually talk about what dy we mean by HDL war IS HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX (Ho Very High above 0.808 49 ) High between 0.700 up to 0.807 53 Medium between 0.556 up to 0.699 42 Low below 0.555 43 GLOBAL HDI RANKINGS—TOP TEN COUNTRIES RANK et R A] ADI } ae NDEs } 0.957 5 - ent 0.955 _|______ SWITZERLAND E 0.955 4 a HONG KONG, CHINA 0.949 ‘Sl Se eEEANDY IB 0.949 7 _ __ 0947 8 0.945 9 tn. Se 0, ic ee lee saa ies DI = ee0) —|___ DENMARK ida ey LOWEST TEN COUNTRIES IN HDI 1 a SS — { NIGER : B TRAD ARE us 0.394 = CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC 0397 4 =e a 0398 z BURUNDI . = } SOUTH SUDAN 0.433 6 cae ete 0.433 Z . a ~ es ? fr. BURKINA FAso st 0.434 pi 0.45 os; SIERRA LEONE - 452 7 MOZAMBIQUE t 0.452 a ERITERIA 0.456 0.459 Goyal Brothers Prakashe'sya door these HDI Sr ndiatag Co asioully Wa coun Wa Jevelopment and between 1-0.788 it is considered comitry with Wig aa ifs Satay lower than 0.48 then it a Soe [HO DS WH i ee iT — = Ty ae SECO cae Orin: aoe ote 2. Australia 4 essa India Bencladesh i [2200 Poker a ‘considered as low Human Development, 3, Switzerland 4. Denmark 5, Netherlands ———— | Country |, | India [Bangladesh | amen a 221 | 16.1 [Pakistan —— (23 | i South Asia a |S 16 \ HE «15 i rn) HDI ASPECTS OF INDIA ¢ India ranks - 131 HDI - 0.586 « Gain of 0.003 HDI from previous year. Comes under medium human development countries. Indicators: > Life expectancy at birth (by UN). Overall - 64.19 years(Rank 147). Male - 62.80 years. Female - 65.73 years. > Education index : 0.47. > Mean years of schoolin| > GNI Gross National Income) per capita at PPP ; $5350 (rank 127). HUMAN DEVELOPEMENT RT) Weer tac 129 10 131 5.1 (rank 65). Project Work in Economics (Class-X1)nan Development Index: Trend INDIA’S HDI TRENDS India’s Har ee hat since 1990, the HDI value of ¥ The Tepe sie 10 0.645 from 0.429, registering wn bsqielney sith mHDIalve = Croc wars 5 ine nt 3 DE sy ay 2 ae extn ot ingen a nen 2 while mean yovrng this. while, the expected years 0 ¥ i : alee tag's years. Moreover, during on af Bk ae 8 pita of India also increased, 0 sud ONT pets j rs | iatring a rise of nad " B i 14 spared to other countries India's HDI trends comps suntries compared India’s value in the ith Lo . 5 au Meters Bangladesh and 0 im mm to 00 205 06 i og other countries in South Asia, viz, 3 As against India’s rank at 131, Bangladesh a rd position, while Pakistan stood at 154th place, In the South Asian region, India’s HDi, 30 stands at .641, while India is also above the average value of 0.631 3h Pakistan. ranked at the P more than the region's average which sta among the medium HDI category countries. INDIA'S PROGRESS IN HUMAN DEVELOPMENT India's human development ; Loss in human development due to inequality grows slower than before india HOI m World HOI 0.581 0.600 2012 0.709 jee 2014 718 130 : — oc: 2015 0.722 134 i Overall oss du to inequalty in at primary indicators Loss due to income inequality Figura in a 5 of HE) il | India| Pakistan |Bangladesh| South | Medium Asia | HO 0.636 (0.640 2017 0.728 130 HDI ranking of all the states of India ________ High human development countries: Medium human development eee Territor | HDI (2019) | Rank State/Union Territory HDI (2019) ie ek __|_0.782_ 15 Maharashtra 0,691 hoe — 0.776 16 | Manipur 0.691 aE | 0.76317 Jammu and Kashmir 0.688 | 50 Goyal Brothers Praka™ Sdi s 0.746 and Nicobar Islands | 0.741 \32 \33._| Madhya Pradesh (34 | Sharkhand 0.613 (35 _| Uttar Pradesh 0.596 36 | Bihar sta Project Work in Economics (Class-XIl)NKING? 1a SO BEHIND TN HO ean rank which was 130 so what happened that the a) ead of ip ome ngs on other HDI indices of r in e ualities amplify fail ome inequality, Lagain pore e lower in countries with high-in Reasons for 1nd! * ich Cn germ ace to quality healthcare, education, and o aed development eee Jeger ‘mequalty, In Indie, the income growts of the caret avndl in income inequality opportu J a a i pmticnly below the average income growth org, #5 if 40% between 000 sh : entire population ( how female per capita income i India as only 21.8% of that of rata “ Gender Inequality: Numbah "1 40% in other developing countries % : S heaton rk ne of females in India is mainly because of their exclusion from jabour force the working-age group were in the labour force a Only 20.5% suman development improv Some poorer countries do : ae than India in human better he La Ce et ere aa but sluggishly Is gender inequality and the suicide rate Viera, ego bing pr au poate “ =< =) =a = ¢ : 833 | i (201 PPPS) see an eariens Sle ee sus = | °o 6353 553 at 35) 3677 (3s) rs ack Male e Per capita. Male Life expectany at bith ye2) Le expecaney Be, 7 ora, ee a ale = ne 70.4 err ‘ Female hs ee 200 (orz00) | 174 tor205) Cee ate ets) é aanetael sere 346 62203) Gera eas) one Maternal mortality ratio Undertvemeraty rato | 56 unm) | 43 Garam) er onvo ve rs) wos | m4) st _ Infant mortality | Sumtng imoderneorseere) | oy comox) |37.9% aooaon) (per 000 NeDiths) noe |aa6| 73 | 22 Gute rate 5 (ix208200] 53 qonoz07) Under five mora | See cee] geen enone mw a ae | oe Suicide ate (er 100.000 people) ‘Suicide rate per 100,000 people | Femate 7B (2003-09) 14.2 2015) Male 25/179) 13 | 53 ae 13 Gomeon | 179.008 Female |ros|ua2 34] 66 © Cumulative Impact: The cumulative impact of these factors spills over across generations. It is tis intergenerational cycle which denies opportunities to those at the bottom of the pyramid. ° ad een pegiieR While the size of economic resources is a key factor affecting humat ; the distribution and allocation of thes s mining te leva of buen deveopnact these resources also play a major role in determining 52 Goyal Brothers Prakashsoo Governance Reforms: partici nder EMP! ey are intesr tory democracy positlvl ative trends over the a frail regions: most people today live longer, are educated and have more and services than sst 28 years However, we note that as the HDI reyes nave been rising across all regions and human development groups, the rates Vary significantly. South Asia was the fastest growing von over 1990-2017, at 45.3 nt, followed by East & t » Pacific at 41.8 percer at 34.9 percent. th Saharan Africa BENIFIT OF USIN Apart from the fact that HDI gave @ 1s with human centred approach. Wi advantages of using HDI. Pros 1, Wide use: HDI indicators are us' development and global ec: 2. Increased infrastructure: improvement in the Project Work in Economics (Class-XH) artng af the Finances: Saini i ota atps lke rationalised targeting Bsa ing of subsidl iG HUMAN DEVELO! much fall picture th more actual human W ed worldwide. Count nomic patterns. Increase in the country’s infrastruc’ * eve approach vente Str development etc will prob approach of generat ! 1 probably mect the financial requirement eed Oe secs in /equirements for needed for improv ing HDI. tive Gar ive performane 1 Gt sector development thro ance evaluation use wile — an imovetive methods ks oem WOME eee sown to yield pode teu > oameeeer Rae aces E auditing and , werment: Gove 0" Government should invest in Ger I to human development ender equality and wo omen’s empowerment, as | TRENDS IN THE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX ‘Haman Devolopment ade ses, by couty pig 19 ans dome caer VrenGecepet er ey toh ri (Caos oxo Wie ih (bro-ona om — oan PMENT INDEX of how well a developed @ country 'S, Ttalso prov elfare than just mere economic. So hare are s ries use HDI to compare their level of ect education Jevel and health of individuals leads ture. a