Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PDF Quasi Hopf Algebras A Categorical Approach Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications 1St Edition Daniel Bulacu Ebook Full Chapter
PDF Quasi Hopf Algebras A Categorical Approach Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications 1St Edition Daniel Bulacu Ebook Full Chapter
https://textbookfull.com/product/mathematics-of-the-bond-market-
a-levy-processes-approach-encyclopedia-of-mathematics-and-its-
applications-1st-edition-michal-barski/
https://textbookfull.com/product/proof-complexity-encyclopedia-
of-mathematics-and-its-applications-1st-edition-jan-krajicek/
https://textbookfull.com/product/topology-a-categorical-
approach-1st-edition-tai-danae-bradley/
https://textbookfull.com/product/discrete-mathematics-and-its-
applications-8th-edition-rosen/
Crossing Numbers of Graphs (Discrete Mathematics and
Its Applications) 1st Edition Marcus Schaefer
https://textbookfull.com/product/crossing-numbers-of-graphs-
discrete-mathematics-and-its-applications-1st-edition-marcus-
schaefer/
https://textbookfull.com/product/r-programming-and-its-
applications-in-financial-mathematics-1st-edition-shuichi-ohsaki/
https://textbookfull.com/product/combinatorics-and-number-theory-
of-counting-sequences-discrete-mathematics-and-its-
applications-1st-edition-istvan-mezo/
https://textbookfull.com/product/systems-of-nonlinear-partial-
differential-equations-applications-to-biology-and-engineering-
mathematics-and-its-applications-a-w-leung/
https://textbookfull.com/product/mathematics-and-philosophy-1st-
edition-daniel-parrochia/
Q UA S I - H O P F A L G E B R A S
This series is devoted to significant topics or themes that have wide application in
mathematics or mathematical science and for which a detailed development of the
abstract theory is less important than a thorough and concrete exploration of the
implications and applications.
All the titles listed below can be obtained from good booksellers or from Cambridge
University Press. For a complete series listing visit
www.cambridge.org/mathematics.
122 S. Khrushchev Orthogonal Polynomials and Continued Fractions
123 H. Nagamochi and T. Ibaraki Algorithmic Aspects of Graph Connectivity
124 F. W. King Hilbert Transforms I
125 F. W. King Hilbert Transforms II
126 O. Calin and D.-C. Chang Sub-Riemannian Geometry
127 M. Grabisch et al. Aggregation Functions
128 L. W. Beineke and R. J. Wilson (eds.) with J. L. Gross and T. W. Tucker Topics in Topological
Graph Theory
129 J. Berstel, D. Perrin and C. Reutenauer Codes and Automata
130 T. G. Faticoni Modules over Endomorphism Rings
131 H. Morimoto Stochastic Control and Mathematical Modeling
132 G. Schmidt Relational Mathematics
133 P. Kornerup and D. W. Matula Finite Precision Number Systems and Arithmetic
134 Y. Crama and P. L. Hammer (eds.) Boolean Models and Methods in Mathematics, Computer Science,
and Engineering
135 V. Berthé and M. Rigo (eds.) Combinatorics, Automata and Number Theory
136 A. Kristály, V. D. Rădulescu and C. Varga Variational Principles in Mathematical Physics, Geometry,
and Economics
137 J. Berstel and C. Reutenauer Noncommutative Rational Series with Applications
138 B. Courcelle and J. Engelfriet Graph Structure and Monadic Second-Order Logic
139 M. Fiedler Matrices and Graphs in Geometry
140 N. Vakil Real Analysis through Modern Infinitesimals
141 R. B. Paris Hadamard Expansions and Hyperasymptotic Evaluation
142 Y. Crama and P. L. Hammer Boolean Functions
143 A. Arapostathis, V. S. Borkar and M. K. Ghosh Ergodic Control of Diffusion Processes
144 N. Caspard, B. Leclerc and B. Monjardet Finite Ordered Sets
145 D. Z. Arov and H. Dym Bitangential Direct and Inverse Problems for Systems of Integral and
Differential Equations
146 G. Dassios Ellipsoidal Harmonics
147 L. W. Beineke and R. J. Wilson (eds.) with O. R. Oellermann Topics in Structural Graph Theory
148 L. Berlyand, A. G. Kolpakov and A. Novikov Introduction to the Network Approximation Method for
Materials Modeling
149 M. Baake and U. Grimm Aperiodic Order I: A Mathematical Invitation
150 J. Borwein et al. Lattice Sums Then and Now
151 R. Schneider Convex Bodies: The Brunn–Minkowski Theory (Second Edition)
152 G. Da Prato and J. Zabczyk Stochastic Equations in Infinite Dimensions (Second Edition)
153 D. Hofmann, G. J. Seal and W. Tholen (eds.) Monoidal Topology
154 M. Cabrera Garcı́a and Á. Rodrı́guez Palacios Non-Associative Normed Algebras I: The Vidav–Palmer and
Gelfand–Naimark Theorems
155 C. F. Dunkl and Y. Xu Orthogonal Polynomials of Several Variables (Second Edition)
156 L. W. Beineke and R. J. Wilson (eds.) with B. Toft Topics in Chromatic Graph Theory
157 T. Mora Solving Polynomial Equation Systems III: Algebraic Solving
158 T. Mora Solving Polynomial Equation Systems IV: Buchberger Theory and Beyond
159 V. Berthé and M. Rigo (eds.) Combinatorics, Words and Symbolic Dynamics
160. B. Rubin Introduction to Radon Transforms: With Elements of Fractional Calculus and Harmonic Analysis
161 M. Ghergu and S. D. Taliaferro Isolated Singularities in Partial Differential Inequalities
162 G. Molica Bisci, V. D. Radulescu and R. Servadei Variational Methods for Nonlocal Fractional Problems
163 S. Wagon The Banach–Tarski Paradox (Second Edition)
164 K. Broughan Equivalents of the Riemann Hypothesis I: Arithmetic Equivalents
165 K. Broughan Equivalents of the Riemann Hypothesis II: Analytic Equivalents
166 M. Baake and U. Grimm (eds.) Aperiodic Order II: Crystallography and Almost Periodicity
167 M. Cabrera Garcı́a and Á. Rodrı́guez Palacios Non-Associative Normed Algebras II: Representation
Theory and the Zel’manov Approach
168 A. Yu. Khrennikov, S. V. Kozyrev and W. A. Zúñiga-Galindo Ultrametric Pseudodifferential Equations
and Applications
169 S. R. Finch Mathematical Constants II
170 J. Krajı́ček Proof Complexity
171 D. Bulacu, S. Caenepeel, F. Panaite and F. Van Oystaeyen Quasi-Hopf Algebras
E n cyc l o p e d i a o f M at h e m at i c s a n d i t s A p p l i c at i o n s
Quasi-Hopf Algebras
A Categorical Approach
DA N I E L B U L AC U
Universitatea din Bucureşti, Romania
S T E FA A N C A E N E P E E L
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
F L O R I N PA NA I T E
Institute of Mathematics of the Romanian Academy
F R E D DY VA N OY S TA E Y E N
Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium
University Printing House, Cambridge CB2 8BS, United Kingdom
One Liberty Plaza, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10006, USA
477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia
314–321, 3rd Floor, Plot 3, Splendor Forum, Jasola District Centre,
New Delhi – 110025, India
79 Anson Road, #06–04/06, Singapore 079906
www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781108427012
DOI: 10.1017/9781108582780
© Daniel Bulacu, Stefaan Caenepeel, Florin Panaite and Freddy Van Oystaeyen 2019
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception
and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements,
no reproduction of any part may take place without the written
permission of Cambridge University Press.
First published 2019
Printed and bound in Great Britain by Clays Ltd, Elcograf S.p.A.
A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Bulacu, Daniel, 1973– author. | Caenepeel, Stefaan, 1956– author. |
Panaite, Florin, 1970– author. | Oystaeyen, F. Van, 1947– author.
Title: Quasi-Hopf algebras : a categorical approach / Daniel Bulacu
(Universitatea din Bucureti, Romania), Stefaan Caenepeel (Vrije
Universiteit, Amsterdam), Florin Panaite (Institute of Mathematics of the
Romanian Academy), Freddy van Oystaeyen (Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium).
Description: Cambridge ; New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, [2019] |
Series: Encyclopedia of mathematics and its applications ; 171 | Includes
bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2018034517 | ISBN 9781108427012 (hardback)
Subjects: LCSH: Hopf algebras. | Tensor products. | Tensor algebra.
Classification: LCC QA613.8 .B85 2019 | DDC 512/.55–dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018034517
ISBN 978-1-108-42701-2 Hardback
Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy
of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication
and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain,
accurate or appropriate.
Dedicated to our wives
Adriana, Lieve, Cristina, Danielle.
Contents
Preface page xi
1 Monoidal and Braided Categories 1
1.1 Monoidal Categories 1
1.2 Examples of Monoidal Categories 7
1.2.1 The Category of Sets 7
1.2.2 The Category of Vector Spaces 7
1.2.3 The Category of Bimodules 7
1.2.4 The Category of G-graded Vector Spaces 8
1.2.5 The Category of Endo-functors 13
1.2.6 A Strict Category Associated to a Monoidal Category 15
1.3 Monoidal Functors 16
1.4 Mac Lane’s Strictification Theorem for Monoidal Categories 25
1.5 (Pre-)Braided Monoidal Categories 28
1.6 Rigid Monoidal Categories 38
1.7 The Left and Right Dual Functors 43
1.8 Braided Rigid Monoidal Categories 48
1.9 Notes 54
2 Algebras and Coalgebras in Monoidal Categories 55
2.1 Algebras in Monoidal Categories 55
2.2 Coalgebras in Monoidal Categories 65
2.3 The Dual Coalgebra/Algebra of an Algebra/Coalgebra 70
2.4 Categories of Representations 78
2.5 Categories of Corepresentations 82
2.6 Braided Bialgebras 87
2.7 Braided Hopf Algebras 95
2.8 Notes 101
3 Quasi-bialgebras and Quasi-Hopf Algebras 103
3.1 Quasi-bialgebras 103
3.2 Quasi-Hopf Algebras 110
3.3 Examples of Quasi-bialgebras and Quasi-Hopf Algebras 119
viii Contents
Bibliography 515
Index 525
Preface
Some basic ideas in mathematics are very generic and almost omnipresent. Let us
just mention “operators on some structure,” an idea going back to symmetry of ge-
ometric configurations, and also “duality.” These ideas are also at the roots of the
modern theory of quasi-Hopf algebras, which is the topic of this book.
Geometry is at the root of many developments in mathematics, and for our topic
of interest we may go back to algebraic geometry and the theory of (affine) algebraic
varieties, which may be seen as sets of solutions of polynomial equations in some
affine space over some field. One then studies such varieties via the ring of functions
on them with values in the base field; in fact one restricts attention to polynomial
functions forming the coordinate ring of the variety. There one observes the funda-
mental duality between commutative (affine) algebra and the algebraic geometry of
(affine) algebraic varieties, later better phrased in the more general scheme theory.
The other generic idea of operators acting on geometric structures led directly to
actions or transformation groups and operator algebras. The idea of group actions
and their invariants is deeply embedded in the philosophy of mathematics; for ex-
ample, in the “Erlangen Program” of F. Klein, geometry was redefined as the study
of properties invariant for actions of transformation groups. On the more algebraic
side, actions of groups of automorphisms of fields were used by E. Galois to solve
some problems about solutions to polynomial equations over a field. In the resulting
Galois theory another duality appeared, namely the duality between subgroups of
the Galois group of some field extension and the lattice of subfields of the field. This
Galois duality originally was considered for finite-dimensional separable field exten-
sions but it was extended to inseparable extensions by using derivations and higher
derivations, leading to Lie algebra actions and their invariants. Thus, a more general
Galois theory mixing Lie actions (of derivations) and group actions (of automor-
phisms) resulted, immediately leading to a Galois theory for Hopf algebra actions.
Further extensions of the Galois theory were in the direction of continuous groups,
later called Lie groups. So here the generic ideas of action and duality met, and Hopf
algebras appeared naturally. But also the geometric line of development showed a
similar phenomenon with the study of abelian varieties and algebraic groups. Roughly
stated, an algebraic group is an algebraic variety with a group structure on its points;
xii Preface
interesting examples are matrix groups, that is, groups embedded in a matrix ring
and having the structure of an algebraic variety, like GLn (k) and SLn (k), the general
and special linear groups over the field k, respectively. The group structure on the va-
riety translates into a structure of the coordinate ring given by a comultiplication, a
counit and an antipode satisfying suitable conditions that turn it into a commutative
Hopf algebra. Hopf algebras got their name because they appeared first in a cele-
brated paper by H. Hopf on algebraic topology. In fact the structure was discovered
on the cohomology ring of an H-space; roughly stated, that is a topological space
with a multiplication on it together with a special element such that left and right
multiplication by this element defines a map which is homotopic to the identity map
(so a kind of neutral element up to homotopy).
Group actions on vector spaces may be studied by looking at modules over the
group algebra k[G] of the acting group G over the base field k; similarly, Lie algebra
actions of a Lie algebra g on a vector space may be studied by looking at the uni-
versal enveloping algebra of g over k, say Uk (g). Now both k[G] and Uk (g) are Hopf
algebras but not commutative anymore; instead, they are cocommutative. So aspects
of group actions and Lie algebra actions become unified in a theory of actions of
arbitrary Hopf algebras on general algebras or vector spaces or modules, and this
received extensive interest in ring theory.
Let us point out one important “generality” for general Hopf algebras: they need
not be commutative or cocommutative, as many of the early examples of Hopf alge-
bras were. In his famous address to the International Congress of Mathematicians in
1986, Drinfeld introduced the term “quantum group,” roughly referring to a quasitri-
angular Hopf algebra, that is, a Hopf algebra endowed with a so-called R-matrix, sat-
isfying certain axioms that represent a relaxation of the cocommutativity condition
and implying the (equally famous) quantum Yang–Baxter equation. Drinfeld proved
that any finite-dimensional Hopf algebra can be embedded in a quasitriangular one,
called its quantum (or Drinfeld) double. There is a vast literature on quantum groups
and many examples could be obtained from deforming well-known easier Hopf al-
gebras. Combined with the restriction to special Hopf algebras it also makes sense
to restrict to special categories of modules like so-called Yetter–Drinfeld modules,
to name just one.
Essential for the transition from Hopf algebras to quasi-Hopf algebras was the
concept of monoidal category, roughly stated a category with a product (called the
“tensor product”) generalizing the tensor product of vector spaces in a suitable way
and satisfying natural conditions. For example, the category of sets is a monoidal
category, the “tensor product” being the Cartesian product of sets. One of the ax-
ioms of a monoidal category is the so-called “associativity constraint,” which for the
categories of vector spaces and of sets is “trivial;” for instance, for vector spaces
this boils down to saying that, if U, V , W are vector spaces, then (U ⊗ V ) ⊗ W and
U ⊗ (V ⊗W ) can be identified in the usual (or “trivial”) way.
One of the fundamental features of a Hopf algebra, H, is that its category of
(left) representations is a monoidal category, with tensor product inherited from the
Preface xiii
category of vector spaces, and the tensor product of two left H-modules is again a
left H-module via the comultiplication of H. The associativity constraint is, again,
“trivial.”
If one is not interested in an a priori given type of algebra but wants to make sure
that there is a “product” on the category of its representations, then one finds the
motivation for the introduction of quasi-Hopf algebras as Drinfeld did in his seminal
paper [80]. Roughly, a quasi-Hopf algebra is an algebra for which its category of
left modules is monoidal, but maybe with non-trivial associativity constraint. More
precisely, what Drinfeld did was to weaken the coassociativity condition for a Hopf
algebra so that the comultiplication is only coassociative up to conjugation by an
invertible element of H ⊗ H ⊗ H (which is a sort of 3-cocycle). Moreover, examples
of quasi-Hopf algebras can be obtained by “twisting” the comultiplication of a Hopf
algebra via a so-called “gauge transformation” (only if the gauge transformation is a
sort of 2-cocycle is the twisted object again a Hopf algebra). After specialization to
quantum groups, sometimes just taken to be non-commutative non-cocommutative
Hopf algebras but usually with extra conditions like quasitriangularity, the general-
ization in terms of non-coassociativity became popular too and it found several appli-
cations as well. Again, the fundamental property is that the relaxation of coassocia-
tivity still makes the representation category into a monoidal category, and moreover
the rigidity (i.e. the existence of dual objects) of the category of finite-dimensional
representations of a Hopf algebra, owing to the presence of an antipode, is preserved
by replacing the notion of an antipode by a suitable analogue. Categorically speak-
ing, passing from the category of Hopf algebras to the one of quasi-Hopf algebras
does not (in principle) really add to the complexity; in fact the latter is in some sense
more manageable because of the presence of a kind of gauge group.
Monoidal categories were present, if hidden, in the classical ideas mentioned be-
fore and they have been very useful in obtaining a unified theory. One of the early
facts that stimulated interest in monoidal categories stemmed from their applicabil-
ity in rational conformal field theory (RCFT). The monoidal categories in RCFT
could, by Tannaka–Krein reconstruction, be considered as module categories over
some “Hopf-like” algebras. Back in 1984 Drinfeld and Jimbo introduced a quantum
group by deforming a universal enveloping algebra U(g) for some Lie algebra g; in
fact for every semisimple Lie algebra they constructed what was called afterwards
the Drinfeld–Jimbo algebra. For the study of some categories of modules over the
Drinfeld–Jimbo algebras, a relation with the so-called KZ-equations had to be used;
these equations were introduced by Knizhnik and Zamolodchikov in 1984. The KZ-
equations are linear differential equations satisfied by two-dimensional conformal
field theories associated with affine Lie algebras. Such KZ-equations may be used
to obtain a quantization of universal enveloping algebras, and Drinfeld used KZ-
equations to construct a quasi-Hopf algebra for some Lie algebra g, say Qg , so that
some categories of modules over Qg are equivalent to similar ones over the Drinfeld–
Jimbo algebra of the Lie algebra g. Further interesting applications of KZ-equations
follow, for example, from the fact that their monodromy along closed paths yields
xiv Preface
a representation of the braid group. We refer to the specialized literature for more
detail concerning applications in physics. We do the same for some deep relations
with number theory in the sense of A. Grothendieck’s “Esquisse.”
In this book we aim to develop the theory of quasi-Hopf algebras from scratch,
or almost, dealing mainly with algebraic methods. Knowledge of Hopf algebras will
benefit the reader but we do introduce the necessary concepts. Using monoidal cate-
gories as the main tool makes for a rather abstract treatment of the material, but we
hope the unifying effect of it will expose well the beautiful generalization from Hopf
algebras to quasi-Hopf algebras; moreover, the categorical point of view also stays
close to the applications in physics, as indicated by the foregoing remarks.
We now outline the content of the book (more historical and bibliographical re-
marks can be found in the Notes section at the end of each chapter).
In Chapters 1 and 2 we present the basic categorical concepts and tools needed for
the rest of the book (monoidal, rigid and braided categories and algebras, coalgebras
and Hopf algebras in such categories). We included detailed definitions and proofs;
we do not assume that the reader has prior knowledge of these topics. In particular,
we introduce the concepts of coalgebra, bialgebra and Hopf algebra in the usual sense
(over a field), so we do not assume from the reader a knowledge of these concepts
either.
In Chapter 3 we introduce the main objects of our study, quasi-bialgebras and
quasi-Hopf algebras (as well as the dual concepts), present their basic properties and
some classes of examples. We have two warnings for the reader: (1) the concept of
quasi-bialgebra is introduced in Definition 3.4, but afterwards we make a reduction,
and the axioms of a quasi-bialgebra that will be used from there on are the ones
presented in equations (3.1.7)–(3.1.10); (2) unlike Drinfeld, we do not include the
bijectivity of the antipode in the definition of a quasi-Hopf algebra, and we shall see
in later chapters that the bijectivity is automatic in the finite-dimensional and the
quasitriangular case.
In Chapter 4 we study “(co)actions” of quasi-bialgebras and quasi-Hopf algebras,
namely we introduce the concepts of module (co)algebra and (bi)comodule algebra
over a quasi-bialgebra, we give some examples and present some connections that
exist between these structures.
In Chapter 5 we introduce various types of crossed products that appear in the
context of quasi-Hopf algebras (smash products, diagonal crossed products, etc.), we
study the relations between them and as an application we present a duality theorem
for finite-dimensional quasi-Hopf algebras.
In Chapter 6 we introduce so-called quasi-Hopf bimodules over a quasi-Hopf alge-
bra H, prove some structure theorems for them leading to the fact that their category
is monoidally equivalent to the category of left H-modules and, as an application,
we prove a structure theorem for quasi-Hopf comodule algebras.
In Chapter 7 we study finite-dimensional quasi-Hopf algebras, more precisely in-
tegrals and cointegrals for them. We use the machinery provided by Frobenius al-
gebras, and we present some basic results about Frobenius, symmetric and Frobe-
Preface xv
nius augmented algebras (so again we do not assume from the reader a knowledge
of these topics). A consequence of the theory we develop is that the antipode of a
finite-dimensional quasi-Hopf algebra is bijective. We end the chapter with a section
containing a freeness result for quasi-Hopf algebras (for that section the reader is
assumed to have some knowledge of module theory).
In Chapter 8 we introduce the four categories of Yetter–Drinfeld modules over a
quasi-Hopf algebra, prove that they are all braided isomorphic and, when restricted to
finite-dimensional objects, rigid. Then we introduce the quantum double of a finite-
dimensional quasi-Hopf algebra (for the moment, only as a quasi-Hopf algebra),
and two particular cases, objects denoted by Dω (H) and Dω (G) (for the latter, G
is a finite group and Dω (G) is called the twisted quantum double of G). We end the
chapter with some properties and examples of algebras in Yetter–Drinfeld categories.
In Chapter 9 we define so-called two-sided two-cosided Hopf modules over a
quasi-Hopf algebra, prove that their category is monoidally equivalent to a category
of Yetter–Drinfeld modules and use this equivalence to prove some structure theo-
rems for bicomodule algebras and bimodule coalgebras. We characterize Hopf al-
gebras within the category of two-sided two-cosided Hopf modules and use this to
define biproduct quasi-Hopf algebras.
In Chapter 10 we study quasitriangular quasi-Hopf algebras, QT for short. We
show that the antipode of a QT quasi-Hopf algebra is inner, hence bijective. We prove
that the quantum double of a finite-dimensional quasi-Hopf algebra is a QT quasi-
Hopf algebra and we characterize the quantum double of a QT finite-dimensional
quasi-Hopf algebra as a certain biproduct quasi-Hopf algebra.
In Chapter 11 we introduce the concept of factorizable quasi-Hopf algebra, prove
that the quantum double of a finite-dimensional quasi-Hopf algebra is factorizable,
and describe the quantum double of a factorizable quasi-Hopf algebra. We prove
also that any factorizable quasi-Hopf algebra is unimodular (i.e. the spaces of left
and right integrals coincide).
In Chapter 12 we describe the integrals of a quantum double of a finite-dimensional
quasi-Hopf algebra (reproving that it is unimodular). We define the quantum dimen-
sion of an object in a braided rigid category, apply this to the category of finite-
dimensional modules over a quasi-Hopf algebra and compute the quantum dimen-
sion of a finite-dimensional quasi-Hopf algebra H and of its quantum double D(H)
regarded as left D(H)-modules. We present a trace formula for quasi-Hopf algebras,
and then we introduce the concept of involutory quasi-Hopf algebra.
In Chapter 13 we introduce the concepts of balanced and ribbon categories, lead-
ing to the concept of ribbon quasi-Hopf algebra, which is a QT quasi-Hopf algebra
endowed with an element (called ribbon element) satisfying some axioms. In the final
two sections, we present two classes of examples of ribbon quasi-Hopf algebras.
We have tried to make this book as self-contained as possible, providing as many
details (in definitions and proofs) as we could. Owing to lack of space, we had to
leave aside some other topics on quasi-Hopf algebras that would have deserved to be
presented here (we intentionally left aside Drinfeld’s theory of quantum enveloping
xvi Preface
algebras, because this is very well presented in C. Kassel’s book [127]). In order to
help the reader to get an idea of what else can be said about quasi-Hopf algebras, we
have included in the bibliography a number of papers on (or related to) quasi-Hopf
algebras that we did not cite or use in the book. We have also included some papers
or books about Hopf algebras or category theory or other topics that we considered
relevant for us or for the subject of the book.
This book is an outcome of the long-term scientific cooperation between the Non-
commutative Algebra groups from Antwerp, Brussels and Bucharest. We whole-
heartedly thank our colleagues from the University of Antwerp, the University of
Brusssels, the University of Bucharest and the Institute of Mathematics of the
Romanian Academy for the scientific discussions we had with them over the years.
Finally, the authors would like to thank Paul Taylor and Bodo Pareigis for sharing
their “diagrams” programs, which were intensively used in this book.
1
Monoidal and Braided Categories
In this chapter we introduce the basic categorical language that will be used throughout this
book. We define the concepts of monoidal and braided monoidal category and prove that any
monoidal category is monoidally equivalent to a strict one.
• a map Ob(F) : Ob(C ) → Ob(D); we will denote Ob(F)(X) = F(X), for all X ∈
Ob(C );
• a function
for any objects X,Y of C ; we will denote HomF (X,Y )( f ) = F( f ), for any mor-
phism f : X → Y in C .
We can now introduce the concept of monoidal category, which is roughly a cat-
egory C endowed with an associative “tensor product” ⊗ : C × C → C , with a unit
object 1 and coherence. Rigorously, we have the following:
Definition 1.1 A monoidal category consists of a category C endowed with a func-
tor ⊗ : C × C → C (called the tensor product), a distinguished object 1 ∈ C (called
the unit object of C ) and natural isomorphisms (X,Y, Z are arbitrary objects of C )
aX,Y,Z : (X ⊗Y ) ⊗ Z → X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z) (the associativity constraint),
lX : 1 ⊗ X → X (the left unit constraint),
rX : X ⊗ 1 → X (the right unit constraint),
satisfying the so-called Pentagon Axiom and Triangle Axiom, namely for any ob-
jects X,Y, Z, T ∈ C the following diagrams are commutative:
aX⊗Y,Z,T aX,Y,Z⊗T
((X ⊗Y ) ⊗ Z) ⊗ T (X ⊗Y ) ⊗ (Z ⊗ T ) X ⊗ (Y ⊗ (Z ⊗ T )) (1.1.1)
aX,Y,Z ⊗IdT IdX ⊗aY,Z,T
aX,1,Y
(X ⊗ 1) ⊗Y X ⊗ (1 ⊗Y ) (1.1.2)
f g f g
Remark 1.2 Let X → Y → Z and X → Y → Z be morphisms in C . The fact that
⊗ : C × C → C is a functor implies the following equality:
(g ◦ f ) ⊗ (g ◦ f ) = (g ⊗ g ) ◦ ( f ⊗ f ) : X ⊗ X → Z ⊗ Z .
Also, for all objects X,Y of C we have IdX⊗Y = IdX ⊗ IdY .
If C is a monoidal category and X,Y, Z, T are objects of C , there are two different
ways to go from ((X ⊗ Y ) ⊗ Z) ⊗ T to X ⊗ (Y ⊗ (Z ⊗ T )). The Pentagon Axiom
says that these two ways coincide. Then it is automatic that all the other consistency
problems of this type are solved as well; see Remark 1.35 below.
Proposition 1.3 Let (C , ⊗, 1, a, l, r) be a monoidal category and consider the switch
functor τ : C × C → C × C , defined by τ (X,Y ) = (Y, X), for any X,Y ∈ C , and
f g
τ ( f , g) = (g, f ), for any morphisms X → X and Y → Y in C . Then
C := (C , ⊗ := ⊗ ◦ τ , a, 1, l := r, r := l)
is a monoidal category, where aX,Y,Z := a−1
Z,Y,X , for all X,Y, Z ∈ C .
In what follows C will be called the reverse monoidal category associated to C .
4 Monoidal and Braided Categories
Proof All the axioms for C to be a monoidal category follow from those of C and
f g
the fact that (g ◦ f )−1 = f −1 ◦ g−1 , for any isomorphisms X → Y → Z in C . For
example, the Pentagon Axiom for C reduces to the commutativity of the diagram
a−1
T,Z,Y ⊗X a−1
T ⊗Z,Y,X
T ⊗ (Z ⊗ (Y ⊗ X)) (T ⊗ Z) ⊗ (Y ⊗ X) ((T ⊗ Z) ⊗Y ) ⊗ X
IdT ⊗a−1
Z,Y,X a−1
T,Z,Y ⊗IdX
T ⊗ ((Z ⊗Y ) ⊗ X) (T ⊗ (Z ⊗Y )) ⊗ X,
a−1
T,Z⊗Y,X
which holds because of (1.1.1). Similarly, for a as above, l = r and r = l, the Triangle
Axiom is satisfied because of (1.1.2).
Remark 1.4 Apart from C , to a monoidal category C we can associate a new
one that will be denoted by C opp and called the opposite category associated to C .
As a category, C opp has the same objects as C and HomC opp (X,Y ) = HomC (Y, X),
for any objects X,Y of C . If f ∈ HomC opp (X,Y ) and g ∈ HomC opp (Y, Z) then the
composition ◦opp between g and f in C opp is g ◦opp f = f ◦ g, the latest composition
being in C .
If C is monoidal then so is C opp , with the monoidal structure induced by that of
C , namely C opp = (C opp , ⊗, 1, a−1 , l −1 , r−1 ).
The Triangle Axiom in Definition 1.1 gives the compatibility between the left and
right unit constraints. There also exist other compatibilities of this type:
Proposition 1.5 Let (C , ⊗, 1, a, l, r) be a monoidal category. Then the diagrams
aX,Y,1
(X ⊗Y ) ⊗ 1 X ⊗ (Y ⊗ 1)
(IdX ⊗rY )aX,Y,1 ⊗Id1 rX⊗Y ⊗Id1 (IdX ⊗rY )aX,Y,1 rX⊗Y
(X ⊗Y ) ⊗ 1 rX⊗Y
X ⊗Y
and therefore the first triangle in the proposition is commutative because r(X⊗Y )⊗1 is
an isomorphism.
If we express the commutativity of the first triangle for C , the reverse monoidal
category associated to C as in Proposition 1.3, we obtain the commutativity of the
second triangle in the proposition.
So it remains to prove l1 = r1 . For this, note that the naturality of r implies that
rX⊗1
(X ⊗ 1) ⊗ 1 X ⊗1
rX ⊗Id1 rX
X ⊗1 rX
X
Now, by (1.1.2) we have r1⊗1 = r1 ⊗ Id1 = (Id1 ⊗ l1 )a1,1,1 , and by the commuta-
tivity of the first triangle in the proposition we get r1⊗1 = (Id1 ⊗ r1 )a1,1,1 . Since a1,1,1
is an isomorphism we obtain Id1 ⊗ l1 = Id1 ⊗ r1 .
By the naturality of l the diagrams
l1⊗1
1 ⊗ (1 ⊗ 1) 1⊗1
Id1 ⊗l1 Id1 ⊗r1 l1 r1
1⊗1 1
l1
are commutative. Using that l1⊗1 is an isomorphism and Id1 ⊗ l1 = Id1 ⊗ r1 we get
l1 = r1 , and this finishes the proof.
Proposition 1.6 Let 1 be the unit object of a monoidal category C . Then EndC (1)
is a commutative monoid, and if we identify 1 ⊗ 1 with 1 via l1 = r1 then the tensor
product of two morphisms in EndC (1) coincides with their composition.
Proof It can be easily checked that the composition endows EndC (1) with a monoid
structure, the unit element being Id1 . Thus, we only need to show that
f ⊗ g = r1−1 ◦ ( f ◦ g) ◦ r1 = r1−1 ◦ (g ◦ f ) ◦ r1 ,
for all f , g ∈ EndC (1). To this end, note that the naturality of l and r imply the
commutativity of the following diagrams:
l1 r1
1⊗1 1 and 1⊗1 1
Id1 ⊗g g f ⊗Id1 f
l1 r1
1⊗1 1 1⊗1 1.
Now, since l1 and r1 are isomorphisms we obtain Id1 ⊗ g = l1−1 ◦ g ◦ l1 and f ⊗ Id1 =
r1−1 ◦ f ◦ r1 . Since l1 = r1 it follows that
for all g ∈ G. Indeed, it is an elementary fact that in k M the tensor product commutes
with arbitrary direct sums. Hence
⎛ ⎞
(V ⊗W )g = Vσ ⊗Wτ = Vg ⊗ ⎝ Wg ⎠ = V ⊗W,
g∈G g∈G σ τ =g g∈G g ∈G
Our next aim is to describe the monoidal structures of VectG , somehow induced
by the monoidal structure of k M . To this end we first need some group cohomol-
ogy, with a particular emphasis on the third cohomology group of a group G with
coefficients in k∗ , the group of units of a field k, viewed trivially as a Z[G]-module.
Here Z is the ring of integers and Z[G] is the group algebra associated to G over
the commutative ring Z. More generally, for G a (multiplicative) group with neutral
element e and R a commutative ring we denote by R[G] the free R-module with basis
{g | g ∈ G}, so any element of R[G] has the form ∑g∈G αg g with (αg )g∈G a family
of elements of R having only a finite number of non-zero elements. Then R[G] with
multiplication defined by (αh h)(βg g) = αh βg hg, extended by linearity, and unit e, is
called the group algebra associated to G over R. It is easy to see that R[G] is a unital
associative R-algebra, and that R[G] is a G-graded vector space with grading defined
by R[G]g = Rg, for all g ∈ G.
Coming back to the survey on group cohomology, let K n (G, k∗ ) be the set of maps
from Gn to k∗ . Then one can easily see that K n (G, k∗ ) is a group under pointwise
multiplication. There exist maps Δn : K n (G, k∗ ) → K n+1 (G, k∗ ), which for n ∈ {2, 3}
are given by the formulas
Proof By taking y = z = e in (1.2.2) we find φ (x, e,t) = φ (e, e,t)φ (x, e, e). In par-
ticular, by taking x = t = e, it follows that φ (e, e, e) = 1. Then we consider the map
10 Monoidal and Braided Categories
Let B3n (G, k∗ ) and Zn3 (G, k∗ ) be the subgroups of B3 (G, k∗ ) and Z 3 (G, k∗ ) consist-
ing of normalized elements. We have a well-defined group morphism
which is surjective by Lemma 1.11. One can see that it is also injective, and therefore
One can now provide the connection between H 3 (G, k∗ ) and some monoidal struc-
tures on VectG .
Proposition 1.13 Let G be a group, k a field and VectG the category of G-graded k-
vector spaces. There is a bijective correspondence between the monoidal structures
on VectG of the form (VectG , ⊗, a, k, l, r) and the set of normalized 3-cocycles on G,
where ⊗ is defined by (1.2.1) and l, r are the constraints of the monoidal category
k M as defined in Subsection 1.2.2.
More precisely, any associativity constraint a on VectG is completely determined
by a normalized 3-cocycle φ ∈ H 3 (G, k∗ ), in the sense that, for any U,V,W ∈ VectG
and any homogeneous elements u ∈ U, v ∈ V and w ∈ W , aU,V,W is the k-linear map
Conversely, suppose that VectG has a monoidal structure of the form mentioned in
the statement. For any U ∈ VectG and any k-linear map f : U → k define θ f : U →
k[G] by θ f (u) = ∑x∈G f (ux )x, for all u ∈ U, where u = ∑x∈G ux is the decomposition
of u in homogeneous components. Obviously, θ f is a graded morphism. Likewise
we define θg and θh , for any V,W ∈ VectG and all g : V → k and h : W → k.
Now take ε : k[G] → k defined by ε (g) = 1, for all g ∈ G, extended by linearity. A
simple computation shows that (ε ⊗ ε )(θ f ⊗ θg ) = f ⊗ g.
We are now able to show that an associativity constraint a of VectG is completely
determined by ak[G],k[G],k[G] . More precisely, for a, an associativity constraint on
VectG , define φ (x, y, z) := (ε ⊗ (ε ⊗ ε ))ak[G],k[G],k[G] ((x ⊗ y) ⊗ z), for all x, y, z ∈ G.
By the naturality of a, for any U,V,W and f , g, h as above, we have
Example 1.15 (Super vector spaces) Let k be a field, Z2 = {0, 1} the cyclic group
of order 2, this time written additively, and consider the category VectZ2 of Z2 -graded
k-vector spaces. It can be identified with the category whose objects are pairs V =
(V0 ,V1 ) of k-vector spaces. A morphism from (V0 ,V1 ) to (V0 ,V1 ) in VectZ2 is a pair
( f0 , f1 ) of k-linear maps with fi : Vi → Vi , i ∈ {0, 1}.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
boys,” he said, “will tease you for a bit, but don’t you take any notice of
them. There is nothing really bad at their hearts.”
“Thank you,” said Sandie; “I’ll try to take your advice.”
By-and-bye the young men began to arrive in swarms, and Sandie at
once became the centre of attraction. It must be confessed that Sandie’s
clothes, if not decidedly countrified, were not over fashionable.
“Hullo, Geordie,” cried one fellow, rushing up and seizing Sandie by the
hand; “man, I’m awfu’ glaid to see you.”
“And hoo’s the taties and neeps?” cried another.
Sandie answered never a word.
“Man, Geordie Muckiefoot, do you think ye can manage to do a
version?”
“Can you conjugate amo, Geordie? Ye ken hoo it goes: Amo, amas, I
love a lass; amas, amat, she lived in a flat, and so on?”
“But I say, Geordie Muckiefoot,” cried a taller fellow, coming forward
and throwing himself into a pugilistic attitude before Sandie—squaring up,
as it is called—“can ye fecht? Losh! I’m spoilin’ for a fecht.”
“I can’t fight, and I won’t fight,” said Sandie; “I’d rather be friends with
you.”
“Rather run a mile than fecht a minute, eh? Weel, weel, dinna fash your
fins; I wadna like to hurt ye, Geordie Muckiefoot.”
This hulking lad, it may be as well to state, was the bully of the school,
and all had to lower their flag to him. He changed his tactics now to tactics
more tantalising.
“And foo (how) did ye leave a’ at hame?” he asked. “Foo is your big fat
mither, and your sister, muckle-moo’d Meg?”
Sandie’s face grew crimson with rage.
“Stop just right there,” he cried; “you may insult me as much as you like,
but you shall leave my dear mother and sister alone.”
“Bravo!” cried several students.
But the bully didn’t mean to be put back. He threw off his jacket, and
advanced once more in a threatening attitude, and once more launched an
insult at Sandie’s sister.
Off came the ploughman-student’s coat, and in half-a-minute more the
bully was lying in the quad, breathless, and bleeding from nose and eye.
But he hadn’t quite enough. He rallied, and once again came on like death.
And now Sandie got his head in chancery, and simply made what is
called a mummy of the fellow. When our hero let him go, he dropped down
on the gravel as limp and “dweeble” as bath-towel, and the rest of the
students crowded round the victor to wish him luck, and bid him welcome
to the Grammar School. Fraser, the bully, they said, richly deserved what he
had gotten, and he, Sandie M‘Crae, had emancipated the whole school.
Just then the bell began to ring, and presently Rector Geddes himself
walked up to the hall-door. He walked with a slight studious stoop. Whether
or not he saw Fraser doubled up there like an old dishcloth may never be
known; at all events, he took no notice.
Sandie said that he quite reciprocated the good feeling of the lads, and
hoped they would all be friends henceforward. Then he went quietly in with
his burden of books, and seated himself at the very bottom of the lowest
faction. Here Lord Byron’s name was cut out in the desk; it had been carved
by his own hand, and the lads who occupied this faction pointed to it with
no little pride. They were a merry lot in this corner, and laughed and talked
instead of paying any attention to what the Rector was saying.
“You’ll be as happy as a king down here for months,” said one bright-
faced and particularly well-dressed boy; “I’ll lend you novels to read, if you
like.”
“But I hope,” said Sandie, “I won’t be long down here. Your father is
rich, I suppose?”
“Yes, my father is Provost.”
“Ah! but mine is only a poor farmer, and I am really only a farm-servant
to him. If I get a bursary this year, I will get on; if not, I shall have to go
back again to the plough.”
“Poor fellow! what is your name?”
“Sandie M‘Crae.”
“Well, Sandie, I like you; you are brave. I rejoiced in the way you stood
up for your mother and sister; I’m sure she must be a nice girl.”
“She is the best and sweetest girl in all the parish of Drumlade.”
“And I like the way you tumbled old Eraser, the bully, up, and turned
him outside in. Will you come and have supper with me to-night? Do.”
What could Sandie say to this idle but gentle boy? He could not well
refuse.
“My life depends on my gaining a bursary,” he replied; “but I will come
for two hours.”
“Well, two hours be it.”
And no more was said.
That forenoon the students under the Rector adjourned to the hall, and
the version was dictated, and translations gone on with.
Sandie found that version far more easy than he had expected. He hardly
had to use a dictionary twice the whole time. When he had finished, he
carefully revised it twice, than handed it in, and received a bow and thanks
from the polite Rector.
. . . . . .
He did not forget his appointment with gentle Willie Munro, the
Provost’s son. Sandie dressed most carefully for the occasion, and in his
Sunday’s clothes, with a flower in his button-hole, he really looked
handsome.
He was shy, however, and a little taken aback when ushered into the
splendidly furnished and well-lighted drawing-room, more particularly as
Willie’s mother and ever so many sisters were there. The mother rallied him
about the battle with the bully, and Willie arriving just then, Sandie was
soon completely at his ease. He soon found that he was among real friends,
in the bosom of a family of kind-hearted people, who, though very well-to-
do in the world, had none of that foolish pride only too common to people
in such a station.
When at the two hours’ end Sandie left to burn the midnight oil, it was
with a promise that he would come again and again, that he would look
upon them as friends, and the house as his home. Sandie promised.
Very much to his own astonishment, and to the wonder of everybody
else, Sandie’s version next day was declared sine errore (free from all
mistakes), and from the bottom faction he was elevated to the very first,
close beneath the Rector’s desk.
As he walked up the passage between the rows of seats, he held down
his head, for his face was burning like a coal.
Rector Geddes held out his hand, and shook that of Sandie.
“I congratulate you, boy, from my heart, and trust you will maintain the
proud position you have now secured.”
And Sandie did. He never once had reason to leave that first faction all
the time he was there. And the Munroes became his constant friends and
companions whenever he had an hour to spare. Many a delightful long walk
Willie and he had together out by the dark woods of Rubislaw, or by the old
bridge of Balgownie, that Byron writes about so feelingly. After walks like
these, Sandie always went to Willie’s house to supper. The girls would play
and sing to him, and sometimes he himself would be induced to sing an
auld Scotch song, so that the evenings passed quickly and pleasantly
enough.
One day Sandie received a polite invitation from the Rector to come to
supper. It wanted just eight days from the great competition day. The Rector
was very merry to-night, and did not talk classics at all; but just before
Sandie left, he took him by the hand.
“You’ll do what I tell you, won’t you?”
“I will, sir, right gladly.”
“Well, you shall go home to-morrow to the country, and you shall not
open a book nor pass a single hour in study until you are seated in the
University Hall with the competition papers before you. Do this, and you
will succeed. Disobey me, and you will worry yourself and fail.”
“I promise,” said Sandie; and he kept his word.
CHAPTER VII
CHAPTER VIII
CHAPTER IX