Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Download PDF) Elt The Basics 1St Edition Michael Mccarthy Online Ebook All Chapter PDF
(Download PDF) Elt The Basics 1St Edition Michael Mccarthy Online Ebook All Chapter PDF
Mccarthy
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://textbookfull.com/product/elt-the-basics-1st-edition-michael-mccarthy/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://textbookfull.com/product/economics-the-basics-third-
edition-michael-mandel/
https://textbookfull.com/product/metaphysics-the-basics-2nd-
edition-michael-rea/
https://textbookfull.com/product/english-phrasal-verbs-in-use-
advanced-2nd-edition-michael-mccarthy/
https://textbookfull.com/product/academic-vocabulary-in-use-
edition-with-answers-2nd-edition-michael-mccarthy/
English Vocabulary in Use Advanced 3rd Edition Book
with Answers and Enhanced Ebook Michael Mccarthy
https://textbookfull.com/product/english-vocabulary-in-use-
advanced-3rd-edition-book-with-answers-and-enhanced-ebook-
michael-mccarthy/
https://textbookfull.com/product/dating-the-player-the-
legends-1-1st-edition-erin-mccarthy/
https://textbookfull.com/product/english-idioms-in-use-
intermediate-book-with-answers-vocabulary-reference-and-
practice-2nd-edition-michael-mccarthy/
https://textbookfull.com/product/quareia-the-initiate-book-ten-
mccarthy/
https://textbookfull.com/product/general-education-and-language-
teaching-methodology-the-gdansk-school-of-elt-1st-edition-
karolina-janczukowicz/
This admirably accessible introduction to ‘the basics’ of ELT provides
a review of key elements of English language teaching that is ideally
suited to trainee teachers and those early in their career. Drawing on
the authors’ wide-ranging knowledge and expertise, this informative
text combines real world data with reflective tasks as it outlines key
elements of language teaching and learning. With its suggestions for
further reading and discussion of pathways for professional
development, it provides an excellent overview for those starting out
in ELT.
Graham Hall, Northumbria University, UK
ELT
THE BASICS
PRAGMATICS
BILLY CLARK
ENGLISH VOCABULARY
MICHAEL McCARTHY
MEDIEVAL LITERATURE
ANGELA JANE WEISL AND ANTHONY JOSEPH CUNDER
ELT
MICHAEL McCARTHY AND STEVE WALSH
and by Routledge
605 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10158
DOI: 10.4324/9781003350316
Typeset in Bembo
by Apex CoVantage, LLC
To the memory of Ron Carter, friend and fellow traveller
CONTENTS
Acknowledgements
Introduction to the reader
The EL in ELT
Substance
The stuff of language
Sounds
Intonation
Writing
Form
Words
Grammar
Lexicogrammar
Meaning
Health, safety, and dinosaurs
What do you mean?
Completing the language puzzle
The discourse process
Discourse in the classroom
Templates and genres
Writing, speaking, or both at once?
English in the world
From variation to varieties
Accents and dialects
Then what?
Further reading
2 Language skills
Organising learning
Curriculum and syllabus
Organising a syllabus
Grammar at the centre
Vocabulary
The lexical syllabus
Taken to task
Tasks to the fore
A mixed grill
Materials
Material issues
Are they real?
Do they work?
Methodology
Fashions come and go
What lies beyond?
Further reading
5 Being a teacher
6 Classroom interaction
Interacting
Talking the talk
Easy as 1, 2, 3
SETT: self evaluation of teacher talk
Managerial mode
Materials mode
Skills and systems mode
Classroom context mode
Could do better (CIC)
Conclusion
Further reading
ELTE pathways
What teachers say
Getting started: PRESET
CELTA
By degrees: BA and MA
Gaining entry
Keeping going: INSET
DELTA
Professional development ‘in the wild’
Thinking it through
A way forward?
Where’s the evidence?
It’s good to talk
The right tools for the job
Stimulated recall
Enhancing SETT: SETTVEO
Further reading
Words have phonic and graphic substance, and they have form.
We know when we are in the presence of an English word, just as
we know when we see or hear something that is not an English
word. We know that glass is an English word, but ssalg is not – we
might suspect ssalg could be a word from an exotic language we
know nothing about, but we know it is not an English word. Neither
the spelling nor the pronunciation follows the normal conventions of
English words, and the sounds and letters don’t mean anything.
A word must contain at least one bit of language that means
something to the speakers of that language. The word egg has one
syllable, and that syllable means something in English. The word
singer has two syllables: a syllable meaning an action (sing), and
one meaning ‘person who does something’ (er). The word lettuce
has two syllables but only one element that means something, in
this case, the whole word. The elements which mean something are
called morphemes. We can define a word as an item consisting of
at least one morpheme.
English words build and combine in various ways to produce new
or more complex meanings. We add prefixes and suffixes, as in
rewrite (prefix in bold) and beautiful (suffix in bold). The prefixed
and suffixed versions are derived words. Words combine to form
compounds, where two or more words create a fixed form that has
a single meaning, as in car park, lampshade and electric car charger.
Making compounds and derived words are the two most important
ways in which we introduce new words into English. McCarthy
(2023: ch. 1) gives examples of other ways in which new words are
created.
Words often combine in sequences of anything from two to five or
six words which occur time and time again, many of which occur so
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
279. Many months after the death of Dr. Rittenhouse, the same
licentious writer who publicly charged him with being an Atheist,
declared, in the same public manner, what was equally untrue. He
asserted, not only that Mr. Rittenhouse “volunteered as president of
the Democratic Society, in Philadelphia,” but that “he himself signed
the inflammatory resolves against the excise-law, which encouraged
the malecontents to rise in open rebellion.” The fact is, that the
“inflammatory resolves” referred to, were entered into by that body,
on the 8th of May, 1794; and were not signed by Mr. Rittenhouse,
but by another person, as “President pro tem.”
280. The Abbé le Blanc (or the writer who assumed that
appellation) names, of this metaphysical tribe, Hobbes, Lord
Shaftesbury, Tindal and Collins, all Englishmen; though his own
country has long been the superlatively prolific soil of infidelity in
religion, and chimerical theories in every department of science:
such philosophers abound in France. He observes very justly,
however, that “there is nothing so improperly made use of, as the
name philosopher.” See Le Blanc’s Letters on the English and
French Nations.
283. “If the example of all the republics that have preceded us did
not authorize the hope, that history will not find us guilty of
ingratitude, but only of delay, the national neglect of the memory of
Washington would be sufficient to repress every sentiment of
patriotism and public spirit. Of this neglect, aggravated by the
solemn steps taken by congress to obtain a right to remove the body
of the Founder of our Liberties to a place of public and honourable
sepulture, and the abandonment of that right when obtained, it is
painful to speak—nor is it necessary. There is not wanting a general
sentiment of the disgrace which the nation suffers, while the body of
Washington rests upon a trussle, crouded into a damp and narrow
vault, in which the rapid decay of the wooden support must in a few
years mingle his ashes with those of his worthy but unknown
relations. Exertions not altogether worthy of the object, but such as
the present fashion of finance authorizes, are made, to give to his
memory that honour in other cities, which is denied him in the
metropolis of the Union.” [See the Ann. Oration delivered before the
Society of Artists, in Philadelphia, in May, 1811, by B. H. Latrobe,
Esq.]
285. The Right Hon. David Stewart Erskine, is the present Earl.
291. Mr. Bond must have been mistaken, in the date he has
assigned to the election of Dr. Rittenhouse; or, perhaps, the date of
the diploma has reference to the time of nomination: the variance in
these dates is, however, unimportant.
294. Mr. Lalande was first appointed to that station, in the year
1761. “The College of France,” heretofore styled “The Royal College
of France,” was originally founded in the year 1530, by Francis I. but
letters patent were issued in favour of it in 1772, by the unfortunate
Louis XVI. The present edifice, finished in 1775, gave new activity to
the ancient establishment; and Lalande viewed it, when he wrote his
Astronomie, as having been one of the best schools in the world for
the sciences, but principally for astronomy.
295. The original letter was politely presented to the author, by his
venerable friend, the profound Lawyer and distinguished Patriot to
whom it was addressed. On that occasion, Governor M‘Kean
expressed himself in terms of the highest respect and kindest regard
for the memory of Dr. Rittenhouse, as one of his friends, whom,
while living, he greatly valued for his talents and esteemed for his
virtues.
298. In a letter written to the Rev. Mr. Barton, in Sept. 1755, when
the writer was little more than twenty-three years of age.
299. The extract from a letter to one of his friends, which Dr. Rush
has quoted in his Eulogium on Rittenhouse, furnishes additional
testimony, if, indeed, any were wanting, of the exalted sense of
Divine Goodness, that was entertained by our pious philosopher:
“Give me leave,” says he, “to mention two or three proofs of infinite
Goodness, in the works of Creation. The first is, possessing
goodness in ourselves. Now it is inconsistent with all just reasoning
to suppose, that there is any thing good, lovely or praiseworthy, in
us, which is not possessed in an infinitely higher degree by that
Being who first called us into existence. In the next place, I reckon
the exquisite and innocent delight, that many things around us are
calculated to afford us. In this light, the beauty and fragrance of a
single rose is a better argument for Divine Goodness, than a
luxuriant field of wheat. For, if we can suppose that we were created
by a malevolent Being, with a design to torment us for his
amusement, he must have furnished us with the means of
subsistence, and either have made our condition tolerable, or not
have left the means of quitting it at pleasure, in our own power. Such
being my opinions, you will not wonder at my fondness for what Mr.
Addison calls The Pleasures of Imagination: they are all, to me, so
many demonstrations of Infinite Goodness.”
301. Ibid.
THE CONCLUSION:
COMPREHENDING
A RETROSPECT OF THE LIFE
OF
DAVID RITTENHOUSE,
WITH
“It has been the fashion of late years,” says his eloquent Eulogist,
[302]
“to say of persons who had been distinguished in life,—when
they left the world in a state of indifference to every thing, and
believing and hoping in nothing,—that they died like Philosophers.”
Rittenhouse did not, indeed, die like a disciple of that new
philosophy, referred to by the Eulogist,—like some of those modern
pretenders to illumination, who have been struggling to resuscitate
all the maddening dreams and absurdities of the Pyrrhonists of old:
His last hours were similar to those, which graced the departure from
the world, of a Newton and a Boyle, with very many illustrious
Christians besides, who truly deserved the name of Philosophers;—
for, “he died like a Christian, interested in the welfare of all around
him—believing in the resurrection, and the life to come, and hoping
for happiness from every attribute of the Deity.”[303]
By his last will and testament, which was not executed till the day
preceding his death, Dr. Rittenhouse disposed of his estate in a very
equitable manner, between Mrs. Rittenhouse and his two daughters,
besides making a liberal provision for an amiable widowed sister, so
long as she should live.
His face was of an oval form; his complexion, fair; and his hair,
which in his latter years became thinned and whitened, was brown.
All his features were good: his forehead was high, capacious and
smooth; his eyes, which were of a greyish colour, were alike
expressive of animation, reflection and good nature, and well placed
under full, arched brows; his nose was large, handsome, and
inclined to the aquiline; his mouth, well-formed, though a little
prominent, and corresponding with the general character of the face;
and his chin, broad and strong. In short, his whole countenance was
indicative of intelligence, complacency and goodness, even after its
characteristic marks had been in some degree impaired by sickness
and years. Dr. Rush observes, that his countenance was too
remarkable to be unnoticed. “It displayed,” says the Doctor, “such a
mixture of contemplation, benignity, and innocence, that it was easy
to distinguish his person in the largest company, by a previous
knowledge of his character.”[307] Such were, upon the whole, the
figure and appearance of David Rittenhouse; but more particularly, in
his earlier life: and, as thus described, he was generally considered
an handsome man.
With such feelings and such views of the subject as these, our
Philosopher could not consider that as a justifiable cause of war,
which has not for its object, either the defence of a country against
an hostile invader, or the security of the state and the support of the
liberties of the people, against treasonable domestic insurrections.
[314]
His habits and manners were such as comported with the honest
sincerity of his heart, the amiable simplicity of his whole character,
[315]
and the nature of his pursuits in life. He loved quiet and order,
and preferred retirement to the bustle of the world: and these
dispositions endeared to him the comforts of domestic society. He
considered ambition, pomp and ostentation, as being generally
inconsistent with true happiness. His sentiments respecting luxury
are expressed in very energetic language, in his Oration: he viewed
it as the constant forerunner of tyranny; and both, as being,
eventually, the means of destroying useful science, though
professing to be its friends. Yet he was far from being inimical to that
mutual “exchange of benefits,”[316] which is effected by means of
foreign commerce; or to those intercourses of society, which
augment our rational enjoyments: he was, in truth, a friend to
beneficial trade, and approved of those “social refinements, which
really add to our happiness, and induce us with gratitude to
acknowledge our great Creator’s goodness.”[317] But he justly
distinguished between that sort of commerce with foreign nations,
that conduces to the well-being of mankind, and such as is obviously
immoral in itself, or deleterious in its consequences. Of both these
latter descriptions, he considered the slave-trade; a traffic, against
which he bore his testimony more than thirty-seven years ago: and,
as Dr. Rush has emphatically observed in respect to what he had
advanced in favour of Christianity, “the single testimony of David
Rittenhouse,” on the the one side, “outweighs the declamations of
whole nations,” on the other. Commerce of an injurious nature, he
viewed to be such as ministers more to the debauching luxuries of
mankind, than to their necessities, conveniencies and substantial
comforts.
Though rather plain and simple than otherwise, in all his domestic
arrangements, he lived well,—in the common acceptation of the
phrase. Nor was he in any respect deficient in that decorum in his
personal appearance, and in the modest appendages of his
household, which corresponded with his character and station in
society. There was not the least affectation of any thing like parade
or splendour, in his manner of living. In his dress he was remarkably
neat, correct and gentlemanlike: his house, with its furniture were of
a corresponding style of propriety; the mansion itself, with every
thing appurtenant to it, seemed to denote its being the residence of
good sense, elegant simplicity, and genuine comfort.
But the same causes that prevented his seeing his friends, beyond
the circle of his family-connections, at his own table, as often as the
sociability of his temper must have prompted him to do, imposed on
him the necessity of very frequently declining the acceptance of
invitations from others; more especially, for large dining parties, and
companies of formal visitors: his habits of great temperance, a
dislike of much ceremoniousness, and an economical disposition of
his time, were further inducements to his declining, very generally,
such invitations.