Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Methods Epg
Research Methods Epg
Development Team
Dr. P. Venkatramana
Paper Coordinator
Faculty of Anthropology, School of Social Sciences,
IGNOU, Delhi
Contents:
1. Introduction
2. Types of Field Techniques and Methods in Socio-cultural Anthropology
3. Stepwise demonstration or implementation of the Field Methods
4. Few ethical guidelines to follow in the field
Summary
Learning Outcomes:
After going through this module, you will be able to know:
meaning of fieldwork in socio-cultural anthropology;
importance of fieldwork in anthropology;
different types of techniques and methods used in socio-cultural field research;
how to demonstrate these techniques and methods in the field; and
ethical guidelines one must follow in the field.
1. Introduction
Fieldwork in Socio-cultural Anthropology refers to the study of people and their culture in their natural
habitat. Anthropological fieldwork has been characterized by the prolonged residence of the
investigator, his participation in and observation of the society, and his attempt to understand the inside
view of the native people and to achieve the holistic view of a social scientist. Field studies have been
This module will be discussing about the different types of field methods or techniques used in the
field by the Socio-cultural anthropologist. It will also try to highlight the demonstration of these field
methods in a sequential manner, which type of field method is best suited for a particular type of
situation and limitations one may face during the application of these field methods.
Socio-cultural anthropology fieldworks are based on the data collected through different methods and
techniques such as observation, interview, administering of questionnaire, case study, focus group
discussion, life history and genealogy. However, before starting with any of these techniques one needs
to get familiar with the field situations and get acquainted and friendly with the people whom a
researcher is going to study. This is called rapport establishment and it is the first and most crucial step
of any ethnographic field work.
Rapport Establishment
It is the preliminary step before starting on a fieldwork. Rapport establishment or rapport building
means trying to establish a friendly relationship with the people among whom the fieldwork is to be
conducted. This includes building up of a sense of trust among the people about the investigator that
his or her presence there does not pose any form of threat or harm to the people or community. Cultural
anthropologists often strive to build rapport and trust with individuals in the community to carry out
research more effectively and authentically before embarking on the field study.
4
One of the main point for rapport establishment with people under study is knowing a little bit of their
language such as how they greet each other or say ‘hello’ to any new person and to have some
knowledge about their cultural pattern. Many times, it proves that hearing single word in their own
language even if it is broken in form may open up a floodgate of ‘love’ towards the researcher. It also
means that field investigator must be careful about how or when he or she visits a household instead of
landing at somebody’s house at a very odd timing. Talking politely and maintaining rapport
subconsciously through matching non-verbal signals, including body positioning, body movements,
eye contact, facial expressions and tone of voice with the other person are some off the steps to be kept
in mind by the researcher.
In an ethnographic fieldwork, a researcher should not be too concern about how much time she or he
spends in just freely mingling with the people because the success of the entire fieldwork depends on
how much fieldworker and respondent are comfortable about each other. However, one should be
careful about not getting over friendly with the respondent, this might lead to biases on the part of the
researcher.
Participant Observation
One of the main techniques Social anthropologist use is the participant observation and is most of the
time the only ethnographic technique used. It is sustained, intensive, extended or of a broad range
(Srivastava, 2004). The term ‘participant observation’ was first used by Edward Linderman in his
publication called Social Dictionary (1924). It became a very popular and effective technique of field
study in anthropology after Malinowski’s extensive study among the Trobariand Inslanders
(Argonauts of the Western Pacific) and trend is still continuing. In participant observation, the
researcher gets first hand experience of the people and their culture under study. The researcher tends
to live with the people, eat with them and also participates in every activity that is happening as a
person belonging to that culture.
6
Nevertheless one should be cautious and aware of the problems of bias and reactivity in participant
observation. In this technique, the events are interpreted through the single observer's eyes therefore,
his/her personal viewpoints can easily come into play. Again, since the researcher is so involved with
the community and the people being studied, chances are that the objectivity might be lost in the
process. Besides, as the researcher is a participant in the activities and events being observed, it is easy
to influence other people's behaviour, thereby raising the problem of reactivity influencing what is
being observed (online source).
Quasi-participant Observation
In this kind of observation, the researcher role is confined to that of a researcher and he/she declares
openly that he/she is a researcher instead of adopting the role in the community itself. Here, the
observer actively participates in some of the ordinary activities and observes passively from distance in
others. Many anthropologist therefore resort into this practice as only a quasi-participant observation
gives thee observer perform both the roles ‘the observer’ and ‘the observed’ instead of disguising
himself completely from the people. Therefore, this technique can avoid the demerits of participant
observation since it is not always possible for the researcher to take part in every activity of the people
under study. As Srivastava (2004) also elaborates that the choice of the field worker and the likes and
dislikes should not be compromised while maintaining humility and respect for the people. This
situation can be averted in case of quasi-participant observation technique.
Many social research these days are conducted through quasi-participant observations because this
gives more freedom to the researcher to learn as a participant when he/she needs to get involved and
could be an inactive observer when he/she needs to restrain himself or herself.
7
Interview
Interview is a procedure of collecting data where two or more people come face to face and have
verbal interaction with a purpose. It involves at least two people: an interviewer and a respondent.
There is distinction between everyday conversation and interview (Kvale,1996). According to Young
(2012), interview is “the conversation of gestures”. He also elaborated that interviewing is not a simple
two way process between interviewer and the respondent. Voice inflections and halting statements play
as much role in the conversation as the facial expressions, body gestures, glances and pauses in
between. Goody and Hatt (2006) says interviewing is ‘fundamentally a process of social interaction’.
In an interview, the researcher defines and controls the conversation and he/she can direct the flow of
communication according to his/her requirements. The interviewer’s personality may often play a role
in the interview process such as ethnicity, sex, social status, age, physical appearance, clothing and
9
Structured interview
In structured interview the interviewer prepares a set of questions in advance and seeks the answer of
those questions from the respondents. In this type of interviews, the interviewer asks each respondent
the same series of questions with very small modifications, the questions mostly have limited sets of
response categories, majority of the questions are pre-tested and standardised. While interviewing, the
use of words and paraphrasing of the questions as well as the order of questions are kept consistent as
far as possible.Besides, the interviewer plays a neutral role and does not try to insert his or her opinion
to the respondent.
This type of interview can yield qualitative as well as quantitative data. Therefore, it is widely used for
collecting ethnographic data. The advantage of using structured interview is it maintains uniformity
and precision. In this the interviewer's bars can be reduced to a great extent and it is also easy to
administer the people under study. However, the interviewer has to remind the respondent from time to
time if the flow of the conversation deviates from the original topic. This might sometimes annoy the
respondent and it would depend on how skilfully an interviewer handles the situation.
Unstructured interview
In this technique, the interviewer does not have a pre decided set of questions. Therefore, the
interviewer has greater freedom and flexibility in the number and sequence of questions. The
researcher can come up with any question related with the situation on the spot and also may probe
10
Unstructured interview can elicit a lot of general as well as insightful information. However, it could
be very time consuming and very often the focus of the interview might be shifted. The interviewer
probes the respondent from time to time otherwise the flow of interview might go entirely in a different
direction. For collecting deeper qualitative data on a particular social issue or aspect, unstructured
interview is mainly used.
Group interview
When a group of people is interviewed for ascertaining their opinions or views about a particular social
issue, then it is called as group interview. This interviews are conducted to yield a general idea about
the people’s perception concerning a particular issue. In this type of interview, a set of questions is
prepared by the interviewer and it is ask to the particular group and the response are either recorded or
noted down.
Focused interview
Focus interview takes place with an individual known to have been involved in a particular situation
(Srivastava, 2004).
11
Clinical interview
The interviews which are taken in order to gauge a person’s physical health or psychological status is
called as clinical interview.
Life History
Life history is a qualitative research technique which shows the overall pictures of the respondent’s life
and all the important life events. It is also known as life history interview technique since all the
informations are collected by interviewing the respondent. The main purpose of this interview is to be
able to describe what it is like to be this particular person meaning the person who is being
interviewed. Life history not only reveals certain facts about a person’s life experiences but at the same
time it uncovers the social situations and issues which could have impacted the person at different
point of times. In this technique, many a times the respondent is asked to narrate his or her experiences
instead of asking close ended questions. These forms of telling one’s own story in his or her own way
is called narrative method.
Life histories most often focuses on a specific aspect of a person's life, such as work life or a special
role in some part of the life of a community or else it focuses on specific historical event, issue, time,
or place (cited from Gubrium and Holstein, 2002). Through life histories, person keeps the worthwhile
memories, experiences, and collective values alive by telling others about them or putting them in a
form that may last longer than ourselves. In a life story interview, the interviewee is a story teller, the
narrator of the story of his or her own life; the interviewer is a guide, or director, in this process. The
two together are collaborators, composing and constructing a story the teller can be pleased with
(Gubrium and Holstein, 2002).
12
Along with the numbers usefulness of a case study method, it is not free from certain forms of
difficulties in application. As Yin (1984) has rightly noted “too many times, the case study
investigator has been sloppy, and has allowed equivocal evidence or biased views to influence the
direction of the findings and conclusions”. Case studies provide very little basis for scientific
generalisation since they use a small number of subjects, some conducted with only one subject. The
question commonly raised is “How can you generalise from a single case?” (Yin, 1984). Besides, case
studies are often labelled as being too long, difficult to conduct and producing a massive amount of
documentation (Yin, 1984). In particular, case studies of ethnographic or longitudinal nature can elicit
15
Genealogy
The genealogical method is the process by which a researcher a collection of data about the kinship,
family and marriage which are prepared through the techniques of observation and interview. In this a
detail kinship lineage is traced about a person termed as ‘Ego’ which includes tracing both ancestors
and descendants as long as ego could recount from his or her memories. Then, this is expressed
graphically in a document called genealogy that shows family connections the ego or the respondent.
This document is housed in a graphical representation of social and historical situation, making it
possible to give an overview showing their members in generations. Here ego is the person through
which the genealogy is being traced or ‘the person of reference’.
The genealogical method was invented by W.H.R. Rivers (1864—1922) during the Torres Straits
Expedition of 1898-99. According to Rivers, its primary purpose was to improve the analysis of social
organization, i.e., the concrete actuality of interpersonal relations and living arrangements. Later on,
Malinowski(1922) defined genealogy as “synoptic chart of a number of connected relations of
kinship”.
The genealogical method has been used in the present times by combining with ego-centred network
analysis. It has also been foundational in studies of the migration of ethnic groups to the United States.
Most striking has been its application in medical anthropology where the history of a disease could be
traced in a certain group of people or a population (Srivastava, 2004). Besides this, when a fieldworker
prepares genealogies, he or she not only prepares a genealogical chart but respondents can also keep an
account of their kins and affines. The kinship chart, therefore, is an analytical tool as well as an
ensemble of rules according to which the participants are expected to behave (Barnes, 1978).
However, in spite of the best efforts of the fieldworker, this method is entirely depended on the
respondent’s recalling power. In other words, many times the respondent might not be able to recall all
the names and other details of their ancestors beyond a certain number of generations and these might
16
17
Again using research aids s extremely important. Research aids means audio visual instruments or
devices use for enhancing the deeper understanding of a culture and also to retain the original memory
of the people and the different experiences. This includes tape recorder, video camera, digitised camera
etc. These help in capturing the original voice and producer of interview sessions and also the people
and the area in their original settings. It gives vivid memory of the things happened there and remains
for a long time. Ethnographic films are being made these days and these are possible because of these
feel aids.
18
Step 3: Deciding on the place of fieldwork and also doing a back ground check about the culture and
language of the place
Step 4: Reaching the field place and making arrangement for staying which can also be prior to
reaching the field
Step 5: Seeking permission from the local authorities like the District Collector, Village Head, Village
Chief, Sarpanch (Head of the village panchayat) or any organisation functioning at the place
and whose permission is required
Step 5: Rapport establishment or trust building with the people of the area and gaining their trust and
letting them known about the purpose of this fieldwork and also identifying the key
informants
Step 6: Implementation of the field techniques such as observation and befitting interview techniques
or administration of interview schedule or questionnaires on the topic of study and later on
collecting the questionnaires
Step 7: Application of different field methods such as case study, genealogies or focus group
discussions
Step 8: Taking field notes and using of aides including video taping, recording the interviews and
taking photographs simultaneously with data collection
20
Justice
The principle of justice applies to the population that you choose for your study. You should not
choose a population just because they are easily available, in a compromised position, or because they
are open to manipulation. The burden for research should be fairly distributed and related to the
problem being studied. In addition, participants have a right to know the purpose of the research. Thus,
truthfulness is a necessary ingredient of the research design.
Integrity
One should be forthright in describing to your participants the nature of your research, spelling out the
duration and nature of your relationship with them. Further, you must treat the data you gather
honestly, only drawing from it those conclusions that can be legitimately justified (Watkins, 2016).
Summary
The module Demonstration of field methods in socio-cultural anthropology will help the learner to
understand the meaning of fieldwork and its importance. Fieldwork plays a major role in social and
cultural anthropology in providing information about the societies and cultures which are never
studied. This module also highlights the different types of techniques, methods and tools used in
conducting a socio-cultural fieldwork. The techniques of fieldwork include observation such as
participant observation, quasi-participant observation, non-participant observation, structured and
unstructured observation. Different types of interviews are also discussed in this module. The
interviews are namely structured interview, unstructured interview, personal interview, group
interview, clinical interview, in-depth interview and focus interview. Besides, this module also
discusses about life history as a form of interview and the research tools like interview schedules and
21
22