At's impact on Cont pelibet — wa lng wref CDM Grading Grid for Oral Assessment, BF! American Section canciste name B(GT UR! Mac 14 MAscrot Liv Examiner(s) Name(s) Tacs Circle ono of he hal numbers in each column (0 ative ata candidate's final grade out of 20 pots ‘Comment: cate: GAC I~ Rendre compte de son project Project Presentation ‘Renda comple de son engagement Personal Investment “bh, CCommuniquer la orale Oral Communication Project report is well-organized with strong links to one or more of the subject themes, The research topic is well-defined. Very good knowledge demonstrated with no prompting: strong analysis and cross-cultural The candidate explains with clarity and justifies their choices, demonstrating deep understanding of their research topic. The candidate clearly analyzes the value of the project, the approach, and the fterences porneai, ev the pat hs ha Shiatrlerang, ard onthe person! icles eu. vo S pons sin ‘The candidate expresses themselves ‘with ease, fluency, and sophisticated vocabulary and syntax. The candidate responds to questions with clear pronunciation and confident interaction, ‘and uses any supporting document or visual sid effectively. Project repottis organized and Fsconnects to al least one of the subject themes, The research topic is clearly defined. Good knowledge, requiring Title prompting: good analysis and cross-cultural references. S| 1 34 2 4 s 45 polis ‘The candidate explains clearly the choices made during the project, demonstrating citical thinking. The candidate is able to identify what they ‘gained, of would have gained from the partnership in terms of their learning ‘and the development of their personal intellectual curiosity. Some prompting ‘may be necessary. 4-5 points ‘The candidate demonstrates fluent and correct expression, with precise vocabulary and clear pronunciation. ‘The candidate interacts with ease and is able to respond to most questions, Using any supporting document or visual aid in an interesting way. 5-7 points Project report contains come attempt at organization. The research topic is defined, and partially links to at least fone of the subject themes. Satisfactory knowledge but the candidate needs prompting. Satisfactory analysis with ‘some cross-cultural references. 3 points ‘The candidate gives a simple presentation of the choices made during the project with limited analysis or explanation, thus demonstrating litle cftical thinking. The candidate is able to identify the benefits of a partnership or potentiat partner but needs prompting The candidate attempts to show the link between the project and the ‘development of their personal intellectual curiosity. 3 points ‘The candidate expresses themselves clearly, although the language may be simple, Vocabulary is accurate and pronunciation is generally correct, despite some errors and hesitation. ‘The candidate is able to respond to some questions, The use of any ‘supporting document or visual aid adds litle to the presentation. 3-4 points Project report lacks organization; the research topic is nat clearly defined or linked to subject themes. Limited knowledge; the candidate is unable to respond to prompts or questions. Simple analysis with minimat cross-cultural references. 2 points ‘The candidate offers limited explenation of choices made, with ltl justification, The candidate has difficulty identifying the value of a partnership and what it ‘has added to the development of their critical thinking and intellectual curiosity, despite promoting 2 points The candidate can be understood despite pauses. Vocabulary is limited ‘and pronunciation is often incorrect. Interaction is limited and responses are short. The candidate is entirely reliant ‘on their supporting document or visual aid which hinders their presentation ‘and ablity to communicate. 2 points Wa candidate © unabie © feidence of attempts made, va: Examiners must complete the official French rubric at each examination canter. Civ School comment Cypad wird Circe one of the whole numbers in each column to ative at a candidate's final grade out of 20 points. Move Man v Date: Grade; {6 "24 Rendre compte de son pect Project Presentation Rendte compte de son engagement Personal Investment ‘Communiquer fa orale Oral Communication Project report is well-organized with strong links to one or more of the subject themes. The research topic is well-defined. Very good knowledge demonstrated with no prompting, strong analysis and cross-cultural references. 6 points The candidate explains with clarity and justifies their choices, demonstrating deep understanding of their research topic. The candidate clearly analyzes the value of the project, the approach, and the partnership, and the impact it has had (on their learning, and on their personal intelectual curiosity, 6 points ‘The candidate expresses themselves with ease, fluency, and sophisticated vocabulary and syntax. The candidate responds to questions with clear pronunciation and confident interaction, and usas any supporting document or visual aid effectively 8 points Project report is organized and connects to at least one of the subject themes. The research topic is clearly defined. Good knowtedge, requiring litle prompting; good analysis and cross-cultural references. The candidate explains clearly the choices made during the project, demonstrating critcal thinking. The candidate is able to identify what they gained, or would have gained from the partnership in terms of their learning and the development oftheir personal intellectual curiosity. Some prompting may be necessary. ‘The candidate demonstrates fluent and correct expression, with precise vocabulary and clear pronunciation, ‘The candidate interacts with ease and is able to respond to most questions, using any supporting document or visual aid in an interesting way. fp "Project report contains some attempt at ‘organization. The research topic is defined, and partially inks to at least one of the subject themes. Satisfactory knowiedge but the candidate needs prompting. Satisfactory analysis with some cross-cultural references. 3 points The Candidate gives a simple presentation of the choices made during the project with limited analysis or explanation, thus demonstrating litle critical thinking, The candidate is able to identity the benefits ofa partnership or potential partner but needs promoting, The candidate attempts to show the ink between the project and the development oftheir personal intellectual curiosity. 3 points ‘The candidate expresses themselves clearly, although the language may be simple. Vocabulary is accurate and pronunciation is generally correct, despite some errors and hesitation, The candidate is able to respond to some questions. Tho use of any ‘supporting document or visual aid adds title to the presentation. 3-4 points Project report lacks organization; the research topic is not clearly defined or linked to subject themes. Limited knowledge; the candidate is unable to respond to prompts or questions. ‘Simple analysis with minimal cross-cultural references. 2 points The candidate offers limited explanation lof choices made, with Iitle justification. The candidate has difficulty identifying the value of a partnership and what it has added to the development of their critical thinking and intellectual curiosity, despite prompting 2 points The candidate can be understood despite pauses. Vocabulary is limited ‘and pronunciation is often incorrect. Interaction is limited and responses are short. The candidate is entirly reliant fon their supporting document or visual aid which hinders their presentation and ability to communicate 2 points Ifa candidate fs unabie to secure @ pariner they should sill be able to sctiewe a high grade provided tat they demonsirate the folowing: evidence of attempts made, explanation of the choice of partners), and a detailed plan of how they would have used a partner. NB: Examiners must complete the ofclal French rubric at each examination center.Compete Satter pariown. rt cor OFT up (loool your oe! - ou PPT to “pase! - fyb director of pitt ety UPS tala . (fu. pede / - poe —wibdr your fms _ Uriad © OM —_—CDM Grading Grid for Oral Assessment, BFI American Section ou Examiner(s) Name(s)-) no Candidate Name; 2) > eveweN schoot: AS: Comment pate: 2 Ops Grade: | / Girco one ofthe whole numbers in each column to arive ta candidate's fal grade out of 20 points FRondre compte de son project Project Presentation ‘Rene compte de son engagement Personal Investment ‘Communiquar la erate Oral Communication Project report is well-organized with strong links to one or more of the subject themes. The research topic is ‘weildefined. Very good knowiedge ‘demonstrated with no prompting: strong analysis and cross-cultural references. 6 points ‘The candidate explains wit clarity and justifies their choices, ‘demonstrating deep understanding of thelr research topic. The candidate clearly analyzes the value of the project, the approach, and the partnership, and the impact has had (on their learning, and on their personal Intallectual curiosity. 6 points The candidate expresses themselves with ease, fluency, and sophisticated vocabulary and syntax. The candidate responds to questions with clear pronunciation and confident interaction, ‘and uses any supporting document or visual aid efectivaly. B points Project report is organized and connects to atleast one ofthe subject, themes. The research topicis clearly defined. Good knowledge, requiring litle prompting; good analysis and cross-cultural references. 45 points ‘The candidate explains clearly the choices made during the project, demonstrating critical thinking. The candidate is able to Identify what thoy gained, or would have gained from the partnership in terms of their leaming and the development oftheir personal intellectual curiosity. Some prompting may be necessary, 45 points ‘The candidate demonstrates fuent and correct expression, with precise ‘vocabulary and clear pronunciation. ‘The candidate interacts with ease and is able to respond to most questions, using any supporting document or visual aid in an interesting way. 5-7 points | Projecteport contains some attempt at ‘organization. The research topic is defined, and partially links to at least ‘one of the subject themes. Satisfactory knowiedge but the candidate needs prompting. Satisfactory analysis with ‘some cross-cultural references. 3 points The candidate gives a simple presentation ofthe choices made during the project with imited analysis or explanation, thus demonstrating litle critical thinking. The candidate is able to identity the benefits ofa partnership or potential partner but needs prompting. The candidate attempts to show the link between the project and the Jéevelopment oftheir personal intellectual curiosity 3 points ‘The candidate expresses themselves ‘clearly, although the language may be ‘simple, Vocabulary is accurate and pronunciation is generally correct, despite some errors and hesitation ‘The candidate is able to respond to some questions. The use of any supporting document or visual ald adds litle to the presentation. 3-4 points Project report lacks organization; the research topic is not cleariy defined or linked to subject themes. Limited knowiadge; the candidate Is unable to respond to prompts or questions. ‘Simple analysis with minimal cross-cultural references. 2 points [The candidate offers imited explanation lof choices made, with ite justfication. The candidate has dificulty identifying the value of a partnership and what it has added to the development oftheir critical thinking and intellectual curiosity, despite prompting 2 points ‘The candidate can be understood despite pauses. Vocabulary is limited ‘and pronunciation is offen incorrect. Interaction is limited and responses are short. The candidate is entirely reliant Con thelr supporting document or visual aid which hinders their presentation ‘and ablity to communicate, 2points Ifa candidate ls unable to secure @ partner, thay shoud ail be abi To achiove a igh grade provided that they demonsivate the folowing: evidence of attempts made, explanation ofthe choice of parber(s), and a detalled pan of how they would have used a partner NB: Examiners must complete theofficial French rubric af each examination center ‘OCTOBER CONFERENCE 2029 DRAFT UPDATED FOR USE AS OF DECEMBER 2023,gece es : d canecdaa - whois CrrosinlbercX naire ~~ bn ag passes © Sats - hak mony > ieee.WL PAC CDM Grading Grid for Oral Assessment, BF! American Section Candidate Name: CASS Examiner(s) Names): YEA J Maria jouer Schoo ‘Comment: Seppe | _ ust Grade: “G94 CAV Date: &F F lad Circle one ofthe whole numbers in each column fo arive ata candidate's final grade out a Rendre compte de son project Project Presentation Rendre compte de son engagement Personal Investment Communiquer a la orale Oral Communication eel Project report is well-organized with strong links fo one or more of the ‘subject themes. The research topic is well-defined. Very good knowledge demonstrated with no prompting: strong analysis and cross-cultural references, 6 points ‘The candidate explains with clarity ‘and justifies their choices, demonstrating deep understanding of their research topic. The candidate ‘clearly analyzes the value of the project, the approach, and the partnership, and the impact ithas had fn their learning, and on their personal intelectual curiosity. is ‘The candidate expresses themselves with ease, fluency, and sophisticated vocabulary and syntax. The candidate responds to questions with clear pronunciation and confident interaction, ‘and uses any supporting document or visual aid effectively. Gon Projact report is organized and ‘connects to at least one of the subject themes, The research topic is clearly defined. Good knowledge, requiring litle prompting; good analysis and cross-cultural references. Bots ‘The candidate explains clearly the choices made during the project, demonstrating critical thinking. The candidate is able to identify what they gained, or would have gained from the partnership in terms of their learning and the development oftheir personal intelectual curiosity. Some prompting may be necessary. 4-5 points, ‘The candidate demonstrates fluent and correct expression, with precise vocabulary and clear pronunciation. ‘The candidate interacts with ease and is able to respond to most questions, using any supporting document or visual aid in an interesting way. 5-7 points, Project report contains some attempt at organization, The research topic is defined, and partially links to at least ‘one of the subject themes. Satisfactory knowledge but the candidate needs prompting. Satisfactory analysis with some cross-cultural references. 3 points The candidate gives a simple presentation of the choices made during the project with limited analysis or explanation, thus demonstrating litle ritical thinking. The candidate is able to Identify the benefits of a partnership or potential partner but needs prompting. ‘The candidate attempts to show the Ink between the project and the development oftheir personal intellectual curiosity 3 points ‘The candidate expresses themselves. clearly, although the language may be simple. Vocabulary is accurate and pronunciation is generally correct, despite some errors and hesitation. The candidate is able to respond to some questions. The use of any supporting document or visual aid adds litle to the presentation, 3-4 points, Project report lacks organization; tho research topic is not clearly defined or linked to subject themes. Limited knowledge; the candidate is unable to respond to prompts or questions. ‘Simple analysis with minimal cross-cultural references. 2 points [The candidate offers limited explanation of choices made, with litte justification The candidate has diffculty identifying the value of a partnership and what it has added to the development of their critical thinking and intellectual curiosity, despite prompting. 2 points The candidate can be understood despite pauses. Vocabulary is limited and pronunciation is often incorrect. Interaction is limited and responses are short, The candidate is entirely reliant ‘on their supporting document or visual aid which hinders their presentation and ability to communicate. 2 points Ia candidate Is unable to secure a partner they should all be able fo achieve & high grade provided that they demonstrate the folowing evidence of attempts made, explanation ofthe choice of partner(s), and a detailed pian of how they would have used a partner. NB: Examiners must compte the official French rubric at each examination center. >pe aY oo bit slewer! (OCTOBER CONFERENCE 2023 ORAFT UPDATED FOR USE AS OF DECEMBER 2023 /(RH pracy * the uUSft MEETS com pillar Peezsss. IONE COUN, . prgsical resplacdien, — Uspack orn sips Colonie ~ corruption Pore Roder — nb pow dsr AnswWSrsd greek ons cnaligss S resources. Tesues: relevant Late. REM Seurcss Get Yea Lib. e.g. court deieds Primont Sourcesmoucw Candidate Name: “Thewas, ‘ Examiner(s) Name(s) Sat CDM Grading Grid for Oral oh Mel Bet Kmerican 5 sehoot CU conn haw. Kunr3r iis neo ha wl umters nos cotin oarea Ea ST Noo Rendre compte de son project Project Presentation Rendre compte de son engagement Personal Investment ‘Communiquer la orale Oral Communication woe: Ue 2Cy Phir Project report is well-organized with strong links to one or more of the subject themes, The research topic is well-defined. Very good knowiedge demonstrated with no prompting strong analysis and cross-cultural references. The candidate explains with clarity and justifies their choices, demonstrating deep understanding of their research topic. The candidate clearly analyzes the value of the project, the approach, and the partnership, and the impact ithas had fon their learning, and on their personal loctual curiosity, 6 pohts vocabulary and syntax. The candidate responds to questions with clear pronunciation and confident interaction, ‘and uses any supporting document or visual aid effectively. The candidate expresses themselves with ease, fluency, and sophistical Project raport is organized and ‘connects to at least one of the subject themes. The research topic is clearly defined. Good knowledge, requiring litle prompting; good analysis and cross-cultural references. 45 points Ler candidate explain coaty the choices made during the project, demonstrating ital thinking. ‘The candidate is able to identity wnat they gained or would have gained fom the Partnership in terms of tht tearing tnd the development of thet perso infact curiosity, Some prompting may be necessary. 45 points The candidate demonstrates fluent and correct expression, with precise vocabulary and clear pronunciation ‘The candidate interacts with ease and is able to respond to most questions, using any supporting document or visual aid in an interesting way. 5-7 points Project report contains some attempt at ‘organization, The research topic is defined, and partially inks to at least cone of the subject themes. Satisfactory knowledge but the candidate needs prompting. Satisfactory analysis with ‘some cross-cultural references. 3 points The candidate gives a simple presentation of the choices made during the project with limited analysis or explanation, thus demonstrating litle ciitcal thinking. The candidate is able to identify the benefits of a partnership or potential partner but needs prompting, The candidate attempts to show the link between the project and the development of their personal intellectual curiosity, 3 points The candidate expresses themselves clearly, athough the language may be simple. Vocabulary is scourate and pronunciation is generally correct, despite some errors and hesitation. The candidate is able to respond to some questions. The use of any supporting document or visual aid adds litle to the presentation. 3-4 points Project report lacks organization; the research topic is not clearly defined or linked to subject themes. Limited knowledge; the candidate is unable to respond to prompts or questions. Simple analysis with minimal cross-cultural references. 2 points The candidate offers limited explanation of choices made, with litle justification The candidate has difficuly identifying the value of a partnership and what it has added to the development oftheir ciitcal thinking and intellectual curiosity despite prompting. ‘The candidate can be understood despite pauses. Vocabulary is limited ‘and pronunelation is often incorrect. Interaction is limited and responses are short, The candidate is entirely reliant (on their supporting document or visual ald which hinders their presentation and ability to communicate Wp candiate ons evidence of attempts made, explanation of he choice of parner(s), Ne: toto uM Ol ree qi Foca | Gp ilk re. CONFERENC| oe cate iw vad edgar - Dhveihy 4-0.Mood CDM Grading Grid for Oral Assessment, BFI American Section Candidate NameCOu/Seres , Aco examiners) ometst: Saul. Xeno Circle one ofthe whoa numbers in each column schoo: C\Y vate: 6 /4e/, comment, Vor Emawel Aireese 2 candidates final grade out of 20 points. Renate compte de son project Project Presentation Rendre compte de son engagement Personal Investment LY Communiquer 8 la orale Oral Communication Project report is well-organized with strong links to one or more of the subject themes, The research topic Is welkdefined. Very good knowledge demonstrated with no prompting strong analysis and cross-cultural references 6 points ‘The candidate explains with clarity and justifies their choices, demonstrating deep understanding of their research topic. The candidate clearly analyzes the value of the project, the approach, and the partnership, and the impact it has had fn their learning, and on their personal intelectual curiosity ‘The candidate expresses themselves with ease, fluency, and sophisticated vocabulary and syntax. The candidate responds to questions with clear pronunciation and confident interaction, and uses any supporting document or visual aid effectively, 8 points Project roportis organized and Connects to at least one of the subject themes. The research topic is clearly defined. Good knowledge, requiring litle prompting; good analysis and cross-cultural references, The candidate explains clearly the choices made during the project, demonstrating critical thinking. The ‘candidate is able to identity what they gained, or would have gained from the partnership in terms of their learning and the development of their personal intellectual curiosity. Some prompting may be necessary. 45 points The candidate demonstrates fluent and correct expression, with precise vocabulary and clear pronunciation. The candidate interacts with ease and is able to respond to most questions, using any supporting document or visual aid in an interesting way. Ems pes Project report contains some attempt at ‘organization. The research topic is defined, and partially links to at least cone ofthe subject themes. Satisfactory knowledge but the candidate needs prompting. Satisfactory analysis with some cross-cultural references, 3 points The candidate gives a simple presentation of the choices made during the project wit limited analysis or explanation, thus demonstrating litle critical thinking. The candidate is able to Identify the benefits of a partnership or potential partner but needs prompting. ‘The candidate attempts to show the link between the project and the ‘development oftheir personal intelectual curiosity 3 points ‘Tho candidate expresses themselves. ceatly, although the language may be simple, Vocabulary is accurate and pronunciation is generally correct, despite some errors and hesitation. The candidate is able to respond to some questions. The use of any supporting document or visual ald adds lite to the presentation 3-4 points Project report lacks organization; the research topic is not clearly defined or linked to subject themes, Limited knowledge; the candidate is unable to respond to prompts or questions. ‘Simple analysis with rinimal cross-cultural references. 2 points The candidate offers limited explanation lof choices made, with litle justification The candidate has aifficuly identilying the value of a partnership and what it has added to the development of their critical thinking and intellectual curiosity, despite prompting, 2 points ‘The candidate can be understood despite pauses. Vocabulary is limited ‘and pronunciation Is often incorrect. Interaction is limited and responses are short, The candidate is entirely reliant ‘on their supporting document or visual ‘ald which hinders their presentation and ability to communicate 2 points IF candidate le unable To secure a pares, they should Sill be able fo achieve a High Grade provid 5 fil bt, evidence of attempts made, planation ofthe a. ei “pr choice of parter(s), and a [OCTOBER CONFERENCE 2023 ORAFT UF Qallhn yor — eo rod. That they demonstrate he folowing sed a partner. nf not courest Sor reladedcaveer . . How wall dovelipusets a AC afeck (puswess « tn Foe Pillors— Fada =der foe — — fnpeote 6 Hlalnfer~ everyey We Pence = hous wil it affect gh bid you ese ‘ols /Websude — hetpedo Al to poten fee Nant aGansuners - nasfovved do0N( Meeeerh gore whip or ean Pring Vane Ue Ann # alticlis- By jlia Of article- $ iblice = alk aHbcoret Bibliography iy hie. teeto ¥ ‘ r spt ideule®?) vad enh, polpul ayhwor ermal, Wwarked somoowe For & r Buses using #\ (e@eds mcmpn) Ly did nok Fv thoet Partner’ Filelely tL (wheat is Mes qe) Not a9 Ae vel Sorts dete praiehet L> iL br eer ~ Cisn't ae ey) kon oced: veseaun 7 ¢ c Lawyers — use toed ee, ot ho 0h 9 MAS spre No interpretation Cean't lae- aces ong" Cost Guard pouhes vord— P| vse-more efricun Concluson not a8 a as eae 0 ee nine Ho érvatl0 Sch oon. ob marllt .Mouck CDM Grading Grid for Oral Assessment, BF! American Section candidate Name: QiCHERT Somes Braminers) Name(s: SYSONI « Cirle one ofthe whole numbers in each column fo arrive ata candidate's nal grade ot 20 points. Schoo: \Sh¥0-1 600 vate: 9 [W. comment: Cleos Oak SluLld , Grade: 1S Gnd SHUCHUN . Rend compte de son project Project Presentation Rendre compto do son engagement Personal Investment Communiquer 8 a orale Oral Communication Project report is well-organized with strong links to one or more of the subject themes. The research topic Is ‘wolldefined, Very good knowledge demonstrated with no prompting; strong analysis and cross-cultural references. 6 points ‘The candidate explains with clarity and justifes their choices, domonstrating deep understanding of, their research topic, The candidate clearly analyzes the value of the project, the approach, and the partnership, and the impact it has had (on their learning, and on their personal intellectual curiosity 6 points “The candidate expresses themselves with ease, fluency, and sophisticated vocabulary and syntax. The candidate responds to questions with clear pronunciation and confident interaction, ‘and uses any supporting document or visual aid effectively B points Project report is organized and connects to atleast one of the subject themes, The research topic is clearly defined, Good knowledge, requiring litle prompting; good analysis and cross-cultural references. uy 4-5 points ‘The candidate explains cleary the choices made during the project, demonstrating critical thinking. The candidate Is able to identify what they gained, or would have gained from the partnership in terms oftheir learning {and the development oftheir personal intellectual curiosity. Some prompting may be necessary, 45 points The candidate demonstrates fluent and ‘correct expression, with precise ‘vocabulary and clear pronunciation. The candidate interacts with ease and is able to respond to most questions, Using any supporting document or visual aid in an interesting way. 6 5-7 points Project report contains some attempt at ‘organization. The research topic is defined, and partially links to at least fone of the subject themes. Satisfactory knowledge but the candidate needs prompting. Satisfactory analysis with ‘some cross-cultural references. 3 points The candidate gives a simple presentation ofthe choices made during the project with limited analysis or explanation, thus demonstrating litte ctitcal thinking. The candidate is able to Identity the benefits ofa partnership or potential partner but needs prompting. "The candidate attempts to show the link between the project and the [development oftheir personal intelectual curiosity 3 points ‘The candidate expresses themselves clearly, although the language may be simple. Vocabulary is accurate and pronunciation is generally correct, despite some errors and hesitation. ‘The candidate is able to respond to some questions. The use of any supporting document or visual aid adds litle tothe presentation 3-4 points Project report lacks organization; the research topic isnot clearly defined or linked to subject themes. Limited knowledge; the candidate is unable to respond to prompts or questions. ‘Simple analysis wit minimal cross-cultural references, The candidate offers limited explanation lof choices made, wit itl justification. The candidate has difficulty identifying the value of a partnership and what it has added to the development oftheir critical thinking and intellectual curiosity, despite prompting 2 points ‘The candidate can be understood despite pauses. Vocabulary is limited ‘and pronunciation is often incorrect. Interaction is limited and responses are short. The candidate is entirely reliant (on their supporting document or visual ald which hinders their presentation and ability to communicate. 2 points 2 points Ifa candidate & unable To Gocare & parrer, they should al be abl fo achieve a Figh grade provided that hey demonstrate the folowing: ‘evidence of attempts made, expiration ofthe choice of partners), and a detalled plan of how they would have use partner. NB: Examinere must compete the offal Franch rubric at egch examination center UL PEM oa. cose ORT UPATEDFOR SAS OF OSENGER Now, Walmake our Aeornu rod you ton GUE Wek ou bow Coed, Wak you Wout Aton Guoowl” your sue[100k | Tahar ownsam rane: se: Baten, SINC O1/ ppb ¢ Examiner(s) Name(s): ARAFAT Bx lane CDM Grading Grid for Oral Assessment, BF! American Section SBD See wea = Grate: 570 Circo one ofthe whole numbers in each column to amv at» candidate's final grade out of 20 points FRendre compte de son project Project Presentation FRencire compte de son engagement Personal Investment Communiquer 4 a orale Oral Communication Project repot is well-organized with strong links to one or more of the ‘subject themes. The research topicis wel-defined, Very good knowledge demonstrated with no prompting; strong analysis and cross-cultural references. (Dane Project report is organized and Connects to at least one of the subject themes, The research topicis clearly defined. Good knowledge, requiring litle prompting; good analysis and cross-cultural references, 4-5 points ‘The candidate explains with clarity and justifies their choices, demonstrating deop understanding of their research topic. The candidate clearly analyzes the value of the project, the approach, and the partnership, and the impact has had on their learning, and on their personal intellectual curiosity, (2ons ‘The candidate explains clearly the choices made during the project, demonstrating critical thinking. The candidate is able to identify what they gained, or would have gained from the partnership in terms of theie learning and the development of their personal intellectual curiosity. Some prompting may be necessary. 45 points ‘The candidate expresses themselves, with ease, fluency, and sophisticated vocabulary and syntax. The candidate responds to questions with clear pronunciation and confident interaction, ‘and uses any supporting document or vigual aid effectively. (ne ‘The candidate demonstrates fluent and correct expression, with precise vocabulary and clear pronunciation. “The candidate interacts with ease and is able to respond to most questions, Using any supporting document or Visual aid in an interesting way. 5-7 points Project report contains some attempt at organization, The research topic is defined, and partially links to at least fone of the subject themes. Satisfactory knowledge but the candidate needs prompting. Satisfactory analysis with some cross-cultural references. 3 points ‘The candidate gives a simple presentation of the choices made during the project with limited analysis or explanation, thus demonstrating litle critical thinking. The candidate is able to identify the benefits of a partnership or potential partner but needs prompting. ‘The candidate attempts to show the link between the project and the development oftheir personal intellectual curiosity, 3 points ‘The candidate expresses themselves clearly, although the language may be simple, Vocabulary is accurate and pronunciation is generally correct, despite some errors and hesitation. ‘The candidate is able to respond to some questions. The use of any supporting document or visual aid adds litle to the presentation. 3-4 points Project report lacks organization; the research topic is not clearly defined or linked to subject themes. Limited knowledge; the candidate is unable to respond to prompts or questions. ‘Simple analysis with minimal cross-cultural references, 2 points The candidate offers limited explanation of choices made, with litle justifeation. The candidate has difficulty identifying the value of a partnership and what it hhas added to the development of their cttcal thinking and intellectual curiosity, despite prompting. 2points ‘The candidate can be understood despite pauses. Vocabulary is limited and pronunciation is often incorrect. Interaction is limited and responses are short. The candidate is entirely reliant ‘on their supporting document or visual ‘aid which hinders their presentation ‘and ability to communicate. 2 points a candidate & unable to Secure partner they should ail be able to achieve a high grade provided thal they demonstrate the folowing evidence of attempts made, explanation ofthe choice of pariner(s), and a detailed plan of how they would have used a partner. NB: Examiners must complete the offical French rubric at each examination center OCTOBER CONFERENCE 2022 DRAFT UPDATED FOR USE AS OF DECEMBER 2029, vate: Fa 24