You are on page 1of 1

There is an extremely dangerous situation in The 2019 National High School Exam in Viet

Nam has 70% of History exams below 5; 4.3 is the average subject score, the lowest among
the 9 subjects. The average score in History has always been the lowest, in 2017 at 4.6; in
2018 it was 3.79. This does not only exist in one or a few countries but the whole world. In
today's educational landscape, the debate over the significance of history versus subjects
like science and technology is ongoing.

One group of thought that history is so important, serving as a lens through which to
understand the past, and present and make informed decisions for the future. They argue
that studying history fosters critical thinking skills, empathy, and cultural diversity.

In contrast, others group for the prioritization of science and technology subjects, contending
that they are more directly relevant to addressing challenges and driving innovation. In
today's rapidly advancing world, proficiency in STEM is often known as essential for
economic and technological. Additionally, the practical applications of STEM knowledge are
undeniable, making these subjects look more impactful than history.

However, it's crucial to recognize that history and STEM are not mutually exclusive they
complement each other. History provides context for scientific and technological
advancements, illustrating the evolution of human thought and innovation over time.
Conversely, STEM disciplines benefit from historical perspectives, as understanding past
scientific breakthroughs and societal responses can guide future directions.

In conclusion, while science and technology play pivotal roles in our modern world, history
remains an indispensable cornerstone of education. Both offer knowledge and skill sets
essential for global challenges and fostering individuals contributing to society. Therefore,
rather than one over the other, educational systems should be balanced that integrates the
best of both.

You might also like