Polluter Pays Principle (“PPP”) is a widely-applied principle in environmental
adjudication in India. At the same time, its conceptual boundaries and the challenges involved in its implementation have received little scholarly attention in the Indian context. This paper seeks to address, at least to some extent, this gap or inadequacy of knowledge through an analysis of judgments of the National Green Tribunal (“NGT”). This paper focuses on three aspects of PPP as emerging from NGT cases. First, it looks at the ways in which the meaning of the terms ‘pollution’ and ‘polluter’ evolved over a period of time through different cases. Second, it examines the methods of calculation of compensation adopted by NGT. Third, the paper analyses the rationale for applying PPP as explained by the NGT in different cases. Overall, the paper highlights inconsistencies and ambiguities in the understanding and application of PPP in India.