Study: episiotomy increases perineal laceration length in primiparous women. Little evidence supporting claims that it prevents severe perineal lacerations. Episotomy remains a common practice in more than 40deg oI deliveries in the u.s.
Study: episiotomy increases perineal laceration length in primiparous women. Little evidence supporting claims that it prevents severe perineal lacerations. Episotomy remains a common practice in more than 40deg oI deliveries in the u.s.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Study: episiotomy increases perineal laceration length in primiparous women. Little evidence supporting claims that it prevents severe perineal lacerations. Episotomy remains a common practice in more than 40deg oI deliveries in the u.s.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Nager CW, Helliwell JP. Episiotomy increases perineal laceration length in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185:444-50. * BACKGROUND Episiotomy was initially used based on theoretical beneIit, with little evidence supporting claims that it prevented severe perineal lacerations or pelvic Iloor dysIunction. As principles oI evidence-based medicine have begun to inIluence obstetrical practice, the utility oI routine episiotomy has been called into question. Several observational studies have suggested that episiotomy increases the risk oI third-and Iourth-degree lacerations. A recent Cochrane review oI 6 randomized controlled clinical trials comparing routine versus restricted use oI episiotomy showed that episiotomy was associated with more second-degree perineal trauma, without signiIicant diIIerences in dyspareunia, severe perineal trauma, or severe pain. Although all but one oI the trials included in the review used mediolateral episiotomy, the one randomized trial conducted in North America (which used midline episiotomy) showed similar results. Despite these data, episiotomy remains a common practice perIormed in more than 40 oI deliveries in the United States. * POPULATION STUDIED The authors oI this study enrolled 80 pregnant women at term who had not had previous vaginal deliveries. The 62 who went on to have vaginal deliveries were included in the analysis. The participants' mean age was 26.3 years. The majority (92) had prenatal care, and most (88) had epidural analgesia during labor. Approximately one Iourth oI the women (28) had Iorceps or vacuum-assisted delivery. A Iew had malpresentations, with 6 in the occiput posterior position. * STUDY DESIGN AND VALIDITY This small observational study looked at a range oI variables hypothesized to be related to perineal laceration length, including maternal demographics, size oI genital hiatus and perineal body, Ietal size and presentation, duration oI second stage oI labor, level oI experience oI birth attendant, operative vaginal delivery, and episiotomy. AIter delivery, one oI the study authors measured perineal laceration length, and Ior 10 patients 3 additional observers measured laceration length to assess interrater reliability. Observers were blinded to one another's measurements but not to the other variables included in the analysis. The authors used logistic regression and Mann-Whitney U test to determine which variables were associated with laceration length. Industry: Email Alert Amy C. Denham "Does episiotomy increase perineal laceration length in primiparous women? - POEMs". Journal oI Family Practice. FindArticles.com. 23 Nov, 2011. COPYRIGHT 2001 Appleton & Lange COPYRIGHT 2002 Gale Group