Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BACKGROUND
The Classification Act Requires Municipalities To Classify Real Property Into One Of Four Classes, According To Use: Residential, or Commercial, Industrial, And Personal Property (CIP). Cities That Are Certified as Assessing Property at Full And Fair Cash Value May Elect to Shift Tax Burden Among The Major Property Classes Within Certain Limits Established By Law. The Bureau Of Local Assessment Have Certified Lawrence as Assessing Property at Full And Fair Cash Value.
The Adoption Of Different Rates DOES NOT CHANGE the Total Property Tax Levy. Rather it Determines The Share Of The Total Levy To Be Borne By Each Class.
The Minimum Residential Factor Established By The Commissioner Of
Revenue Ensures That the shift of the tax burden complies with the Classification Act.
November 30, 2011 BOARD OF ASSESSORS CLASSIFICATION HEARING
Step 1:
The Bureau of Local Assessment have certified Lawrence as assessing property at full and
Step 2:
The Board of Assessors will provide the councilors with information to select the
residential factor toward the determination of the rate for each class of property. A limited set of possible choices will be provided by the Board of Assessors, but City Councilors may, if desired, explore other tax rate combinations that meet their needs.
Step 3:
City Councilors are required to determine the percentage of the tax levy to be borne by
each class of real property: residential, commercial, industrial and by personal property (CIP). The decision is made after holding a public hearing. The Conclusion of the hearing MUST result in a vote of required choices
Step 4:
The split tax rates for Fiscal Year 2012 are certified by the Department of Revenue
Step 5:
Mail 3rd quarter actual bills January 1, 2012
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CLASSIFICATION HEARING
CURRENT STATUS
every 3 Years) for all Real and Personal Property as Required by DOR For FY 2012. This Revaluation ensures that changes in market conditions are Reflected in the Current Assessment.
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CLASSIFICATION HEARING
DETERMINE LEVY
YES
VERY HIGH
RESIDENTIAL
TAX RATE
NO
LOW
HIGH
1.75 MAXIMUM SHIFT OF TAX BURDEN TO CIP & LOWEST RESIDENTIAL TAX RATE
CITY OF LAWRENCE - BOARD OF ASSESSORS
5 CLASSIFICATION HEARING
New Growth is a calculation of the net increase in municipal property values because of new construction, improvements to properties, subdivisions, condo conversions, the return of exempt property to the tax rolls or new personal property accounts as well as new personal property equipment at existing locations. New Growth is added to the Citys Levy Limit, thereby increasing the Citys taxing capacity. Assessors must submit documentation of New Growth to the Bureau of Local
Assessment annually and receive approval prior to setting the tax rate. The assessed value of real estate and personal property New Growth during the twelve-month period January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 is $54,200,000. This Growth translates into $1,388,208 of increased tax levy capacity over the basic limits of Proposition 2 .
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CLASSIFICATION HEARING
Levy is the amount the City raises each year through Property Taxes . The Levy Limit is the Maximum amount the City can levy. FY 2012 Tax
Levy Limit increased by $2,672,250 over FY 2011. Excess Levy capacity is the difference between the Levy Limit and the Actual Levy.
Levy Summary FY 2011 Levy FY11 Amended Growth Prop 2 1/2 Increase New Growth Overrides FY 2012 Maximum Levy FY 2012 Proposed Levy Excess Capacity
November 30, 2011 BOARD OF ASSESSORS
FY 2012 VALUES
Values are based on Sales in Calendar Year 2010 The residential values decreased by 0.70% and
commercial/industrial increased by 0.78%. The City of Lawrence Total FY2012 Property value is $2.843 Billion. This is a 0.39% decrease from FY 2011. The average single family home assessed value in FY 2012 is $176,836. This is a $1,413 decrease from FY 2011 average assessed value of $178,249.
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CLASSIFICATION HEARING
$2,705,022,200.00 $2,693,646,700.00 ($11,375,500.00) $2,193,228,846.00 $2,177,867,654.00 ($15,361,192.00) $308,416,654.00 $313,314,846.00 $4,898,192.00 $203,376,700.00 $202,464,200.00 ($912,500.00) $149,199,370.00 $149,378,760.00 $179,390.00 $2,854,221,570.00 $2,843,025,460.00 ($11,196,110.00)
-0.42%
-0.70%
1.59%
-0.45%
0.12%
-0.39%
CLASSIFICATION HEARING
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
LARGEST TAXPAYERS
Mass Electric
Bay State Gas Bouwfonds Jefferson LP Lincoln Andover LLC
$205,884,560
$25,460,810
New Balance Athletic Shoe Hampton on Beacon Chi Energy Inc Lawrence/Methuen Props
$17,716,600
$14,682,500 $13,770,630
$13,240,430
$10,098,600 November 30, 2011 $11,778,200 BOARD OF ASSESSORS CLASSIFICATION HEARING
10
Tax Levy
FY 2012 Maximum Allowable Levy = $52,314,601 FY 2012 Estimated Levy = $ 52,314,601
Total Value
FY 2012 Total Value = $2,843,025,460
Assessed Value. FY 2012 C.I.P. Value = $665,157,806 or 23.3961% of Total Assessed Value. Single Tax Rate $18.40 / $1,000
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CLASSIFICATION HEARING
11
(R.O.) tax burden while increasing the C.I.P. tax share. The combination of the two tax classification amounts must equal the total property tax. The chosen Factor for FY2011 was 1.75,which provided for maximum Tax Shifting, as allowed by law, from Residential to C.I.P. Continuing with a Factor of 1.75, the residential tax rate for FY 2012 would be $14.19, a $0.74 increase over FY 2011. The correspondent C.I.P. tax rate for FY 2012 would be $32.20, a $1.79 increase over FY 2011.
November 30, 2011 BOARD OF ASSESSORS CLASSIFICATION HEARING
12
13
FY 2012
Residential Residential Commercial Commercial Industrial Industrial $2,193,227,846 76.6039% 76.7590% $2,177,867,654 $311,487,554 $313,314,86 $203,376,700 $202,464,200 10.9015% 11.0205% 7.1178% 7.1214% $29,451,930 $30,895,318 $9,470,575 $10,089,304 $6,183,536 $6,519,713 59.3282% 59.0568% 19.0776% 19.2858% 12.4562% 12.4625%
Personal Personal
Total Total
$149,199,370 $149,378,760
5.2217% 5.2542%
$4,536,310 $4,810,266
9.1380% 9.1949%
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CLASSIFICATION HEARING
14
Various Tax Rate Factors are shown below Other choices are possible and can be shown if desired. As
a reminder, a factor below 1.75 will increase the residential tax bill.
Residential Factor 1.75 1.74 1.73 1.72
November 30, 2011
FACTOR COMPARISON
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CLASSIFICATION HEARING
16
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CLASSIFICATION HEARING
17
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CLASSIFICATION HEARING
18
AVERAGE TAX BILL IMPACT ANALYSIS FISCAL YEAR 2012 VS. 2011 (1.75 Factor)
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CLASSIFICATION HEARING
19
AVERAGE TAX BILL IMPACT ANALYSIS FISCAL YEAR 2012 VS. 2011 (1.73 Factor)
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CLASSIFICATION HEARING
20
AVERAGE TAX BILL IMPACT ANALYSIS FISCAL YEAR 2012 VS. 2011 (1.71 Factor)
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CLASSIFICATION HEARING
21
AVERAGE TAX BILL IMPACT ANALYSIS FISCAL YEAR 2012 VS. 2011 (1.70 Factor)
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CLASSIFICATION HEARING
22
AVERAGE TAX BILL IMPACT ANALYSIS FISCAL YEAR 2012 VS. 2011 (CONT.)
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CLASSIFICATION HEARING
23
PROPERTY TAX ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION AVERAGE VALUE FISCAL YEAR 2012 VS. 2011
* 1.75 Factor
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CLASSIFICATION HEARING
24
WHATS NEXT?
Full Council Vote on the Classification Factor Upon the Commissioners determination that the percentages meet statutory requirements and the public hearing has been held, the assessors will submit to the Bureau of Accounts the local tax rates for final approval. Councilors certify the excess levy capacity on recap. (Form LA5). This will happen after full Council Meeting.
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CLASSIFICATION HEARING
25
DISCUSSION
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CLASSIFICATION HEARING
26
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CLASSIFICATION HEARING
27