0% found this document useful (0 votes)
81 views4 pages

Young

Young’s double slit

Uploaded by

mohammedsalan07
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
81 views4 pages

Young

Young’s double slit

Uploaded by

mohammedsalan07
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Young’s Double Slit Experiment

SYNOPSES

Introduction:
"In the early 19th century, Thomas Young conducted a groundbreaking experiment to investigate
the nature of light. Young's experiment involved a simple setup consisting of a barrier with two
narrow, closely spaced slits, illuminated by a coherent light source such as a laser. Behind the
barrier, a screen was placed to capture the pattern of light that passed through the slits.

When light from the coherent source was directed toward the barrier, it passed through the two
slits and created two separate beams. These beams then intersected and overlapped on the screen
placed behind the barrier.

What Young observed on the screen was unexpected and revolutionary. Instead of just two
bright spots corresponding to the positions of the slits, he observed a series of alternating bright
and dark fringes, known as interference fringes. The pattern of these fringes was not random but
exhibited a characteristic series of light and dark bands.

This interference pattern could only be explained by the wave-like nature of light. Young
proposed that light waves emanating from the two slits interfered with each other as they
propagated to the screen. Where the waves reinforced each other, bright fringes appeared,
indicating constructive interference. Conversely, where the waves canceled each other out, dark
fringes appeared, indicating destructive interference.

The key significance of Young's Double Slit Experiment was its challenge to the prevailing
belief of light as particles, as advocated by Newton's corpuscular theory. Instead, Young's
experiment provided compelling evidence for the wave theory of light, suggesting that light
behaves as a wave when traveling through space and interacting with obstacles.

Young's Double Slit Experiment not only revolutionized our understanding of light but also laid
the groundwork for the wave-particle duality concept in physics, which posits that particles like
light can exhibit both wave-like and particle-like behaviors under different conditions. It remains
one of the most iconic and influential experiments in the history of physics, demonstrating the
power of simple yet ingenious experimental setups in unraveling the mysteries of the natural
world."

Theoretical:
Why do we not ordinarily observe wave behavior for light, such as observed in Young’s double
slit experiment? First, light must interact with something small, such as the closely spaced slits
used by Young, to show pronounced wave effects. Furthermore, Young first passed light from a
single source (the Sun) through a single slit to make the light somewhat coherent. By coherent,
we mean waves are in phase or have a definite phase relationship. Incoherent means the waves
have random phase relationships. Why did Young then pass the light through a double slit? The
answer to this question is that two slits provide two coherent light sources that then interfere
constructively or destructively. Young used sunlight, where each wavelength forms its own
pattern, making the effect more difficult to see. We illustrate the double slit experiment with
monochromatic (single λ) light to clarify the effect. Figure 2 shows the pure constructive and
destructive interference of two waves having the same wavelength and amplitude.
When light passes through narrow slits, it is diffracted into semicircular waves, as shown in
Figure 3a. Pure constructive interference occurs where the waves are crest to crest or trough to
trough. Pure destructive interference occurs where they are crest to trough. The light must fall on
a screen and be scattered into our eyes for us to see the pattern. An analogous pattern for water
waves is shown in Figure 3b. Note that regions of constructive and destructive interference move
out from the slits at well-defined angles to the original beam. These angles depend on
wavelength and the distance between the slits, as we shall see below.
To understand the double slit interference pattern, we consider how two waves travel from the
slits to the screen, as illustrated in Figure 4. Each slit is a different distance from a given point on
the screen. Thus different numbers of wavelengths fit into each path. Waves start out from the
slits in phase (crest to crest), but they may end up out of phase (crest to trough) at the screen if
the paths differ in length by half a wavelength, interfering destructively as shown in Figure 4a. If
the paths differ by a whole wavelength, then the waves arrive in phase (crest to crest) at the
screen, interfering constructively as shown in Figure 4b. More generally, if the paths taken by the
two waves differ by any half-integral number of wavelengths [(1/2)λ, (3/2)λ, (5/2)λ, etc.], then
destructive interference occurs. Similarly, if the paths taken by the two waves differ by any
integral number of wavelengths (λ, 2λ, 3λ, etc.), then constructive interference occurs.

You might also like