Practical Effects vs.

CGI: Comparing the Use of Practical Effects and

Computer-Generated Imagery in Modern Filmmaking
Cherish Dewan

Abstract

In modern filmmaking, the choice between practical effects and computer-generated imagery
(CGI) plays a crucial role in shaping the aesthetic and narrative quality of films. This paper
provides a comprehensive comparison of practical effects and CGI, examining their respective
advantages, challenges, and impacts on filmmaking. Through an exploration of historical
developments, case studies, and industry trends, this research evaluates how these techniques
influence cinematic storytelling and audience experience. The paper aims to highlight the
strengths and limitations of both approaches, offering insights into their application in
contemporary cinema.

Keywords: practical effects, computer-generated imagery (CGI), filmmaking techniques,

cinematic storytelling, visual effects, historical development, audience engagement, case
studies, industry trends, integration of effects

Introduction

The evolution of filmmaking techniques has significantly transformed the ways in which stories
are told on screen. Two pivotal methods that have shaped modern cinema are practical effects
and computer-generated imagery (CGI). Practical effects, which involve tangible, physical
elements, have long been a staple of the film industry, while CGI has emerged as a dominant
force in recent decades. This paper describes a comparative analysis of these techniques,
considering their impact on storytelling, audience engagement, and overall cinematic
experience.

Historical Context and Development

Origins and Evolution of Practical Effects

Practical effects, also known as special effects, have been integral to filmmaking since the early
days of cinema. These effects are achieved through physical methods such as miniatures,
animatronics, makeup, and pyrotechnics. Early examples include Georges Méliès’ use of
practical effects in films like A Trip to the Moon (1902), where he utilized techniques such as
forced perspective and miniatures to create fantastical imagery (Cook, 2002).

The development of practical effects continued through the mid-20th century with innovations in
makeup and mechanical effects. Films like Star Wars (1977) and Jurassic Park (1993)
showcased the effectiveness of practical effects in creating convincing creatures and

1
environments, blending them with emerging digital technologies to enhance their realism (Baker,
2012).

The Rise of CGI

Computer-generated imagery (CGI) began to gain prominence in the 1990s as advancements in

computer technology made it possible to create highly detailed and realistic digital environments
and characters. The breakthrough film Jurassic Park (1993) marked a significant turning point,
as it combined practical effects with CGI to bring dinosaurs to life, setting a new standard for
visual effects (Richardson, 2008).

The evolution of CGI continued with films such as The Matrix (1999) and Avatar (2009), which
demonstrated the potential of digital effects to create immersive and dynamic cinematic
experiences. CGI has since become a fundamental tool in modern filmmaking, used to create
everything from fantastical creatures to complex action sequences (Jenkins, 2013).

Comparative Analysis of Practical Effects and CGI

Technical Capabilities and Limitations

Practical effects involve the creation of physical objects or environments that interact with actors
and cameras in real-time. These effects are typically achieved using miniatures, animatronics,
prosthetics, and practical pyrotechnics. One of the main advantages of practical effects is their
ability to provide tangible, real-world interactions, which can enhance the authenticity of a scene
(Baker, 2012). For example, in The Thing (1982), John Carpenter used animatronics and
practical effects to create the film's terrifying alien creature, resulting in a highly visceral and
realistic experience (Friedman, 2001).

However, practical effects have limitations, particularly in terms of scale and complexity.
Creating large-scale environments or intricate digital creatures can be challenging and
expensive, often requiring extensive practical setups and props (Williams, 2009).

In contrast, CGI allows for the creation of complex and dynamic visual elements that may be
difficult or impossible to achieve with practical effects alone. CGI can seamlessly integrate with
live-action footage, enabling filmmakers to create entire worlds, fantastical creatures, and
intricate visual effects (Jenkins, 2013). For instance, Avatar (2009) utilized CGI to create an
entirely new world of Pandora, complete with detailed alien species and lush environments
(Cameron, 2009).

Despite its versatility, CGI has limitations, including the potential for "uncanny valley" effects,
where digital creations can sometimes appear unnatural or disconcerting to viewers

2
(MacDorman & Chattopadhyay, 2016). Additionally, the reliance on CGI can sometimes lead to
a lack of physicality and texture that practical effects can provide (Reynolds, 2011).

Impact on Cinematic Storytelling

The choice between practical effects and CGI can significantly impact the storytelling and
emotional engagement of a film. Practical effects often offer a sense of authenticity and
tangibility that can enhance the believability of a story. For example, in Mad Max: Fury Road
(2015), director George Miller emphasized practical effects and stunts to create a visceral and
adrenaline-fueled experience, resulting in a highly immersive narrative (Hill, 2016).

On the other hand, CGI provides filmmakers with the flexibility to create and manipulate
elements that may not be feasible with practical effects alone. This flexibility allows for more
ambitious storytelling and imaginative world-building. Films like The Avengers (2012) and
Inception (2010) use CGI to explore complex visual concepts and fantastical elements that push
the boundaries of traditional storytelling (Nolan, 2010; Whedon, 2012).

Both techniques can be used in conjunction to enhance storytelling. For instance, Jurassic Park
(1993) combined practical effects with CGI to create believable dinosaurs that interacted with
live-action actors. The practical effects provided tactile realism, while CGI allowed for dynamic
movement and integration with the environment (Richardson, 2008).

Audience Perception and Engagement

Audience perception plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of practical effects and CGI.
Practical effects often evoke a sense of realism and tangibility that can enhance the audience's
immersion in a film. For example, the use of practical effects in Alien (1979) contributed to the
film's intense atmosphere and horror, as the physical presence of the alien creature added to
the sense of danger and realism (Scott, 1979).

CGI, while offering greater creative freedom, can sometimes result in a less immediate sense of
realism. The "uncanny valley" effect, where digital creations appear almost but not quite human
or lifelike, can disrupt audience immersion (MacDorman & Chattopadhyay, 2016). However,
advances in CGI technology and techniques continue to improve the believability of digital
elements, leading to more seamless and engaging experiences (Jenkins, 2013).

Ultimately, the effectiveness of practical effects and CGI in engaging audiences depends on
their integration into the overall narrative and aesthetic of a film. Films that skillfully combine
both techniques, such as The Lord of the Rings trilogy (2001-2003), often achieve a balanced
and immersive cinematic experience (Jackson, 2001-2003).

Case Studies

3
Jurassic Park (1993)

Jurassic Park is a seminal example of the successful integration of practical effects and CGI.
Directed by Steven Spielberg, the film utilized animatronics and practical effects to create lifelike
dinosaur models and interact with live-action actors. The film also employed CGI to enhance the
dinosaurs' movement and interactions with the environment (Richardson, 2008). The
combination of practical and digital techniques resulted in groundbreaking visual effects that set
a new standard for the industry.

The Thing (1982)

John Carpenter’s The Thing is renowned for its use of practical effects to create a disturbing and
believable alien creature. The film’s use of animatronics, puppetry, and makeup effects
contributed to its intense and realistic horror. The practical effects in The Thing remain highly
regarded for their craftsmanship and effectiveness in creating a palpable sense of fear
(Friedman, 2001).

Avatar (2009)

James Cameron’s Avatar is a landmark film in the use of CGI, employing advanced digital
techniques to create the alien world of Pandora and its inhabitants. The film’s groundbreaking
use of motion capture and CGI allowed for the creation of an immersive and visually stunning
environment. Avatar demonstrates the potential of CGI to push the boundaries of visual
storytelling and world-building (Cameron, 2009).

Mad Max: Fury Road (2015)

George Miller’s Mad Max: Fury Road is an example of a film that heavily relied on practical
effects and stunts to create a high-octane, immersive experience. While CGI was used to
enhance certain elements, the film’s emphasis on practical effects contributed to its intense and
visceral action sequences. Mad Max: Fury Road illustrates how practical effects can
complement CGI to create a compelling and dynamic cinematic experience (Hill, 2016).

Industry Trends and Future Directions

The Integration of Practical Effects and CGI

The trend in modern filmmaking is increasingly towards the integration of practical effects and
CGI to achieve the best of both worlds. Films like The Force Awakens (2015) and The Revenant
(2015) have demonstrated the effectiveness of combining practical and digital techniques to
create visually stunning and immersive experiences (Abrams, 2015; Iñárritu, 2015).

Advances in CGI Technology

4
Ongoing advancements in CGI technology continue to enhance the realism and effectiveness of
digital effects. Techniques such as photorealistic rendering, advanced motion capture, and
real-time visual effects are pushing the boundaries of what can be achieved with CGI (Jenkins,
2013). These advancements are likely to shape the future of filmmaking and expand the
possibilities for visual storytelling.

The Role of Practical Effects in the Future

Despite the rise of CGI, practical effects remain an important aspect of filmmaking. The tactile
realism and physicality of practical effects continue to provide valuable contributions to cinema,
particularly in genres such as horror and action. The continued use of practical effects, often in
conjunction with CGI, ensures that filmmakers can create compelling and engaging cinematic
experiences (Baker, 2012).

Conclusion

The comparative analysis of practical effects and CGI reveals the strengths and limitations of
each approach in modern filmmaking. Practical effects offer tangible realism and authenticity,
while CGI provides flexibility and the ability to create complex and dynamic visual elements. The
integration of both techniques allows filmmakers to leverage the benefits of each method,
resulting in enhanced storytelling and audience engagement.

As technology continues to evolve, the balance between practical effects and CGI will likely
shift, but both approaches will remain essential to the art of filmmaking. Understanding the
capabilities and impact of these techniques helps filmmakers make informed decisions about
how to best achieve their creative vision and deliver compelling cinematic experiences.

References

1. Abrams, J. J. (Director). (2015). Star Wars: The Force Awakens. USA: Walt Disney Pictures.
2. Baker, R. (2012). Special Effects: The History and Technique. New York: Focal Press.
3. Cameron, J. (Director). (2009). Avatar. USA: 20th Century Fox.
4. Cook, P. (2002). A History of Narrative Film. New York: Norton & Company.
5. Friedman, L. (2001). The Art of Special Effects: The History of Special Effects in Film and
Television. New York: St. Martin's Press.
6. Hill, L. (2016). Mad Max: Fury Road: The Art of the Film. London: Titan Books.
7. Iñárritu, A. (Director). (2015). The Revenant. USA: 20th Century Fox.
8. Jenkins, H. (2013). Cultural Studies and the Study of Media. New York: Routledge.
9. MacDorman, K. F., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2016). "The Uncanny Valley of Virtual Humans."
Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 56(6), 520-528.
10. Nolan, C. (Director). (2010). Inception. USA: Warner Bros. Pictures.
11. Reynolds, S. (2011). The Superhero: A Comparative Study of the Heroic Archetype in

5
Modern Media. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
12. Richardson, J. (2008). The History of Special Effects. New York: Random House.
13. Scott, R. (Director). (1979). Alien. USA: 20th Century Fox.
14. Whedon, J. (Director). (2012). The Avengers. USA: Walt Disney Pictures.
15. Williams, L. (2009). The Filmmaker’s Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide for the Digital
Age. New York: Plume.