Delhivery LTD Initiating Coverage - Revolutionizing Indias Logistics Landscape - Initiate With LONG
Delhivery LTD Initiating Coverage - Revolutionizing Indias Logistics Landscape - Initiate With LONG
Initiating Coverage
Delhivery Ltd
CMP Target Price
Revolutionizing India’s Logistics Landscape - Rs 393 Rs 459
Mar 2026
Initiate with LONG Rating Upside
LONG 17% ()
➢ Delhivery, one of India's leading logistics players, has evolved into a comprehensive Stock Information
logistics solutions provider with a focus on supply chain reliability and efficiency. Its Market Cap (Rs Mn) 2,91,652
services include express parcel (B2C), part-truck load (PTL), truck load (TL), 52 Wk H/L (Rs) 488/326
warehousing & supply chain solutions, and cross-border logistics. Avg Daily Volume (1yr) 31,55,545
➢ The company’s robust network of 18,775 pin codes, 80 in-house tech applications, Avg Daily Value (Rs Mn) 14.7
advanced data intelligence, and an asset-light model with a strong partner ecosystem Equity Cap (Rs Mn) 91,446
enable agility, superior service, and an expansive reach across 38,044 customers.
Face Value (Rs) 1
➢ We project a 14% revenue CAGR over FY24-FY27E, with EBITDA margins expanding Share Outstanding (Mn) 742.0
to 8.6% by FY27E, driven by operating leverage and improved B2B PTL margins.
Bloomberg Code DELHIVERY IN
➢ Given Delhivery's rapid growth, market share gains from established B2B players, and
Ind Benchmark SPBSMIP
transition to profitability, we expect its premium valuations (over traditional logistics
players) to sustain. The stock is currently trading at P/E of 142x/69x/39x and an Ownership (%) Recent 3M 12M
EV/EBITDA of 57x/35x/22x on FY25E/FY26E/FY27E earnings respectively. Initiate
Promoters 0.0 0.0 0.0
coverage with LONG and a Mar’26 TP of Rs 459 at 27x one-year fwd. EV/EBITDA.
DII 28.6 -6.5 -13.9
India’s e-commerce market – strong industry tailwinds: As per a Redseer report, India's FII 55.0 6.6 10.5
e-commerce market is poised for stellar growth with a projected ~21% CAGR over next Public 16.4 0.0 3.4
five years, outpacing China (~10%) and USA (~8%). Despite accelerated growth, India’s
B2C e-commerce penetration (as a proportion of total retail) remains low at ~7%, way
below China’s 31% and USA’s 16%. Also, per capita shipments for India (~3) pale in
comparison to China (~78) and the USA (~62), indicating massive growth potential. As
per Redseer, B2C shipment volumes should grow at a 28-32% CAGR over FY24-FY29P.
B2B+B2C under a single network – a unique capability: Delhivery operates its B2B PTL
and B2C express parcel business under a single network – a remarkable attribute across
the logistics industry. The company’s B2B PTL segment stabilises operations and enhances
efficiency through pricing flexibility and cross utilisation of assets, boosting truck utilisation
and mitigating B2C festive volatility. Shared infrastructure lowers cost, enhances reliability,
and optimises fixed capacities while balancing heavy PTL loads with volumetric
e-commerce shipments.
Delhivery’s PTL surge – outpacing established peers: Delhivery’s focus on scaling its PTL Relative price chart
segment, bolstered by the Spoton acquisition, has propelled it to the no. 3 position in India’s DELHIVERY IN EQUITY Nifty Index
500
organised PTL market. Despite initial integration challenges, including a ~50% tonnage loss
in 1QFY23, Delhivery has rebounded strongly, outdoing peers in both volume and revenue 450
growth. While competitors posted marginal growth in FY24 and 1HFY25, Delhivery’s PTL 400
Sep-24
Jun-24
Dec-23
Dec-24
Refer to important disclosures at the end of this report December 16, 2024 | 1
all@[Link] - 17/12/2024 [Link] PM
Delhivery Ltd (DELHIVERY IN) India Equity Research | Initiating Coverage
Contents
Story in Charts .............................................................................................................. 3
Delhivery – Largest 3PL player in India’s B2C e-commerce logistics ........................ 7
Delhivery’s PTL surge puts legacy players on backfoot ............................................ 17
Delhivery's SCS growth surpasses peers, though on a modest base ....................... 20
Full-truck load freight – Aggregators market going forward ................................... 23
Cross-border services – Expanding global reach ..................................................... 24
Tech-Driven logistics solutions at Delhivery .............................................................. 25
Financial Analysis ....................................................................................................... 27
Valuation & View ........................................................................................................ 31
Key Risks ..................................................................................................................... 32
Company Background ............................................................................................... 33
ESG Analysis ............................................................................................................... 37
Story in Charts
Exhibit 1: India’s e-commerce GMV (Including Hyperlocal) Exhibit 2: Low penetration of B2C e-commerce in overall retail
India e-commerce GMV (incl. Hyperlocal) (Rs bn) B2C e-commerce as a % of total retail
14000
12000
India 7%
10000
8000
China 31%
6000
4000
0
FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY29E 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0%
Source: Redseer, Company Data, Equirus Source: Redseer, Company Data, Equirus
Exhibit 3: Per capital B2C e-commerce spending Exhibit 4: B2C e-commerce shipments in India – by volume (In bn)
15-17.5
300000 14
12
250000
10
200000
8
150000
6
100000
4
4.4
3.7
50000 2
2.9
1.4
1.9
0 0
USA China India FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY29P
Source: Redseer, Company Data, Equirus Source: Redseer, Company Data, Equirus
Exhibit 5: B2C e-commerce shipments per capita Exhibit 6: B2C e-commerce shipments – captive vs. 3PL (In bn)
90 3PL Captive
78
80 5.0
70 4.5
62
4.0
60
3.5
50 3.0 56%
52%
40 2.5
50%
30 2.0
1.5 54%
20
1.0 58% 48% 44%
10 50%
3 0.5 46%
42%
0 0.0
India China USA FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
Source: Redseer, Company Data, Equirus Source: Redseer, Company Data, Equirus
Exhibit 7: Horizontal accounted for ~80% shipments in FY24 Exhibit 8: 3PL leads non-horizontal shipment market
In bn
In bn
Source: Redseer, Company Data, Equirus Source: Redseer, Company Data, Equirus
Exhibit 9: Captive leads horizontal shipment market Exhibit 10: 3PL B2C e-commerce logistics market size by value
3PL Captive B2C e-commerce logistics market size by value (Rs bn)
4.0 400
3.5 350
3.0 300
Source: Redseer, Company Data, Equirus Source: Redseer, Company Data, Equirus
Exhibit 11: Express parcel revenues to grow 12% CAGR over FY24- Exhibit 12: Express parcel service EBITDA margin to remain ~18% over
FY27E medium term
Revenues (Rs bn) Growth yoy % Service EBITDA (Rs bn) Service EBITDA margin (%)
80 70% 14 20%
70 18%
60% 12
16%
60
50% 10 14%
50 12%
40% 8
40 10%
30% 6 8%
30
20% 4 6%
20
4%
10 10% 2
2%
0 0% 0 0%
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E FY19 FY20 FY21 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
Exhibit 13: PTL revenues to grow at 20% CAGR over FY24-FY27E Exhibit 14: PTL service EBITDA margin improvement to continue
Exhibit 15: SCS revenues to grow at 20% CAGR over FY24-FY27E Exhibit 16: SCS service EBITDA margin to remain range bound
Exhibit 17: Consolidated revenues to grow at 14% CAGR over FY24- Exhibit 18: Express parcels and PTL to continue to contribute ~80% of
FY27E the consolidated revenues
Revenues (Rs bn) Express parcel Part truck load Truck load Supply chain Cross border
140 100.0%
90.0%
8%
11%
120 80.0%
8%
16%
20%
19%
21%
21%
22%
100 70.0%
60.0%
80
50.0%
83%
60 40.0%
70%
70%
63%
63%
62%
59%
59%
58%
40 30.0%
20.0%
20
10.0%
0 0.0%
FY21
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25E
FY26E
FY27E
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25E
FY26E
FY27E
Source: Company Data, Equirus Source: Company Data, Equirus
Exhibit 19: EBITDA margin improvement to continue Exhibit 20: Delhivery to witness strong profitability
EBITDA (Rs bn) EBITDA margin (%) Reported PAT (Rs bn)
10 7.4
8.6%
6.5%
12
4.6%
20.0%
1.6%
10.0% 4.3
10 5 2.1
8 0.0%
-31.4%
-2.5%
-10.0%
-3.1%
6 0
-6.2%
-6.3%
-8.3%
-20.0%
4 -0.7
-30.0% -5 -2.7 -2.5
2 -3.2
-61.0%
-4.2
-10.1
-40.0%
-66.7%
0 -6.4 -6.9
-50.0% -10
-78.5%
-2 -60.0% -10.1
-4 -70.0% -15
-6 -80.0%
-8 -90.0% -20 -17.8
FY25E
FY26E
FY27E
FY25E
FY26E
FY27E
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
FY23
Source: Company Data, Equirus Source: Company Data, Equirus FY24
Gross debt / equity (x) Net debt / equity (x) Gross asset t/o (x) Net asset t/o (x)
0.3 4.0
0.2 3.5
0.1
3.0
0.0
2.5
-0.1
-0.2 2.0
-0.3 1.5
-0.4
1.0
-0.5
0.5
-0.6
FY25E
FY26E
FY27E
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
0.0
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
Over FY20-FY24, India’s e-commerce market grew at ~31% CAGR to attain a GMV of ~Rs 5,100bn;
growth was fuelled by COVID-19-led tailwinds that resulted in wider e-commerce adoption in India.
As per Redseer Research and Analysis (Redseer), the market is projected to grow at a ~21% CAGR for
the next 5 years to become Rs 12,500-13,500bn in FY29, surpassing in China (10% growth) and USA
(8%) during this period.
Exhibit 23: India e-commerce GMV (Incl. Hyperlocal) Exhibit 24: India’s e-commerce market to outpace other markets
India e-commerce GMV (incl. Hyperlocal) (Rs bn) FY24-29 - growth projection
14000
12000
India 21%
10000
8000
China 10%
6000
4000
2000 USA 8%
0
FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY29E 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%
Source: Redseer, Company Data, Equirus Source: Redseer, Company Data, Equirus
In India, B2C e-commerce as a percentage of total retail market stands at ~7% as against 31% and
16% in China and USA respectively. Further, per capita B2C e-commerce spend in India is significantly
low at ~Rs 3,700 vs ~Rs 78,000 for China and ~Rs 2,90,000 for USA.
Exhibit 25: Low penetration of B2C e-commerce as a % of total retail Exhibit 26: Per capita B2C e-commerce spending
B2C e-commerce as a % of total retail Per capita B2C e-coomerce spending (In Rs)
350000
India 7% 300000
250000
200000
China 31%
150000
100000
USA 16% 50000
0
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% USA China India
Source: Redseer, Company Data, Equirus Source: Redseer, Company Data, Equirus
- First Mile: Movement from the seller or platform warehouse to the pickup centre
- Mid-Mile: Multiple sorting processes at various centres and cross-docking at sortation centres
- Last Mile: Delivery from the dispatch centre to customers, after passing through delivery hubs
Each of these stages involves multiple touchpoints, such as gateways, sortation centres, bagging
centres, processing centres, delivery centres, and return processing centres. Effective coordination
B2C logistics demands advanced
across these stages is crucial to prevent disruptions like delays or inventory issues that can affect overall
technologies for real-time tracking,
efficiency.
route optimisation, and precise
inventory management Managing this intricate network requires a careful balance between cost and operational efficiency
while maintaining high levels of customer satisfaction. Logistics providers must employ advanced
technologies for real-time tracking, route optimisation, and precise inventory management. This
complexity underscores the need for specialised solutions and infrastructure, making it difficult for new
entrants and internal teams to manage the entire process effectively.
As per Redseer, India’s B2C e-commerce logistics market is expected to grow at a faster pace than the
overall B2C e-commerce market over the next five years. This market's growth is driven by its highly
complex and multi-faceted nature, demanding advanced technological operations for effective
management.
Strong growth projected in Indian B2C e-commerce shipments: Indian B2C e-commerce shipments
grew by a robust 33% during FY20-FY24, reaching ~4.4bn in FY24. As per Redseer, this figure is
projected to surge to 15-17.5bn shipments by FY29, growing at a CAGR of 28-32%, outpacing growth
in B2C e-commerce GMV (~20% CAGR).
16
15-17.5
14
12
4.4
3.7
2
2.9
1.4
1.9
0
FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY29P
Low penetration in India’s B2C e-commerce shipments: As per redseer, India’s ~3 shipments per
capita is significantly lower than global counterparts like China and the USA, with ~78 and ~62
shipments per capita respectively. This disparity underscores the substantial untapped growth potential
within India’s B2C e-commerce logistics market.
40
30
20
10 3
0
India China USA
As per Redseer, in FY23, captive logistics managed ~52% of total shipments, while it has increased to
Large B2C e-commerce players like ~56% in FY24 due to the launch of a leading player’s captive network. In FY24, 3PL providers handled
Amazon, Flipkart, and Meesho have ~44% of last-mile shipments. Exhibit 32 depicts the market share trends of captive vs 3PL shipments
developed captive logistics solutions over last five years.
Exhibit 30: B2C e-commerce shipments – captive vs. 3PL (In bn)
3PL Captive
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
56%
3.0
52%
2.5
50%
2.0
1.5 54%
1.0 58% 48% 44%
50%
0.5 46%
42%
0.0
FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
As per Redseer, 3PL providers cover ~27,000 pin codes, while captive logistics handle ~12,000 pin
codes. To expand their market reach into these additional locations, B2C e-commerce platforms rely
on 3PL providers, as their own captive logistics are limited to fewer pin codes. With growth increasingly
coming from tier 2+ cities, the dependence of B2C platforms on 3PL providers to manage these
deliveries is likely to remain high.
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
Captive 3PL
Non-horizontal Horizontal
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
In bn
2.5 80%
79%
2.0
81%
1.5
1.0 87%
86%
0.5 21% 20%
13% 19%
0.0 14%
FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
Exhibit 33: 3PL leads non-horizontal shipment market Exhibit 34: Captive leads horizontal shipment market
Source: Redseer, Company Data, Equirus Source: Redseer, Company Data, Equirus
Over the years, businesses have increasingly outsourced their logistics to 3PL providers, driven by the
desire to focus on core activities and maximize profits through enhanced logistics solutions. Key growth
drivers include comprehensive pan-India network coverage, diversification of business models, and the
rise of ONDC. With ~60% of demand originating from tier 2+ cities, the role of 3PL B2C logistics
providers is set to expand significantly as they broaden their service offerings.
This apart, 3PL B2C e-commerce logistics players are also likely to benefit from the following.
Seasonal demand peaks: The seasonal nature of B2C e-commerce shores up shipment demand during
peak periods like Diwali sales, driven by festive discounts and sales. Captive logistics providers often
depend on 3PL partners to handle these demand spikes effectively.
Supply chain unbundling: A notable market trend is the unbundling of supply chains. Captive players
With ~60% of demand originating are increasingly outsourcing parts of their logistics operations to 3PL providers, leveraging their
from tier 2+ cities, the role of 3PL B2C expertise for various stages of the value chain. Major horizontal platforms are collaborating with local
logistics providers is set to expand logistics and warehousing providers for efficient order and delivery management.
significantly
Ancillary monetization: 3PL providers benefit from high-quality customer intelligence, enabling them to
generate additional revenue through the monetization of ancillary services. The regular and recurring
data they collect enhances their ability to capitalize on these opportunities.
As per Redseer, the 3PL B2C logistics market measures Rs 100bn-130bn (US$ 1.2-1.6bn) as of FY24.
This is projected to rise to Rs 340bn- 380bn (US$4.2-4.6bn) by FY29, growing at a 24-26% CAGR.
350
300
250
3PL e-commerce market on a strong,
upward trajectory 200
150
100
50
43 115 360
0
FY20 FY24 FY29E
Rising B2C e-commerce activity in tier 2+ cities – a tailwind for 3PL players
Strong growth projected for B2C e-commerce in tier 2+ cities: As per Redseer, B2C e-commerce GMV
growth is increasingly coming from tier 2+ cities. In FY21, these cities contributed ~42% to overall
GMV, and by FY24, their share grew to 55%. This segment has seen the fastest growth, with a
significant increase in the online shopper base. Consequently, the contribution of tier 2+ cities to B2C
e-commerce shipments rose from 56% in FY21 to 62% in FY24. This is further expected to grow at a
35% CAGR till FY29, with the share touching 70-80%.
Exhibit 36: Tier 2+ cities expected to account for 70-80% of the shipments by FY29E
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY29E
Competitive analysis
India’s B2C express parcel (3PL + captive) landscape is dominated by few players including Delhivery,
Xpress Bees, Ecom Express, Amazon Transportation Services, Ekart (Flipkart) and Meesho (Valmo)
Revenues: The combined revenues of top-5 players grew at a 30% CAGR over FY19-FY23, with
Xpressbees leading at a 46% CAGR, followed by Delhivery at 35%. In FY24, Delhivery’s express parcel
shipment revenues grew by 12% yoy, while Ecom Express saw a modest 2% increase.
EBITDA margins: While EBITDA margins were negative across the board, recent trends show margins
turning positive.
Working capital: Net working capital days have been largely negative or minimal for most players.
Over FY19-FY23, revenue growth for Delhivery’s higher net working capital is due to its diverse revenue streams, including PTL, supply chain
Xpressbees was the highest at a 46% solutions, FTL, and cross-border services, while peers primarily focus on express parcels and
CAGR followed by Delhivery at a 35% warehousing.
CAGR
Net asset turnover: Delhivery’s net asset turnover is lower than peers due to capital investments in its
46-foot container trucks, whereas competitors largely operate leased fleets.
Leverage and liquidity: Most players, including Delhivery, have strong liquidity, except for Ecom
Express. Peers are generally well-funded to withstand industry downturns.
Market share among 3PL players (Revenues) FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
Delhivery B2C 47% 49% 49% 51% 48%
Xpress Bees 19% 19% 19% 23% 25%
Ecom Express 34% 32% 31% 26% 27%
Source: Redseer, Ecom Express DRHP, Company Data, Equirus
Revenue Growth % FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Payable Days FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
Delhivery B2C NA 40% 32% 64% 9% 12% Delhivery (all segments) 35 36 44 44 40 36
Xpress Bees 100% 40% 33% 84% 31% NA Xpress Bees 68 57 56 63 45 NA
Ecom Express 78% 23% 32% 28% 22% 2% Ecom Express 30 25 34 40 27 33
ATS 31% 43% 37% 13% -1% NA ATS 53 40 36 29 28 NA
Ekart (Flipkart) 78% 6% 40% 57% 24% NA Ekart (Flipkart) 69 85 104 87 79 NA
Gross Margins % FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Inventory Days FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
Delhivery (all segments) 24% 21% 24% 25% 22% 27% Delhivery (all segments) 5 2 3 1 1 1
Xpress Bees 3% 14% 19% 20% 17% NA Xpress Bees 0 0 0 0 0 NA
Ecom Express 49% 52% 51% 46% 46% 47% Ecom Express 0 0 0 0 0 0
ATS 33% 32% 34% 38% 38% NA ATS 0 0 0 0 0 NA
Ekart (Flipkart) 27% 10% 7% 14% 26% NA Ekart (Flipkart) 0 0 0 0 0 NA
Employee Cost (Rs mn) FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Net working capital Days FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
Delhivery (all segments) 3,446 4,909 6,109 13,133 14,000 14,368 Delhivery (all segments) 17 45 18 10 9 29
Xpress Bees 682 971 1,185 1,744 3,046 NA Xpress Bees 1 (1) 16 (2) 1 NA
Ecom Express 2,817 3,763 4,577 5,136 6,640 6,033 Ecom Express 13 12 11 24 10 5
ATS 2l324 3,141 4,302 5,208 6,034 NA ATS (17) (11) (5) 2 1 NA
Ekart (Flipkart) 5l213 6,425 7,806 10,251 11,326 NA Ekart (Flipkart) (35) (74) (69) (42) (33) NA
Employee Cost as % of Sales FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Net Block FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
Delhivery (all segments) 21% 18% 17% 19% 19% 18% Delhivery (all segments) 4,888 7,756 11,301 31,124 30,181 33,822
Xpress Bees 13% 13% 12% 9% 13% NA Xpress Bees 180 147 217 1,116 1,850 NA
Ecom Express 28% 30% 28% 25% 26% 23% Ecom Express 324 1,731 4,440 3,951 6,779 5,493
ATS 11% 11% 11% 11% 13% NA ATS 1,760 7,157 13,091 18,058 18,206 NA
Ekart (Flipkart) 12% 14% 12% 10% 9% NA Ekart (Flipkart) 6,425 12,195 31,640 65,913 68,428 NA
EBITDA Margins (Rs mn) FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Net asset turnover FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
Delhivery (all segments) -8% -6% -3% -3% -6% 2% Delhivery (all segments) 9.4 3.4 3.6 3.2 2.2 2.4
Xpress Bees -22% -12% -3% 1% -5% NA Xpress Bees 30.0 51.6 46.4 16.6 13.1 NA
Ecom Express -12% -26% 8% 4% -2% 0% Ecom Express 31.1 7.1 3.7 5.3 3.8 4.8
ATS 1% 5% 6% 7% 7% NA ATS 11.7 4.1 3.1 2.5 2.5 NA
Ekart (Flipkart) -6% -23% -18% -8% 7% NA Ekart (Flipkart) 6.9 3.9 2.1 1.6 1.9 NA
PBT Margins FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Networth FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
Delhivery (all segments) -18% -10% -10% -11% -15% -3% Delhivery (all segments) 33,883 31,704 28,368 59,574 91,771 91,446
Xpress Bees -22% -14% -6% -1% -7% NA Xpress Bees 942 622 6,111 11,932 12,157 NA
Ecom Express -13% -31% 3% -3% -13% -10% Ecom Express -14,219 6,111 9,737 8,781 4,770 2,560
ATS -1% -1% -2% -2% -2% NA ATS 6,341 6,303 6,266 9,802 17,663 NA
Ekart (Flipkart) -7% -33% -29% -19% -3% NA Ekart (Flipkart) 5,750 -9,940 6,068 24,273 21,220 NA
PAT Margins FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Net D/E FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
Delhivery (all segments) -18% -10% -10% -10% -14% -3% Delhivery (all segments) (0.5) (0.0) 0.0 0.0 (0.0) (0.0)
Xpress Bees -22% -14% -6% -1% -7% NA Xpress Bees (1.1) (1.1) (0.8) (0.9) (0.7) NA
Ecom Express -13% -25% 3% -2% -14% -10% Ecom Express (0.8) (0.4) (0.7) (0.3) 0.6 1.5
ATS -1% -2% -2% -2% -2% NA ATS (0.7) (0.5) (0.1) (0.2) (0.6) NA
Ekart (Flipkart) -7% -33% -29% -19% -3% NA Ekart (Flipkart) (0.5) 0.9 (0.8) (0.3) (0.4) NA
Source: Redseer, Ecom express DRHP, Industry Data, Company Data, Equirus
From FY19 to FY22, Delhivery's shipment volumes grew at a robust 58% CAGR, 148mn in FY19 to
582mn in FY22, driven by the booming B2C e-commerce and D2C markets in India. However, FY23
growth slowed to 14%, reaching 663mn shipments, impacted by Shopee’s exit from India.
In FY24, while Meesho’s rapid growth in B2C e-commerce was notable, the scaling of its in-house
Meesho handles ~30-35% of its logistics arm, Valmo, began to impact 3PL players. As a result, though 9MFY24 shipment volumes
volumes captively, while further grew 17% yoy, 4QFY24 saw a 2% decline yoy, bringing overall FY24 growth to 12%. Currently,
insourcing unlikely Meesho handles around 30-35% of its volumes captively, with further insourcing unlikely; this implies
that incremental growth is expected to benefit 3PL providers.
Despite disruptions from Shopee’s exit and Meesho’s insourcing over the past two years, these issues
now appear resolved. We thus expect Delhivery’s shipments to grow at a 12% CAGR over FY24-FY27E.
Delhivery's service EBITDA margins for the B2C express parcel segment have remained steady at
16-18% between FY19-FY24. We expect margins to remain steady at 18% going forward with any
additional cost savings likely to be passed on to customers.
Exhibit 40: Shipment volumes to grow 11% CAGR over FY24-FY27E Exhibit 41: Revenues to grow at a 12% CAGR over FY24-FY27E
Shipment Volumes (mn) Growth yoy % Revenues (Rs bn) Growth yoy %
Exhibit 42: Realisation to remain stable Exhibit 43: Service EBITDA margin to remain ~18%
Realisation (per shipment) Service EBITDA (Rs bn) Service EBITDA margin (%)
100 14 20%
90 18%
12
80 16%
70 10 14%
60 8 12%
50 10%
40 6 8%
30 4 6%
20 4%
2
10 2%
0 0 0%
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E FY19 FY20 FY21 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
Launch in 2016: After achieving significant scale in its express parcel network and establishing a full-
fledged surface line-haul network, Delhivery in 2016 launched PTL freight services focussed on the
B2B express segment.
Growth phase (FY19-FY21): With network expansion, customer addition, and cross-selling PTL services
to existing customers, freight volumes increased at 75% CAGR over FY19-FY21 to 374k tonnes.
However, the segment has faced margin challenges during this phase amid rapid expansion; EBITDA
margins stood at -79%/-36%/-6% during FY19/FY20/FY21.
Spoton acquisition: To further scale-up the PTL freight services business, provide benefits of synergies
between its B2C and B2B express businesses to customers, and further enhance its end-to-end supply
chain capabilities, Delhivery acquired Spoton Logistics in Aug’21. As of Mar’21, Spoton has a network
presence across 13,087 pin codes with 2.85m sqft of infrastructure, and it has registered volumes of
759k tonnes in FY21. Post acquisition of Spoton, Delhivery has become the #3 PTL player in India in
terms of revenues, with an ~8.3% market share of the organised PTL market. Post acquisition, together
with Spoton, Delhivery had over 7,700 active customers across industries such as consumer durables,
auto, lifestyle, fashion, ecommerce, FMCG and retail.
Initial teething issues post Spoton acquisition: In the first two quarters following the acquisition,
Delhivery focused on integrating customer-facing operations, streamlining customer service processes,
and merging teams to create a consistent training framework across the organization. Subsequently,
Delhivery phased out Spoton’s systems and began transitioning to a unified network. At a certain point,
Delhivery made a strategic decision to reduce specific client volumes where integration with Spoton
was highly specialized or involved freight types that Delhivery was not optimally equipped to handle.
As a result of these integration challenges, Delhivery experienced a ~50% loss in combined tonnage
during 1QFY23.
Latest trends
Outperformed peers: Delhivery has outperformed its B2B express/PTL peers across parameters over
last 6 quarters.
Volume: Post integration related issue and degrowth of volume in FY23, Delhivery has bounced back
strongly and registered volume growth of ~30%/~20% during FY24/1HFY25 while its peers have
registered marginal volume growth (highest growth of 10%).
Revenue: With peers have struggled to grow their volumes in FY24 and 1HFY25, Delhivery’s PTL
segment has outpaced its peers and reported a revenue growth of 31%/26% in FY24/1HFY25.
EBITDA: Delhivery's PTL segment has seen lower EBITDA margins compared to traditional logistics
players, impacted by rapid growth and network expansion, as well as integration challenges following
the Spoton acquisition. Despite these pressures through FY23, Delhivery has implemented measures
to improve margins, achieving the strongest margin gains over the past five quarters among peers.
However, its margins still lag behind traditional PTL players, indicating significant potential for future
expansion. Currently as of 1HFY25, Delhivery reported PTL segment EBITDA margin/EBITDA per KG
of 3.1% / Rs 0.34/KG, still lowest in the industry.
Sales growth (%) FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 1HFY25 EBITDA (per KG) FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 1HFY25
TCI Express 1% -18% 28% 15% 1% -3% TCI Express 1.44 1.94 2.02 1.96 1.87 1.48
Gati -6% -13% 23% 18% 1% -3% Gati 0.53 0.42 0.37 0.64 0.43 0.63
Safexpress 12% 10% 25% 28% NA NA Safexpress NA NA NA NA NA NA
Delhivery 64% 67% 250% -14% 31% 26% Delhivery -3.37 -0.61 NA -2.15 -0.32 0.34
VRL Logistics 2% -8% 36% 22% 9% 10% VRL Logistics 0.75 1.04 1.16 1.03 0.92 1.02
Volume ('000 MT) FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 1HFY25 EBITDAM (%) FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 1HFY25
TCI Express 840 691 863 993 1000 485 TCI Express 11.8% 15.9% 16.2% 15.7% 14.9% 11.8%
Gati 904 781 962 1133 1249 616 Gati 4.2% 3.3% 2.9% 4.9% 3.7% 5.3%
Delhivery 243 373 1579 1101 1429 826 Delhivery -35.5% -6.0% NA -20.5% -3.0% 3.1%
VRL Logistics 3068 2560 3227 3912 4276 2163 VRL Logistics 13.3% 16.7% 17.3% 15.2% 13.6% 14.4%
Volume growth (%) FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 1HFY25 EBITDA margin FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 1HFY25
TCI Express 0% -18% 25% 15% 1% -1% TCI Express 13 bps 416 bps 24 bps -48 bps -74 bps -308 bps
Gati -7% -14% 23% 18% 10% -1% Gati -160 bps -91 bps -38 bps 205 bps -127 bps 168 bps
Delhivery 99% 53% 323% -30% 30% 20% Delhivery 4300 bps 2958 bps NA NA 1746 bps 611 bps
VRL Logistics 6% -17% 26% 21% 9% 6% VRL Logistics 117 bps 338 bps 58 bps -215 bps -154 bps 79 bps
Source: Company Data, Equirus
Following the acquisition of Spoton, Delhivery faced integration challenges and a loss in market share,
leading to margin compression due to lower volumes. However, after overcoming these hurdles, the
PTL segment has shown steady sequential improvement in service EBITDA margins. While still below
industry standards, there remains considerable room for further enhancement. With Delhivery’s unique
network supporting both B2C parcel express and PTL loads, and improving utilization levels, we expect
margins to continue inching up. In the long run, Delhivery aims for PTL service EBITDA margins to
reach ~18%, on par with its B2C express parcel segment. The following chart illustrates the service
EBITDA margin trends for the segment:
EBITDA margin
10.0%
2.2% 3.2% 3.0%
-1.8%
0.0% -4.9%
-8.0% -8.5%
-10.0%
-17.9% -17.3%
-20.0%
-30.0%
-40.0% -42.8%
-50.0%
1QFY23
2QFY23
3QFY23
4QFY23
1QFY24
2QFY24
3QFY24
4QFY24
1QFY25
2QFY25
In the mesh network, to attain better turnaround time and service levels, the shipment gets directly
As of Sep’24, Delhivery had: routed for the destination without going to the hub. For the mesh network to be successful, there must
• 119 gateways be sufficient capacity utilization for the truck to be directly routed to final destinations.
• 45 automated sort centres Delhivery has designed the PTL service around shared linehaul operations with the express parcel
business. This enables it to build larger, automated gateways, operate larger trucks, including tractor-
• 124 freight service centres trailers, and enhance capacity utilization in mid-mile operations. Shared network allows it to offer e-
• 3,645 express delivery centres commerce equivalent turnaround times and direct reach across the entire network to PTL freight
customers.
• 159 processing centres
As of Sep’24, Delhivery’s network infrastructure included 119 gateways, 45 automated sort centres,
124 freight service centres, 3,645 express delivery centres and 159 processing centres.
With integration issues resolved, Delhivery’s focus on expanding its sales force, adding new customers,
boosting B2B visibility, and benefiting from the shift from unorganized (>80% currently) to organized
players (<20% currently) is expected to drive 20% revenue CAGR from ~Rs 15.2bn in FY24 to ~Rs
26.3bn by FY27E. Volumes are projected to grow at a 17% CAGR over the same period.
As revenues increase and infrastructure costs remain stable, utilization levels should rise, driving margin
improvement. Delhivery is targeting ~18% service EBITDA margins in the long run, while we expect
margins to reach ~10% by FY27E (vs. -3% in FY24 and 3.1% in 1HFY25).
Exhibit 46: Revenue to grow at 20% CAGR over FY24-FY27E Exhibit 47: Margin improvement to continue
FY26E
FY27E
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY23
FY24
0
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
The SCS market has the following three segments: 3PL, 4PL, and integrated supply chain solutions.
The SCS market (much more organised than the overall logistics market) is projected to grow faster
(22% CAGR) than the logistics market (6% CAGR) between FY22-FY27E. This is due to the type of
services offered, which require large-scale service providers with deep knowledge of complex logistics
management.
Penetration of SCS in the total logistics market has increased from 3.6% in FY20 to 5% in FY22. This
is further projected to become ~7.3% of the total logistics market by FY27E.
Exhibit 48: India’s SCS market growth to outpace overall logistics market growth
• Large potential to unlock efficiency improvement at the manufacturing end of supply chain.
• Demand from end users for sophisticated needs (fast-paced, flexible) across industries.
• Need for data insights and other value-added services provided by supply chain solutions.
• Extensive industry knowhow of supply chain solution players and their capabilities to provide
insights across the supply chain
• Increasing favourable policy support for developing supply chain services (PM Gati Shakti,
and National Logistics Policy).
Service offerings: Delhivery offers comprehensive supply chain solutions, combining its strengths in
warehousing, transportation, infrastructure, network, and advanced data science. These integrated
services improve the speed, reliability, and cost-efficiency of customers' supply chains. Designed to be
modular and flexible, Delhivery's solutions enable customers to select from various fulfilment and
transportation models.
Delhivery’s warehousing services include management, in-warehouse processing, and order fulfilment,
optimizing inventory and delivery timelines. Powered by its proprietary WMS, Godam, Delhivery
supports multi-tenant, multi-channel operations for efficient end-to-end (E2E) supply chain solutions.
Integrated transportation services span PTL, TL, cross-border freight, intra-city distribution, and express
parcel delivery.
The acquisition of Primaseller Inc. in 2021 enabled Delhivery to help D2C and omnichannel retailers
integrate online and offline channels, ensuring a reliable order-to-delivery experience for end
consumers.
Revenue/EBITDA to grow at an 20%/21% CAGR over FY24-FY27E: As India's logistics industry evolves
from basic transportation and warehousing to integrated supply chain solutions and value-added
services, Delhivery’s SCS segment stands to benefit significantly. We project Delhivery’s SCS segment
revenue to grow at a CAGR of ~20%, increasing from ~Rs 7.8bn in FY24 to ~Rs 13.5bn by FY27E.
With revenue growth, Delhivery's SCS segment is expected to see service EBITDA margins rise to ~7.0%
by FY27E. We project a 21% CAGR in service EBITDA, increasing from ~Rs 530mn in FY24 to ~Rs
1020mn by FY27E.
Exhibit 49: Revenue to grow at 18% CAGR over FY24-FY27E Exhibit 50: Margin to remain range bound
Though on a smaller base, Delhivery has outpaced its peers in the SCS segment in terms of revenue
growth. From FY19 to FY24, Delhivery's revenue grew at a 43% CAGR, rising from ~Rs 1.3bn in FY19
to ~Rs 7.7bn in FY24, compared to the ~7-8% CAGR growth of its peers during the same period. In
1HFY25, Delhivery’s revenues further surged 23% yoy, again outperforming peers.
This strong growth reflects Delhivery’s increasing presence in the SCS segment and its growing
competitive edge. The table below highlights the revenue trajectory of Delhivery and its peers in the
SCS segment over FY19 to 1HFY25:
While Delhivery initially reported losses due to its smaller base, Delhivery has steadily improved margins
as revenues have grown. Over time, we expect the SCS segment to achieve mid to high single-digit
margins. The following table compares Delhivery’s margins with its peers:
Delhivery - SCS Service EBITDA margin -23.0% -30.6% -23.0% NA 3.2% 6.8% 0.4%
Mahindra Logistics - SCM EBIT 7.6% 8.1% 7.5% 6.2% 3.2% -0.5% -0.4%
TCI - SCS EBIT 6.9% 6.0% 6.3% 6.1% 6.1% 6.5% 5.9%
TVS SCS - India ISCS Adjusted EBITDA margin 9.3% 7.5% 6.8% 7.8% 8.9% 10.2% 10.3%
Source: Company Data, Equirus
Full truckload freight (TL), the largest segment of road transportation, refers to the delivery of a full
truck/trailer load of freight, moving directly from shipper to consignee.
The TL market has been historically fragmented (unorganised players have ~99% market share) and
plagued with information asymmetries and intermediary costs. Over 85% of fleet owners operate fleets
of less than 20 trucks, and therefore depend on a network of brokers and transporters (broker-cum-
fleet-owners) who match demand and supply of truckload freight locally.
B. Analysis of current and historical performance data of fleet owners, more accurate demand
forecasting and real-time supply visibility enable new-age players to provide better pricing
estimates as well as working capital financing to fleet owners at lower costs.
These benefits are expected to push up the share of organised players going forward.
Delhivery’s presence
Delhivery’s Orion platform connects
Truck aggregator platforms facilitate the matching of demand and supply for truckload freight. In full
shippers with fleet owners/truckload
truckload scenarios, optimization opportunities are limited, with the primary benefit being better pricing
capacity suppliers nationwide
through visibility of empty lanes and profitable return trips. Accurate return consignment predictions
allow truck vendors to offer competitive pricing. Traditionally managed through brokers, this demand
visibility is now being transitioned to digital platforms.
Delhivery’s Orion platform enhances this process by connecting shippers with fleet owners and
truckload capacity suppliers nationwide through a centralized bidding and matching engine. Orion
enables shippers to post both spot and long-term freight requirements, which registered agents and
fleet owners can bid for using our in-house application, **Axle**. Loads are then matched to available
capacity based on price and service quality. The Orion platform manages all operational and financial
processes in real-time, including job creation, bidding, matching, tracking, document management,
and transactions.
To further improve its engagement with truckload capacity suppliers, Delhivery acquired Roadpiper
Technologies, a digital freight broker specializing in fleet owner management, load matching, and
pricing applications.
Delhivery’s TL segment has achieved a 13.6% revenue CAGR from FY20 to FY24. We project a 11.0%
revenue CAGR for the segment from FY24 to FY27E.
In 2018, Delhivery launched door-to-door and port-to-port express parcel services to and from India,
addressing the growing demand for cross-border e-commerce. By late 2019, it entered cross-border
air cargo services.
The company’s global shipping platform, ‘Starfleet’, follows a ‘string of pearls’ strategy, integrating
global networks and airlines, offering shippers single-window visibility into express and freight shipping.
‘Starfleet’ provides international air cargo services through charter and block space agreements with
major airlines across key trade corridors, including the US, Europe, and China. Delhivery has forged
strategic alliances with global leaders Aramex and FedEx, offering reciprocal access to customs
clearance, pickup, and delivery services. The 2019 Aramex partnership expanded coverage across the
Middle East and North Africa, while the 2021 FedEx alliance extended reach into North America,
Europe, Australia, and Asia. Domestically, partners like SpiceJet and Indigo facilitate air cargo
operations.
Strategic partnerships with Aramex,
FedEx, and Teamglobal for cross- In Sep’24, Delhivery enhanced its ocean freight capabilities through a partnership with Teamglobal
border services Logistics, expanding less than container load services to over 120 countries and integrating inland part
truckload shipping within India for seamless cargo solutions. Their cross-border services are available
to existing and retail customers alike.
Following the post-COVID spike in ocean and air freight rates, Delhivery's cross-border services
generated ~Rs 3.2bn in FY22. However, with rate normalisation, revenues declined by 7.1% in FY23
and 48.3% in FY24.
With freight rates stabilising and cargo volumes increasing, Delhivery is poised for recovery. We
anticipate an 15% revenue CAGR from FY24 to FY27E, aided by strategic partnerships with Aramex,
FedEx, and Teamglobal.
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
Delhivery’s tech stack, comprising 80+ applications, covers every aspect of the supply chain—order,
warehouse, and transportation management, billing, remittance, tracking, and supply chain analytics.
These seamlessly integrate with customer systems, enabling a streamlined and efficient process.
To enhance operational efficiency, Delhivery collects and analyses vast quantities of transaction data,
Delhivery collects and analyses vast including location, product, shipper and consignee details, and performance data. This data, gathered
data in real time, setting it apart from from handheld devices, IoT systems, and automated equipment, is enriched with traffic and weather
traditional logistics players inputs, enabling real-time optimisation through machine learning and big data analytics. This sets
Delhivery apart from traditional players, minimizing human intervention while optimizing critical
business decisions.
• Network simulation tools forecast cost and service impacts of route changes
• Fraud detection identifies high-risk orders through data from over a billion deliveries
While the Indian supply chain sector is still in early stages of tech adoption, Delhivery’s approach
positions it to continue growing revenue streams as these solutions mature.
Exhibit 55: Big data stack – Data is collected, enriched, processed, analysed, and fed to build algorithms to improve operational efficiency
Transportation management system (TMS): Delhivery’s TMS tracks shipments and assets in real-time
across its network, including partner operations. The system identifies optimal shipment paths based
on factors like size, weight, transport mode, and speed. It integrates seamlessly with customer systems
for data exchange, billing, and cash management.
Mid-mile system: This system manages in-facility operations such as sorting, consolidation, loading,
unloading, and transshipment. It provides detailed shipment traceability, capacity planning, and
performance monitoring. Integrated with automated sortation and material handling systems, it ensures
efficient in-facility processes with real-time tracking and mobile applications for operational teams.
Last mile & dispatch system: Delhivery’s last-mile system manages goods at service centres, sorts
shipments, dispatches consignments, and tracks parcel statuses. Field agents use a dispatch app for
route planning, consignee communication, and performance tracking. Station managers access
automated reports and performance scorecards to plan for future loads and manage capacity.
Warehouse management system (WMS): Delhivery’s proprietary WMS, “Godam,” manages order
26ulfilment across various channels. Integrated with Delhivery’s transportation services and external
logistics providers, Godam optimizes inventory placement, order allocation, and aggregation in real-
time. Its multi-tenant architecture provides global inventory visibility and control.
Orion: TL Brokerage: The orion platform connects shippers with truckload suppliers in real-time
through reverse bidding via the “Axle” app. Orion includes a freight matching engine, real-time
tracking, proof of delivery, and transaction management integrated with financial modules.
Partner management toolkit: The Partner Management Toolkit streamlines the registration,
onboarding, and management of third-party agents, including franchisees, business partners, and
delivery agents. Through the partner web portal, partners gain access to operational and customer-
facing applications, along with real-time visibility into service contracts, performance, and earnings.
The “Axle” and “Roadpiper” mobile apps offer truckload partners real-time order visibility, enable
bidding and contract management, and facilitate financial transactions. These apps also provide tools
like price guidance and advance truck availability sharing to help partners improve their win rates.
Customer portals: Delhivery offers web-based customer portals for seamless registration, self-
onboarding, and management of fulfilment and shipping accounts. Customers can handle key tasks
such as order creation, pickup slot booking, tracking, escalation management, billing, cash remittance,
and claims management. These portals are being consolidated into a Unified Customer Portal (UCP),
providing access to all services through a single interface. The UCP will also feature value-added
services, including online channel integration, returns prediction, fraud detection, and customized
shipping notifications.
Supply chain solutions products: Telescope, Delhivery’s supply chain visibility tool, provides enterprises
with a customizable, end-to-end view of their entire supply chain. By integrating customer ERPs with
Delhivery’s WMS and TMS systems, along with a proprietary analytics engine, Telescope enables real-
time, data-driven decisions on inventory placement, order aggregation, optimal order-to-inventory
allocation, and selection of transportation modes and partners. Through Primaseller, Delhivery offers
multi-channel integrations (online and offline), order management, and inventory virtualization, widely
used by D2C and omni-channel retailers.
Netplan & location stack: Delhivery’s ‘Netplan’ product, combined with its location stack, maps
unstructured addresses to delivery centers, identifies optimal facility locations, and minimizes shipment
distances, helping manage costs amid shifting demand patterns.
Financial Analysis
Expect 14% consolidated revenue CAGR over FY24-FY27E
Delhivery achieved a remarkable revenue CAGR of 59% from FY15 to FY21, growing from ~Rs 2.2bn
to ~Rs 36.5bn. This sustained growth was driven by the expanding B2C e-commerce sector in India,
the introduction of new services, and strategic acquisitions.
However, growth moderated in FY23, with a mere 5% increase, primarily due to the exit of key customer
Shopee from the Indian market and integration challenges with Spoton, resulting in lost market share.
In FY24, Delhivery rebounded, reporting a 13% yoy revenue increase, bolstered by strong performance
across most sectors, except a decline in cross-border services attributed to falling freight rates.
With integration issues resolved and freight rates stabilizing, we project a 14% revenue CAGR for
Delhivery from FY24 to FY27E, anticipating revenues will rise from ~Rs 81.4bn in FY24 to ~Rs
121.4bn by FY27E.
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
FY27E
FY25E
FY26E
FY18
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
Source: Company Data, Equirus
We anticipate that the current revenue distribution will persist over the next few years, with ~80% of
revenues coming from express parcels and part truckload services. Meanwhile, other segments,
including FTL, supply chain services, and cross-border services, are expected to contribute ~20% of
total revenues. The chart below illustrates the segment-wise revenue contribution from FY19 to FY27E.
Exhibit 57: Express parcels and PTL to continue to contribute ~80% of the consolidated revenues
Express parcel Part truck load Truck load Supply chain Cross border
100.0%
90.0% 8%
80.0%
8% 11% 20%
70.0% 16% 19% 21% 21% 22%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0% 83%
70% 70%
30.0% 63% 63% 62% 59% 59% 58%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
In FY24, Delhivery achieved a milestone with its first positive EBITDA margin of ~2%, signalling
operational stabilization. With acquisitions completed and a robust infrastructure in place, we
anticipate positive operating leverage and margin improvement in its B2B PTL segment to drive EBITDA
margins up to 8.6% by FY27E.
The following chart illustrates the trend in EBITDA and EBITDA margins from FY15 to FY27E.
12 8.6% 20.0%
10 10.0%
8 -8.3% 0.0%
6.5%
6 1.6% 4.6% -10.0%
-6.2% -3.1% -2.5% -6.3% -20.0%
4 -31.4%
-30.0%
2
-40.0%
0
-50.0%
-2 -60.0%
-4 -61.0% -78.5% -70.0%
-6 -66.7%
-80.0%
-8 -90.0%
FY25E
FY26E
FY27E
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
Source: Company Data, Equirus
As operating leverage coming into play, we anticipate employee and other expenses (incl. ESOP costs)
to decrease as a percentage of revenues, from ~2.5% in FY24 to ~1.7% in FY27E. Excluding ESOP
costs, employee and other expenses are expected to decline from ~2.2% in FY24 to ~1.7% in FY27E.
Exhibit 59: Gross margins trend Exhibit 60: Employee and other expenses to reduce as a % of sales
Gross Margin (%) Employee and other expenses (% of sales - incl. ESOP cost)
3.5% 3.3%
25.0%
2.8% 2.8%
3.0% 2.7% 2.7%
20.0%
3.0% 2.5%
2.5% 2.2%
15.0%
2.6% 2.0%
2.5%
2.4% 2.4%
10.0% 2.0% 2.2% 1.7%
2.1%
1.9%
1.5%
24.4%
21.3%
23.5%
25.1%
21.5%
26.7%
26.9%
26.1%
26.1%
5.0% 1.7%
0.0% 1.0%
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
0
-0.7
-5 -3.2 -2.7 -2.5
-4.2
-6.4 -6.9
-10
-10.1 -10.1
-15
-20 -17.8
FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
Gross debt (Rs bn) Net Debt (Rs bn) Gross debt / equity (x) Net debt / equity (x)
10.0 0.3
0.0 0.2
-10.0 0.1
0.0
-20.0
-0.1
-30.0
-0.2
-40.0
-0.3
-50.0 -0.4
-60.0 -0.5
-70.0 -0.6
FY25E
FY26E
FY27E
FY25E
FY26E
FY27E
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
Exhibit 65: Capex as a % of revenues to decline Exhibit 66: Asset turnover to improve
Capex as a % of revenues Gross asset t/o (x) Net asset t/o (x)
12.0% 4.0
3.5
10.0%
3.0
8.0%
2.5
6.0% 2.0
1.5
4.0%
1.0
2.0%
0.5
0.0% 0.0
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
B2C e-commerce shipments in India surged by 33% between FY20 and FY24, reaching ~4.4bn
shipments, and are expected to grow at 28-32% CAGR to hit 15-17.5bn by FY29. This growth
outpaces GMV expansion, highlighting logistics as a key driver. India’s ~3 shipments per capita stand
in stark contrast to China (~78) and the USA (~62), reflecting untapped potential.
We expect Delhivery to maintain leadership across key segments while continuing to gain market share
and enhance profitability. We project a 14% revenue CAGR over FY24-FY27E. In terms of margins,
leveraging scale and operating efficiency, we anticipate EBITDA margins to jump from 1.6% in FY24
to 8.6% by FY27E. Given Delhivery's rapid growth, market share gains from established players in B2B
segment, and its transition to profitability, we believe its premium valuations (over traditional logistics
players) will sustain.
Key Risks
E-commerce dependency: Majority of the Delhivery’s revenue comes from e-commerce clients. Any
slowdown in this sector or challenges with major platforms like Flipkart, Amazon, and Meesho could
significantly impact revenue growth and profitability. Loss of scale would hurt margins, making
profitability harder to maintain.
Concentration risk: The reliance on a few key clients increases the risk of revenue volatility if any of
these customers reduce their business or terminate contracts given that the top few customers contribute
significant revenues for Delhivery.
Competitive pressure: Delhivery faces significant competitive pressure in the logistics sector, particularly
within the e-commerce space. Aggressive pricing from existing rivals can erode margins and
profitability. Additionally, the expansion of in-house logistics operations by major e-commerce
platforms like Flipkart (Ekart), Amazon (ATS) and Meesho (Valmo) intensifies competition, potentially
diminishing Delhivery’s share in the third-party logistics market.
Funding constraints impacting e-commerce growth: Reduced funding for e-commerce companies may
dampen the growth of the sector, limiting demand for express parcel services, which forms a significant
portion of Delhivery’s revenue.
Cost management and profitability risks: Delhivery operates an asset-light model, leasing its entire
logistics infrastructure and renting most of its trucks from third-party partners. Facility leases are subject
to annual rent escalations, while vehicle rental prices fluctuate with diesel costs, introducing cost
volatility. Despite recently achieving breakeven, Delhivery’s profitability remains unstable. Aggressive
pricing strategies could further impact realizations in the express segment, and managing costs across
diverse business segments, along with delayed breakeven in loss-making areas, poses ongoing
financial challenges.
Company Background
A comprehensive logistics solutions provider
Delhivery, founded in 2011, is one of India's leading logistics and supply chain companies. Established
as a hyperlocal express delivery service provider for offline stores, Delhivery has evolved into a
Services provided: comprehensive logistics solutions provider with a network of over 18,775 pin-codes. The company has
established numerous gateways – automated sort centres, freight service centres, express delivery
• Express parcel delivery
centres, processing centres and warehouses – thus handling a significant volume of shipments daily.
• PTL freight
• TL freight Delhivery aims to meet overall (rather than mono-line) customer requirements, with supply chain
• Supply chain solutions reliability and efficiency. The company provides a full range of logistics services, including express
• Cross-border services parcel delivery, heavy goods delivery, partial truckload (PTL) freight, truckload (TL) freight,
warehousing, supply chain solutions, cross-border express and freight services. It also offers value-
added services such as e-commerce return services, payment collection and processing, installation
and assembly services, and fraud detection. Delhivery believes that this wide range of service offerings
leads to a higher wallet share and customer retention.
The integrated approach allows Delhivery to exploit network and infrastructure synergies, reduce
dependence on any single business line and reduce the effect of cyclicality in customer businesses
operations. Express parcel business sees festival and sale-driven volatility that is offset by part-truck
load (PTL) business. This ultimately leads to lower costs and greater reliability due to company’s ability
to operate with higher fixed capacities, balance network inefficiencies (like PTL or truckload backhaul)
and share infrastructure and operational costs across business lines.
Delhivery's services are supported by its robust technological backbone, which includes proprietary
logistics software, data analytics, and AI. This enables real-time tracking, route optimization, and
efficient resource management, ensuring timely deliveries and cost-effective operations. The tech
platform integrates various stakeholders in the supply chain, from shippers and carriers to end
Covers 38,044 active customers customers, facilitating seamless communication and coordination. The company has attracted sizeable
across 18,775 pin-codes investments from notable investors, including SoftBank, Carlyle Group, and Tiger Global.
Strategic acquisitions
Delhivery, in alignment with its strategy to enhance customer service, has actively pursued investments,
acquisitions, and strategic initiatives. These efforts have been pivotal in helping the company gain scale
and acquire new capabilities, positioning it competitively in the logistics industry.
ESG Analysis
Environment:
Environment – Average – The company has not been able to improve its environmental performance
y-o-y and it has no future targets set. However, it has been taking steps to improve it and may yield
better results in future.
Key Positive
• Energy Efficiency
o Initiatives to measure Carbon Footprint - In FY24, the company adopted the GLEC (Global
Logistics Emissions Council)-certified methodology for measuring its carbon footprint. This
GLEC framework serves as the foundation for ISO 14083, which focuses on the
quantification and reporting of GHG emissions resulting from transport chain operations.
o Increase in Renewable Energy – In FY23, the company increased its installed solar power
capacity from 1.5 MW in FY23 to 4.6 MW by FY24. More than 50% of the total sanctioned
capacity of 8 MW across 15 facilities is now operational, generating about four times the
output of FY23. Plans are underway to operationalize an additional 1 MW.
o Added fuel-efficient trucks to reduce emissions - The company has continued to add higher
form factor, fuel-efficient 46-ft tractor trailers to its fleet. These trucks are 17% to 44% more
fuel efficient per kilogram per kilometer compared to traditional industry trucks. In FY24, a
joint effort with vendors led to the addition of 191 tractors, increasing the total fleet from 562
to 753 by the end of FY24. Consequently, the share of mid-mile loads carried by 46-ft tractor
trailers surpassed 70%.
o Focus on deploying CNG/EV/LNG powered vehicles - At the end of FY24, the company had
a combined fleet of 1,634 vehicles that ran on CNG or EVs.
• Increase in Sustainable Sourcing and Supplier evaluation - In FY24, the company increased the
share of sustainably sourced inputs to 55%, up from 43% in FY23. Initiatives included
communicating the supplier code of conduct and sustainable sourcing policy to all suppliers,
incorporating these documents and a conflict-of-interest clause into supplier agreements and
onboarding forms effective April 1, 2023, and regularly monitoring adherence to these policies.
Major vendors, accounting for 75% of annual expenditure, are evaluated on ESG parameters.
• Significant increase in Capex for sustainability - In FY24, 30.20% of capital expenditure (capex)
investments were directed towards specific technologies aimed at improving environmental and
social impacts, compared to 9.89% in FY23. The FY24 capex initiatives included the induction of
fuel-efficient 43-46 ft tractor trailers, electric trucks, and rooftop solar installations, all contributing
to a reduction in overall logistics intensity compared to FY23.
• Waste management
o Plastic waste
o Flyers: Suppliers are required to use 20% recycled material in the production of flyers and to
comply with regulations regarding single-use plastics.
o Bags: Polypropylene (PP) woven bags are reused 2-3 times for shipping. At the end of their
lifecycle, these bags are sent to authorized scrap dealers for treatment in accordance with
established norms.
o E-waste Disposal - E-waste is disposed of exclusively through authorized scrap dealers, who
provide a green certificate upon disposal.
o Other Waste Disposal - including wood, iron, metals, paper, and tires, are sent to vendors
for recycling.
o Registration for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) – The company aims to get registered
as Brand Owner in Q3 of FY24.
Social:
Social – Below average performance as it lacks in diversity, H&S, and human rights parameters.
Diversity – Below Average – Women representation is low in the company across all employment level.
Health & Safety – Below Average: Although there has been a slight reduction in safety incidents y-o-y,
a significant number of incidents still occur, coupled with low training coverage.
Human Rights – Below Average – Major concern is high number of sexual harassment complaints
reported in both FY23 and FY24.
Employee Development –Average - While the return-to-work and retention rates are positive, there are
concerns regarding the high turnover rate and low coverage for skill upgradation among workers.
• One Incident of Cyber-attack in FY24 - On May 2, 2023, the company’s main website
([Link]) experienced a DDoS attack; however, after enhancing the WAF rules,
the number of requests per minute decreased, and there was no impact on its services.
Governance:
Governance – Moderate performance based on strong representation of ID, and Chairperson is
Independent. However, employee complaints is increasing y-o-y.
• The Chairman and Managing Director positions are held by distinct individuals, ensuring a
clear separation of interests and eliminating potential conflicts.
• Independent Directors – Strong representation of IDs on the board (75% as of July 5, 2024).
They have attended majority of board meetings and are not overloaded with directorships as
none of them holds more than 5 directorships in other companies.
• Audit Committee – consists of 4 members of which 3 are independent directors including the
chairperson.
• Auditor changed - The company appointed S R Batliboi and Associates LLP as the auditor in
FY23 and again appointed in Deloitte Haskings for FY24 and FY25. Generally, auditor
should be rotated once every 5 years.
Company Snapshot
How we differ from consensus
Particular (Rs Mn) Equirus Consensus % Diff Comment
Key Estimates
Key Assumptions FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
Comparable valuation
P/E EV/EBITDA P/B RoE Div Yield
Mkt Cap Price Target
Company Reco. CMP
Rs. Mn. Target Date
FY24A FY25E FY26E FY24A FY25E FY26E FY24A FY25E FY26E FY24A FY25E FY26E FY25E
DELHIVERY LONG 393 2,91,652 459 Mar-26 -116.2 141.5 68.5 194.3 57.1 34.8 3.2 3.1 3.0 -2.7% 2.2% 4.5% 0.0%
CCRI ADD 835 5,08,456 900 Mar-26 41.1 37.3 31.6 24.7 22.3 19.1 4.3 4.1 3.9 10.7% 11.0% 12.6% 1.5%
GDL LONG 88 44,149 118 Mar-26 17.2 18.8 16.8 12.4 12.1 10.8 2.4 2.1 2.0 13.8% 11.7% 12.2% 2.1%
VRLL ADD 541 47,334 551 Mar-26 53.4 37.6 31.6 12.7 10.4 9.0 5.0 4.6 4.2 9.2% 12.7% 13.9% 1.0%
TCIEXP REDUCE 848 32,550 886 Mar-26 24.7 29.0 26.5 17.3 19.9 17.8 4.6 4.1 3.7 20.3% 15.1% 14.7% 0.9%
MLL REDUCE 388 27,974 408 Mar-26 -47.8 369.4 45.6 13.4 10.4 8.5 5.7 5.8 5.3 -10.0% 2.5% 12.8% 0.6%
TVS SCS LONG 185 81,758 212 Mar-26 -194.5 101.4 41.5 12.3 10.9 8.7 4.4 4.2 3.8 -8.0% 4.3% 9.9% 0.0%
TRPC LONG 1,175 90,009 1397 Mar-26 25.7 21.7 19.1 22.1 19.7 17.4 4.4 3.9 3.4 18.9% 19.5% 19.5% 0.7%
AEGIS ADD 775 2,72,148 897 Mar-26 47.8 46.1 35.0 29.4 27.1 21.8 7.0 6.4 5.8 15.8% 15.1% 17.8% 0.9%
BLUEDART NR 7,788 1,84,788 NR NR 61.5 59.6 41.9 22.1 20.5 17.0 13.5 11.4 9.4 23.6% 21.9% 25.3% 0.6%
ALLCARGO
NR 96 14,052 NR NR 85.3 47.8 31.9 22.5 15.4 10.8 2.0 NA NA 2.3% 1.9% 4.7% 0.0%
GATI
ALLCARGO
NR 54 53,365 NR NR NA 58.0 30.6 14.5 12.1 9.8 2.1 2.1 2.0 5.6% 2.6% 4.2% 1.7%
LOGISTICS
GUJARAT
LONG 191 92,313 252 Dec-25 26.1 19.7 17.9 14.5 12.4 11.4 4.4 4.3 4.1 17.0% 22.1% 23.5% 4.3%
PIPAVAV PORT
ADANI PORTS
ADD 1,242 26,82,893 1738 Sep-25 33.1 25.9 23.8 19.3 16.5 14.7 4.9 4.2 3.6 16.5% 18.0% 16.9% 0.5%
AND SEZ
JSW INFRA NR 320 6,71,476 NR NR 54.3 48.7 41.4 32.1 29.0 24.5 8.2 7.0 6.0 19.2% 15.3% 15.2% 0.3%
Source: Company Data, Equirus Source: Company Data, Equirus Source: Company Data, Equirus
Quarterly performance
Y/E Mar (Rs mn) 1QFY24A 2QFY24A 3QFY24A 4QFY24A 1QFY25A 2QFY25A 3QFY25E 4QFY25E
Margin (%)
Gross Margin 25.5 25.7 28.4 26.8 27.3 25.2 27.6 27.5
EBITDA Margin (0.7) (0.8) 5.0 2.2 4.5 2.6 6.3 5.0
PAT Margin (4.6) (5.3) 0.9 (2.6) 2.7 0.5 3.9 2.0
YoY Growth (%) FY21A FY22A FY23A FY24A FY25E FY26E FY27E
Sales 31.1 88.7 5.0 12.7 11.6 15.8 15.3
EBITDA (33.9) 51.4 162.2 0.0 233.2 61.9 52.9
EBIT 9.5 67.2 63.8 (53.6) (77.9) 0.0 412.2
PAT 54.6 143.2 (0.3) (75.3) 0.0 106.6 74.0
Key Ratios
Profitability (%) FY21A FY22A FY23A FY24A FY25E FY26E FY27E
Gross Margin 23.5 25.1 21.5 26.7 26.9 26.1 26.1
EBITDA Margin (3.1) (2.5) (6.3) 1.6 4.6 6.5 8.6
PAT Margin (10.0) (10.3) (13.9) (2.8) 2.3 4.0 6.1
ROE (13.8) (23.0) (13.3) (2.7) 2.2 4.5 7.3
ROIC (14.3) (16.2) (15.7) (6.5) (1.4) 0.7 3.6
Core ROIC (20.4) (26.1) (28.6) (13.6) (3.0) 1.7 8.1
Dividend Payout 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Balance Sheet
Y/E Mar (Rs mn) FY21A FY22A FY23A FY24A FY25E FY26E FY27E
Equity Capital 16 642 729 737 737 737 737
Reserves 28,352 58,932 91,043 90,710 92,770 97,029 1,04,440
Net Worth 28,368 59,574 91,771 91,446 93,507 97,765 1,05,177
Total Debt 3,013 3,531 1,989 1,256 1,256 1,256 1,256
Other long term liabilities 6,758 6,739 6,167 9,217 11,067 13,146 15,427
Minority Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Account Payables 4,422 8,345 7,874 7,974 9,648 10,311 11,894
Other Current Liabilities 3,417 4,319 4,093 4,637 5,365 6,297 7,331
Total Liabilities 45,978 82,508 1,11,893 1,14,530 1,20,843 1,28,776 1,41,085
Gross Fixed Assets 15,510 38,776 43,082 50,199 55,479 61,389 68,247
Acc. Depreciation 4,977 8,236 13,117 16,663 19,313 22,102 25,202
Net Fixed Assets 10,534 30,540 29,965 33,537 36,166 39,287 43,045
Capital WIP 768 584 215 286 286 286 286
long term investments 4,206 6,295 6,125 9,981 9,981 9,981 9,981
Others 1,956 2,382 3,540 3,589 3,010 2,045 2,359
Inventory 259 253 194 164 183 212 245
Receivables 5,946 9,903 9,436 14,297 14,963 17,623 21,326
Loans and advances 264 89 62 40 40 40 40
Other current assets 6,472 12,122 11,835 5,849 4,400 3,756 4,152
Cash & Cash Equivalents. 15,573 20,341 50,521 46,788 51,814 55,546 59,652
Total Assets 45,978 82,508 1,11,893 1,14,530 1,20,843 1,28,776 1,41,085
Non-Cash WC 6,516 10,485 10,205 8,560 5,815 6,730 8,755
Cash Conv. Cycle 17.8 9.6 8.9 29.1 22.1 26.1 29.1
WC Turnover 5.6 6.6 7.1 9.5 15.6 15.6 13.9
Gross Asset Turnover 2.4 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8
Net Asset Turnover 3.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.8
Net D/E (0.4) (0.3) (0.5) (0.5) (0.5) (0.6) (0.6)
Cash Flow
Y/E Mar (Rs mn) FY21A FY22A FY23A FY24A FY25E FY26E FY27E
Profit Before Tax (4,157) (10,293) (10,531) (2,444) 2,031 4,258 7,411
Depreciation 3,546 6,107 8,311 7,216 5,533 6,114 6,770
Others 1,236 6,867 2,440 130 (3,546) (3,692) (3,891)
Tax paid (182) (132) (716) (328) 30 0 0
Change in WC (395) (4,954) 222 151 3,398 164 (2,211)
Operating Cashflow 48 (2,405) (273) 4,724 7,446 6,845 8,080
Capex (2,486) (7,246) (6,007) (4,684) (3,729) (4,226) (4,968)
Change in Invest. 14,636 (15,920) 25 (2,512) 0 0 0
Others 755 1,322 1,049 2,400 4,781 5,117 5,538
Investing Cashflow 12,905 (21,844) (4,933) (4,796) 1,051 891 570
Change in Debt 666 (2,977) (1,203) (735) 0 0 0
Change in Equity 98 33,977 39,372 (23) 0 0 0
Others (2,231) (1,983) (2,785) (2,903) (3,472) (4,004) (4,543)
Financing Cashflow (1,467) 29,018 35,385 (3,661) (3,472) (4,004) (4,543)
Net Change in Cash 11,485 4,769 30,179 (3,732) 5,026 3,732 4,106
Source: Company Data, Equirus
2024 Equirus Securities Private Limited. All rights reserved. For Private Circulation only. This report or any portion hereof may not be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the written
consent of Equirus Securities Private Limited
Analyst Certification
I, Jainam Shah/Shreyans Mehta, author to this report, hereby certify that all of the views expressed in this report accurately reflect my personal views about the subject company or
companies and its or their securities. I also certify that no part of my compensation was, is or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in
this report.
Disclosures
Equirus Securities Private Limited (ESPL) having CIN: U65993MH2007PTC176044 is registered in India with Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) as Research Analyst (Reg. No.
INH000001154), Stock Broker:(Reg. No. INZ000251536), RA: INH000001154, DP: (Reg. No. IN-DP-324-2017) NSE Mem id: 13017|BSE Mem id: 3309|DP ID:84500| having its
Registered office at A 2102 B, A wing, 21st Floor, Marathon Futurex, N. M. Joshi Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai-400013.. There are no disciplinary actions taken by any regulatory authority
against ESPL for Research Analyst activity. ESPL is a subsidiary of Equirus Capital Private Limited (ECPL) which is registered with SEBI as Category I Merchant Banker and provides investment
banking services including but not limited to merchant banking services, private equity, mergers & acquisitions and structured finance.
As ESPL and its associates are engaged in various financial services business, it might have: - (a) received compensation (except in connection with the preparation of this report) from
the subject company for investment banking or merchant banking or brokerage services or any other product or services in the past twelve months;(b) managed or co-managed public
offering of securities for the subject company in the past twelve months; or (c) received a mandate from the subject company; or (d) might have other financial, business or other interests
in entities including the subject company (ies) mentioned in this Report. ESPL & its associates, their directors and employees may from time to time have positions or options in the company
and buy or sell the securities of the company (ies) mentioned herein. ESPL and its associates collectively do not own (in their proprietary position) 1% or more of the equity securities of
the subject company mentioned in the report as the last day of the month preceding the publication of the research report. ESPL or its Analyst or Associates did not receive any compensation
or other benefits from the companies mentioned in the report or third party in connection with preparation of the research report. Accordingly, neither ESPL nor Research Analysts have
any material conflict of interest at the time of publication of this report. Compensation of our Research Analysts is not based on any specific merchant banking, investment banking or
brokerage service transactions. ESPL has not been engaged in market making activity for the subject company.
The Research Analyst engaged in preparation of this Report:-
(a) has not received any compensation from the subject company in the past twelve months; (b) has not managed or co-managed public offering of securities for the subject company in
the past twelve months; (c) has neither received any compensation for investment banking or merchant banking or brokerage services from the subject company in the past twelve months
nor received any compensation for products or services other than investment banking or merchant banking or brokerage services from the subject company in the past twelve months;
(d) has not received any compensation or other benefits from the subject company or third party in connection with the research report; (e) might have served as an officer, director or
employee of the subject company; (f) is not engaged in market making activity for the subject company.
This document is not directed or intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction,
where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law, regulation or which would subject ESPL and affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement within
such jurisdiction. The securities described herein may or may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to a certain category of investors. Persons in whose possession of this document
are required to inform themselves of, and to observe, such applicable restrictions. Please delete this document if you are not authorized to view the same. By reading this document you
represent and warrant that you have full authority and all rights necessary to view and read this document without subjecting ESPL and affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement
within such jurisdiction.
This document has been prepared solely for information purpose and does not constitute a solicitation to any person to buy, sell or subscribe any security. ESPL or its affiliates are not
soliciting any action based on this report. The information and opinions contained herein is from publicly available data or based on information obtained in good faith from sources
believed to be reliable, but ESPL provides no guarantee as to its accuracy or completeness. The information contained herein is as on date of this report, and report and is subject to
change or modification and any such changes could impact our interpretation of relevant information contained herein. While we would endeavour to update the information herein on
reasonable basis, ESPL and its affiliates, their directors and employees are under no obligation to update or keep the information current. Also, there may be re gulatory, compliance, or
other reasons that may prevent ESPL and its group companies from doing so. This document is prepared for assistance only and is not intended to be and must not alone be taken as the
basis for an investment decision. Each recipient of this document should make such investigations as it deems necessary to arrive at an independent evaluation of an investment in the
securities of companies referred to in this document including the merits and risks involved. This document is intended for general circulation and does not take into account the specific
investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any particular person. ESPL and its group companies, employees, directors and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all
responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it. ESPL/its
affiliates do and seek to do business with companies covered in its research report. Thus, investors should be aware that the firm may have conflict of interest.
A graph of daily closing prices of securities is available at [Link] and [Link] (Choose a company from the list on
the browser and select the “three years” period in the price chart).
Disclosure of Interest statement for the subject Company Yes/No If Yes, nature of such interest
Standard Warning: Investment in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. |
Registration granted by SEBI and certification from NISM in no way guarantee performance of the intermediary or provide any assurance of
returns to investors.
Compliance/Grievance Officer: Naman Shah | Tel. No. 079-61909561|email: [Link]@[Link] | [Link] |









