ARTICLES : 2010 Articles... written by Kerry, originally posted on the blog.

February 10, 2012 MY REPLY TO BILL BROCKBRADER'S UNFORTUNATE NEED TO LIE ABOUT CAMELOT (THIS REFERS ONLY TO HIS COMMENTS MADE ON LISA HARRISON'S INTERVIEW WITH HIM...) It is amazing to me that putting our lives on the line for our whistleblowers to get the truth out to the people sometimes ends up with them turning on us and t elling lies. The dynamic of what went on with Bill Brockbrader/Wood is a case i n point. He is not the first one... yes Pete Peterson did as well. While I am happy to hear he has found another outlet for his ideas... the follow ing information must be clearly made public. 1. I did not call David Wilcock in distress over someone unearthing his "channe ling"... this is not only not surprising to me but as a matter of fact it is my observation that almost without exception our witnesses; researchers and whistle blowers all end up "channeling" some more than others. I have stated this publi cly in my Sedona Presentation a year or two ago and others. 2. Pete Peterson has held a grudge and has been working hard to turn a certain person against us for a while now. What actually happened... and I have a witne ss, both Bill Ryan and I were involved in that interview process. We waited a mo nth for his PENTAGON SOURCES to VET THE INTERVIEW... Finally he gave us the ok o n the phone. We posted it to youtube and then several hours later he called and wanted it taken down and changed. At that point it was too late. People had a lready seen it and downloaded it. Anything taken out at that point would simply make it go even more viral. Be aware: He doth protest too much..now as he did then.. I didn't hold a gun to his head and I didn't give him drugs, torture or mind control.. something he knows a LOT ABOUT. And yes I could get killed, as h e said several times for saying so... What he and BILL BROCKBRADER and anyone else out there needs to know is WE ARE F REE as interviewers to ask whatever questions we choose. Just as the whistleblo wer is FREE to take the 5th and not answer. He's a big strong man... I don't t hink he was afraid of me but then again you never know. There was nothing to ta ke out there because he never admitted anything. He simply got a lot of flak fr om his PENTAGON HANDLERS (along with some possible rewiring) and this made him u ncomfortable... 3. Regarding Bill Brockbrader -- the only thing I asked after consulting a lawy er... because originally he had said he was going to release NAMES and EVIDENCE that would as he said "shut the SEALS up"...etc. I simply said we don't want to get caught up in useless lawsuits for slander etc so please ONLY USE first and last initials or ROLES... FOR EXAMPLE I said.. if it's a Police Chief say that.. do not use names... and then put the evidence which presumably would have the n ames on a site we can link to. ... Why he would choose to lie about this now is something only his handler can say for sure... 4. Regarding spiritual matters... If you pay attention, on my first interview an d on the second Livestream with David Wilcock and Bill Ryan .. we delved into Lo

oking Glass, the timeline convergence and so on. He had plenty of time to speak about this and answer questions and he did so... I am a HIGHLY SPIRITUAL PERSO N... that is why I do what I do... And why I don't lie about anything. Unlike s ome people. What I don't care to do is give a whistleblower a platform to repeat himself ove r and over again or spout rhetoric and philosophy for hours on end. The 3rd Liv estream was hugely problematic... And it is public record. Judge for yourself. ****

February 5, 2012 Evaluating Whistleblower Testimony from Bill Brockbrader aka Bill Wood: Thank you for all who took the time to listen and participate in the recent Live stream follow up interview with Bill Brockbrader. Unfortunately some of what was initially promised by Bill prior to the Livestream event was not delivered. If nothing else, what becomes evident is that what one person considers to be earth shattering or mind blowing can easily be seen as run of the mill to someone els e. It all has to do with your frame of reference. In addition to that, as the in terview progressed, what appeared to happen is that Bill Brockbrader had stretch ed his security oath as far as it would go. From that point on, it is evident th at he is primarily talking from a personal/philosophical point of view. It also became obvious, at least to me, that there was a lack of familiarity wit h what Project Camelot is all about. And therefore Bill and Eva are not able to assess accurately what is new and what is well known to the Camelot audience and so both he and Eva Moore, although well meaning, ended up discussing concepts a nd experiences that are already out in the public domain and therefore not at al l novel or new. You be the judge. Naturally, Bill's personal experiences seem unique to him. This is understandabl e. Unfortunately a lot of the material in this livestream had already been revea led in the first interview I did with him. The rest of the material with regard to the Las Vegas police department while interesting is hardly surprising. Actua lly it would be more surprising if they weren't run by the mob, on the take and corrupt as well as deeply involved in scandals of every kind... What you will se e is that halfway through the interview I simply decided to take charge of the p rocess and attempt to get some focus and answers to direct questions that some o f the viewers had. Suffice to say, whistleblower testimony is often full of distortions, blanks and unanswered questions due to the impact that mind control has had on the person' s life. In this regard, Bill Brockbrader is no exception to this rule. I suggest that rather than judging him you consider the impact that simple mass mind cont rol has had on your own lives and then try to put yourself in the shoes of someo ne who has that and on top of it joins the military and becomes the focus of int ense mind manipulation over long periods of time. Then you will begin to underst and what it truly means to be a whistleblower, or someone who has chosen to brea k ranks and come forward to tell the truth about what they have experienced. We need more people who have that kind of courage. Unfortunately they are few an d far between. On top of that, the very people who could substantiate and stand

beside a whistleblower often choose to hide in the dark. As we enter this time where the veils are thinning between worlds consider how m any lies you and people around you are dealing with on a daily basis. Then consi der whether you would have the courage to come forward into the public domain to tell the truth about what you know. Consider how you would become an outcast am ong those who supposedly are your friends and loved ones. Consider how once you take the RED PILL you can never go back. Then look again at the testimony from B ill Brockbrader. Ultimately truth is something each person must discover one step at a time using their own heart and mind to discern. Lastly, for those of you who do not understand what my role is as a filmmaker an d investigative reporter... please understand. I am not interested in following in the steps of others. Project Camelot has a unique mission in this regard. For more on this mission click on About Us. Please note: A viewer came across the following link which contains a written ex pose apparently posted back in July 2011 by Bill Brockbrader on the internet. So me of his statements and the information described there may be useful to people attempting to understand where he is coming from regarding his past, channeling and philosophy. On the other hand, it may simply confuse things even further... You need to decide what resonates with you and what does not. CLICK HERE for his previously published statement.