You are on page 1of 22

Enterprise Strategy Group | Getting to the bigger truth.

TM

Virtualizing Exchange Workloads with Microsoft Hyper-V R2


Mark Bowker, Senior Analyst Brian Garrett, Vice President, ESG Lab

2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

The Enterprise Strategy Group

2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

Application Virtualization Timeline


100% virtualized Scalability Percent Virtualized
Tier-1

Performance Availability

Tier-2

Agility Manageability Consolidation

Utilities

Time

59% have not virtualized any tier-1 workloads


2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

ESG Server Virtualization Maturity Model


Percent of current virtualization users, by segment Basic, 22% Progressing, 53% Advanced, 25%

75% of the market

58% are less than 30% virtualized 75% expect to be more than 30% virtualized in 24 months

56% have less than 250 virtual machines deployed

2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

Factors Preventing Organizations from Using Virtualization

Collaboration and Training Virtual Stall

Best Practices

Application Performance

Lack of Understanding

Virtualization technology is not the barrier to success


2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

Accelerating Virtualization Adoption


Massive Opportunity
70% of organizations using more than one hypervisor

31% expect 25:1 VM consolidation in 24 months


75% expect to be more than 30% virtualized in 24 months Key Metrics for Gauging Virtualization Success

2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

Extent of Production VM-based Applications


E-mail

Why This Matters


Deployment flexibility Simplified administration Reduced hardware costs

Ability to improve service levels


2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

ESG Lab: Hands-on Testing and Analysis


The Gold Standard in Independent Product Validation Services Discover whether a product works as advertised or not
Insight into why and how these capabilities matter

Focused on usability, functionality, performance, scalability, total cost of ownership, etc.

2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

2010 ESG Lab Highlights: VM Scalability


Hyper-V R2 on 16 servers with Microsoft Cluster Shared Volumes (CSV) stored on a single SAN attached disk array supported 1,024 virtual machines
Virtual Machine Scalability
1 through 16 Microsoft Hyper-V R2 Servers
1,024

896

Vrirtual Machines

768 640 512 384 256 128 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Clustered Hyper-V R2 Servers


http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/11/emc-symmetrix-vmax-and-microsoft-server-virtualization-scalable-enterprise-class-virtual-infrastructure/
2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

2010 ESG Lab Highlights: Mixed Workloads


Hyper-V R2 on 2 servers with 16 VMs sharing a single disk array:
18,750 mailboxes with the Microsoft Exchange 2010 Jetstress utility and 3,475 small database IOs per second with the Microsoft SQLIO utility and 650 MB/sec of database throughput with the SQLIO utility and 3,106 simulated web server IOPs with the Iometer utility and 413 MB/sec of simulated backup throughput with the Iometer utility with predictably fast response times and scalability
14,000 12,000

I/O's per second (IOPS)

10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 1 2 3 4

Exchange SQL Server Web Server Scan/read

Virtual Machines
http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/06/ibm-system-storage-ds5020ds3950-express-and-ibm-system-x3950-m2-mixed-workload-performance-in-microsoft-hyper-v-r2-environments/
2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

10

2011 ESG Lab Test Bed (Physical)

HP BL680C up to 24 cores and 128 GB RAM per blade

2x4 Gbps FC per server


SAN

RAID-10 Pools:

EMC CX4-960 155 15K RPM FC disk drives

Data (88): Logs(16):

OS(24):
Apps(16):

2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

2011 Exchange Test Bed (Logical)


Application: Exchange 2010 VM configuration: 4 vCPU, 4 GB RAM Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1
Hyper-V R2

Hypervisor: Microsoft Hyper-V R2 Physical OS: Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1

SAN

Virtual machine images: Exchange data and logs:

Fixed VHD Fixed VHD

2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

12

2011 Exchange Workload


Microsoft Exchange Server Jetstress 2010
Scale from 5,000 to 20,000 simulated Exchange mailboxes 5,000 mailboxes per VM 250 MB mailboxes 0.15 IOPs per mailbox 2 databases/2 copies per VM

2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

13

2011 Exchange Workload Results


Hyper-V R2 Virtual Application Workload Scalability (Up to 20,000 Exchange 2010 mailboxes, Windows 2008 R2 SP1)
25,000 25 Exchange DB Read Response Time (ms)

20,000

20

Exchange 2010 Mailboxes

15,000

15

10,000

10

5,000

0 1 2 3 4

Hyper-V R2 Virtual Machines


2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

14

2011 Exchange Workload Results


Hyper-V R2 Virtual Application Workload Scalability (Up to 20,000 Exchange 2010 mailboxes, Windows 2008 R2 SP1)
8,000 7,000

Exchange IO Operations per second

6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000

2,000
1,000 0

Hyper-V R2 Virtual Machines


2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

15

Exchange Tested Solutions


Microsoft and participating server and storage vendors Key design decision points for common scenarios

Cost effective resource planning (server, storage, network)


Device Access Group and multi-site designs for HA

Documented results of exhaustive performance tests

2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

16

Exchange Tested Solutions Virtualized with Hyper-V R2


35,000 30,000 25,000

Exchange 2010 Mailboxes

20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0

Exchange Tested Solutions


2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

17

Exchange Tested Solutions Virtualized with Hyper-V R2


Hyper-V R2 VMs Solution
1 2 3 4

Mboxes
9,000 15,000 20,000 32,000

Sites
2 2 2 3

Cores
36 96 128 96

RAM(GB)
432 512 768 1,152

Drives
144 136 160 432

Mbox
9 12 16 24

CAS/Hub
9 8 16 12

Total
18 20 32 36

1. 2. 3. 4.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg513522.aspx http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=4D83E5AC-7D9A-47C6-A843-A5520D118FC4 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=6FD7E23F-30C8-4FB7-BCA3-A5DE9AA9A8E4 http://www.emc.com/collateral/hardware/white-papers/h7337-exchange-unified-cisco-hyper-v-wp.pdf

2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

18

2011 Exchange Results Summary


Hyper-V R2 Exchange Workload Scalability 20,000 simulated Exchange 2010 users on a single server in four Hyper-V R2 VMs with Jetstress Exchange tested solutions from 9,000 through 32,000 mailboxes The 32,000 mailbox solution was deployed in 36 Hyper-V R2 VMs over three sites

2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

19

The Bigger Truth


Why This Matters
A single Hyper-V R2 enabled server scaled to meet the IO performance requirements of 20,000 Exchange 2010 mailboxes. Exchange Tested Solutions virtualized with Hyper-V R2 met the scalability and performance requirements of 9,000 through 32,000 highly available Exchange 2010 mailboxes. The performance, scalability, and low overhead of Hyper-V R2 can be used to reduce costs and improve the manageability, flexibility, and availability of consolidated Exchange applications.
2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

20

Issues to Consider
Mileage varies; test with your workloads and your data Hyper-V Included for free with Windows Server 2008 Proven to perform with demanding applications

Accelerate the time it takes to move from pilot to production


Maximize investments Leverage ESG Lab Validations, Microsoft and its partners best practices/proof points

2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

21

Thank You

For more information, please contact Mark Bowker, Senior Analyst 508.381.5153 | mark.bowker@esg-global.com Brian Garrett, Vice President, ESG Lab 508.381.5160 | brian.garrett@esg-global.com

Getting to the bigger truth.

TM

2011 Enterprise Strategy Group

You might also like