1

Model United Nations

Pakistan International School Qatar

The United Nations Human Rights Council

Addressing the Global Rise in Digital Surveillance and Its

Implications for Individual Privacy and Human Rights

January 24 – 25th 2024

 I. ABOUT THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS
COUNCIL (UNHRC)
The United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) is an intergovernmental
body within the United Nations system responsible for promoting and protecting
human rights globally. Established by the UN General Assembly in 2006, the
UNHRC addresses human rights violations, provides recommendations, and
facilitates discussions on thematic human rights issues throughout the year. The
Council is composed of 47 member states elected by the General Assembly, with
members serving three-year terms.

The UNHRC operates from the United Nations Office at Geneva (UNOG),
Switzerland, and collaborates closely with other UN bodies like the Office of the
High Commissioner for Human Rights. Together, they monitor rights violations,
offer technical assistance, and advocate for member states to align their practices
with international human rights standards.
For more information on the UNHRC, visit:

 UNHRC Official Website

 UN Women - Human Rights Council

 UNHRC Information on Refworld

II. BACKGROUND ON DIGITAL SURVEILLANCE
I. The Emergence of Mass Surveillance Technologies
In recent years, the advancement of digital technologies has facilitated the global rise of
mass surveillance. Governments and corporations now have unprecedented capabilities to
monitor, analyze, and store individuals' digital and physical activities. Technologies such
as facial recognition, artificial intelligence (AI), and geolocation tracking have enabled
extensive monitoring under the guise of national security, crime prevention, and public
health.

II. Implications for Individual Privacy

While surveillance technologies have provided certain societal benefits, such as crime
reduction and pandemic management, they have simultaneously eroded privacy rights.
Citizens often have little awareness or control over the data collected about them.
Additionally, inadequate regulation of surveillance practices has resulted in the misuse of
these tools, leading to violations of individuals' fundamental rights.

III. Global Disparities

Authoritarian States: These regimes frequently exploit surveillance technologies to
suppress dissent, monitor activists, and control public discourse.

Democratic States: Even democracies struggle with the ethical and legal challenges
posed by invasive surveillance, often in the context of counterterrorism or national
security.

IV. Challenges to Human Rights

Free Speech: Surveillance often leads to self-censorship as individuals fear being

monitored.

Freedom of Assembly: Monitoring public gatherings discourages civic participation.

Discrimination: AI-driven surveillance systems are prone to biases that

disproportionately affect marginalized groups.
III. TIMELINE OF EVENTS

 Post-9/11 Era: Governments worldwide ramped up surveillance

measures to counter terrorism.

 2013: Edward Snowden’s revelations exposed global surveillance

programs like PRISM, highlighting extensive data collection by
governments.

 2017: China launched its Social Credit System, using AI to

monitor and rank citizens based on their behaviors.

 2020-2022: The COVID-19 pandemic saw a surge in the use of

contact-tracing apps, raising concerns over data misuse.

 2023: Growing calls for regulating AI surveillance technologies

emerged following high-profile cases of data breaches and
algorithmic biases.

The post-9/11 era marked a significant increase in global surveillance as

governments sought to counter terrorism. This trend intensified in 2013 with
Edward Snowden's revelations, exposing vast surveillance programs like PRISM.
In 2017, China introduced its Social Credit System, leveraging AI to monitor
citizens' behaviors. The COVID-19 pandemic further accelerated the use of
contact-tracing apps, sparking concerns over data privacy. By 2023, mounting
instances of data breaches and biases in surveillance algorithms prompted
widespread calls for stronger regulation of AI technologies.
IV. MAIN PROBLEMS
Five key issues need to be addressed for this committee.

1. Inadequate Legal Frameworks: Most countries lack robust, clear

legislation to regulate the use of surveillance technologies, leading
to legal gray areas. This absence of comprehensive laws allows
governments and private companies to gather vast amounts of
personal data without appropriate oversight. As a result, there is a
heightened risk of data misuse, including profiling, surveillance of
innocent individuals, and discriminatory practices, all of which can
undermine citizens' trust in both public and private institutions.

2. Lack of Transparency: Governments and corporations often

collect data through surveillance programs without providing clear
information to the public. This lack of transparency can prevent
individuals from understanding how their data is being used,
whether it's being shared with third parties, or how it may be stored
or analyzed. Without proper disclosure, people cannot make
informed decisions about their privacy or take steps to protect their
personal information, leading to an erosion of trust in institutions.

3. Violation of Privacy Rights: Surveillance often involves the

collection of personal data without individuals' explicit consent.
This practice violates the fundamental principle of informed
consent and infringes on the right to privacy, which is protected
under various international human rights laws. Additionally, data
gathered through surveillance can be used in ways individuals
never agreed to, such as for commercial purposes or to influence
political views, further compounding privacy concerns.

4. Potential for Abuse: Surveillance technologies can be misused by

governments or other powerful actors to target individuals or
groups based on their political beliefs, activism, or religion. Tools
such as facial recognition, social media monitoring, and data
 tracking can lead to the repression of dissent, censorship, and
harassment of journalists and human rights defenders. When
unchecked, these tools can be weaponized to stifle free speech and
undermine democratic processes, threatening both civil liberties
and the rule of law.

5. International Disparities: The regulation of surveillance

technologies is uneven across different countries, creating
significant challenges for global cooperation. Some nations may
have strict privacy laws, while others lack adequate regulations,
creating loopholes that can be exploited. This disparity enables
cross-border data flows, where personal information collected in
one country can be misused in another with weaker regulations,
raising concerns over international human rights violations and the
potential for global surveillance networks.

V. POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS
1. Developing International Norms: The UNHRC could lead efforts
to establish global standards for the ethical use of surveillance
technologies and encourage cross-border agreements to prevent the
misuse of surveillance tools.

2. Strengthening Legal Frameworks: Member states should adopt

comprehensive privacy laws modeled after frameworks like the
 EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and mandate
transparency in data collection and usage.

3. Promoting Technological Safeguards: Invest in privacy-

preserving technologies, such as encryption and anonymization
and restrict the use of tools like facial recognition in public spaces
without judicial oversight.

4. Civil Society Involvement: Support advocacy groups that raise

awareness about privacy rights and encourage public participation
in discussions about the ethical use of surveillance.

5. Accountability Mechanisms: Establish independent oversight

bodies to monitor surveillance practices and hold governments and
corporations accountable for rights violations.

It is important to note here that there are several potential solutions to address the
ethical concerns surrounding surveillance technologies. The proposed actions
provide a comprehensive framework for addressing the misuse of surveillance
tools, ensuring privacy protection, and promoting accountability. By focusing on
international norms, strong legal frameworks, technological safeguards, civil
society involvement, and oversight mechanisms, the global community can work
towards ensuring that surveillance technologies are used responsibly and in
alignment with human rights principles.
VI. MAIN STAKEHOLDERS

1. China
2. Russia
3. Iran
4. United States
5. European Union countries
6. India

VII. CURRENT STATUS ON ISSUE

The global rise in digital surveillance poses significant challenges to individual

privacy and human rights. As governments and corporations increasingly deploy
advanced technologies to monitor citizens, concerns about data misuse, algorithmic
biases, and the erosion of personal freedoms grow. The widespread use of
surveillance tools, often without sufficient oversight or transparency, risks
infringing on privacy rights and could disproportionately affect vulnerable groups.
Addressing these concerns requires robust legal frameworks, international
cooperation, and the implementation of privacy-preserving technologies to ensure
that surveillance practices are ethically managed and do not undermine
fundamental human rights.
VIII. QUESTIONS

1. How can international laws and standards be developed to regulate

surveillance technologies?

2. What measures can governments implement to ensure transparency and

accountability in their surveillance programs?

3. How can civil society and media outlets raise awareness about the
implications of digital surveillance?

4. What role can international organizations like the UNHRC play in

addressing the global rise in digital surveillance?

5. How can states balance the need for national security with the protection of
individual privacy and human rights?
REFERENCES

- United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). “Digital
Surveillance and Privacy.”

[Link]
[Link].23.40_EN.pdf

- CrowdStrike: What the 2024 outage reveals about security.

[Link]
about-security

- Freedom on the Net – The Repressive Power of Artificial Intelligence.

[Link]
[Link]

- Digital Surveillance and Human Rights.

[Link]
[Link]

- Spyware and surveillance: Threats to privacy and human rights growing, UN report
warns.

[Link]
privacy-and-human-rights-growing-un-report

- Surveillance and Digital Rights

[Link]

- Analyzing the Human Rights Impact of Increased Digital Public Health Surveillance
during the COVID-19 Crisis

[Link]

- How technology and the world have changed since 9/11

[Link]