Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mughees Ali
374-FSL-LLB5Y/S21
Name: Mughees Ali
Outline:
1. Introduction
3. Adoption in Pakistan
6. Judgments
7. Conclusion
Deprivation Of Adopted Child From Inheritance
1. Introduction:
Deprivation:
The damaging lack of material benefits considered to be
basic necessities in a society.
Adoption:
The action or fact of legally taking an-other's child and
bringing it up as one's own, or the fact of being adopted.
Inheritance:
The devolution of property on an heir or heirs upon the
death of the owner.
Summarized:
In the inheritance it would be deprivation of adopted
child from inheritance. Adopted child will not be entitled to the
inheritance from his/her adopted parents.
1. Non-inheritance:
Adopted children do not have inheritance rights
within the adoptive family. They cannot inherit from their adoptive
parents, and the adoptive parents cannot inherit from the adopted child.
2. Marriage to Foster Siblings:
Adopted children retain the status of 'Na-
Mehram' within the foster family, meaning they can marry their foster
siblings.
3. Inheritance from Biological Parents:
Adopted children maintain
inheritance rights from their biological parents, and these rights remain
intact even after adoption.
4. Legal Provisions:
Pakistan's legal system, based on Shariah, does not
recognize adoption in the conventional Western sense. Instead, it
permits guardianship under the Guardians and Wards Act of 1890,
allowing individuals to take legal responsibility for a child's welfare
without altering their lineage.
5. Kafala and Alternative Care:
'Kafala' functions as an alternative care
arrangement, where a child's care is undertaken without erasing their
biological identity or rights. This practice is encouraged in Islam and
ensures the welfare of orphaned or abandoned children.
6. Limited Inheritance Rights through Will:
While adopted children
cannot inherit from their adoptive parents, the adoptive parents have
the option to bequeath one-third of their estate to the adopted child
through a will.
Adopted children in Pakistan,
under Islamic law and prevailing cultural
practices, do not inherit from their adoptive parents. Instead, they
maintain inheritance rights from their biological parents, emphasizing
the significance of biological lineage and preserving family connections
in Islamic traditions.
5.Status of gift deed for an adopted child:
In Islam and specifically in Pakistan, the status of gift deeds for adopted
children involves adherence to Shariah principles and local legal
regulations. Shariah, the Islamic law, does not grant adopted children
the same inheritance rights as biological children within the adoptive
family. However, it allows for the provision of gifts and financial support
to adopted children during the lifetime of the adoptive parents.
Regarding the status of gift deeds for adopted children in Islam and
Pakistan:
1. Inheritance Rights:
According to Islamic law, adopted children do not
inherit from their adoptive parents. Shariah specifies inheritance shares
for biological heirs, and adopted children are not considered as direct
heirs under these laws.
3. Gift Limitations:
Islamic teachings advise that the amount or value of
the gift should be within reasonable limits and not exceed the capacity
of the giver. Shariah suggests that the maximum limit for gifting during
one's lifetime is one-third of the total estate, ensuring that rightful heirs
are not unfairly disinherited.
5. Equitable Distribution:
While adoptive parents can gift assets to their
adopted children, Shariah emphasizes fairness and equitable distribution
of wealth among all heirs. It is crucial to ensure that gifting does not
unfairly favor one child over others who are entitled to inheritance.
6. Legal Compliance:
The execution of gift deeds in Pakistan should
comply with local legal regulations in addition to Islamic law. Seeking
advice from Islamic scholars well-versed in Shariah principles and legal
experts familiar with Pakistan's legal system is recommended to ensure
compliance with both religious and legal requirements.
6.Judgments:
No. 1
Facts:
The case revolves around a petition filed under Article 199 of the
Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, stemming from a
suit for the recovery of maintenance allowance dismissed by the learned
Additional District Judge, Shakargarh, on 31.10.2008.
Key Points:
Conclusion:
1.The court concluded that while Islamic law doesn't grant the adopted
child inheritance rights, the adoptive parents assume a fiduciary duty
towards the child when publicly adopting and caring for them. This duty
includes the responsibility to provide maintenance for the child.
2.The judgment of the appellate court was set aside, reinstating the
decision of the Family Court, which allowed the petitioner's claim for
maintenance allowance, it was based on the fiduciary relationshipand
guardianship trust.
Personal Opinion:
The ruling presented in this case highlights an interpretation of Islamic
law concerning adoption and its implications on rights and obligations,
particularly in the context of maintenance allowance for an adopted
child. The court's decision to reinstate the petitioner's claim for
maintenance allowance based on the fiduciary relationship and
guardianship trust appears to align with principles of equity and fairness
within the Islamic legal framework.
My Opinion:
1. Recognition of Fiduciary Obligation:
The court's recognition of a
fiduciary duty assumed by adoptive parents, even in the absence of
formal inheritance rights for adopted children in Islamic law, is
commendable. It acknowledges the moral and ethical responsibility
undertaken by adoptive parents when publicly adopting and caring for a
child.
Judgement
No: 2
Civil Petition No. 659 of 2019
(Against the judgment dated 10.01.2019 of
the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench
passed in C.R.No.532-D/2012)
Versus
Facts:
The case involves a dispute over inheritance according to Shariah law.
Mst. Munir Sultan, daughter of Fateh Khan, contested three gift
mutations that supposedly transferred her father's land to his
second wife and her sons (petitioners). She challenged these gifts,
claiming her rightful inheritance.
The petitioner’s counsel argued that the gifts were valid, presenting
copies of gift mutations and the daily diary register as evidence.
However, Fateh Khan, in his nineties and in poor health at the time
of his death, didn't sign or thumb-impress these documents. The
specifics of the gifts weren’t mentioned in the documents or the
petitioners’ written statement.
The court dismissed the argument that possession of the land by the
petitioners confirmed the gifts. It criticized the petitioners for
disregarding court orders and expected them to abide by legal decrees.
Concluding Remarks:
The court refused leave to appeal, finding the burden of proof unmet
by the petitioners regarding the alleged gifts. It condemned attempts
to deprive rightful heirs of their inheritance, emphasizing Shariah’s
principles of inheritance equality, especially for vulnerable
individuals like widows and orphans.
The judgment underscores constitutional protections ensuring
property rights, especially for women and children, highlighting the
responsibility of state organs to address cases of inheritance
deprivation promptly.
The court highlighted the revenue department’s lapses, calling for
improved record-keeping and stricter adherence to legal procedures
to safeguard property rights. It urged concerned authorities to rectify
shortcomings in departmental functionality to prevent fraudulent
entries in revenue records, emphasizing the sanctity of inheritance
rights in Shariah and law.
My Opinion:
The court's decision rightfully upholds the principles of Shariah law
and inheritance equality by refusing to recognize the contested gift
mutations due to lack of proper evidence. The burden of proof
wasn't met, and the documents presented lacked essential details,
making the gifts questionable, especially given the circumstances
surrounding Fateh Khan's health and age.