Scribd
Upload
46 views4 pages

Performance Ratings Analysis at Celleo

The document presents performance ratings for employees at Celleo Engineering, comparing supervisor ratings and self-ratings across various performance metrics. It includes a detailed breakdown of scores for each employee, highlighting discrepancies between supervisor and self-assessments. Additionally, it summarizes average deviations between the two rating sources, indicating areas of alignment and misalignment in performance perceptions.

Uploaded by

famfam199000
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
46 views4 pages

Performance Ratings Analysis at Celleo

The document presents performance ratings for employees at Celleo Engineering, comparing supervisor ratings and self-ratings across various performance metrics. It includes a detailed breakdown of scores for each employee, highlighting discrepancies between supervisor and self-assessments. Additionally, it summarizes average deviations between the two rating sources, indicating areas of alignment and misalignment in performance perceptions.

Uploaded by

famfam199000
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

USING PERFORMANCE DATA AT CELLEO ENGINEER

SELF- AND SUPERVISOR RATINGS OF PERFORMANCE:

SUPERVISOR'S RATINGS
EMPLOYEE Quality Productivity Effort Dependibility Job Knowledge Judgment Personality
Jim 5 4 5 5 4 3 2
Anna 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Eric 2 3 3 4 3 2 2
Margot 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Jose 3 3 4 4 4 3 2
Alexa 6 6 6 5 5 4 4

SELF-RATINGS
EMPLOYEE Quality Productivity Effort Dependibility Job Knowledge Judgment Personality
Jim 6 6 3 4 7 6 5
Anna 5 4 5 4 4 4 3
Eric 6 5 5 6 6 7 5
Margot 6 7 6 6 5 6 6
Jose 4 4 3 4 7 7 7
Alexa 5 4 6 4 5 4 4

SUPERVISOR'S RATINGS MINUS SELF-RATINGS


EMPLOYEE Quality Productivity Effort Dependibility Job Knowledge Judgment Personality
Jim -1 -2 2 1 -3 -3 -3
Anna -1 0 -1 0 0 0 1
Eric -4 -2 -2 -2 -3 -5 -3
Margot 1 0 1 1 2 1 1
Jose -1 -1 1 0 -3 -4 -5
Alexa 1 2 0 1 0 0 0

AVERAGE DEVIATION BETWEEN SUPERVISOR AND SELF-RATINGS, AND AVERAGE SELF- AND SUPER

AVERAGE SCORES
EMPLOYEES SUPERVISOR SELF DEVIATION
Jim 4.18 5.55 1.00 AVERAGE DEVIATION BETWEEN
AVERAGE SELF- AN
Anna 4.00 4.09 0.00
Eric 2.55 5.91 2.00 8
Margot 6.91 6.00 1.00 7
6
5
4
3
AVERAGE DEVIATION BETWEEN
AVERAGE SELF- AN
8
7
Jose 3.36 4.64 0.00 6
Alexa 5.09 4.55 1.00 5
4
3
2
1
0
Jim Anna Eric

SUPERVISOR
ELLEO ENGINEERING

PERFORMANCE:

NGS
Job Ability Initiative Cooperation Effectiveness
6 5 4 3
4 4 4 4
3 2 1 3
7 6 7 7
5 4 3 2
5 6 4 5

Job Ability Initiative Cooperation Effectiveness


6 7 5 6
4 4 4 4
6 6 7 6
7 5 6 6
4 3 4 4
5 5 4 4

SELF-RATINGS
Job Ability Initiative Cooperation Effectiveness
0 -2 -1 -3
0 0 0 0
-3 -4 -6 -3
0 1 1 1
1 1 -1 -2
0 1 0 1

D AVERAGE SELF- AND SUPERVISOR RATINGS

GE DEVIATION BETWEEN SUPERVISOR AND SELF-RATINGS, AND


AVERAGE SELF- AND SUPERVISOR RATINGS
GE DEVIATION BETWEEN SUPERVISOR AND SELF-RATINGS, AND
AVERAGE SELF- AND SUPERVISOR RATINGS

Anna Eric Margot Jose Alexa

SUPERVISOR SELF DEVIATION

You might also like