Indian Contract Act: Contract Formation Essentials
Indian Contract Act: Contract Formation Essentials
Essentials of valid
Offer/proposal
Since section 10 is not complete and exhaustive, so there are certain Omission/Abstinence
others sections which also contains requirements for an agreement
to be enforceable.
Not given by Section 10 but are also considered essentials (4) Classification of Offer
of valid contracts
• Two parties
• Intention to create legal relationship Counter Standing
• Fulfillment of legal formalities General Offer Offer
• Certainty of meaning Offer
• Possibility of performance
Cross
Specific Offer
(1) Meaning of offer/proposal
Offer
As offer is the starting point in the making of an agreement. An offer
is also called as proposal. Thus, for a valid offer, the party making it
must express his willingness 'to do' or 'not to do' something.
1
BUSINESS LAWS
General offer Name of the Facts of the case Decision
offer made to public at large and anyone can accept by performing case laws
the desired act
When he came to know
Special/specific offer of the reward, which
had been announced in
offer made to a specific / ascertained person, & can be accepted his absence, he brought
only by that specified person an action against the
Cross offer defendant to claim this
reward. It was held that
2 parties exchange identical offers in ignorance of each other's since the plaintiff was
offer at the same time. It is not binding ignorant of the offer of
reward, his act of bringing
Counter offer
the lost boy did not
offeree offers to qualified acceptance of the offer subject to amount to the acceptance
modifications and variations in the terms of original offer. Counter- of the offer and therefore
offer amounts to rejection of the original offer he was not entitled to
claim the reward.
Standing / continuing / open offer
An offer of continuous nature which remains open for acceptance Boulton Vs. Boulton had taken Held: Jones is not liable
over a period of time Jones over the business of to pay for the good. It is
one Brocklehurst,
a rule of law that offer
with whom Jones had
Important case laws previous dealings. made to a specific /
Jones sent an order for ascertained person can
Name of the Facts of the case Decision
goods to Brocklehurst, be accepted only by that
case laws
which Boulton supplied specified person.
Carlill Vs. In this famous case, Held, she could recover without informing
Carbolic Carbolic smoke Ball Co. the amount as by using Jones that the business
Smoke Ball advertised in several the smoke balls she had changed hands.
Co. newspapers that a had accepted the offer. When Jones found
reward of £100 would be In terms of Sec. 8 of the out that the goods
given to any person who Indian Contract Act, had not come from
contracted influenza anyone performing the Brocklehurst, he
after using the smoke conditions of the offer refused to pay for
balls produced by the can be considered to them and was sued by
Carbolic Smoke Ball have accepted the offer. Boulton for the price.
Company according Until the general offer is
to printed directions. retracted or withdrawn, (5) Difference between Offer and Invitation to Offer, and
One lady, Mrs. Carlill, it can be accepted by Invitation to Treat
used the smoke balls anyone at any time as it is
as per the directions of a continuing offer. Case laws Facts of the case Decision
company and even then Harvey Vs. In this case, Privy Council Held that the mere
suffered from influenza. Facie briefly explained the statement of the lowest
Lalman Gauri Dutt sent his Held, he was not entitled distinction between an price at which the vendor
Shukla Vs. servant Lalman to trace to the reward, as he offer and an invitation to would sell contained no
Gauri Dutt his missing nephew. He did not know the offer. offer. In the given case, implied contract to sell
then announced that Section 4 of the Indian the plaintiffs through to the person who had
anybody who traced Contract Act states that a telegram asked the enquired about the price.
his nephew would be the communication of defendants two questions
entitled to a certain a proposal is complete namely,
reward. Lalman traced when it comes to the (i) Will you sell us
the boy in ignorance knowledge of the person Bumper Hall Pen? and
of this announcement. to whom it is made. (ii) Telegraph lowest cash
Subsequently when he price.
In Lalman case, the The defendants replied
came to know of the defendant’s nephew
reward, he claimed it. through telegram that the
absconded from home. “lowest price for Bumper
The plaintiff who was Hall Pen is ₤900”. The
defendant’s servant was plaintiffs sent another
sent to search for the telegram stating “we agree
missing boy.
to buy Bumper Hall Pen
After the plaintiff had left at ₤900”. However, the
in search of the boy, the defendants refused to sell
defendant announced the property at the price.
a reward of Rs. 501 to The plaintiffs sued the
anyone who might find defendants contending that
out the boy. The plaintiff they had made an offer to
who was unaware of this sell the property at ₤900
reward, was successful in and therefore they are
searching the boy. bound by the offer.
No term of the non compliance amounting to Acceptance Neale Vs. M offered to sell his land It was held that N
Merret to N for £280. N replied could not enforce his
(7) Acceptance purporting to accept the acceptance because it
offer but enclosed a cheque was not an unqualified
for £ 80 only. He promised one
to pay the balance of £ 200
person to whom Signifies his Proposal is said by monthly installments of
the Proposal is Assent thereto to be Accepted £ 50 each.
made
3
BUSINESS LAWS
Case laws Facts Decision (12) When is communication of acceptance complete?
Brogden vs. Brogden a supplier, sent a Held, that there was As against the Proposer-
Metropolitan draft agreement relating no contract as the
to the supply of coal to the when put in course of transmission to the Proposer
manager had not
Railway Co. manager of railway Co. viz, communicated his As against the Acceptor
Metropolitian railway for
his acceptance. acceptance to the
supplier, Brogden.
when it comes to the knowledge of the Proposer
The manager wrote the
word “Approved” on the (13) Communication of acceptance by post
same and put the draft
agreement in the drawer As against the Proposer- As against the Acceptor
of the table
Intending to send it to when the letter of when the letter reaches the
the company’s solicitors acceptance is posted proposer
for a formal contract to
be drawn up. By an over
sight the draft agreement (14) Acceptance over telephone or telex or fax
remained in drawer.
Offer is made by instantaneous communication-
(10) Rules for Communication of Offer and Acceptance Contract is completed
For Valid Offer and Acceptance When the Acceptance is The Contract is made at the
• Offer must be communicated to the Offeree received by the Offeror, place where the Acceptance is
• Acceptance must be communicated to the received
Offeror
(15) When revocation of offer and acceptance is complete
(11)When communication of offer is complete?
comes to the knowledge of as against the person • when it is put into a
the person to whom it is made who makes it- course of transmission
Communication as against the person • when it comes to his
of an offer is either by words spoken or to whom it is made- knowledge.
complete written, or it may be inferred
from the conduct of the
parties (16) When a Proposal and Acceptance can be revoked?
Relevant Case laws
Proposal Acceptance
Case laws Facts Decision
may be revoked at may be revoked at
Lilly Plaintiff delivered Held, the terms were any time before the any time before the
White Vs. some clothes to unreasonable and communication of its communication of the
Mannuswamy drycleaner for which Plaintiff was entitled acceptance is complete acceptance is complete
she received a laundry to recover full value as against the proposer as against the acceptor
of the saree from the
receipt containing drycleaner.
a condition that in
case of loss, customer The receipt carries
would be entitled special conditions (17)Modes of revocation of offer by
to claim 15% of the and are to be treated
market price of value as having been duly
communicated to the Lapse of Death or Non
of the article, Plaintiff customer and therein a Notice of specified Insanity fulfilment Counter
lost her new saree. tacit acceptance of these Revoca- or of the of Offer
conditions is implied tion reason- Conditions
by the customer’s parties
able time of Offer
acceptance of the receipt
has done or promises to do (4) Suit by a !ird Party on an Agreement (Doctrine of Privity
abstained from does or abstains or abstain from
from doing, or of Contract)
doing, or doing something,
General rule
Such an Act or Abstinence or Promise is called A stranger to a contract cannot sue
Consideration for the Promise
(2) Law relating to Minor’s agreement/ Position of minor (5) Positions of agreements in case of persons of permanently
unsound mind (in case of Idiots)
In case of supply of
No rati$cation necessaries claim to
on attaining be reimbursed from (6) Positions of agreements in case of Drunken/Intoxicated
majority property of minor person
6
BUSINESS LAWS
(7) Persons disqualified by law (6) Effect of undue influence
contracts by such person are Void. when agreement caused by undue influence-
• contract is voidable at the option of the party
- Alien enemies whose consent was obtained
Statutes • contract may be set aside
disqualify - Foreign ambassadors
certain persons - Convicts
to enter into - Insolvents Relevant Case Law
contract
- Corporations In Kirpa Ram vs. Sami-Ud-din Ad. Khan, a youth of 18 years of
- Etc. age, spend thrift and a drunkard, borrowed Rs. 90,000 on a bond
bearing compound interest at 2% per mensem (p.m.). It was held
by the court that the transaction is unconscionable, the rate of
III. Free Consent interest charged being so exorbitant.
Undue
In%uence
Misrepresentation
Fraud can be
committed by- { •
•
•
a party to a contract, or
with his connivance or
by his agent
Consent is said
{
Coercion to be free Mistake • another party thereto or
when it is not Act when done
• his agent, or
caused by with intent
• to induce him to enter
to deceive-
into the contract
8
BUSINESS LAWS
(19) Differences IV. Legality of Object and Consideration
Coercion and Undue influence (1) When there is an unlawful object & unlawful consideration
in an agreement, its effect
Basis of difference Coercion Undue Influence
Nature of action It involves the It involves moral or Consideration or Object of an agreement is unlawful, if-
physical force or mental pressure. forbidden defeats If it is involves immoral
threat. by law provision fraudulent or implies or
Involvement of It involves No such illegal act of any law injury to a opposed
criminal action committing or is committed or a person or to public
threatening to threat is given. property policy
commit any act of another
forbidden by "e "e "e "e "e
Indian Penal Code Agreement agreement agreement agreement agreement
or detaining or is Void. is void. is void. is void is void.
threatening to detain
property unlawfully. (2) Agreements against Public policy
R e l a t i o n s h i p It is not necessary Some sort of
between parties that there must relationship between Interfering with
Trading with the Course of Brokerage
be some sort the parties is
Enemy Justice Contracts
of relationship absolutely necessary.
between the parties.
Exercised by Coercion need not Undue in%uence Restraint
whom proceed from the is always exercised Sti%ing Creating of Legal
promisor nor need it between parties to Prosecution Monopoly Proceedings
be directed against the contract.
the promisor. It
Maintenance Sale/Transfer of
can be used even Restraint of
and Public Offices
by a stranger to the Champerty and Titles. Trade
contract.
Enforceability "e contract is Where the consent
voidable at the is induced by undue Restraint Restrained
of Personal of Parental Restraint of
option of the party in%uence, the Marriage
Liberty Rights
whose consent has contract is either
been obtained by voidable or the
V. Agreements which are expressly declared void
the coercion. court may set aside
or enforce it in a
(1) Law declares following agreement to be either illegal or void
modi$ed form.
Fraud and misrepresentation Agreements by Agreements in Agreements, the
Incompetent Restraint of Legal Meaning of which
Basis of difference Fraud Misrepresentation Parties Proceeding is not Certain
Intention To deceive the other "ere is no such
party by hiding the intention to deceive Reciprocal
truth. the other party. Agreements made Agreements
Promises to do
under a Mutual in Restraint of
Knowledge of "e person making "e person making things Legal
Mistake of Fact Trade and also Illegal
truth the suggestion the statement
believes that the believes it to be
statement is untrue. true, although it is Agreements, the Agreements Agreements
not true. Consideration or
made without Contingent on
Object of which
Recission of "e injured party "e injured party is is Unlawful Consideration Impossible Events
the contract can repudiate the entitled to repudiate
and claim for contract and claim the contract or sue
damages damages. for restitution but Agreements Agreements
in Restraint of in Restraint of Agreements by
cannot claim the way of wager
damages. Trade Marriage
Means to "e party using Party can always
discover the the fraudulent act plead that the (2) Consequences of agreement expressly declared void
truth cannot secure or injured party
protect himself had the means to
Agreements
by saying that the discover the truth. expressly
injured party had declared void Void- ab- initio
means to discover / illegal by the
the truth. Contract Act
A contract is said
Legal
to be performed Promisor himself Promisor’s Agent
-Either perform, or
Representatives
when the
parties
to the -O"er to
contract
perform their
promises
10
BUSINESS LAWS
(8) Is time an essence of Contract? (12) Supervening impossibility
makes
Fails to perform
it impossible
refuses, or his part of the By his act
(11) Impossibility existing at the time of contract or Initial to perform his
contract, or
Impossibility obligation
Case Effects
If the impossibility is known to Such an agreement is void-ab- (2) Effects of the Breach of Contract
the parties initio
If unknown to the parties Such an agreement is void on
the ground of mutual mistake !e aggrieved party is
If known to the promisor only Such promisor must gets a right to proceed
relieved from performing
against the party at fault
compensate for any loss his obligation, and
which such promisee sustains
through the non performance
of the promise.
The Chartered Accountant Student January 2021 31
11
BUSINESS LAWS
(3) Types of breach of contract
Case laws Facts Decision
Breach of contract Gibbons A business man whose In the case, it was held
Vs. West credit has su"ered will that a non-trader cannot
Minister get exemplary damages get heavy damages in
Bank even if he has sustained the like circumstances,
Anticipatory breach Actual breach no pecuniary loss. unless the damages are
alleged and proved as
special damages.
breach occuring
before time fixed Refusal to perform
for performance has promise on the
arrived scheduled date III. Special types of Contract
Contingent
(4) Liability for Damages Quasi-Contracts
Contracts
Ordinary
damages
Rules Relating to
Cases deemed as
Pre-fixed Special
Enforcement of
Quasi -Contracts
damages damages Contingent Contracts
Contingent contract is
Nominal
damages
12
BUSINESS LAWS
(3) Rules regarding Contingent contracts
(a) Rule 1 regarding contingent contracts (e) Rule 5 regarding contingent contracts
Where a contingent contract is made to do or not to do • Such contract can be enforced by law if before the
anything if an uncertain future event happens, expiry of fixed time-
• Such event does not happen ,or
• it cannot be enforced by law unless and until that • It become certain that such event will not happen.
event has happened.
• If the event becomes impossible, such contracts
become void.
(f) Rule 6 regarding contingent contracts
(1) Meaning
Quasi
Contract
(c) Rule 3 regarding contingent contracts
(d) Rule 4 regarding contingent contracts Obligation is a duty and not the promise of a party
• Such an obligation/right to recover arises “where a Trikamdas T’ was traveling without !e suit was decreed in
person lawfully does anything for another person, vs. Bombay ticket in a tram car and his favour.
or delivers anything to him not intending to do so Municipal on checking he was asked
gratuitously and such other person enjoys the benefit Corporation to pay R5/- as penalty to
thereof, compound transaction.
• the latter is bound to make compensation to the T filed a suit against the
former in respect of, or to restore, the thing so done corporation for recovery
or delivered. on the ground that it was
extorted from him.
14
BUSINESS LAWS
CA FOUNDATION - PAPER 2A - BUSINESS LAWS
In this capsule, we have summarized the important concepts of the Unit 1 and 2 of the Chapter 2: The Sale of Goods
Act, 1930. From Examination point of view, this chapter comprises of around 12 to 14 marks of the paper. In this
chapter, students are tested with conceptual understanding of the legal provisions, as well application of the important
concepts in the simple practical scenarios. This capsule will help the students to revise and retain essentials of some
of the important definitions and various requirements in the formation of the Contract of Sale.
15
BUSINESS LAWS
Future Goods Contingent Goods 7. Property [Section 2(11)]
[Section 2 (6)]. [Section 6(2)] Property means
• Goods to be • The acquisition of which
manufactured or • by the seller
produced or • depends upon an uncertain ownership in goods/ and not merely
acquired contingency (uncertain event) General Property a special property
• by the seller after making • Ex: P contracts to sell 500
the contract of sale pieces of particular item 8. Price [Section 2(10)]
• Ex: 1000 quintals of provided the ship which is
potatoes to be grown in Mr. bringing them reaches the
A's field. port safely. Money consideration for a sale of goods
Delivery of
Fulfil other an o#er to by acceptance
goods: Transfer for a price
Subject matter: essential Buy/sell of such o#er
of property i.e
Movable goods elements of a
ownership to
Valid contract
take place
Basis of difference Sale Hire- Purchase for the immediate delivery of the goods or immediate
payment of the price or Both
Time of passing Immediately On payment of last
property instalment or
Position of the Buyer is like that of Position of the hirer
party owner is like that of bailee for the delivery or payment by instalments
till final payment
or
Termination of the buyer cannot The hirer may
contract terminate the terminate the
that the delivery or payment or both shall be
contract and bound contract by returning postponed.
to pay price the goods
Burden of Risk of risk of seller Owner takes no risk
insolvency of the and has right to take
buyer back the goods 3. Mode for entering into contract of Sale
Transfer of title The buyer can pass a Hirer cannot pass
good title to a bona any title even to a A contract of
fide purchaser bonafide purchaser sale may be
made in-
Resale The buyer can Hirer cannot, unless
all installments paid
17
BUSINESS LAWS
2. Nature of contract of sale with respect to perishing goods
Stipulation as to time of Payment and time
Perishing Goods Future Goods of delivery [Section 11]
Where there is a contract for the Stipulation as to the Stipulations as to time
If the future goods time of payment of delivery are usually
sale of specific goods,
are specific and the essence of the
• no knowledge to the seller contract
• at the time when the
• contract was made, goods the destruction are not deemed to be of Delivery of goods
perished or become so damaged of such goods the essence from the terms must be made
• Contract is void amount to of the contract of sale, without delay
supervening unless terms of contract
Where there is an agreement to sell impossibility state otherwise.
specific goods,
• without any fault on the part of
the seller or buyer
• before the risk passes to the buyer
contract Conditions and Warranties with reference
becomes void
• and subsequently the goods to the goods [Section 12]
perishes or become so damaged 1. Meaning -Condition and Warranty
• agreement can be avoided or
becomes void. Condition Warranty
is a stipulation is a stipulation
essential to the main purpose co-lateral to the main purpose
Ascertainment of price [Section 9] of the contract, of the contract,
the breach of which gives rise the breach of which gives rise
fixed by the contract, or
to a right to treat the contract to a claim for damages
as repudiated. but not to a right to reject the
goods and treat the contract
agreed to be fixed in a manner provided by the contract, or
as repudiated.
Ex: P is having two bikes. He agrees to sell both of the bikes to may be either
‘Conditions’ and express or
S at a price to be fixed by the Q. He gives delivery of one bike ‘Warranties’
immediately. Q refuses to fix the price. As such P ask S to return implied
the bike already delivered while S claims for the delivery of the
second bike too. In the given instance, buyer S shall pay reasonable
price to P for the bike already taken. As regards the Second bike,
the contract can be avoided.
19
BUSINESS LAWS
9. Condition as to wholesomeness 10. Implied Warranties-Types
Ex: A supplied F with milk. The milk contained typhoid germs. F’s Warranty as to non- disclosure of dangerous
wife consumed the milk and was infected and died. Held, there was existence of encumbrances nature of goods
a breach of condition as to fitness and A was liable to pay damages.
buyer shall have the goods shall An implied the goods are
and enjoy quiet be free from warranty as to dangerous in
possession of the any charge or quality or fitness nature and
goods. encumbrance for a particular
purpose may
be annexed or the buyer is
attached by the ignorant of the
If the buyer having danger,
in favour of any usage of trade
got possession of
third party not
the goods, is later
declared or known
on disturbed in his the seller must
to the buyer
possession, Ex: Shares warn the buyer
purchased from of the probable
broker expected to danger.
he is entitled to be free from bad
before or at the
sue the seller for deliveries
time the contract If there is a breach
the breach of the
is entered into. of warranty, the
warranty.
seller may be
liable in damages.
Ex: A Purchased
Ex: S sells a car
a second hand Ex : Lid of
which was given
typewriter which disinfectant
as security by Y
happened to be powder to be
against a loan
stolen opened with care.
Identification of goods Intention of parties Example: X purchased a laptop and asks for home delivery but
that laptop does not have a Windows operating system installed.
!e property transfers to X only after shopkeeper installed OS
Property in goods is making the laptop ready for delivery and intimated the buyer
Goods must be ascertained
transferred at the time- about it.
in order to pass the
• when parties intend it to
property in goods to buyer
be transferred
Sale of unascertained or
future goods by description
Delivery to the Carrier Example: X sends furniture to a company by a truck and instructs
the driver not to deliver the furniture to the company until the
payment is made by company to him. !e property passes only
Seller delivers the goods when the payment is made.
for the purpose of
to the buyer or carrier or
transmission and
other bailee
Risk Prima Facie passes with Property
the goods are does not reserve the right Until the property therein is transferred to the buyer
appropriated of disposal,
the goods remain at the seller’s risk
PASSING OF PROPERTY
If delivery is delayed by the fault of the seller or the buyer
When he signifies his approval or acceptance
Retains goods without giving notice of rejection the goods remain at the risk of the party in default
(seller or buyer as per the case)
Does something to the goods which is
equivalent to acceptance
!e duties and liabilities of the seller or the buyer as bailee of
goods for other party
Example: A sends to B a water motor on approval or return in will not be a"ected even when risk has passed.
March, 2020. B to return it after trial in August, 2020. !e water
motor has not been returned within a reasonable time, and
therefore, A is not bound to accept it and B must pay the price. Example: A bids for an antique painting at a sale by auction.
After the bid, when the auctioneer struck his hammer to signify
acceptance of the bid, he hit the antique which gets damaged. !e
4. Reservation of Right of Disposal loss will have to be borne by the seller, because the ownership of
goods has not yet passed from the seller to the buyer.
the seller may by the terms of
the contract or appropriation,
Where there is a
contract for the sale
of specific goods
or where goods reserve the right of disposal of
are subsequently the goods
appropriated to the
contract
until certain conditions are
fulfilled
22
BUSINESS LAWS
(II) Transfer of Title by Non Owners (Section 27-30) Types of Delivery
Symbolic
delivery
Where goods are who does not have
buyer does not Actual Constructive
sold by a person the authority or
acquire a Delivery Delivery
who is not the with the consent of
good title
owner; and the owner
Types of
delivery
Example: P, the hirer of vehicle under a hire purchase agreement, Duties of seller and Buyer
sells them to Q. Q, though a bona fide purchaser, does not acquire
the ownership in the vehicle. At the most he acquires the same
right as that of the hirer. Duty of Duty of
the the
seller buyer to accept
to deliver the
and pay for
goods
NEMO DAT Sale by a Mercantile Agent them
QUOD NON
HABET – No one Sale by one of the joint owners
can give what he
has not got. Sale by a person in possession under voidable Rules regarding Delivery of Goods
contract
Exceptions:
Sale by a person who has already sold goods Delivery to
Part Instalment
but continues in possession thereof carrier/
delivery deliveries
wharfinger
E"ect of Estoppel
Rights of an Example: A sold a car to B for R1,00,000 and delivered the same
unpaid Seller to the railways for the purpose of transmission to the buyer. !e
railway receipt was taken in the name of B and sent to B. Now A
cannot exercise the right of lien.
Against Goods Against the Buyer
24
BUSINESS LAWS
(iv)
When does the transit come to an end?
When the buyer Buyer obtains Where the carrier If the carrier Where goods Where the part Where the
or other bailee delivery before or other bailee wrongfully are delivered delivery of the goods are
obtains delivery. the arrival acknowledges to the refuses to to the carrier goods has been delivered to a
of goods at buyer or his agent that deliver the hired by the made to the ship chartered
destination he holds the goods as goods to the buyer buyer, the transit by the buyer,
soon as the goods are buyer. will come to the transit
loaded on the ship, an end for the comes to an
unless the seller has remaining goods end.
reserved the right of which are yet
disposal of the goods. in the course of
transmission.
(vi)
Fails to deliver the goods at the time or in manner prescribed
Exceptions When the seller has assented to the sale,
where unpaid mortgage or other disposition of the goods made
seller’s right by the buyer
of lien and Breach of contract by seller, where he-
stoppage in When a document of title to goods has been
transit are transferred to the buyer and the buyer transfers
defeated the documents to a person who has bought goods
in good faith and for value Repudiates the contract
3. Right of re-sale
Damages for
non-delivery
Where an unpaid
Where he gives seller who has
Where the
notice to the buyer exercised his right Suit for specific
goods are of a
of his intention to of lien or stoppage performance
perishable nature
re-sell the goods in transit resells
the goods
Rights of Suit for breach
buyer of warranty
A re-sale by the
seller where a Where the
right of re-sale property in goods Repudiation of
is expressly has not passed to contract before
reserved in a the buyer due date
contract of sale
Suit for
interest
26
BUSINESS LAWS
CA FouNdAtIoN - PAPer 2A - BuSINeSS LAwS
This capsule on Paper 2A: Business Laws at Foundation level covers the concepts of Unit 1 of the Indian Partnership
Act, 1932 which is Chapter 3 of this paper. It covers significant concepts explained in a graspable manner for rational
understanding of legal provisions. This will help the student to understand and retain the important aspects of the legal
provisions. This capsule in fact, is in short notes which aids to revise the subject in the examination condition and can be
referred a day before examination. This is relevant for the November 2022 examination.
individually 'Partners’
Persons who
have entered into 'a firm'
collectively
partnership with one
another are called
2. Elements of Partnership
27
BUSINESS LAWS
3. True Test of Partnership Basis of Partnership Joint Stock Company
difference
Registration For a partnership, firm Company is created
registration is not com- by registration under
agreement pulsory. Companies Act, 2013.
between all Winding up A partnership may be A Company is wind up
the persons dissolved by any part- by NCLT or its name is
concerned ner at any time if all the struck o" by the ROC.
partners agree.
Number of Number of partners: Private company:
Existence of membership maximum-100 (As minimum- 2, maxi-
partnership, when per Section 464 of the mum- 200
Companies Act, 2013)
Present limit is 50 Public Company: min-
[As per Companies imum- 7, maximum-
share the profits (Miscellaneous) Rules, No limit
of business 2014]
One person compa-
ny: 1
Duration of Firm does not have Company has perpetual
business was existence perpetual succession. succession.
carried on by all
or any of them II. Partnership Vs Club
5. Kinds of Partnership
Partnership
Particular General
Partnership at will Partnership for a fixed period
Partnership Partnership
organised for
no fixed period no provision partnership
comes to an end any particular constituted with
has been agreed made as to the created for a
on the expiry of adventure or respect to the
upon for the determination of particular period
the fixed period undertaking the business in general
duration; and the partnership. of time
partnership
6. Types of Partners
Types of Partners
29
BUSINESS LAWS
Active or
Sleeping or
Actual or Nominal Partner in Incoming Outgoing Partner by
Dormant
Ostensible Partner profits only partner partner holding out
Partner
partner
When a person
Lend his represent
admitted as
name to the A partner himself, or
Entitled to a partner
firm who leaves
share the into an
a firm in
become a profits only already
a partner by which the
partner by existing Knowingly
agreement, Without rest of the
agreement, firm with permits
and having any partners
and the consent himself,
real interest continue
of all the
in firm to carry on
existing
business. to be
partners.
represented as
Not entitled Not liable a partner in a
to share the for the firm (when in
profits losses fact he is not)
remains he is liable,
actively does not Does not take Not liable liable to like a partner
participates actively take part in the for any third parties in the firm
in the part in the conduct of the act of the for all acts
conduct conduct business Liable to firm done of the firm
to anyone
of the of the the third before his until public
who on the
partnership partnership parties for admission as notice is
Liable to faith of such
business all acts of a partner. given of his
third parties representation
the profits retirement.
for all acts has given
only credit to the
of the firm
firm.
LLP itself will be liable for the full extent of its assets
formed,
Foreign
Liability of the partners will be limited LLP Outside
incorporated
means or India
LLP which establishes
a place of business
2. Important De!nitions registered within India.
(i) Body Corporate [Section 2(d)]
• a LLP registered under this (v) Limited Liability Partnership [Section 2(n)]:
It means a company Act;
as de!ned in clause
(20) of section 2 of the • a LLP incorporated outside
Companies Act, India; and
2013 and includes • a company incorporated LLP means
outside India
a partnership formed and registered
under LLP Act, 2008.
• a corporation sole;
• a co-operative society
registered under any law for the
time being in force; and (vi) LLP Agreement [Section 2(o)]:
• any other body corporate (not
but does not being a company as de!ned in
include between the partners which determines the
clause (20) of section 2 of the of the LLP; or mutual rights and duties
Companies Act, 2013 or a LLP of the partners and
as de!ned in this Act), which Any
the Central Government may, written
by noti!cation in the Official agreement
Gazette, specify in this behalf.
between the LLP their rights and duties
and its partners in relation to that LLP
(ii) Business [Section 2(e)]
31
buSiNeSS lawS
(viii) Small Limited Liability Partnership [Section 2(ta)] 5. Minimum number of partners (Section 6)
(i)
the contribution of which, does not exceed
`25 Lacs or such higher amount, not exceeding
`5 Crore, as may be prescribed; and Every LLP shall have at least two
partners
Small LLP
means
(ii)
the turnover of which, as per the person,
which meets such the Statement of Accounts and the LLP who is the only
other requirements and Solvency for the carries on partner of the LLP
If at any time during the time
as may be prescribed, immediately preceding F/Y, the number of business for
and ful!ls such terms does not exceed `40 Lacs more than 6 shall be liable
partners of a personally for
and conditions as or such higher amount, not LLP is reduced months while
may be prescribed. exceeding `50 Crore, as may the number is the obligations
below 2 of the LLP incurred
be prescribed; or so reduced,
during that
period.
7. Characteristic of LLP
Any Individual; or Body Corporate
Minimum
he is an undischarged Management and Business for
insolvent; or Maximum Investigation
of Business number of Pro!t Only
Partners
he has applied to be
adjudicated as an insolvent
and his application is
pending Compromise Conversion E-Filing of Foreign
or
Arrangement into LLP Documents LLPs
easy to form
%e certi!cate issued shall be signed by the Registrar
and authenticated by his official seal.
33
buSiNeSS lawS
5. Name (Section 15) 2. Cessation of partnership interest (Section 24)
(i)
A person shall
cease to be a
partner of a LLP—
6. Reservation of name (Section 16)
if he has
A person may apply in applied to be if he is declared
such form and manner and adjudged as to be of
accompanied by such fee • name of a proposed LLP; or unsound mind
an insolvent
as may be prescribed to the • name to which a LLP proposes or declared as by a competent
Registrar for the reservation to change its name. an insolvent. court; or
of a name set out in the
application as—
(iii)
(ii)
where a person becomes where there is any change in the
or ceases to be a partner, name or address of a partner, such
Every LLP in such
shall- form statement
be signed
35
buSiNeSS lawS
(iii)