Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cash Nav
Cash Nav
18PM IST Tags: y samajwadi party| y Faggan Singh Kulaste NEW DELHI: A Delhi court today reserved for December 12 its order on a plea for lodging a case against Rajya Sabha MP Amar Singh for his alleged role in kidnapping of a witness in 2008 cash-forvote case hours before his deposition on the issue before a parliamentary panel. Metropolitan Magistrate Sudesh Kumar reserved his order on the plea made by the alleged victim Hashmat Ali, accusing Singh of getting him kidnapped through his secretary Tarun Goel and aide Ramesh from Khan Market in south Delhi. Ali in his complaint to the court had contended that Singh had got him kidnapped on September 25, 2008, the day he was to appear before a parliamentary panel inquiring into the scam involving alleged payment of bribes to some MPs for their vote during a trust motion in Lok Sabha on July 22, 2008. Ali's counsel L K Verma told the court that the Crime Branch of Delhi Police, in its status report to the court on the complaint for lodging the kidnapping case against Singh, has refused to believe his client, despite "solely relying" on his testimony in the cash-for-vote case. "On the one hand, they (police) are solely relying on Hasmat Ali's testimony in the 2008 cash-for-vote scam case, but here they are disbelieving him and his complaint," Verma said. The counsel submitted Ali was kidnapped from Khan Market and was taken to Amar Singh's residence where former Samajwadi Party leader slapped him and snatched his mobile phone. He was handed over to the police in presence of media at his residence on the same day, he said. Ali's counsel submitted that the police had not properly probed his client's complaint and had simply sought its dimissal in the status report.
The court, after hearing the arguments, reserved its order on Ali's plea for December 12. The police, in its status report, had said that the plea was devoid of "merits" and allegations were "not found substantiated" and were an "after thought". Ali had sought registration of an FIR against Amar Singh and his two aides under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act, accusing them of kidnapping him at gun point and illegally confining him. The police, however, had said after a detailed inquiry, it was revealed that no such incident as alleged by Ali took place near Khan Market area here on September 25, 2008, the day when he was to depose before the parliamentary panel. The police had said no cognisable offence was made out against Singh and his two aides. It had said Goel had filed a complaint against Ali on September 25, 2008 accusing him of repeatedly calling them - Singh and his aides, demanding money from them to depose "honestly" before the parliamentary committee. It had said Goel had alleged that Ali had come to Singh's 27, Lodhi Estate residence, and had claimed that he (Ali) was ready to disclose the names of conspirators involved in the sting operation, conducted by a private news channel in connection with the trust vote. Singh has been chargesheeted by the Delhi Police in the 2008 cash-for-vote case along with BJP leader L K Advani's former aide Sudheendra Kulkarni, former BJP MPs Faggan Singh Kulaste, Mahabir Singh Bhagora and co-accused Sohail Hindustani and Sanjeev Saxena. All six have been granted bail by the Delhi high court. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/20 11-12-07/india/30485109_1_cash-for-votescam-status-report-hashmat-ali
Saxena and political activist Suhail Hindustani, to furnish a personal and surety bond of Rs.2 lakh each as pre-condition for bail. The judge allowed the plea of accused BJP MPs that the accused wanted to expose the Congress and the Samajwadi party as they would not have planned the sting with the news channel, if they intended to accept the illegal gratification. Even according to the prosecution, the basic requirement of mens rea (criminal motive) to accept bribe so as to (bring it) within the ambit of Prevention of Corruption Act was lacking on the part of all the petitioners, the court said. With regard to petitioner Sudheendra Kulkarni, it may be noted that he was not a public servant and he was neither the giver or the taker of money and was also not present at the time of the alleged negotiations. His role is of introducing the petitioner MPs and CNN-IBN team and, thus, his role was similar to that of the team of CNN-IBN against which there was no charge of any kind. Discussing the role of Hindustani, the court said his role was that of a "whistle blower" who engineered the sting operation. Saxena was not a beneficiary of the scam and, moreover, is in jail since July 17. http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes. com/2011-11-16/news/30405640_1_bjpmps-cnn-ibn-bribe-givers
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court Wednesday granted bail to six accused in the 2008 cash-for-votes scam that had rocked parliament ahead of a trust vote. Following are the highlights of Justice M.L. Mehta's order and the proceedings of the day: If there was any conspiracy between the petitioners (accused), amongst themselves, or with bribe givers, they would not have associated themselves with the CNN-IBN news channel and exposed themselves to the act of taking money before the camera. I have gone through the entire voluminous charge sheet but could not find any prima facie evidence on record of demand and acceptance of illegal gratification by the three (Bharatiya Janata Party) MPs. If the intention of the petitioner MPs was to receive bribe, they would have done so and kept the amount so received silently instead of producing the same in parliament immediately thereafter. Admittedly, no action was taken by the parliament except that of appointing a parliamentary inquiry committee. It is noted that some of the members of the inquiry committee have also given dissenting views. Justice Mehta also granted anticipatory bail to sitting Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Ashok Argal and asked the six accused, including Amar Singh's former aide Sanjeev
the UPA government in the July 2008 trust motion. The court also granted anticipatory bail to co-accused Ashok Argal, a BJP legislator and directed him to appear before the concerned court during the hearing of the case. The Delhi Police have received Lok Sabha Speaker Meira Kumars nod to proceed against Argal. Former Samjwadi Party leader Amar Singh, who is also an accused in the case, was granted bail recently by the HC on health grounds. Singh told the court that he has undergone a kidney transplant and needs utmost care to avoid any infection.
Saxena is accused of delivering Rs 1 crore to Kulaste and Bhagora to buy their votes for
According to the petition, though the incident had occurred on July 22, 2008, neither the Delhi Police Crime Branch which registered an FIR nor the chairman of the Joint Parliamentary Committee headed by Kishore Chandra Deo, which inquired into the allegation, had so far taken any tangible step to initiate action against those responsible. Lyngdoh, in his petition, has urged the apex court to direct the government to set up an independent SIT to probe the allegations and try to complete the investigations within six months. He has pleaded that the SIT chief should be given absolute powers and independence to choose the best officers for the probe. On July 22, 2008, three BJP members had placed one crore rupee cash in the Lok Sabha alleging they were given to them by floor managers of the UPA government to secure their support during the noconfidence motion after Left parties withdrew their support over the Indo-US nuclear deal. The BJP members had claimed that the floor managers had sought to purchase them through a Samajwadi Party leader. The allegation was levelled by the BJP MPs Ashok Argal, Faggan Singh Kulaste and Mahavir Bhagora.
news.oneindia.in/2011/07/07/scse eks-status-report-on-probe-intocash-forvotescam-aid0126.html
http://news.oneindia.in/2011/07/20 /cash-for-vote-ex-bjp-workerhindustani-to-be-enquiredaid0156.html
some MPs to abstain from voting during the trust vote in 2008.
http://news.oneindia.in/2011/07/19 /delhi-police-seek-to-quiz-amarsingh-cash-for-vote-scamaid0120.html
November 8 to November 30, stipulating that he would have to furnish a surety bond of Rs 5 lakh before going abroad. Singh had moved the court last month for its permission to go abroad. The high court, while granting bail to Singh, had said that he would not leave the country without prior permission of the lower court. He was arrested in the cash-for-vote case on September 6. During the press conference, Singh demanded creation of a Poorvanchal state curved out of Uttar Pradesh and asked Chief Minister Mayawati to bring a proposal in this regard in the winter session of state Assembly.
http://news.oneindia.in/2011/11/08 /amar-has-full-information-aboutcash-for-vote-case.html
trading" that was going on to save the then UPA-I government in the vote of trust in the Lok Sabha on July 22, 2008. Claiming themselves to be "whistle blowers" who helped in exposing corruption, the accused pleaded that the trial court had wrongly dismissed their bail pleas and that order should be set aside. Meanwhile, BJP MP Ashok Argal, an accused in the case, has also moved the Delhi High Court seeking anticipatory bail in the case and his bail plea is likely to be heard on Tuesday.
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Monday sought response from the police on the bail pleas of four accused, including Sudheendra Kulkarni, a former aide of BJP leader LK Advani, and two ex-BJP MPs in the cash-for-vote scam. Issuing notice to Delhi Police, Justice M L Mehta sought its response by November 14 on the bail pleas of Kulkarni, former BJP MPs Faggan Singh Kulaste, Mahabir Singh Bhagora and alleged BJP activist Suhail Hindustani. Justice Mehta also sought a status report from the police by the next date of hearing. The four accused approached the high court challenging the order of the trial court dismissing their bail pleas. Kulkarni, who is in jail since September 27, has challenged the trial court's order which had rejected his bail plea saying that he was the "guiding star" and "facilitator" of the conspiracy aimed at mocking the Republic of India. In the petition filed through advocate Mahipal Ahluwalia, Kulkarni claimed that he, along with the BJP MPs, got involved in the sting operation, conducted by a private news channel only to expose the "horse
http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/c ash-for-votes-scam-high-courtseeks-police-response-on-bailpleas-145333
under the Prevention of Corruption Act but has been granted bail for medical reasons. Mr Kulkarni had skipped earlier court hearings because, he said, he was in the US with his daughter for her college admission. The judge hearing the case today said "I can't understand why some were arrested and others were not." Two of the three BJP MPs who were paid money in 2008 are in jail. The third is still serving his term as MP so the Speaker of the Lok Sabha has to sanction action against him. In Parliament a few weeks ago, Mr Advani in a dramatic episode dared the government to jail him too. He said that as Leader of the Opposition in 2008, he was aware of his party's plans to entrap the government ahead of the trust vote on July 22, 2008. Like Mr Advani, Mr Kulkarni argued today that those who helped expose corruption are being penalized while those who benefited from Amar Singh's alleged conspiracy remain untouched. "The issue is who benefited ultimately from this cash for votes? And why is it that those who benefited are all scott free today and those who try to expose it are behind bars?" asked Mr Kulkarni. The Delhi Police has so far not disclosed the source of the money paid to the BJP MPs. It has also not elaborated on whose behalf Amar Singh may have been acting by bribing BJP MPs to support the government. The BJP has repeatedly said that because Dr Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi were the intended beneficiaries of Amar Singh's actions, they should explain the cash-for-votes scam.
http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/cas h-for-votes-case-sudheendrakulkarni-remanded-to-judicialcustody-till-october-1-136543
Usman Balwa and Vinod Goenka, Unitech Wireless' Sanjay Chandra, Cineyug Film's Karim Morani, directors of Kusegaon Fruits and Vegetables Pvt Ltd Asif Balwa and Rajeev B Agarwal. Three officials of the Anil Ambani Group Gautam Doshi, Hari Nair and Surendra Pipara - were also arrested for their alleged involvement in the 2G scam. The other big scandal that nailed VIPs was the Commonwealth Games. Congress MP and sacked former chairman of the Commonwealth Games Organising Committee, Suresh Kalmadi was arrested April 25. With him were his colleagues Lalit Bhanot, VK Verma and ASV Prasad. Former government official Surjeet Lal, who was attached to the Commonwealth Games, is also in jail.
http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/with -amar-singh-list-of-tihars-whos-whogrows-longer-131776
by it from appearing before the trial court, which had summoned him in response to a Delhi police charge sheet indicting him for his alleged role in the case. Rajya Sabha MP Amar Singh, who is also an accused in the case, has already been granted bail by the high court on health grounds. The trial court had on October 21 dismissed the bail pleas of Kulkarni, Bhagora and Kulaste. Kulkarni, who is in jail since September 27, has appealed against the trial court's order which had rejected his bail plea saying he was the "guiding star" and "facilitator" of the conspiracy aimed at mocking the Republic of India [ Images ]. Kulkarni, in his petition, had claimed that he, along with the BJP MPs, got involved in the sting operation conducted by a private news channel only to expose the "horse trading" that was going on to save the then UPA-I government in the trust vote in Lok Sabha on July 22, 2008. Kulkarni has been chargesheeted under section 120-B (criminal conspiracy) of the IPC and provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act. Kulaste, who was arrested on September 6 along with Bhagora and Amar Singh, in his petition had questioned the probe and had said that he was entitled to bail as the investigation in the case was "tainted." The trial court had also rejected bail to Hindustani on September 29 and Saxena, who was arrested on July 17.
Justice M L Mehta reserved the order on the pleas of the six accused till November 16. "The honourable court may consider granting bail to all the six accused who have filed their bail applications in the court," Delhi police counsel Pawan Sharma told the high court during the hearing of the bail pleas of the five jailed accused and the anticipatory bail plea of BJP MP Ashok Argal. The five jailed accused -- former BJP law makers Faggan Singh Kulaste and Mahabir Singh Bhagora, Kulkarni, Rajya Sabha MP Amar Singh's [ Images ] former aide Sanjeev Saxena and alleged BJP activist Suhail Hindustani-approached the high court challenging the trial court's order denying them bail. Justice Mehta will on Tuesday hear the anticipatory bail plea of Samajwadi Party leader Rewati Raman Singh, who was summoned as an accused by the trial court judge recently. During the hearing, the counsel for Delhi police said the probe into the case was over and custodial interrogation of none of the accused was required. Ashok Argal, who has moved the high court for anticipatory bail, was earlier granted exemption
http://www.rediff.com/news/report/noopposition-for-bail-to-cash-for-vote-scamaccused-says-police/20111114.htm