0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views2 pages

Portfolio Presentation Evaluation Criteria

The document outlines a rubric for evaluating portfolio presentations in the EDUC 5910 Applied Professional Inquiry course. It categorizes performance into three levels: Exemplary, Meets Expectations, and Does Not Yet Meet Expectations, covering aspects such as organization, reflections on teaching philosophy, and presentation preparation. Each category includes specific criteria to assess the quality of the portfolio and the effectiveness of the presentation.

Uploaded by

aKuNa mAtAta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views2 pages

Portfolio Presentation Evaluation Criteria

The document outlines a rubric for evaluating portfolio presentations in the EDUC 5910 Applied Professional Inquiry course. It categorizes performance into three levels: Exemplary, Meets Expectations, and Does Not Yet Meet Expectations, covering aspects such as organization, reflections on teaching philosophy, and presentation preparation. Each category includes specific criteria to assess the quality of the portfolio and the effectiveness of the presentation.

Uploaded by

aKuNa mAtAta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Portfolio Presentation Rubric

EDUC 5910 Applied Professional Inquiry

Exemplary (5) Meets Expectations (3) Does Not Yet Meet Expectations (0)
Overview of Portfolio
- Description of how Excellent, succinct Adequate explanation of organization Insufficient information about
portfolio is organized explanation of organization organization
- Rationale for why Thoughtful, insightful Satisfactory discussion of principles Lack of clarity in reasons for portfolio
organized portfolio in this discussion of basis for undergirding structure of portfolio structure
manner portfolio structure
- How choices of artifacts to Evidence of high level of Evidence of sufficient Limited flexibility/adaptability
include changed from when flexibility/adaptability flexibility/adaptability
first began collecting
- Where found most Thoughtful, insightful Satisfactory discussion of Little understanding of
meaningful analyses of interconnectedness interconnectedness
connections/relationships interconnectedness
- Challenges encountered in Strong ability for self- Satisfactory ability to respond to Limited evidence of self-reflection or
working with portfolio & reflection & problem- recognized obstacles problem-solving skills
how handled solving

Reflections on Portfolio
- How artifacts reflect Thoughtful analysis of Able to describe teaching philosophy & how Unable to articulate how philosophy has
teaching philosophy & how evolution of teaching it has changed evolved
this may have changed philosophy
during [Link]. studies
- How artifacts show an Strong defense of artifacts & Satisfactory explanation of artifacts & their Little evidence of linkage between
understanding of teaching their importance usage artifacts & instructional practice
& the instructional process
- What overall portfolio Thoughtful explanation of Able to describe how portfolio supports Little sense of the overall portfolio as
says about candidate as how portfolio supports beliefs about being a teacher having personal meaning for the role of
teacher beliefs about being a teacher
teacher
- How expects to use Clearly-articulated plan for Able to summarize plans for use of portfolio Unclear how intends to use portfolio in
portfolio as a teaching how intend to use portfolio in the future professional practice
professional going forward
Presentation Preparation
- Effort & attention to detail Impressive effort & Consistent effort and attention to detail; all Minimal effort devoted to preparation of
attention to detail; careful required components covered; occasional presentation
sequencing, effective grammar/spelling errors
transitions; correct
grammar/spelling;
formatting contributed to
clarity of content
- Choice of visuals Imaginative choice of Visuals satisfactorily demonstrated Mismatch between message & choice of
visuals to support content concepts being discussed visuals
- Oral presentation skills Used highly professional Used appropriate language suited to the Used language unsuited to the
language; sophisticated and task professional nature of task
varied professional
vocabulary

You might also like