Faculty Course Review Report
For completion by the course instructor and transmission to Head of Department of his/her nominee
Department: Electrical Engineering Faculty: Electrical Engineering
Course Code: EE-209 Title: Digital Logic Design
Session: Fall – 2020 Semester: Fall Spring
Name of Course Muhammad No. of Lectures Other (Please State)
Instructor: Saleh Rashid Students
Contact Tutorials
Hours
Assessment Methods: Quiz weightage: 55% (3/6)
(no & length of assignments, exams, weightings Project: 10%
etc) Midterm exam, weightage: 15% each
Assignment: 10% (1/3)
Class participation: weightage: 10% (1/4)
Overview/Evaluation
Feedback: first summarize, then comment on feedback received from:
(These boxes will expand as you type in your answer.)
1) Student (Course Evaluation) Questionnaires
Student feedback
Generally students consider Digital Logic Design as easy course of Electrical engineering.
Since it is fundamental course for Electrical engineering, and also prerequisite to many other
courses, so instructor is required to be cover all the contents mentioned in course outline. For this
instructor have to skim or skip some unimportant parts which is hard for some students to keep
themselves synchronized with the class.
Other than course content, students are generally satisfied with the type of online assessments and
online teaching methods etc.
2) Curriculum: comment on the continuing appropriateness of the Course curriculum in
relation to the intended learning outcomes (course objectives) and its compliance with the
HEC Approved / Revised National Curriculum Guidelines
As mentioned before, this is very important course for Electrical engineering. And this course falls
under three Program learning outcomes (PLO’s): PLO-1 (Engineering Knowledge) and PLO-2
(Problem Analysis) and PLO-3 (Design/Development of solution.
The design PLO in my opinion, (PLO-3) should not be considered for this important Electrical
Engineering course. Since students are in first year of their four year education where they are
actively learning new theoretical concepts and certainly not able to design complex engineering
projects. For this reason, I intentionally have less emphasis on design projects.
3) Assessment: comment on the continuing effectiveness of method(s) of assessment in
relation to the intended learning outcomes (Course objectives)
In this semester, one mid-terms were conducted with six quizzes and three assignments and one
project. This number of assessments is adequate for online assessments which are quite hard.
However to keep the students motivated, it is recommended to increase the number of in class
quizzes and viva.
4) Enhancement: comment on the implementation of changes proposed in earlier
Faculty Course Review Reports
NA
5) Outline any changes in the future delivery or structure of the Course that this
semester/term’s experience may prompt
Instructor of this import EE course have to cover allot of new concepts in ~36 lecture therefore, it
is strongly recommend to emphasis on book examples and exercise questions to make these
concepts absorb by the students. Tutorial sessions may be helpful in these cases.
6) Class control and feedback about the students:
Students are generally respectful and have potential to learn new information. However in online
education, it is hard for instructor to get immediate feedback from students and to know about
their needs. I tried my best, while asking questions during lecture to get them involve in learning
process.
7) Other comments:
Name: _______Muhammad Saleh Rashid______ Date: ___19/5/2021_________
(Course Instructor)
Name: __________Dr. Qasim Awais _________ Date: ___19/5/2021_________
(Head of Department)
