0% found this document useful (0 votes)
727 views35 pages

M Laxmikanth - Inter-State Relation - Chapter 16 - Class Notes - Samagra Book Series Batch (Hinglish)

The document outlines the provisions of the Indian Constitution regarding inter-state relations, focusing on water disputes, trade, and the establishment of inter-state councils. It details the adjudication process for inter-state water disputes under Article 262 and the role of tribunals, as well as the constitutional guarantees for trade and commerce among states. Additionally, it discusses the formation of zonal councils to facilitate cooperation among states in various matters.

Uploaded by

dhanvijayjanhvi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
727 views35 pages

M Laxmikanth - Inter-State Relation - Chapter 16 - Class Notes - Samagra Book Series Batch (Hinglish)

The document outlines the provisions of the Indian Constitution regarding inter-state relations, focusing on water disputes, trade, and the establishment of inter-state councils. It details the adjudication process for inter-state water disputes under Article 262 and the role of tribunals, as well as the constitutional guarantees for trade and commerce among states. Additionally, it discusses the formation of zonal councils to facilitate cooperation among states in various matters.

Uploaded by

dhanvijayjanhvi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Sankalp UPSC Batch 2 Years Complete Preparation @Rs 10K Prahar UPSC Batch 1 Year Complete Preparation @Rs 8K LAXMIKANTH INDIAN POLITY Chapter -XVI Inter-State Relations UPSC SAMAGRA BOOK SERIES (HINGLISH) Cd Laer ee me Maou Rema at URC oe ESS) Sas celta are aera) Centre and States a " el aa States and States }re tee ara non c _— ae rob) Constitution makes the following provisions with regard to Inter-State Relations © Be encad 7 Ore Oe me od eee Le DCS Icy [Link],records inter-state ciel GSTS rel a Ea eons proceedings Crt INTER-STATE WATER DISPUTES @ (ONS our ence Soars / Entry (7 of the State List > Deals with water ie., water supply, irrigation, canal, drainage, embankments, water storage and hydro power gpl aN alg ng cig lea i bbe SUTRA nS eC OE uC ES Naa TS) thee Ce by SU 3 Cxpeeont my eed al Article 262 of the Constitution provides for the adjudication of inter- state water disputes ae waa aes Snes @ Comes under original jurisdiction a fete ederal disputes —> — of SC under Article [31 a ee) et heb) State - State disputes But Inter state water disputes comes under article 262 which gives this responsibility to parliament BOX RR RCO LEU LC Ls Cr oa) FT ee ae are s — Te Cal Ce MOE WCC - Co iin Fate ee n mene ae ccd Ce of a Co dlapute or CT LU Coa ol Ao Pe a ETS Pena Eo ene ee Ml alan ne tt Tor Se ea ne ed eee ee cc seas) iis careal Under this Central We EL hoo Tribunal is only formed when centre cL TEC Eel of river water ~©——> is of opinion that dispute cannot be eer stats) Saar Foal “LY Ce a eee oe Pea eer) eee YC OL Te] @ aie il foes —> ATMK - Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal - I BETES) ae peace (ol TSE Cr or a OO eae ee ee a Dee ur ciak eC ee ee ee Andhra + Odisha ———> 0-Vancachara Water Dips Thbunal-t Punjab ++ Haryana -+- Rajasthan —> HRD - Ravi & Beas Water Dispute Tribunal ee etc Other major inter-state river disputes Ravi&Beas © Nammada _- Krishna Sfates fighting MP, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Punjab, Haryana, Maharashtra, Andhra, Rajasthan Rajasthan "Karnataka Maharashtra, Andhra, Karnataka, MP TN, Kerala (STAM Ce eR Am OS TLS On LA @ AA aN lad lhe chelate err Fale Lane seeur Eas eT Cec oa) Ute, Eo:- Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal > constituted in 1990 gave its award in 2007 posi enn ly ee Owe Although the award given by the Tribunals is final and beyond the jurisdiction of the Courts — ae el The States or individuals can approach the Supreme Court under mau eer) Pee RSA RS RRR Ln ee LO meee OTP Oi els UPD ea oss te as eee een) aoa yew fates aaa L__> Not much difference between the Tribunal and Supreme Court Bench oe a ON ® STAN USED R Am OS LOL —> Lack of availability of authoritative water data leading to difficulty in oT eee RoMmeL | ed oay i —> Tribunals approach aids extended litigation and politicisation of watersharing disputes — ad Se Ure eS EW Eee Cen Lue AA) teary bank poltios _ TASER EL Oe MU Ste SORE Cy a cro Set-up rrr) Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal-|_ 1969 Maharashtra, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal 1969 Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Odicha Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal 1969 Rajasthan, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra Ravi and Beas Water Disputes 1986 — Rajasthan, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Tribunal Maharashtra Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal 1990 Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu and Puducherry OS LCR EL m Oe TM te) RSL RSTO Cd a 6 7 8 9 Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal-I Vansadhara Water Disputes Tribunal Mahadayi Water Disputes Tribunal Mahanadi Water Disputes Tribunal ToT I SPT Le Maharashtra, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh Odisha and Andhra Pradesh Goa, Karnataka and Maharashtra Odisha and Chhattisgarh Inter-State River Water Disputes Amendment Bill, 2019 @ How 2019 Bill Differs from 1956 Law Inert River Wate DisputesAct 1956 = S= ———S— > (ne tribunal One tribunal for for each allcisputes, with cispute ferent benches — No formal Resolution within resolution 18 months, falling mechanism before leh mater wi setting up tribur eototribnal —_— NS Tribunal to Tribunal to ecie within decide within2 yeas, wth extension of anther 3 years —— INTER-STATE COUNCILS DTT Eun Cu eC Mele) i ea ue acute SN eu Lod Pere LOCAL ———— BSE CUE MCC Ao bch oked Ce T aRarl (oer et Rue EA) w m4 ee (Cnc bested ay wy De hen Alor PLR EL EU) Reet a —__ CJ Ae Mie 57) U ue eSeminar Lg between —-> States - States eee Se Fe ra Pere OF cancun Sea discussing and deliberating on such issues _ eraser ue Ltr IA al a aL) ae pe He defines the nature of duties to be performed by such a council and its organisation and procedure Oe aa TRUS Leta a D Recommendatory Peta) reer a ROLL UCL Centre-state and Centre-union territories relations Let (ru Laas (investigating and discussing such subjects in which the states or entre have a common interest =e es ira COO eC Eu SUE WESC) oa a ae sti Eu Se onit —— eae co} Ca CeCe ue ey Se Een pe toit bayciesis OTL) ———$—<$<— Cee e A Ce ae WEE LL AVA Pee but cannot adjudicate on the dispute SE anata Dal Government headed by VP. Singh established the Inter-State Councitin 1990 QY ert sola erase tumi aco vu uCu d Tsun URC Taras (@ Trmenes aren Cr Racca aa ren pa ev co) oe ipl ) Urner CUR PMU Eee SP nue roti.) ¢/9 Lt) WS No ‘ i i p CN am CL UC toe Chief Minister OT TS oa ene a ea There is also a Standing Committee of the Council @ [twas set up in 1996 for continuous consultation and processing of matters for the consideration of the Council egal Ce (CET EL) creamery org The Councilis assisted by a secretariat called the Inter-State Council Secretariat Ne ot een eee ae Oe ~~ aa LO alo Poko Seto ae lure RR el UL RCo aa A Cnn Cae Ae, alii) Local Self Government Sales Tax ares (Cools OPA Cfo | MTOR CLE RCL LR oy aCe Be] aber Ey a ORL ere Government ees am se = RT Paes PUBLIC ACTS, RECORDS AND JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS @ As per Constitution — Jurisdiction of each state is confined to its own territory Acts and records of one state may not be recognised in another state poe pecans ioaaaal No BE rae Gu cus euLe LASS ene ENO emcee ALIS CM Rua ys Fall faith and credits tobe given throughout the teritory of India to publio act, reoorde and judicial proceedings ofthe the Contre and every sate —> Public acts = legislative and executive acts of the government = new, —> Public record = official book, register or record made by a Pr eC Re ue kaa en ee Be Ther OU ee eS UROL RS ee a cc Re Ley eT and their effect determined would be as provided Tt etd nay esi sy tea ae MTU uu Ren rca Se CUE el Rag SLAW AON aU) ee (eee ae nee ya ea ROR Cua SAY Geka ELT OA OO ae a a aN ae ees CR CCL ne aoe) SOS Sunes a rr kOe — ————S etd ISP _ [verey =) v 7 rTPA Produce Same Product X ud Market of State A ee Fad (ga nae oS NS CO ae ec eae with same product produced in State A A ee eRe a ee wvyvs Indian Constitution contains provisions guaranteeing freedom | Dealtin Part Xill of trade and commerce throughout the territory of India‘) Article 301-307 ee iS ert any ern eS) ON aki tea eco Ms eres Lt Alaa) Article 302, 303,304 & 305 ES eC One eae cu eu] st EEALLY CTU eu Re) ek sa Seca) To) reasonable restrictions as imposed on interest of general public = — aw aaa NTA ol Oh MOLISE ACCS Se Cannot approach SC Pa 32) Mergers ear tete Mul an are) OD aa Can be invoked where there is restriction to trade EY RuCl uae Te fg a Article (9(1)(g) eel Real mec pe Ma aes \ OEY) Leora bSey Phy Po CET eet 1) Pt ATT Can be Invoked when lal restrictions are imposed to carry a trade or profession oe Cd Articles related to Inter-state Trade, Commerce and Intercourse 801 ) + Trade, commerce and intercourse throughout the territory of India shall be _free ~>break down the border barr between the states and fo oreate + Not confined to interstate trade, commerce and intercourse but also extends to infra-state trade, commerce and intercourse i a 302 Provides for restrictions: _ + Parliament can impose restrictions on the above freedom in public interest + Parliament cannot digoriminate between states except in the case of (scarcity of goodgin any part of India + State legislatures can impose restrictions within that state in public ial interest. eee + For such a bill should introduced in legislature, previous sanction of the Sanat President is required. = — + States cannot discriminate between states a + States can impose any tax on goods imported from another state or UT if similar goods are manufactured in that state + The freedom (under Art.3Ol) is subject to nationalization laws (law can — provide a monopoly in favor of the Cenfre or State) + Such laws can exclude citizens or others completely or partially from md — “carrying such trade. re ee ET WT ee RR CLL) omar out the purposes of the above provisions relating to the freedom —> of trade, commerce and intercourse and restrictions on it Article 307 Pre Crary t eRe ZONAL COUNCILS es mentioned in Paar tae eR RELL er oe ih aS (ola) >) CA TE Cha ey cu ie ae cere eae ee Act divided the country into five zones and provided a zonal council for each zone oe ow 4 na Northern Western ate Eastern RTT aA) North-Eastern Council Cu North-Eastern Council was created by a separate Act of Parliament The North-Eastern Council Act of 1971 ae {temembersnoide Assam, Manipur, Mizoram, Arunchal Pradesh Nagaland, Meghalaya, Tipura and Sikkim eS rue Ue un) Gao Caer ong ee —> Ithas to formulate a unified and coordinated regional Seba MAE eekly NEL unre acu) Os —~————_ Tee SOUR un UCR RCT tors Pea Ru ere meu net of security and public order in the region eee Natural division seats Lg ® Omer] EU Ntad _ TTT LA) Factors taken into EY aC forming zones ' R TTT a Cuenta! Te en economic development, ee security, law and order Cd LOE OF COU ELS oe Gurus LTE UES TEU linguistic m Cea roa Leary es interstate transport, and so on oS NG Promoting cooperation Ea ere an ale Meter een ae. Objective or Function @ ECU Srice i Eisen yy (9 RACE ie Mae RCL LTT ea Tay Co En ee mrt Te Sala De Ei) hake curry of Se ee STN CC aa eT b Toenable the Centre and states to cooperate with each other in social and economic matters and exchange ideas and experience in order to evolve uniform policies. —> To cooperate with each other in the successful and speedy execution of major development projects - oa oa Cee ee et re Re ® ery Tels Cla) Porous eam eR orn ue Cau) Miniter) CE Pe cata Cem) Ye oe Ue er veg > Chief Minister of Stasis the ees Ce Cesar Cad tn), Pee UL) Sheree eats nr Pree at Re Oe Meee {Northern Zonal Council 2. Central Zonal Council 3. Eastern Zonal Council 4. Western Zonal Council 5. Southern Zonal Couneil (Himachal Pradesh, Haryana, Punjab, Rajasthan, Delhi, Chandigarh, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh “Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, ~ Chhattisgarh, and Madhya Pradesh Bihar, Tharkhand, West Bengal and disha Oe Maharastra, Goa, Dadra and fagar Haveli and Daman and Diu Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Puducherry New Delhi Allahabad Kolkata Mumbai Chennai @ Articles Related to Inter-State Relations at a Glance Ve ee aT ues ar (re arom ea eee cs 261 Public acts, records and judicial proceedings Disputes relating to waters no Eo 262 Adjudication of disputes relating to waters of inter-state rivers or river valleys (eee ea eke a Tees 263 Provisions with respect to an interstate council Articles Related to Inter-State Relations at a Glance Cy Freedom of trade. Commerce and intercourse Power of parliament to impose restriotions on trade, commerce and intercourse Restrictions on the legislative powers of the Union and of the states with with regard to . trade and commerce Restrictions on trade, commerce and intercourse among states Saving of existing laws and laws providing for state monopolies Power of certain states in Part B of the First Schedule to impose restrictions on trade and commerce (Repealed) Appointment of authority for carrying out the purpose of Articles 30! to 304 Wives

You might also like