Rules of Court Rule 37.06 rescinding Orders provides that any Order issued by a Court without first assuring that the person against whom the Court Order affects is served Notice according Rules of Court this Defendant Andre Murray claims occurred; therefore Defendant Andre Murray requests within the herein subject motion that the Orders be rescinded on the grounds that a unfair ex parte Court Hearing has taken place as the other side must be given proper Notice of a Court Hearing, therefore without Notice to the other side Court Hearings cannot reasonably be fair. Nevertheless, notwithstanding normal protocol in such circumstances as alleged by Lawyer George H. LeBlanc Orders were issued by Mr. Justice Zoël R. Dionne upon quest of hearing Lawyer George H. LeBlanc to evict Andre Murray from his residential leasehold duplex house at 29 Marshall Street, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada Orders Heard Without Notice.
Court file MC-0642-09: IN THE COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF NEW BRUNSWICK, TRIAL DIVISION, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF Moncton. Court File Number: MC/0642/09, BETWEEN: Plaintiffs ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd. a body corporate, and Defendant, ANDRE MURRAY.
http://justicedonedirtcheap.blogspot.ca/
The Lawsuit is over alledged conversion of property, and became litigation based on interpretation of the Residential Tenanies Act of New Brunswick and The Property Act of New Brunswick.
Original Title
March 19, 2010, Andre Murray pursuant to Rules of Court Rule 37.06 rescinding Orders to Mr Justice Zoel R. Dionne for ex parte
Rules of Court Rule 37.06 rescinding Orders provides that any Order issued by a Court without first assuring that the person against whom the Court Order affects is served Notice according Rules of Court this Defendant Andre Murray claims occurred; therefore Defendant Andre Murray requests within the herein subject motion that the Orders be rescinded on the grounds that a unfair ex parte Court Hearing has taken place as the other side must be given proper Notice of a Court Hearing, therefore without Notice to the other side Court Hearings cannot reasonably be fair. Nevertheless, notwithstanding normal protocol in such circumstances as alleged by Lawyer George H. LeBlanc Orders were issued by Mr. Justice Zoël R. Dionne upon quest of hearing Lawyer George H. LeBlanc to evict Andre Murray from his residential leasehold duplex house at 29 Marshall Street, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada Orders Heard Without Notice.
Court file MC-0642-09: IN THE COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF NEW BRUNSWICK, TRIAL DIVISION, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF Moncton. Court File Number: MC/0642/09, BETWEEN: Plaintiffs ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd. a body corporate, and Defendant, ANDRE MURRAY.
http://justicedonedirtcheap.blogspot.ca/
The Lawsuit is over alledged conversion of property, and became litigation based on interpretation of the Residential Tenanies Act of New Brunswick and The Property Act of New Brunswick.
Rules of Court Rule 37.06 rescinding Orders provides that any Order issued by a Court without first assuring that the person against whom the Court Order affects is served Notice according Rules of Court this Defendant Andre Murray claims occurred; therefore Defendant Andre Murray requests within the herein subject motion that the Orders be rescinded on the grounds that a unfair ex parte Court Hearing has taken place as the other side must be given proper Notice of a Court Hearing, therefore without Notice to the other side Court Hearings cannot reasonably be fair. Nevertheless, notwithstanding normal protocol in such circumstances as alleged by Lawyer George H. LeBlanc Orders were issued by Mr. Justice Zoël R. Dionne upon quest of hearing Lawyer George H. LeBlanc to evict Andre Murray from his residential leasehold duplex house at 29 Marshall Street, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada Orders Heard Without Notice.
Court file MC-0642-09: IN THE COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF NEW BRUNSWICK, TRIAL DIVISION, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF Moncton. Court File Number: MC/0642/09, BETWEEN: Plaintiffs ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd. a body corporate, and Defendant, ANDRE MURRAY.
http://justicedonedirtcheap.blogspot.ca/
The Lawsuit is over alledged conversion of property, and became litigation based on interpretation of the Residential Tenanies Act of New Brunswick and The Property Act of New Brunswick.