0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views1 page

Hine, Lesson 12 Discussion

The document critiques the unethical practices of a medical experiment that withheld penicillin treatment from participants, arguing that they deserved fair treatment. It emphasizes the need for transparency and informed consent in medical research. The reference cited is a study discussing the implications of the Tuskegee Study on health professionals.

Uploaded by

Teddy jeremy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views1 page

Hine, Lesson 12 Discussion

The document critiques the unethical practices of a medical experiment that withheld penicillin treatment from participants, arguing that they deserved fair treatment. It emphasizes the need for transparency and informed consent in medical research. The reference cited is a study discussing the implications of the Tuskegee Study on health professionals.

Uploaded by

Teddy jeremy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

I agree that the experiment deserve the harsh judgement it received and should still be

frowned upon. Withholding penicillin treatment was not fair as they deserved to receive the

medication (Alsan et al., 2019). The medical practitioners who participated in the program were

completely unethical and should have resigned from the program even before it started. It is

important to ensure that participant receive all the relent information regarding the experiment

before they are allowed to participate.

Reference

Alsan, M., Wanamaker, M., & Hardeman, R. R. (2019). The Tuskegee Study of Untreated

Syphilis: A Case Study in Peripheral Trauma with Implications for Health Professionals. Journal

of General Internal Medicine, 35(1), 322–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05309-8

You might also like