0% found this document useful (0 votes)
60 views3 pages

Contempt Notice Praneeth

The notice from Advocate B. Abhay Siddhanth Mootha addresses the District Mines and Geology Officer regarding the unlawful seizure of a stone crushing unit owned by M/s. Siva Sai Constructions. The notice outlines the client's legal actions, including a Writ Petition and Contempt Cases, due to non-compliance with a High Court order to release the seized machinery and issue dispatch permits. The Advocate demands immediate compliance with the court's orders or further legal action will be pursued within a week.

Uploaded by

abhay
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
60 views3 pages

Contempt Notice Praneeth

The notice from Advocate B. Abhay Siddhanth Mootha addresses the District Mines and Geology Officer regarding the unlawful seizure of a stone crushing unit owned by M/s. Siva Sai Constructions. The notice outlines the client's legal actions, including a Writ Petition and Contempt Cases, due to non-compliance with a High Court order to release the seized machinery and issue dispatch permits. The Advocate demands immediate compliance with the court's orders or further legal action will be pursued within a week.

Uploaded by

abhay
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

B.

ABHAY SIDDHANTH MOOTHA


ADVOCATE
Date: 26.03.2025
Amaravati.
To

The District Mines and Geology Officer,


Puttaparthi, Sri Sathya Sai District.

Respected Sir,

I, am issuing the following notice to you, under the instructions of my

client M/s. Siva Sai Constructions rep., by its Managing Partner K.V.Sai

Praneeth Reddy, having its Office atKutugaulla Village, Kutagulla, Kadiri

Mandal, Satya Sai District, do solemnly state and affirm as follows:

That my client was constrained to file a Writ Petition in W.P.No.20857 of

2024 on the file of the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati

challenging Demand Notice No.1681/QL/RM/2019, dated 13.09.2024 issued by

the respondent No.5 herein levying Rs.12,89,99,926/- (Rupees Twelve Crores

Eighty Nine Lakhs, Ninety Nine Thousand, Nine Hundred and Twenty Six)

towards Seignorage Fee, Penalty, DMF, MERIT, Consideration Amount and IT

under Rules 26(1) and 34(1) of Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Rules, 1966 and

the consequential Seizure Notice in Form-I in Notice No.1681/QL/RM/2019,

dated 16.09.2024 seizing the Stone Crushing Unit of the petitioner, without

considering the explanation submitted by the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal,

abuse of process of law, as one without jurisdiction, contrary to the principles of

natural justice and Rules 26(1) and 34(1) of Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral

Rules, 1966 apart from being violative of the Fundamental and Constitutional
B.ABHAY SIDDHANTH MOOTHA
ADVOCATE
Rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the

Constitution of India.

Whereas, the Hom’ble High Court was pleased to

Whereas, eventhough the Hon’ble High Court was pleased to suspend

the operation of the Seizure Notice vie Order, dated 24.09.2024 in I.A.No.2 of

2024 in W.P.No.20857 of 2024 and was also pleased to direct the respondents

not to take any coercive inpursuance of the demand notice, dated 13.09.2024.

Whereas, the seized stone crusher unit was wrongly confined the seized

machinery and the stone crushing was not release unit after 24.09.2024. Under

those circumstances, my client was constrained to file a Contempt Case in

C.C.No.3883 of 2024 for violation of the Orders, dated 24.09.2024 in I.A.No.2

of 2024 in W.P.No.20857 of 2024.

Further, when you had also failed to issue dispatch permits stating that

the amount specified in Demand Notice has to be paid in violation of the orders

in I.A.1 of 2024 in W.P.No.20857 of 2024, my client was constrained to file

another Contempt Case in C.C.No.3889 of 2024 for violation of the Orders,

dated 24.09.2024 in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in W.P.No.20857 of 2024.

Whereas, the Hon’ble Court was pleased to allow the said Writ Petition in

W.P.No.20857 of 2024 setting aside the Demand Notice, dated 13.09.2024 and

the Seizure notice, 16.09.2024 and remanded the matter back to you to conduct

a fresh enquiry on the survey report vide the Order, dated 13.03.2025
B.ABHAY SIDDHANTH MOOTHA
ADVOCATE
It is necessary to point out here that, the Hon’ble Court while allowing

the said Writ Petition was pleased to hold that admittedly the variation of the

stock excavated and the charges paid is only for 402.095 Cbm within the leased

area but the show cause notice and the demand notice were issued for

2,57,068.168 Cbm contrary to the survey report, dated 30.07.2024.

Whereas, my client was constrained to submit a representation, dated

19.03.2025 brining to your notice the copy of the Order, dated 13.03.2025 and

requested to release the seized machinery and also issue dispatch permits to it.

Whereas, evenafter receipt of the copy of the order, dated 13.03.2025, you have

failed to release the seized machinery and unit and have also failed to issue

dispatch permits by giving login id’s.

Therefore, I call upon you to comply with the orders of the Hon’ble High

Court dated 13.03.2025 in W.P.No.20857 of 2025 and release the seized

machinery and unit immediately and to issue dispatch permits to my client

M/s.Siva Sai Constructions, my client will be constrained to invoke the

contempt jurisdiction of the Hon’ble Court within a period of one week from

the date of receipt of this notice.

B.ABHAY SIDDHANTH
ADVOCATE.

You might also like