0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views6 pages

NURS Week 10

The document is a rubric for a case study assignment in a nursing course, outlining criteria for evaluation across various aspects such as case study analysis, host response to infection, complications and risk factors, writing expression, and adherence to APA formatting. Each criterion is rated on a scale from excellent to poor, with specific expectations for content accuracy, clarity, and organization. The total points for the assignment are 100.

Uploaded by

Olivia Hollon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views6 pages

NURS Week 10

The document is a rubric for a case study assignment in a nursing course, outlining criteria for evaluation across various aspects such as case study analysis, host response to infection, complications and risk factors, writing expression, and adherence to APA formatting. Each criterion is rated on a scale from excellent to poor, with specific expectations for content accuracy, clarity, and organization. The total points for the assignment are 100.

Uploaded by

Olivia Hollon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

NURS_6501_Week 10_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6501_Week 10_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
OutcomeDevel
op a 1- to 2- 30 to >27.0 pts 27 to >24.0 pts 24 to >21.0 pts 21 to >0 pts
page case Excellent Good Fair Poor
study analysis, The response The response includes The response vaguely The response is vague
examining the accurately and accurate explanation or inaccurately and inaccurate, or the
patient thoroughly includes of the includes explanations description is
clear, and detailed pathophysiologic of the missing...The response
symptoms explanations of the process of chlamydia, pathophysiologic does not include
presented in pathophysiologic including the two process of chlamydia, pathophysiologic 30 pt
the case study. process of chlamydia, forms, intracellular including the two process of chlamydia,
including the two development, and forms, intracellular including the two
s
Describe the
forms, intracellular immune evasion. development, and forms, intracellular
pathophysiolog
development, and Content is supported immune evasion. development, and
ic process of immune evasion. by evidence and/or Content is vague or immune evasion. ...
chlamydia, Content is supported research, as based on inappropriate Content is vague or
including the by evidence and/or appropriate, to evidence/research. based on inappropriate
two forms, research, as support the evidence/research.
appropriate, to support explanation.
intracellular the explanation.
development,
and immune
evasion.
NURS_6501_Week 10_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
OutcomeExplai
n the host's
30 to >27.0 pts 27 to >24.0 pts 24 to >21.0 pts 21 to >0 pts
response to Excellent Good Fair Poor
the infection, The response The response includes The response includes a The response includes a
including includes an accurate, an accurate vague or inaccurate vague or inaccurate
pathogen complete, detailed, explanation of the explanation of the explanation of the host's
and specific analysis host's response to the host's response to the response to the
recognition 30 pt
of the host's infection, including infection, including infection, including
receptors and response to the pathogen recognition pathogen recognition pathogen recognition s
proinflammato infection, including receptors and receptors and receptors and
ry cytokines. pathogen recognition proinflammatory proinflammatory proinflammatory
receptors and cytokines and is cytokines, with cytokines, with
proinflammatory supported by evidence explanations that are explanations that are
cytokines. and/or research, as based on inappropriate based on inappropriate
appropriate, to support evidence/research. or missing
the explanation. evidence/research.
NURS_6501_Week 10_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
OutcomeExplai
25 to >22.5 pts 22.5 to >20.0 pts 20 to >17.5 pts 17.5 to >0 pts
n the Excellent Good Fair Poor
complications The response The response The response includes a The response includes a
and risk includes an accurate, includes an accurate vague or inaccurate vague or inaccurate
factors for complete, detailed, explanation of the explanation of the explanation of the
infection. and specific complications and complications and risk complications and risk
explanation of the risk factors for factors for infection, factors for infection, 25 pt
complications and infection and is with explanations that with explanations that
risk factors for supported by are based on are based on
s
infection and is evidence and/or inappropriate inappropriate or missing
supported by research, as evidence/research. evidence/research.
evidence and/or appropriate, to
research, as support the
appropriate, to explanation.
support the
explanation.

This criterion is 5 to >4.0 pts 4 to >3.0 pts 3 to >2.0 pts 2 to >0 pts 5 pts
linked to a Excellent Good Fair Poor
Learning Paragraphs and Paragraphs and Paragraphs and Paragraphs and
OutcomeWritte sentences follow sentences follow sentences follow writing sentences follow
writing standards for writing standards for standards for flow, writing standards for
n Expression flow, continuity, and flow, continuity, and continuity, and clarity flow, continuity, and
and Formatting clarity. ... Content is clarity 80% of the 60%-79% of the clarity < 60% of the
- Paragraph supported by current time. ... Sme content is time....Some content is time. ... No content is
NURS_6501_Week 10_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

Development
and
Organization:
Paragraphs
make clear
points that
support well-
developed
ideas, flow
logically, and evidence-based supported by current supported by current supported by current
demonstrate sources. evidence-based evidence-based sources. evidence-based
continuity of sources. sources.
ideas.
Sentences are
carefully
focused—
neither long
and rambling
nor short and
lacking
substance.

This criterion is 5 to >4.0 pts 4 to >3.0 pts 3 to >2.0 pts 2 to >0 pts 5 pts
linked to a Excellent Good Fair Poor
Learning Uses correct Contains a few (1 or Contains several (3 Contains many (≥ 5)
OutcomeWritte grammar, spelling, 2) grammar, or 4) grammar, grammar, spelling, and
and punctuation spelling, and spelling, and punctuation errors that
n Expression with no errors. punctuation errors. punctuation errors. interfere with the reader's
and Formatting understanding.
- English
NURS_6501_Week 10_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

Writing
Standards:
Correct
grammar,
mechanics,
and proper
punctuation

This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
OutcomeWritte
n Expression
and Formatting
- The paper
follows correct
APA format for 5 to >4.0 pts 4 to >3.0 pts 3 to >2.0 pts 2 to >0 pts
title page, Excellent Good Fair Poor 5 pts
headings, font, Uses correct APA Contains a few (1 or 2) Contains several (3 or Contains many (≥ 5)
spacing, format with no errors. APA format errors. 4) APA format errors. APA format errors.
margins,
indentations,
page numbers,
running heads,
parenthetical/i
n-text
citations, and
reference list.
NURS_6501_Week 10_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

Total Points: 100

You might also like