0% found this document useful (0 votes)
64 views2 pages

Final Defense Grading Sheet

This document outlines the final defense process for thesis research at Holy Trinity University, including sections for general information, summary of reviews, evaluation criteria, and results of evaluation. It specifies the grading system based on content, oral presentation, and additional requirements, along with possible outcomes such as passed, passed with revision, conditional, or failed. Contact information for the university and panel members is also provided.

Uploaded by

ryyyrazon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
64 views2 pages

Final Defense Grading Sheet

This document outlines the final defense process for thesis research at Holy Trinity University, including sections for general information, summary of reviews, evaluation criteria, and results of evaluation. It specifies the grading system based on content, oral presentation, and additional requirements, along with possible outcomes such as passed, passed with revision, conditional, or failed. Contact information for the university and panel members is also provided.

Uploaded by

ryyyrazon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

HOLY TRINITY UNIVERSITY

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY


PAASCU ACCREDITED
QUEZON STREET, PUERTO PRINCESA CITY
5300 PALAWAN
email Add: [Link]@[Link]
Passion for Truth and “A Woman of Great Faith, Resolute Hope and
Compassion for Humanity
contact numbers: landline (048) - 433 - 2161
Steadfast Love; A Woman for our Times”
mobile 0905 - 229 - 9315

FINAL DEFENSE
I. General Information

a. Date of Defense: ______________________________________

b. Name of Researcher(s):___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________

c. Name of Thesis Adviser: __________________________________________________

d. Title of Thesis: __________________________________________________________


__________________________________________________________

e. Name of the Thesis Panelist: ______________________________________________

II. Summary of Reviews: (Please attach additional sheet if necessary)

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.
III. Evaluation:
Criteria for Evaluation Equivalent Grade
Points

I. Content of Manuscript (70%)


A. Sufficient results were presented to derive reasonable conclusions
addressing the stated objectives of the study.

B. The student interpreted the results of the study correctly.

C. The conclusions address the stated objectives of the study.

D. Recommendations for further studies based on the study were


sufficiently and clearly listed.

II. Oral Presentation (30%)


A. The student displayed thorough mastery of the study.

B. The student answered well all questions raised by the examination


committee.

C. The student presented well-prepared visuals to facilitate the


discussions of the study.

D. The student was able to communicate effectively the report to the


examination committee.

III. Additional Requirements (software, model, prototype, etc.)


This is optional. Please specify the equivalent points if applicable.

TOTAL

SCORE OF PANEL MEMBER* (%)


*Passing score is 75%
IV. Result of Evaluation: (please check one)
PASSED (Average Grade of Panel Members is in the range of 90.00% - 100.00%. No revisions
required.)
PASSED WITH REVISION (Average Grade of Panel Members is within the range of 75.00% -
89.00%. Revisions will be reflected in the final thesis paper.)
CONDITIONAL (Average Grade of Panel Members is within the range of 60.00% - 74.00%. The
revised thesis paper must be submitted in writing and needs re-approval by the examination
committee in an oral presentation on the current semester.)
FAILED (Average Grade of Panel Members is below 60.00%. Revised thesis paper must be
submitted in writing and needs re-approval by the examination committee in an oral
presentation next semester.)

Noted by: (Please affix your signature over printed name)

Panel Member: __________________________

Thesis Adviser: __________________________ Subject Teacher:______________________

You might also like