You are on page 1of 16

GREATER GOLDEN HILL CLEAN, GREEN, AND SAFE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MINUTES MONDAY, June

16, 2008 APPROVED I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, David Skillman at 6:34 pm at the Balboa Golf Course Club House II. Roll Call All members were present except for Michelle Dullea and Laura Stansell (excused). III. Old Business Action Items a. Approval of Minutes Bill Hilsdorf moved and Robert Hanson seconded the approval of the June 2, 2008 minutes. The motion passed 7-0, 4 abstentions. This item was taken out of order. V. New Business Public Input was taken at this time. This meeting was conducted with a forum format because of the attendance by Scott Kessler and Luis Ojeda concerning the relationship between the MAD Oversight Committee, the GGHCDC, and the City of San Diego. The forum consisted of the following: 1. Public comments 2. Statements from the Oversight Committee 3. Questions to Scott Kessler from the Oversight Committee and the community 4. Response from the GGHCDC Because of time constraints, the GGHCDC position was not presented at this meeting. They have been given the opportunity to include their position statements with the minutes. The public input consisted of statements from members of the public. With no speaker slips presented, quotes from these comments are not included. The committee members addressed the relationship between the CDC and the Committee in their statements . Questions were presented in writing for Scott Kessler which he answered from the floor. These questions were also submitted in writing and his written answer is attached as Appendix A. The meeting was required to adjourn at 8:00, and accordingly Ben Nicholls moved to adjourn and Lisa Vella Seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.

The following items were not discussed and presumably will carry over to the next meeting. Continued items: a. Subcommittee Reports Bylaws AER Program manager RFPs Public Communication CDC Board City Contacts (anyone with communication with the city)

Attachment A Written answers to Questions from the City of San Diego

TO: Scott Kessler FROM: Barbara Houlton, Secretary, GGHMAD Oversight Committee, houltongh@cox.net DATE: June 17, 2007 SUBJECT: Answers to Questions At the meeting of the Greater Golden Hill Maintenance Assessment District Oversight Committee on June 17, 2008, you provided a response to questions as they were asked. Most of the questions below were discussed, but because of time constraints, a few were submitted by the audience after the meeting. Please provide answers to the questions below for inclusion in the minutes. 1. How is the GGH MAD set up differently from the other MADs and why was that done? The GGH MAD is not set up any differently than the other self managed MADs in the City. 2. Mr. Kessler stated that the contract and the municipal code contain language addressing the role of the advisory or oversight committee. Please provide, page, section, and cite in the contract and the municipal code. The back-up information was provided to the Chair of the Committee prior to the meeting. Municipal Code Article 5, section 65.0212 (c)(7) states The agreement shall provide that the Non-profit Corporation agrees to conduct at least one (1) noticed meeting with property owners within the District or the Zone and to attempt to meet on a regular basis with the relevant community planning group or designated representatives of the District or the Zone, and property owners within the District or the Zone, to finalize plans and specifications for the Improvements and Maintenance of the District or the Zone, to evaluate the performance of any Maintenance contractor for the District or the Zone, and to advise the Non-profit Corporation regarding the Improvements and regular Maintenance for the District or the Zone. Page four, Article B5 of the Agreement (filed with the City Clerks Office as Document # RR-303551) states The GGHCDC shall provide at least one noticed meeting with the property owners within the District annually and attempt to meet on a regular basis with the relevant planning group or property owners within the District. The regular meeting shall be used to finalize plans and specifications for improvements and maintenance as described in the Engineers Report, evaluate the performance of any maintenance contractor, and advise the GGHCDC

regarding the improvements and regular maintenance as described in the Engineers Report for the District... 3. How do we vote this thing out? The question is not clearly articulated. Vote what out? The Committee? Greater Golden Hill CDC? The District? Need further clarification to properly answer. 4. Concerning the committee, are there other persons, agencies or resources within the city that we can contact to (1) have our management issues addressed and (2) request a compliance audit of the contract between the CDC and the city? The recommended primary contact should be our department, City Planning and Community Investment Department, since the department administers the contract with the Greater Golden Hill CDC and is familiar with the ongoing MAD issues in the community. However, the committee is more than welcomed to seek out and contact other persons, agencies, or resources as it has done so already i.e.: City Attorneys Office, Council District 3 and 8, etc

5. (Details for this question provided here). The Mad was voted in with a typical homeowner assessed at $76.48 and condo owners assessed $36.03. Using the typical homeowners assessment, and rounding the numbers to $80.00: The typical homeowner pays 25% of the assessment for in-office services (CDC and City expenses). This leaves $60.00 to do projects. The Ballot material, supported by the Engineers Report, identifies 12 projects. 60/12 is an average cost of $5.00 per project. How did the city determine that they could provide special benefit to these homeowners for $5.00 per project? This question seems hypothetical in nature and leaves out other variable factors that probably should be included such as the number of typical homeowners, average number of typical homeowners for zone 1 and 2, projects budget variations by zone etc, impact of other assessed properties such as condo owners, multifamily properties, vacant properties, etc which makes the question not easy to 1) understand and 2) provide an appropriate answer. 6. If the oversight committee fails or will not implement services, is it legal for the CDC to meet the conditions of the contract directly? The CDC has a legal obligation to meet the provisions of the contractual agreement with the City irrespective if the committee fails to advise or recommend the implementation of services. 7. Many of the MAD services listed in the Engineers Report seem to conflict with the California Constitution article XIII D. For example, banners, canyon trail maintenance, large item pickup, dont seem to confer special benefit, over and above general benefit to all properties. Please explain how you resolve this conflict. The basis of the opinion within the question is incorrect. The services listed in the Engineers Report and approved by City Council do confer special benefits as defined in California Constitution Article XIII D. The California

Constitution Article XIII D requires that all assessments be supported by a detailed engineer's report prepared by a registered professional engineer certified by the State of California. The Citys consultant engineer, is a professional engineer certified by the State of California, prepared the detailed engineers report for Greater Golden Hill MAD and has certified that the cost of districts public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided within the Greater Golden Hill MAD Engineers Report receive special benefits.

Attachment B Statement from Kathy Vandenhuevel, GGHCDC President and Alia Kanani The Greater Golden Hill CDCs (CDC) Position on Relationship between the CDC and the Clean, Green, and Safe Maintenance Assessment District Oversight Committee (MAD Committee) The issues which have been previously reported in the Reader and which were evident at Monday night's MAD Committee meeting, the CDC believes, originate primarily from confusion stemming from each entity's roles and responsibilities in the oversight of the MAD and a lack of clarity in the lines of communication between the CDC and the MAD Committee. The majority of the individuals in both groups are well-intentioned volunteers that are donating their valuable free time to help their community. In order to establish clear practices and procedures for future communications, I would love to see both groups go through a mediation workshop lead by a non-biased organization such as Non-Profit Solutions that are equipped in mediation to help bridge the gap and bring both groups together to work towards our collective goal: the improvement of the Greater Golden Hill community. We also need full clarification of the roles of both groups from the City. An example of the communication issue is evident in the CDC's hiring of the Program Manager (PM) of the MAD. The MAD Committee formed a PM sub-committee that developed a job description for the PM position. The full MAD Committee voted and passed a resolution to release the PM job description. The CDC then posted the job announcement for the PM position. The CDC sent the proposed PM resumes that the CDC received to the Chair of the PM sub-committee and communicated with the Chair of the PM sub-committee when the CDC conducted the PM interviews. The Chair of the PM sub-committee was also involved with conducting some of the interviews. Before the CDC made the final decision to hire the PM, the CDC asked the Chair of the PM subcommittee if the PM sub-Committee would need to provide any additional input before we moved forward with making an offer. So from the CDC's prospective, the CDC included the MAD committee in the hiring process through the involvement of the PM sub-committee established by the MAD Committee. It is the understanding of the CDC that the majority of MAD Committee does not feel they were adequately involved in the hiring process for the PM. Because the MAD Committee is relatively new, no procedures were in place to define how the communication should take place between the PM sub-committee, MAD committee, and the CDC. Complicating the issue is the fact that the Chair of the PM sub-committee is also a Board Member of the CDC; which the CDC understands, in retrospect, may have provided the appearance that the CDC was not sufficiently involving the MAD in the PM hiring process. Although the PM Sub Committee chair is a CDC Board member, he was elected by the property owners of Greater Golden Hill to be a member of the MAD Committee and was appointed by the MAD Committee as the Chair of the PM sub-committee.

This has been a learning process for both groups of volunteers. It is the hope of the CDC that both groups can learn from this misunderstanding and create procedures and establish lines of communication to ensure that the both groups have the opportunity to be engaged and informed regarding MAD decisions. The CDC's opinion of the MAD Committee's Role The CDC believes that the MAD Committee is a partner with the CDC to ensure that the services being provided by the MAD are in accordance with the Engineer's Report and that the contractors providing the services are fulfilling the requirements of their contracts. For example, the CDC should provide the MAD Committee with progress reports on the specific services provided and the costs associated with those services so the MAD Committee can monitor the progress of the MAD and ensure that those services are within budget and in accordance with the Engineer's Report. Another good example of the MAD Committees role is that they have provided a priority list of the services outlined in the Engineers Report to the CDC that the MAD PM is using in the implementation of those services. Background into the Development of the MAD Committee Member Description Sent to Property Owners Regarding Establishing the MAD Committee Prior to my role as President of the Board of Directors for the Greater Golden Hill CDC, I was the chair of the CDC committee that put together the description of the MAD Committee positions, and designed the nomination and election process for the MAD Committee. I opened the CDC committee up to any community members that were interested in helping, regardless of their original position regarding the MAD. The description of the MAD Committee positions that Barbara McGill presented at the MAD meeting was the outcome of our CDC committee meetings. Unfortunately, the committee did not run the description by the City or the CDC Executive Committee prior to releasing it. Some of the language used in the description was not correct and has lead to much of the current confusion and frustration of the MAD Committee members and the CDC. Summary The CDC is contractually obligated to implement the MAD. There is a lot of frustration right now with how slow the progress has been. With the hiring on the PM, the CDC is now in a position where we can move quickly on implementing the MAD but we are waiting for direction from the MAD Committee. For example, the MAD Committee has been sitting on a cleaning Request for Proposal (RFP) for months. This RFP represents much of the services that are to be provided by the MAD and needs to be issued as soon as possible. This puts the CDC in a position where if we move forward with completing the RFP ourselves we will appear to be disregarding the wishes of the MAD Committee; but if we continue to wait, maintaining the status quo, we will be doing a disservice to the

property owners who are paying into the MAD and who are expecting results and potentially be out of compliance with our contract with the City. The CDC wants the MAD Committee to provide direction and input into the decisions of the MAD; however, the MAD Committee is not the ultimate decision maker. I fully agree with MAD Committee member Lisa Vella who pointed out the vast and diverse skill set of the MAD Committee members and feel they are a valuable resource that will help our community best implement the MAD. The CDC looks forward to working with the MAD Committee as a partner. I hope my suggestion regarding mediation or other method by which both groups can establish clear lines of communications and procedures, will be looked upon favorably by the MAD Committee and help us move forward together.

June 16, 2008 Memo: M.A.D Roles of the GGHCDC, Oversight Committee and City of San Diego Dear Members of the Oversight Committee, There has been some recent discussion and requests for clarification regarding the roles of the Greater Golden Hill Community Development Corporation GGHCDC, Oversight Committee Committee and the City of San Diego City pertaining to the management of the Greater Golden Hill Clean, Green, and Safe Maintenance Assessment District District. On May 21, 2008, Rosemary Downing and I met with City staff to discuss the management of the District. The goal of this letter is to provide clarification of the roles each party is responsible and to promote a working relationship that will encourage a successful program and overall benefit to the Greater Golden Hill Community. Role of the Oversight Committee: The Committee is an independent committee comprised of up to 15 elected property owners from the Greater Golden Hill community. One member of the Committee is appointed by the GGHCDC Board. Per the Engineers Report, which was prepared by an independent Assessment Engineering firm and approved by City Council, the Committee was set up to oversee the operation of the District and to be a partner of the GGHCDC. Both the San Diego Municipal Code and the Citys Agreement with the GGHCDC provide that the GGHCDC meet with the Committee to finalize plans and specifications for the improvement and maintenance of the district. During the meetings, the Committee shall also evaluate the performance of any maintenance contractor for the District and advise the GGHCDC regarding the improvement and regular maintenance of the District. In essence, the Committee serves as the eyes and ears of the community tracking maintenance issues, identifying areas that need enhanced services, and making recommendations to the GGHCDC and the M.A.D Program Manager in an advisory capacity. Role of the GGHCDC/M.A.D Program Manager: The GGHCDC has a contract with the City for the purpose of administering contracts for goods and services on behalf the District. The M.A.D Program Manager under the

direction of the GGHCDC is responsible for the program management of the District. Staff of the GGHCDC including the M.A.D Program Manager, are to be directed only by the Board and Executive Director. Per the Engineers Report, the GGHCDC would administer the Districts finances with monthly review and annual audits by the City. The responsibilities of the GGHCDC and the M.A.D Program Manager include but are not limited to; preparing Request for Proposals (RFP) for enhanced services (trash removal, sidewalk sweeping, graffiti removal, etc), distributing RFPs for bid, managing maintenance services and contracts, supervising contractors, tracking and spending of M.A.D funds per the budget in the Engineers Report, submitting funding reimbursement requests to the City, coordinating and implementing community outreach, organizing community clean-ups, installation and maintenance of decorations and banners, and canyon and trail beautification. The GGHCDC and M.A.D Program Manager shall work in partnership with the Committee and the Oversight Subcommittees to implement the priorities identified by the Committee. The Committee, which meets once a month, shall be updated by the M.A.D Program Manager as to the progress of services and contracts at the monthly meeting. The M.A.D Program Manager shall also provide budget updates to the Committee. In order to ensure that communication is clear between the M.A.D Program Manager and the Committee, all communication shall be disseminated directly through the Committee Chairperson. Role of the City: The City is responsible for the overseeing the tax assessments collected by the County of San Diego, updating the annual Engineers Report, ensuring compliance of the program including City audits, and provides program assistance to the GGHCDC and the M.A.D Program Manager. The City operates as the checks and balances ensuring that the tax assessments are spent on enhanced services for the Greater Golden Hill Community. It is important to understand that if the GGHCDC does not properly manage the M.A.D, the program may be removed from the jurisdiction of the GGHCDC and may be managed by the City. I look forward to building a relationship with the Committee that enables successful implementation of the M.A.D and the priorities as identified by the Committee. If you have any question or comments, please feel free to contact me at alia@goldenhillcdc.org or (619) 664-5138. Sincerely, Alia Kanani GGHMAD Program Manager

GGHMAD OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Monday, June 16, 2008 6:30 8:00 pm Balboa Golf Course Club House

Agenda
I. II. Call to Order Roll Call

III. Public Announcements IV. Old Business Action Items a. Approval of 6/2 minutes V. New Business Action Items a. Relationship between MAD Oversight, CDC, and City ------- (the rest of item V will be tabled if short of time ---------b. GGHCGS website Official or Independent? c. repopulate committees and update member contact list d. Bcc e-mail - objections VI. New Business Info-Only items (table if short of time) a. Subcommittee Reports Bylaws AER Program manager RFPs Public Communication CDC Board City Contacts (anyone with communication with the city) VII. To-Do-Review For Next Meeting (table if short of time) VIII. Adjourn

April 24, 2012

Maintenance Assessment District (MAD) Business Improvement District (BID)


South Park Neighborhood Association (SPNA) Golden Hill Neighborhood Association (GHNA) Golden Hill Community Association (GHCA) Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee Friends of Balboa Park & Golf Course Anti-MAD Community Volunteers Verses City of San Diego Grater Golden Hill Community Development Corporation (GGHCDC) These documents are related to an ongoing 17 years conflict between the Citizens (Property owners) of the communities of SOUTH PARK and GOLDEN HILL, of San Diego, California, battling against the employees of the City of San Diego, and the Greater Golden Hill Community Development Corporation (GGHCDC) who dishonestly and maliciously caused the illegal establishment of a Maintenance Assessment District over the majority objections of the Citizens [property owners]. This to specifically provide funding and support with additional property assessments (taxes/fees) to be provided revenue to a privet membership corporation (GGHCDC). In 2012 the battle is continuing although the Citizens clearly and decisively won every court case, which ORERED a Writ of Mandate, vacating the unconstitutional and illegal governmental actions/proclamations establishing the Grater Golden Hill Maintenance Assessment District (GGHMAD) for the benefit of and administration by the Greater Golden Hill Community Development Corporation (GGHCDC). As of today the City employees are continuing the Battle and are refusing to return the stolen monies by the government to the property owners. These Documents are provided to CITIZENS to assists you in fighting the tyranny of our Governments uncaring Politicians, and their dishonest, officious, manipulative, bulling Bureaucrats. They were obtained and provided from many sources and volunteers to whom we shall never forget their goodwill and good-works. I recommend you to first review the following document repaired by community volunteers to better understand what has transpired to this point in time:

20111031 - GGHCDC MAD HISTORY.pdf


I also would recommend that you contact the following Anti-MAD Points of Contact:

www.goldenhillmad.blogspot.com madmatters@cox.net www.madenoughyet.com

INDEX [LIST] OF RELATED DOCUMENTS & PUBLICATIONS


19720000 - Landscaping & Lighting Act of 1972.pdf 19890000 - MAP - South Park & Golden Hill.pdf 19940000 - GGHCDC Revitalization Project.pdf 19951010 - GHCDC Excutive Director Report.pdf 19951010 - GHCDC Revitalization Plan Community.pdf 19951019 - GHCDC Boad Directors.pdf 19951024 - South Park Association 01.pdf 19970000 - CA Gov. Code section 53753.pdf 19970000 - TAX Right to Vote Proposition 218.pdf 19970609 - MAD City Resolution 288830 MAD Ballot.pdf 19980608 - SD MAD MuniCode.pdf 20000614 - MAD local-light mad.pdf 20000628 - GGHCDC Board Agenda.pdf 20000810 - GGHCDC MAD Misc Docs.pdf 20000810 - MAD GGHCDC - Kessler Letter.pdf 20000901 - GGHCDC MAD Hal Tyvoll Protest Flier - Tovel.pdf 20010213 - CDC Newsletter.pdf 20010305 - GGHCDC MAD Reminder Letter.pdf 20010330 - No GGHCDC MAD Flier.pdf 20010401 - MAD GGHCDC Status Report.pdf 20010401 - MAD SD Park Dept.pdf 20010403 - MAD GGHCDC Status Letter.pdf 20010412 - MAD GGHCDC Letter.pdf 20010425 - GHHCDC NewCity 01-10.pdf 20010425 - No GGHCDC MAD Flier.pdf 20010600 - GGHCDC MAD Newletter.pdf 20010608 - CMADJuneNewsletter2001.pdf 20010613 - MAD GGHCDC Letter - Councilmember.pdf 20010623 - MAD GGHCDC Letter - Mayor.pdf 20010710 - MAD GGHCDC Letter - Atkins.pdf 20020108 - MAD SD Process Ord1975.pdf 20020108 - The MAD Process.pdf 20020313 - No GGHCDC MAD Flier.pdf 20020430 - GGHCDC $150 Council Agenda.pdf 20021021 - BID GGHCDC.pdf 20021029 - GH Planning Committee - GGHCDC Business Districts.pdf 20021029 - GH Planning Committee - GGHCDC Community Center.pdf 20021029 - GH Planning Committee - GGHCDC Joint Committees.pdf 20030500 - SD Code MAD Lighting.pdf

20040000 - SD Policy#100-21 MAD Formations.pdf 20040913 - MAD Formation Handout.pdf 20040913 - San Diego MAD Formation Handout.pdf 20050000 - MAD BUDGETS 2004-8 v6_cedadmin.pdf 20050425 - No GGHCDC MAD Flier.pdf 20050622 - MAD SD Self-ManagedMAD-CityFY2006Budget.pdf 20060000 - GHCDC BoardRooster.pdf 20060311 - MAD Court Rulling Greene.pdf 20060318 - GHCDC ActionPlan.pdf 20060401 - GGHCDC strategicPlan2006.pdf 20060600 - GGHCDC eLetter3_06.pdf 20060601 - SD Block Grants amendfyar07.pdf 20060627 - MAD Council Meeting pmfinal.pdf 20061200 - MAD FUNDING SIDEWALKS pmpchap7.pdf 20070000 - FY08 MAD 06v3revenue.pdf 20070000 - San Diego CityBEAT - poochPolitics.pdf 20070101 - GGHCDC Self History.pdf 20070300 - GHCDC MAD SD CITY Survey.pdf 20070300 - MAD North Park AER.pdf 20070400 - GHCDC MAD SCI Engeneers Report-NO APPENDIX.pdf 20070400 - GHCDC MAD SCI Engeneers Report.pdf 20070400 - SD Developemnet services.pdf 20070401 - GGHCDC MAD Tony Atkins News.pdf 20070406 - No GGHCDC MAD Flier.pdf 20070423 - GHCDC MAD Request Council Agenda JUNE 2007.pdf 20070511 - City San Diego City GGHCDC MAD - Ohedia.pdf 20070521 - Hal Tyvoll MAD Ltr to Council.pdf 20070600 - GHCDC City Grants FY07.pdf 20070600 - MAD City FY08v3 CIP Budget.pdf 20070607 - Plan Group juneagenda.pdf 20070608 - MAD GGHCDC Letter 01 - Mayor.pdf 20070608 - MAD GGHCDC Letter 02 - Aguirre.pdf 20070609 - GGHCDC Meeting.pdf 20070612 - Council Agenda - GHCDC MAD1.pdf 20070615 - GGHCDC MAD cert of mailing_1.pdf 20070615 - GGHCDC MAD cert of mailing_2.pdf 20070616 - MAD GGHCDC SD City Flier.pdf 20070617 - NP News- GHCDC MAD SD CITY Advertisement.pdf 20070618 - GGHCDC MAD SD City Ballot.pdf 20070618 - GHCDC MAD SD CITY Letter.pdf 20070619 - GHCDC MAD - SD City Opposition Consultant.pdf 20070621 - Citizen No GGHCDC MAD Ltr to James T. Waring.pdf 20070630 - GHCDC MAD SCI Engeneers Report-02not complete.pdf 20070701 - No GGHCDC MAD Flier.pdf 20070702 - Citizen No GGHCDC MAD Ltr to Toni Atkins.pdf

20070702 - GHCDC MAD SD CITY Flier.pdf 20070702 - Toni Atkins Leter.pdf 20070706 - Dear Neighbor Letter - No MAD tax.pdf 20070708 - MAD GGHCDC Todd Gloria TaxpayersAdvocate.org.pdf 20070709 - MAD Fellow Neighbor Helpful Note.pdf 20070710 - GGHCDC MAD Ben Hueso Website.pdf 20070710 - GGHCDC MAD Vote No Flier.pdf 20070712 - MAD 18July07 MAD Meeting CHANGE.pdf 20070712 - MAD GGHCDC City SAN Diego Parcels.pdf 20070712 - NoMADTax - Gerrymandering.pdf 20070716 - Neighbors Communications & Response from SD Clerk.pdf 20070718 - GHCDC MAD Meeting CHANGE.pdf 20070719 - SCI MAD san diego golden hill response.pdf 20070723 - CA Code 549546.pdf 20070723 - CA Code R28830.pdf 20070723 - CA Constitution-ARTICLE 13 _Prop. 218_.pdf 20070726 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20070726 - San Diego Reader MAD GGHCDC.pdf 20070730 - MAD GGHCDC - NOT A HONEST VOTE.pdf 20070800 - NP NEWS - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20070900 - NP NEWS - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20071000 - GGHCDC MAD Directory.pdf 20071000 - GGHCDC MAD Oversite Committe.pdf 20071100 - NP NEWS - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20071207 - GGHCDC MAD Ballots Oversite Committe.pdf 20080000 - GGHCDC brochurefinal_so (3)_1.pdf 20080000 - GGHCDC MAD City Contract 2008-9.pdf 20080123 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080200 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080200 - NP NEWS - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20080204 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080225 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee By Laws.pdf 20080225 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080317 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080421 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080519 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080519 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20080521 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20080600 - GHCDC MAD SCI Engeneers Report.pdf 20080602 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080616 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080617 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20080620 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20080714 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080715 - GGHCDC MAD Notice of Inviting Bid .pdf

20080723 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20080730 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20080818 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee Procedures.pdf 20080818 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080819 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20080900 - GGHCDC MAD Newspaper.pdf 20080915 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080917 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20081020 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20081022 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20081112 - SD 21.reporttocitycouncilfy09.pdf 20081117 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20081118 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20081215 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20081216 - MAD MAP SD City.pdf 20081230 - HUD Audit - San Diego ig0991005.pdf 20090105 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20090202 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20090302 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20090303 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20090307 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20090323 - GGHCDC MAD sidewalk repair Letter.pdf 20090406 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20090504 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20090601 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20090606 - GGHCDC MAD Oversite Committe.pdf 20090629 - GGHCDC MAD Promotions Letter.pdf 20090630 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTfy092ndreprogramming.pdf 20090707 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20090717 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20090814 - MAD Democratic Values and Special Assessments.pdf 20090918 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20090930 - GGHCDC MAD Disband Oversight Committee Vote.pdf 20100000 - FY11 SD budget MAD 14v1appendix.pdf 20100203 - MAD Court Final Judgment GHAA.pdf 20100203 - MAD Court Findings Judgment GHAA.pdf 20100223 - GHNA - MAD help.pdf 20100324 - MAD University Avenue - uampmtgpresentation.pdf 20100411 - MAD GGHCDC Illegale $732,746 Budget.pdf 20100421 - San Diego Reader - CDC No Refunds.pdf 20100501 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20100600 - MAD GGHCDC.pdf 20100726 - fy11ao.pdf 20100831 - GHHCDC Audit.pdf

20100913 - MAD VENDOR LOT SUMMARY 9958.pdf 20101001 - GGHCDC MAD Annual Report 2009.pdf 20101105 - GGHCDC Hotline Investigation 11-5.pdf 20101110 - UTSanDiego.pdf 20101120 - 25th Street Project.pdf 20101201 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20110000 - MAD 25th Street.pdf 20110200 - MAD Oversight Cmte agenda-Feb 2011.pdf 20110415 - GGHCDC 25thFINAL-FLYER#3.pdf 20110504 - GGH CPUAC.pdf 20110505 - GGHCDC 25th St Project.pdf 20110510 - GGHCDC MAD Farmer's Market.pdf 20110517 - SD Developemnet services.pdf 20110600 - FY11 SD budget 10_37.pdf 20110600 - SD Planning Groups contactlist.pdf 20110604 - Fed Report CDC990-ending Aug 2010.pdf 20110604 - Fed Report CDC990.pdf 20110711 - GGHCDC MAD Audit.pdf 20110726 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20110900 - GHHCDC Boardmembers.pdf 20110922 - COURT Appellate-Final Ruling-D057004.pdf 20110922 - D057004.PDF 20110922 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20111003 - Todd Gloria & David Alvarez GGH MAD D3_D8 Memo.pdf 20111004 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20111006 - GGHCDC MAD BMurry email.pdf 20111014 - California Taxpayers Association - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20111014 - San Diego Uptown News - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20111020 - NP NEWS - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20111021 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20111031 - GGHCDC MAD HISTORY.pdf 20111031 - GGHCDC MAD HISTORY.ppt 20120000 - MAD 25th Street v3schedule1.pdf 20120215 - UTSanDiego.pdf 20120219 - SD Planning Groups contactlist.pdf 20120312 - GGHCDC MAD City Dissolution.pdf 20120329 - Property Tax Letter 2011-12.pdf 20120412 - Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee.pdf 20120412 - UpTown News Artical.pdf 20120419 - GGHCDC Meeting Agenda.pdf 20120419 - GGHCDC WebPage.pdf 20120422 - Marco LiMandri - New City America.pdf 20120423 - GGHCDC MAD Trash Cans.pdf 20120900 - GGH Planning.pdf

You might also like