THE MARK ON THE WALL

Virginia Woolf’s short story The Mark on the Wall is a classic example of modernist writing,
especially her use of the “stream of consciousness” technique. The narrative does not follow a linear plot
with events, characters, or dialogue in the traditional sense. Instead, it records the wandering thoughts
and reflections of the narrator as she contemplates a small, seemingly insignificant mark on the wall of
her room. Through this device, Woolf explores themes of perception, reality, history, knowledge,
tradition, and the search for meaning in a fragmented world.

The story begins with the narrator recalling the first time she noticed the mark on the wall. She
tries to fix the date by associating it with surrounding details: the firelight, a book she was reading,
chrysanthemums on the mantelpiece, and the fact that she had just finished tea and was smoking a
cigarette.

At first, she speculates that the mark might be the trace of a nail once used to hang a picture, perhaps a
miniature portrait of a powdered lady. From there, her mind leaps to the thought of the people who
lived in the house before her—“interesting people,” she imagines, though she can never know them
fully. Even as she begins to wonder about the mark, her thoughts wander in a free-flowing stream,
revealing the instability of perception and memory.

Reflections on Life, Loss, and Impermanence

The narrator then muses on how uncertain and mysterious life is. She recalls objects lost over a lifetime
—birdcages, skates, jewelry—things that vanish mysteriously, suggesting how fragile human ownership
is. Life, she says, feels like being blown through a tunnel at great speed, ending suddenly, with nothing
held firmly in place. This imagery highlights Woolf’s concern with the instability of human experience
and the inevitability of loss.

From there, she contemplates death and rebirth. She imagines what it would be like to be born after
death, helpless and unfocused, surrounded only by indistinct colors and shapes, as infants are in this
world. These philosophical digressions show how a tiny stimulus—the mark—opens up meditations on
existence itself.

Desire for Thought and Escape from Reality

At another moment, she wonders if the mark might be a rose petal left from summer, and she reflects on
her inattentive housekeeping. The narrator expresses a desire to think freely, without interruption, and
to sink deeply into the life of the mind. She turns to Shakespeare as a figure who embodied that kind of
endless flow of ideas. Yet, even in that, she is distracted, admitting that historical fiction and rigidly
factual accounts bore her. She prefers to wander into pleasant trains of thought, even if they indirectly
flatter her own self-image.

Her reflections then turn to identity and self-perception. She considers how individuals constantly create
flattering images of themselves in their minds, secretly cherishing these versions while hiding them from
others. The fragility of this self-image is emphasized: if the “looking-glass” that reflects these images

1|Bhabesh
were shattered, only the shallow outer shell—the version seen by others—would remain. For her, this is
unbearable, as life would lose its richness without private self-reflection.

Reality, Social Rules, and Traditions

The narrator then broadens her reflections to society and reality. She notes that future novelists will
need to capture these inner reflections rather than outward descriptions, since reality itself is already
understood. Woolf here articulates her vision of modernist literature: the exploration of consciousness
rather than mere external action.

Her mind then drifts to memories of social conventions from childhood—Sunday walks, luncheons,
tablecloths. She reflects on how traditions, once seen as “real” and absolute, later reveal themselves to
be half-phantoms, mere illusions of permanence.

History, Knowledge, and the Futility of Certainty

The mark continues to capture her imagination. At times, it seems to project from the wall like a tiny
mound. This leads her to imagine ancient burial sites or camps on the English Downs. She imagines an
antiquary (a retired Colonel) devoting his life to studying arrowheads, pottery, and bones, only to die still
uncertain about his conclusions. Through this, Woolf highlights the futility of human knowledge: nothing
is ever proved, nothing is fully known.

The narrator wonders if identifying the mark—whether it is a nail, a crack, or a leaf—would give her any
more certainty in life. Would such knowledge matter? After all, human knowledge itself is descended
from superstition, from witches and hermits who once interpreted signs in nature.

The Consolation of Nature and Reality

Even so, the narrator acknowledges the pull of reality. She feels tempted to check the mark, and she
reflects that action often interrupts thought, just as nature prompts us to do something when our
thoughts threaten to become painful. Fixing her gaze on the mark provides her with a sense of solidity,
like clinging to a plank in a stormy sea. Reality—wood, trees, rivers, fish, and insects—becomes a
comforting anchor.

Her reflections on trees are especially rich: she imagines their patient growth, their exposure to storms,
their role in nature, and their afterlife as timber in human homes. The tree becomes a symbol of
continuity and renewal, contrasting with human fragility and fleeting traditions.

The Ending: The Revelation

At the very end, the narrator’s meditations are interrupted by another person entering the room,
announcing he is going to buy a newspaper and cursing the war. He casually remarks that the mark on
the wall is simply a snail.

This revelation abruptly ends the narrator’s stream of thoughts. What seemed a portal to philosophy,
memory, identity, history, and imagination turns out to be an ordinary creature slowly moving along the
wall. Woolf leaves the reader with irony: the profound reflections of the narrator are built upon an

2|Bhabesh
illusion, while the reality is mundane. Yet, the deeper truth is that the snail does not diminish the
reflections; instead, it shows how even the smallest, most ordinary object can open up entire worlds of
thought.

THE OWL
The story The Owl is a poignant exploration of grief, denial, and the desperate attempts of the human
mind to rationalize or escape the pain of personal loss. At its heart lies the account of a man struggling to
cope with the death of his beloved wife, and his irrational yet deeply human fixation on an owl that
seems to embody his sorrow. The narrative is symbolic, psychological, and emotionally charged,
presenting both the inner torment of bereavement and the eerie, haunting way in which nature itself
can seem to conspire with human suffering.

The story begins in a tranquil countryside setting, where the protagonist’s wife has recently passed away.
Her death casts an unbearable shadow over his life. He is overwhelmed by grief, unable to reconcile
himself to the reality of her absence. The house, once alive with warmth and companionship, now feels
cold and desolate. Every corner reminds him of her: her voice, her laughter, and her presence linger in
memory, leaving him unable to adjust to the void she has left.

The protagonist’s sorrow soon finds a strange outlet when, during the silent nights of mourning, he
begins to notice an owl that frequently perches near his house. The bird calls out in the stillness, its
mournful cry resonating with his own inner despair. The hooting seems less like a random sound of
nature and more like a deliberate lamentation. To him, it feels as though the owl is weeping alongside
him, mourning the same loss.

The man begins to fixate on the owl, interpreting its presence as more than mere coincidence. He
convinces himself that the bird is somehow connected with his departed wife — perhaps as a
messenger, or even as an embodiment of her soul. The owl’s nocturnal cries take on a deeply personal
meaning, becoming intertwined with his sorrow.

This projection reflects a common human tendency in grief: the desperate need to find signs of the
departed, to imagine that they still exist in some form and are reaching out across the veil of death. The
owl becomes for him what superstition and faith often are for mourners: a bridge between the living and
the dead.

Yet, this fixation also shows his inability to accept reality. Instead of facing the finality of death, he seeks
solace in irrational associations. His reasoning becomes increasingly clouded by emotion, and his nights
are consumed by thoughts of the owl. Where others might hear a simple birdcall, he hears the echoes of
his wife’s spirit.

The Conflict Between Reason and Emotion

As days pass, the protagonist becomes aware of the strangeness of his obsession. Part of him knows it is
absurd to associate the owl with his wife, but grief is stronger than reason. This inner conflict grows

3|Bhabesh
more intense: logic tells him that the bird is nothing but a creature of the night, but emotion insists it
carries significance.

This struggle mirrors the universal battle between rational acceptance of death and the irrational
yearning to hold onto the departed. Many who suffer loss experience dreams, visions, or beliefs that the
dead are still present. For this man, the owl is the embodiment of such illusions. His torment lies in being
unable to free himself from this self-deception, yet unwilling to let it go, since it is his only comfort.

The Descent into Obsession

Over time, the protagonist’s obsession deepens. The owl’s cry begins to dominate his nights, preventing
him from finding peace. It becomes a haunting refrain, echoing in his mind, reminding him of his loss at
every moment. He begins to dread the sound, yet he also depends on it, for without it he would feel
completely abandoned.

His grief twists into a kind of madness. He no longer sees the bird as an ordinary creature but as a
tormentor, deliberately reminding him of his wife’s absence. He wonders whether it is mocking him,
punishing him, or holding him captive to his grief. What began as a comfort turns into a curse.

The transformation of the owl’s meaning — from companion to tormentor — reflects the unpredictable
trajectory of mourning. The same memories that once bring solace can, at other times, feel like
unbearable wounds. The man cannot escape this cycle: when the owl cries, he suffers; when it is silent,
he suffers too.

Climax: The Irreconcilable Loss

The climax of the story comes when the man reaches the breaking point of his grief. His nights become
unbearable. The owl’s presence, once a balm, now feels like torture. In his anguish, he lashes out —
either in thought or in action — at the bird, as though destroying it would finally release him from the
chains of mourning.

Yet this act, whether real or imagined, does not bring relief. The owl, after all, is only a projection of his
own sorrow. Its destruction cannot erase the truth: his wife is gone, and nothing in the world can restore
her. The futility of his struggle becomes clear. He cannot externalize or fight against grief as though it
were an enemy outside himself. The haunting cry of the owl was always inside him, in his memory and
his heart.

TIME TO UNFORGET
Asim Ranian Parhi’s Time to Unforget is a reflective and philosophical poem that journeys through
memory, identity, and human struggle. It portrays the poet’s inner dialogue with himself, his society, and
his cultural inheritance, creating a layered exploration of resilience, justice, and the reclamation of
dignity. The work is not simply a narration of events or emotions; instead, it is a passionate declaration of
awakening from dormancy, resisting oppression, and rediscovering the strength embedded in human
will.

4|Bhabesh
The poem opens with a call to “remind my dormant self,” setting the stage for a personal and collective
reawakening. The poet portrays this moment as one of revival, a “boost” to a drowsy, indecisive state.
This movement from indecision to determination becomes the central motif of the poem, expressed
through the concept of “infinite resolution.” Here, the poet suggests that human existence involves an
eternal struggle—what he calls an “archetypal man’s Ili-evocable mission.” The reference to “Ili” evokes
epic memory, perhaps Iliad-like struggles of humanity against its internal and external enemies. These
enemies are described as “ghosty devils,” forces that must be permanently silenced, symbolizing
injustice, oppression, and corruption that plague societies and individuals.

The second movement of the poem deepens the sense of inheritance. The poet recalls the “Father
ancient,” a figure embodying austerity and saintly sacrifice. With this ancestor’s departure, the poet
assumes the responsibility of carrying forward a mission of resistance. He pledges to “vanquish, vanish,
demolish and perish” these destructive forces. This litany of verbs not only reflects his uncompromising
resolve but also connects his personal struggle with a broader historical continuum. The sense of duty is
strong—he positions himself as both a successor and a defender of human dignity.

Parhi then introduces the metaphor of a “dethroned prince.” This image powerfully conveys paradox:
deprived of means yet still “destiny’s heir.” The dethroned prince symbolizes humanity’s inherent nobility
and inner power, even when materially dispossessed. The prince’s rugged face, hardened by struggle and
revenge, reflects both pain and determination. The poet uses this figure to emphasize resilience—the
strength to keep striving despite deprivation and betrayal. This theme resonates strongly with
postcolonial conditions, where dispossessed nations and individuals must reclaim lost glory while
confronting the scars of history.

The poem also critiques social evils such as caste, gender inequality, and loveless marriages. Parhi calls
caste and gender “heartless slaves,” institutions that have been weaponized to perpetuate division and
cruelty. His words reflect frustration with how these social constructs fuel heinous acts, represented as
darts piercing humanity. The poet invokes the epic past, recalling moments where even the greatest
heroes were stripped of power, or women were reduced to tools of vengeance. These references
highlight the recurring injustices across history, suggesting that oppression is not new but an ancient
cycle humanity must finally break.

A striking element of the poem is its treatment of masculinity and dignity. Parhi rejects the notion that
all men are driven by lust or aggression. He distinguishes between the many who falter and the one who
stands firm, refusing to succumb to betrayal or rowdiness. This defense of masculine honor is not about
domination but about restraint, integrity, and grace. He critiques marriages that have become “loveless,
bitter, fictive”—institutions that fail to nurture true human connection. For him, the tragedy lies not only
in personal disillusionment but also in the loss of the “only race”: the pursuit of authentic human dignity
and grace.

At its heart, Time to Unforget is a meditation on memory and forgetting. To “unforget” is to recall not
just the past but the responsibilities embedded in it. It means confronting ancient struggles, learning
from epic examples, and reigniting the spirit of resistance against injustice. The poem speaks to both the
personal and the collective: the poet’s own journey of awakening mirrors the universal human struggle

5|Bhabesh
for justice, dignity, and meaning. In this way, the work transcends the individual and resonates with a
broader audience.

Stylistically, the poem blends modern free verse with epic allusions. Its diction is forceful and rhythmic,
marked by repetition (“vanquish, vanish, demolish and perish”) and paradox (“deprived of means yet
destiny’s heir”). These devices reinforce the poem’s themes of resilience, struggle, and determination.
The language alternates between personal reflection and universal declaration, creating a dynamic
tension that engages readers. Moreover, the imagery—of ghosts, dethroned princes, rugged faces, and
bitter marriages—conveys both inner and outer battles, situating the poem within a rich symbolic
framework.

The tone throughout is resolute and defiant. Even as the poet acknowledges suffering, dispossession,
and betrayal, his voice is not one of despair but of determination. He sees himself and humanity as
capable of resisting injustice and reclaiming lost dignity. The poem is thus a call to action, urging readers
to awaken from their dormancy, confront their oppressors, and live with integrity.

In conclusion, Asim Ranian Parhi’s Time to Unforget is a profound exploration of human resilience,
justice, and dignity. It is both deeply personal and universally relevant, blending introspection with social
critique. By invoking epic memory, critiquing social evils, and defending human grace, the poet crafts a
work that inspires readers to “unforget” their responsibilities and embrace the struggle for truth and
justice. With its blend of powerful imagery, philosophical reflection, and passionate tone, the poem
stands as a timeless reminder that even in dispossession, humanity retains its destiny, its strength, and
its grace.

THE BANGLE SELLERS

Sarojini Naidu, often called the “Nightingale of India,” is known for weaving Indian culture, tradition, and
everyday experiences into her poetry. The Bangle Sellers is one such poem where she celebrates the
beauty and significance of bangles, while at the same time highlighting the different stages in a woman’s
life. The poem is not only a description of bangles as ornaments but also a symbolic journey of
womanhood, from maidenhood to marriage to motherhood and maturity.

The poem begins with the voice of the bangle sellers themselves. They are shown carrying their glittering
wares to the temple fair, calling out to customers to buy them. The opening establishes the joyful, festive
atmosphere and immediately connects bangles with tradition, spirituality, and social life. The sellers call
their bangles “shining loads” and “delicate, bright, rainbow-tinted circles of light.” These descriptions
highlight both their physical beauty and their symbolic value. The bangles are not mere ornaments; they
are “lustrous tokens of radiant lives,” meant for “happy daughters and happy wives.” This line stresses
that bangles are deeply tied to women’s identities, joys, and milestones in Indian society.

In the second stanza, Naidu shifts to describing bangles suitable for maidens. These are silver and blue
“like the mountain mist,” or flushed and pink like flower buds beside a stream, or green like newborn
leaves. Such colors reflect freshness, purity, and hope—qualities associated with youth. Through these

6|Bhabesh
comparisons, the poet conveys innocence and the promise of growth. The imagery of nature—mist,
flowers, and leaves—underlines how maidenhood is the springtime of life. Naidu suggests that just as
nature is filled with beauty and potential, so too is a young girl stepping into womanhood.

The third stanza describes bangles for a bride on her wedding day. These bangles are golden, glowing,
and fiery, “like the flame of her marriage fire.” Their richness mirrors the excitement, passion, and
sanctity of marriage. They are “tinkling, luminous, tender, and clear,” echoing the emotions of a bride—
her laughter, tears, love, and hope. The red and golden colors represent love, energy, and commitment.
By linking bangles to the marriage fire, Naidu shows their religious and cultural significance, as the fire is
sacred in Hindu rituals. The stanza captures both the outward celebration of marriage and the inner
transformation of the bride as she begins a new phase of life.

The fourth stanza portrays bangles for mature, middle-aged women. These are “purple and gold-flecked
grey,” suggesting both dignity and the wisdom of experience. They symbolize a woman who has lived
through life’s responsibilities and joys. She is described as one who has “cherished,” “blest,” and “cradled
fair sons on her faithful breast.” This highlights her role as a mother, nurturer, and guide. She serves her
household with pride, upholding family traditions and worshipping the gods beside her husband. These
bangles thus represent fulfillment, maturity, and spiritual devotion. Unlike the bright, playful colors of a
maiden or the fiery tones of a bride, these are more subdued, reflecting calmness, steadiness, and a
sense of accomplishment.

Taken together, the poem forms a cycle of life: girlhood, marriage, and maturity. Bangles act as markers
of each stage, making them more than ornaments—they are symbols of a woman’s identity, emotions,
and duties. Naidu also highlights the collective experience of women, not just individuals, suggesting
that these stages are universal in traditional Indian society.

Another important aspect of the poem is the cultural backdrop. The temple fair is not only a marketplace
but also a place of social gathering and spirituality. By setting the poem there, Naidu emphasizes the
close link between tradition, community, and personal milestones. The sellers are not merely tradesmen;
they are participants in a ritual that celebrates womanhood. Their call to buy bangles is, in a way, a call
to recognize and honor the stages of life.

The poem also celebrates the artistry of Indian crafts. The bangles are described with vivid imagery—
mist, buds, leaves, sunlit corn, marriage flames, and purple flecks. Through these, Naidu shows how
handcrafted objects like bangles carry cultural depth and symbolic meaning. The poem thus becomes
both a tribute to Indian tradition and an exploration of feminine identity.

Stylistically, Naidu uses simple rhyme and rhythm, making the poem musical and easy to recite, much
like a folk song at a fair. The repetition of phrases such as “Some are…” adds a chant-like quality,
reflecting the sellers’ rhythmic calls. The sensory imagery—colors, textures, sounds—creates a vivid
picture of the bangles and their symbolism.

In conclusion, The Bangle Sellers is more than a description of ornaments. It is a symbolic portrayal of a
woman’s journey through life, expressed through the colors and beauty of bangles. Naidu celebrates
women in their various roles—innocent maidens, passionate brides, nurturing mothers, and dignified

7|Bhabesh
wives—showing how each stage carries its own beauty and significance. At the same time, the poem
reflects Indian cultural traditions, where ornaments like bangles are not just accessories but integral to
identity, rituals, and emotions. By weaving together art, tradition, and womanhood, Naidu creates a rich,
layered poem that continues to resonate as both a cultural celebration and a feminist appreciation of
women’s lives.

A RIVER
Attipate Krishnaswami Ramanujan, widely known as A. K. Ramanujan (1929–1993), was one of the most
significant poets, translators, folklorists, and scholars of post-independence India. His works often reflect
the tension between tradition and modernity, memory and reality, as well as the rootedness of culture in
everyday life. As a bilingual poet writing in both English and Kannada, Ramanujan occupied a unique
position in Indian literature, serving as a bridge between regional traditions and global literary
expression. His poem A River, included in his celebrated collection The Striders (1966), exemplifies his
ability to combine sharp social observation, irony, and humanistic concern.

The poem situates itself in Madurai, an ancient South Indian city famous for its temples and its
association with classical Tamil poetry. Ramanujan opens by reminding the reader that Madurai has long
been celebrated as a “city of temples and poets,” where poets historically composed verses praising its
sacred spaces and natural beauty. However, Ramanujan immediately contrasts this tradition with his
own modern outlook: he chooses to focus not on the grandeur of temples or the glory of the river but
on its ordinary and sometimes grim realities. This marks a shift from the idealized imagery of classical
poetry to the lived experience of common people.

The central image of the poem is the river in Madurai, which undergoes a dramatic transformation
between the dry summer months and the monsoon floods. In summer, the river is reduced to a trickle,
exposing sand ribs, clogged gates, women’s hair, and stones that gleam like crocodiles. Ramanujan
presents this unromantic scene with vivid imagery, emphasizing decay, neglect, and the river’s
barrenness. Instead of divine beauty, he shows a harsh reality—an empty riverbed filled with debris and
disrepair.

When the monsoon comes, however, the river floods, and this is the moment traditionally celebrated by
poets. Ramanujan, with irony, observes that poets, both old and new, only sing of the floods, ignoring
the suffering and devastation they cause. He recounts how people measure the flood in inches, noting
how many steps of the ghats are submerged. But behind this seemingly objective description lies
tragedy: the flood carries away houses, cattle, and even human lives. The poem specifically mentions a
pregnant woman, drowned along with her unborn twins, as well as two cows named Gopi and Brinda.
These details serve as symbols of the ordinary victims of natural disasters, whose loss rarely finds a place
in poetry.

Ramanujan critiques the indifference of poets and society. The old poets glorified the floods, the new
poets imitated them, yet none addressed the pain of common people. The pregnant woman’s tragic
death, which should be a subject of deep empathy, is left unrecorded in verse. Ramanujan, however,

8|Bhabesh
chooses to speak of it, positioning himself as a different kind of poet—one who does not ignore the
unheroic, everyday suffering.

The tone of the poem is a mixture of irony, realism, and compassion. By repeating details—like the cows’
names or the woman’s unborn twins—Ramanujan highlights both the ordinariness and the neglect of
these tragedies. The precision of description (such as “with different coloured diapers to tell them
apart”) underlines the humanity of the lost lives while mocking the tendency of poets to focus on
superficial details rather than deep truths. His style is deliberately anti-romantic, breaking away from
idealized depictions of nature in classical poetry to confront stark social realities.

A River also embodies Ramanujan’s broader concerns as a poet. He was deeply interested in how
traditions are remembered, repeated, or misrepresented over time. In this poem, he shows how literary
traditions can become detached from reality—poets quoting poets, creating a cycle of repetition that
excludes new perspectives. His own voice intervenes in this cycle, insisting on realism, empathy, and
honesty. In this sense, the poem is both a critique of past traditions and a declaration of a new poetic
vision.

Moreover, the poem reflects postcolonial India’s literary transition. After independence, Indian English
poets sought to distinguish themselves from colonial imitations and root their poetry in local contexts.
Ramanujan achieves this by situating his poem in a specifically South Indian city, drawing on its cultural
history while also questioning its literary heritage. His English is marked by simplicity, clarity, and
precision, yet it carries the rhythms and imagery of Indian experience. Thus, A River not only critiques
poetic traditions but also represents a new form of modern Indian poetry—grounded in local realities
yet globally intelligible.

Ramanujan’s compassion lies at the heart of the poem. He reminds readers that behind cultural symbols
and poetic traditions are human lives often forgotten. By drawing attention to the drowned woman and
her unborn children, he forces us to confront the cost of indifference. He also implies that poetry has a
responsibility: not merely to celebrate beauty or follow tradition, but to bear witness to suffering, to
voice what society prefers to overlook.

In conclusion, A. K. Ramanujan, through A River, emerges as a poet of honesty, irony, and empathy. He
distances himself from the classical poetic tradition of idealizing nature and instead gives voice to the
marginalized realities of ordinary people. His portrayal of Madurai’s river—dry and lifeless in summer,
destructive in flood—becomes a metaphor for poetry itself: often celebrated only in moments of
grandeur, while neglecting the silent tragedies of everyday life. In giving attention to the drowned
pregnant woman, the ruined houses, and the lost cows, Ramanujan reshapes the role of the poet. He
insists that poetry must not only preserve tradition but also interrogate it, bringing to light the
overlooked truths of human existence. In doing so, he redefines Indian poetry in English, making it more
truthful, humane, and socially aware.

SILENCE! THE COURT IS IN SESSION

9|Bhabesh
Vijay Tendulkar’s Silence! The Court is in Session (original Marathi title Shantata! Court Chalu Ahe, 1967)
is a one-act play that boldly critiques patriarchal hypocrisy, social oppression, and the silencing of
women’s voices in Indian society. Though set as a rehearsal for a mock trial, the play transforms into a
cruel exposure of social prejudice, ultimately reflecting how an individual woman becomes a victim of
the collective judgment of society.

The play begins with a group of amateur theatre artists, members of a social awareness group, arriving in
a village to perform a mock trial meant to entertain and educate the villagers. The central character, Miss
Leela Benare, a 34-year-old schoolteacher, is introduced early on. She is independent, witty, confident,
and financially self-reliant. However, her cheerful demeanor masks deep personal struggles.

The group consists of Mr. and Mrs. Kashikar, Sukhatme the lawyer, Ponkshe, Rokde, Karnik, and Samant,
a local villager who helps them arrange the rehearsal. Mr. Kashikar assumes the role of judge in the mock
trial, Sukhatme becomes the lawyer, and Benare, playfully at first, is cast in the role of the “accused.” The
initial mood is lighthearted, and the participants treat the court setup as a game.

However, the rehearsal quickly takes on a grim tone when the charge against Benare is announced:
infanticide, or the attempted killing of an unborn child. What was meant as a harmless mock accusation
begins to reflect reality, as the group draws upon Benare’s personal life. Gradually, her private affair with
Professor Damle, a married academic, comes to light. Damle has impregnated Benare but refuses to take
responsibility, abandoning her to face the shame of unwed motherhood.

As the mock trial proceeds, the line between drama and reality blurs. The group seizes upon Benare’s
personal tragedy as material for entertainment, but their accusations reveal their own prejudices and
cruelty. Sukhatme delivers a scathing prosecution, presenting Benare as immoral, reckless, and unfit to
teach children. The others, instead of showing sympathy, join in condemning her, turning the mock court
into a forum for social judgment.

Benare’s responses initially maintain her characteristic sharp wit and defiance. She mocks the men’s
hypocrisy, exposes their failures, and refuses to bow down to their authority. Yet, as the accusations
intensify, her mask of cheerfulness begins to crack. Her emotional monologues reveal her pain and
loneliness: she loved Damle sincerely, trusted him, and hoped for companionship, but he betrayed her
trust. Her desire to keep her unborn child is her act of defiance against a society that seeks to control
and shame her.

The climax of the play is harrowing. The mock trial delivers a verdict against Benare, branding her guilty
of moral corruption and declaring that she should terminate her pregnancy and be dismissed from her
job. What was once a staged courtroom scene becomes a cruel weapon used to silence and humiliate
her. When Benare attempts to protest, she is commanded to be silent because “the court is in session.”
When she chooses silence, she is accused of contempt of court and ordered to speak. This contradictory
treatment highlights the absurdity and brutality of patriarchal control.

By the end, Benare is emotionally devastated. The others leave the stage, treating the trial as a mere
rehearsal, but for her, the consequences are real and deeply painful. The play ends on a tragic note, with

10 | B h a b e s h
Benare isolated, silenced, and broken, embodying the fate of countless women whose voices and lives
are suppressed by social judgment.

Themes and Analysis

At its heart, Silence! The Court is in Session is a powerful critique of gender discrimination and the
hypocrisy of patriarchy. Benare symbolizes the independent modern woman who dares to live on her
own terms. She is financially independent, outspoken, and refuses to conform to traditional roles of wife
and mother. Yet, instead of being respected, she is punished for her autonomy.

The mock trial is symbolic of society itself—a place where justice should prevail, but instead, women are
judged harshly, with little compassion. The play demonstrates how the judicial system, like social
institutions, can be misused as instruments of oppression when controlled by biased individuals.

The title carries ironic significance. A courtroom demands silence as a sign of order and justice, but here
silence is imposed on Benare to strip her of her voice. It represents the systematic silencing of women
under patriarchal norms. The supposed “court” becomes a parody of justice, exposing how truth and
fairness are often sacrificed to uphold oppressive moral codes.

Another striking theme is social hypocrisy. The men who condemn Benare are themselves morally
flawed: Sukhatme is a failed lawyer, Mr. Kashikar is authoritarian, and even the supposedly intellectual
Damle is cowardly and irresponsible. Yet, these men assume the right to judge and punish Benare,
exposing double standards in society’s treatment of men and women.

11 | B h a b e s h