0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views3 pages

Researcher Supervisor Relations Final

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views3 pages

Researcher Supervisor Relations Final

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

RESEARCHER–SUPERVISOR RELATIONS

INTRODUCTION
The supervisor plays a central role in the research process. He determines not only the
speed but also the quality and successful completion of a project. For this reason, the
relationship between the student and supervisor is of utmost importance. A student’s
attitude and ability to maintain diplomatic relations with the supervisor can either
enhance or hinder his research ambition. This point is best illustrated through real cases.

CASE ONE
Mr. Olagunju, a doctoral student, had two supervisors: Professor Egelege and Dr.
Namilu. Shortly after his appointment, Professor Egelege became Vice-Chancellor,
leaving Dr. Namilu to handle supervision. At the point of thesis submission, Dr. Namilu
refused to certify the work, insisting he should be considered the sole supervisor since
Professor Egelege had little time. This dispute created a deadlock, leaving Mr. Olagunju
in the program for several years. The case highlights the importance of clearly defined
supervisory roles and healthy relations between student and supervisors.

CASE TWO
Mr. Domingo, another doctoral student, was supervised by Professors Anisonia and
Azande. However, he worked exclusively with Professor Anisonia, ignoring Professor
Azande. When his thesis was completed, Professor Azande protested his exclusion. This
confusion delayed graduation for two academic sessions. The case demonstrates the
consequences of neglecting one supervisor and the importance of respecting all appointed
supervisors.

FACTORS TO CONSIDER IN SELECTING A SUPERVISOR


When choosing a supervisor, a student should carefully evaluate the following:

• Area of Research Interest – Alignment of the supervisor’s interests with the student’s
topic.

• Competence – Ability and experience of the supervisor in the research field.

• Workload – Supervisors with excessive teaching or administrative duties may not give
adequate attention.

• Motivation and Willingness – Supervisors should show genuine interest in guiding


students.
• Integrity – A trustworthy supervisor ensures fairness and ethical conduct.

• Organisation – Ability to manage time, meetings, and drafts efficiently.

• Reputation – A good track record enhances trust and progress.

• Rapport with Students – Approachability and good interpersonal skills foster a


supportive environment.

• Academic and Political Clout – Influence and standing within the institution can ease
administrative bottlenecks and prevent unnecessary delays.

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE STUDENT-RESEARCHER


• Choice of Topic – He must select and own the research topic, not shift blame to the
supervisor.

• Planning and Scheduling – Preparing and adhering to a realistic research plan.

• Locating Research Materials – Independently sourcing literature and data.

• Maintaining Communication – Keeping supervisors informed of progress at all times.

• Reconciling Conflicting Views – Managing differences in supervisors’ feedback with


wisdom and fairness.

• Demonstrating Seriousness – Meeting deadlines, attending appointments, and avoiding


dependency on supervisors.

• Completing and Defending the Work – Taking full responsibility for final submission
and defence.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE SUPERVISOR


• Guidance – Helping refine the research topic and providing direction.

• Constructive Feedback – Giving clear, precise, and documented comments.

• Monitoring Progress – Filing reports and keeping track of the student’s work.

• Encouragement – Supporting students through challenges and motivating them to


persist.

• Timeliness – Reviewing drafts promptly to avoid delays.

• Fairness – Avoiding attitudes of sabotage, jealousy, or neglect that harm student


progress.
SUMMARY
The supervisor is a key determinant of success in the student’s research journey.
However, the student has the primary responsibility to manage this relationship
effectively. In choosing a supervisor, the student should consider research interest,
competence, workload, integrity, organisation, reputation, rapport, motivation, and
political clout.

A good supervisor should be approachable, supportive, principled, and efficient. A wise


student should complement this by being serious, committed, and communicative.
Ultimately, successful research is the product of a balanced, respectful, and productive
researcher–supervisor relationship.

You might also like