Intercultural
Communication
A Discourse Approach
Ron Scollon
and
Suzanne Wong Scollon
(995°
BLACKWELL
(lod UR & Combe USA
3
Interpersonal Politeness and
Power
Communicative Style or Register
han Road in Tsim Sha
t and shopping areas, two me
one of Hi
sed by a ve
‘When he spoke to the second
vendor) he used 2 more formal or
ind referred to the item for sal
‘guistic form when those
of spesch events or speech situations. Among.
te4 Interpersonal Politeness and Power
participants remain the same, the greeting will vary in register because of We also make
different setting i er person is and
them and he also project
1us by simply using
speakers making some
e choice of terms of
wguists. The watch
recognized as an essential elemer
said th 1wo aspects of participa
{what roles they are taking. At
participation: the
‘The concept of face will recognize the
term mianzi in Manda in Cantonese, mentsu in Japanese, chae myon
in Korean), where it carrics a range of meanings based upon a core concept
fant ways in which we reduct
he people we ar
ing to someone we try 10 |
when we begJip. If such a claveness is ac
for the favor th:
‘One reason
it leaves open th
which is presented
of psychology or, perhaps,
i. Nevertheless, it is importa
ficant cultural differences in the assump
1 deeper question is ul
not go further
may be
“lf” that
basic groups such as the
10 be more strongly under
ut face.
show them our involvement,
degree of independence from of
respect their independence. These
endence, produ
iy ad t sow
7 nvolvement and inde-
wit per
supporting member of
and need to be co vga normal and contributing
‘society. This involvernent
Interpersonal Politeness and Power a”
in communicative events.
point of view of other parti
take, and by any other means
yws involvement by taking the
views they
say such things as,
just what you mean, the same thing happened to me
or, “Yes, Fageee, I
may be considered a strategy of involvement.
erms have been used
jt has been called posit
itive and negative
at this aspect of face shows
¢ terms might be acceptable
in some contexts, but we
fewest analytical complications for t
snce shows that a person may
and that he or she respects the rights of others
‘of movement or choice.
ance is shown by such
ie face strategies is that
Independence has also been given va