You are on page 1of 9
Intercultural Communication A Discourse Approach Ron Scollon and Suzanne Wong Scollon (995° BLACKWELL (lod UR & Combe USA 3 Interpersonal Politeness and Power Communicative Style or Register han Road in Tsim Sha t and shopping areas, two me one of Hi sed by a ve ‘When he spoke to the second vendor) he used 2 more formal or ind referred to the item for sal ‘guistic form when those of spesch events or speech situations. Among. te 4 Interpersonal Politeness and Power participants remain the same, the greeting will vary in register because of We also make different setting i er person is and them and he also project 1us by simply using speakers making some e choice of terms of wguists. The watch recognized as an essential elemer said th 1wo aspects of participa {what roles they are taking. At participation: the ‘The concept of face will recognize the term mianzi in Manda in Cantonese, mentsu in Japanese, chae myon in Korean), where it carrics a range of meanings based upon a core concept fant ways in which we reduct he people we ar ing to someone we try 10 | when we beg Jip. If such a claveness is ac for the favor th: ‘One reason it leaves open th which is presented of psychology or, perhaps, i. Nevertheless, it is importa ficant cultural differences in the assump 1 deeper question is ul not go further may be “lf” that basic groups such as the 10 be more strongly under ut face. show them our involvement, degree of independence from of respect their independence. These endence, produ iy ad t sow 7 nvolvement and inde- wit per supporting member of and need to be co vga normal and contributing ‘society. This involvernent Interpersonal Politeness and Power a” in communicative events. point of view of other parti take, and by any other means yws involvement by taking the views they say such things as, just what you mean, the same thing happened to me or, “Yes, Fageee, I may be considered a strategy of involvement. erms have been used jt has been called posit itive and negative at this aspect of face shows ¢ terms might be acceptable in some contexts, but we fewest analytical complications for t snce shows that a person may and that he or she respects the rights of others ‘of movement or choice. ance is shown by such ie face strategies is that Independence has also been given va

You might also like