Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WHY
MANUFACTURING?
In
the
short
time
that
Ive
served
as
New
Yorks
26th
District
representative
in
Congress,
I
can
tell
you
that
Washington
does
more
talking
than
listening.
It
does
more
spending
than
saving,
and
often
in
the
name
of
creating
jobs
that
never
seem
to
come.
National
unemployment
continues
to
hover
near
10
percent,
and
when
it
comes
to
action,
Washington
politicians
seem
to
be
looking
in
the
rear-view
mirror.
My
background
is
not
in
professional
politics
but
in
the
private
sector,
and
manufacturing
in
particular.
I
helped
grow
a
manufacturing
business
before
I
ran
for
Congress.
So
I
have
an
understanding
of
manufacturings
potential
to
help
put
our
economy
on
a
long-term
track
for
recovery
as
well
as
the
challenges
faced
by
this
sector
and
its
workers.
It
is
no
secret
to
Western
New
Yorkers
and
Americans
across
the
country
that
manufacturing
faces
difficult
times,
and
has
for
a
while.
New
York
State
has
lost
272,000
manufacturing
jobs
in
the
last
decade,
a
decline
of
36
percent,
according
the
Public
Policy
Institute
of
New
York
State.
Western
New
York
has
borne
the
brunt
of
this
trend,
with
the
Buffalo
and
Rochester
areas
each
shedding
39
percent
of
its
manufacturing
jobs
since
2000.
Nationwide,
nearly
six
million
manufacturing
jobs,
or
33
percent,
have
been
lost
in
that
same
time
period.
President
Obama
was
right
to
single
out
for
praise
the
risk- takers,
the
doers,
the
makers
of
things
in
his
Inaugural
Address,
and
I
believe
we
should
be
providing
incentives
for
our
manufacturers
and
small
businesses
to
grow
and
create
jobs,
rather
than
grow
the
federal
government.
We
must
if
we
are
to
be
more
than
a
service-only
economy
and
stay
strong
in
the
21st
century.
Why
do
manufacturing
jobs
matter?
Because
despite
all
the
talk
that
manufacturing
is
in
an
irrevocable
decline,
manufacturing
is
still
a
strategic
economic
advantage
for
the
United
States.
We
cannot
have
a
strong
economy
without
a
strong
manufacturing
sector.
According
to
the
National
Association
of
Manufacturers,
U.S.
manufacturing:
Is
the
largest
in
the
world,
producing
21
percent
of
all
global
manufacturing
products;
Supports
18.6
million
U.S.
jobs,
about
one
in
six
private
sector
jobs;
Produces
$1.6
trillion
in
value
each
year,
or
11
percent
of
our
gross
domestic
product;
Performs
half
of
all
R&D
in
the
nation;
and
Outworks
every
other
country
in
the
world;
U.S.
manufacturers
are
twice
as
productive
as
workers
in
the
next
10
leading
manufacturing
economies.
2
And one more big reason why manufacturing matters: U.S. manufacturing jobs pay well. In 2009, the average U.S. manufacturing worker earned $70,666 annually, including pay and benefits. The average non-manufacturing worker earned $57,993 annually. It takes more than a DSL and a telephone to create value, and the skills and innovation that U.S. manufacturing workers offer cannot be easily exported.
Despite all the talk that manufacturing is in an irrevocable decline, manufacturing is still a strategic economic advantage for the United States.
But still, we cannot expect to compete with economies where labor is cheaper if we tax ourselves more. We cannot expect to create jobs here when manufacturers are swamped by bureaucratic red-tape and lawsuit abuse that seeks profits, not justice. We cannot expect U.S. manufacturers to continue to lead the world in innovation if we do not produce the finest engineers in the world. And in order to grow jobs here at home and export products around the world, we must ensure a level playing field so our manufacturers can trade and compete to win in a global economy.
Accomplishing this will require Washington policymakers to be as innovative and forward-thinking as U.S. manufacturers already are. Our foreign competitors plan for economic growth over the next generation. We plan year-to-year and election-to-election. We must look over the horizon and set out a forward-looking economic plan if we are to create jobs for the long-term. To that end, I have coupled my many years of experience in the manufacturing sector with two years of discussions with entrepreneurs and manufacturers across Western New York to produce a 5-point jobs plan titled Manufacturing for Tomorrow. It focuses on five key areas of economic reform that need to be addressed: Tax relief and fairness for U.S. workers and manufacturers. Education and workforce training and preparedness for the 21st century. Tort reform to address job-killing lawsuit abuse. Customs reform to stop intellectual property violations. Opening new markets to create U.S. jobs and grow our domestic manufacturing base.
To enact this Manufacturing for Tomorrow agenda, it will take a change in attitude in Washington. Congress must recognize that we cannot tax and spend our way to prosperity, that sustained recovery means liberating American manufacturers from higher taxes and onerous mandates. It means empowering the risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things to do what they do best: create value, economic prosperity and job opportunities for all. Please take a look. I invite you to join with me to pass Manufacturing for Tomorrow today.
Sincerely,
U.S. companies cannot succeed globally unless we have a competitive tax structure domestically. Other industrialized nations have learned this lesson, and as the chart below shows, the worlds major economies have reduced their corporate rate over the last decade and a half, so that the average rate is now 26.3 percent, compared to Americas 39.21 percent. America now has the second-highest corporate tax rate in the world next to Japan. But that will not be for long, as Bloomberg News reports that Japans government pledged to cut the nations tax on businesses as part of a plan to defeat deflation and end two decades of economic stagnation. The trend is clear: Americas manufacturing competitors have sought to attract manufacturing though lower tax rates. As Scott Hodge, president of The Tax Foundation, notes, By keeping our corporate tax rate so high, were creating an economic Berlin Wall around the United States. We need to reverse this economically destructive trend so that American manufacturers are not competing with one hand tied behind their backs. To ensure that we are competing to win and growing jobs here at home, Chris Lees Manufacturing for Tomorrow agenda will: Lower the Corporate Tax Rate Studies suggest that every 1% that the corporate tax rate is lower than the competition results in 3% additional capital investment. Lowering the corporate rate to 25% will increase productivity domestically and stimulate significant economic growth.
TAX RELIEF
Strengthen R&D In a study of the R&D incentives of eight leading Western economies by the British accounting firm Mazars, the United States finished dead-last in a measure of tax competitiveness. James Brett, President and CEO of the New England Council, notes that, Global competitors such as Canada and China have already surpassed the U.S. in terms of R&D incentives. The fruits of R&D spending are critical for competitiveness in todays world economy. Even the French international trade agency IIFA brags that since the reform of tax credits for research in 2008, France now offers the world's most advantageous fiscal regime for corporate research and development. 4
Manufacturers need certainty in order to make long-term investments. Ensuring the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) is made permanent, as well as creating an additional incentive up to 10% credit for resulting domestic manufacturing, encourages U.S. companies to make significant long- term investments here at home and boost our global competitiveness.
Enhance Bonus Depreciation Since deductions taken immediately are worth more than in the future, bonus depreciation incentivizes growth. Making the 50% depreciation permanent and shortening the depreciation schedule means that investment will become more attractive to U.S. companies resulting in the creation of new jobs.
In a study of the R&D incentives of eight leading Western economies by the British accounting firm Mazars, the U.S. finished dead last.
Extend Net Operating Loss (NOL) Carryback If a business is facing a loss, it is important to provide assistance so that they may recover and grow in the future. Making the five-year NOL carryback permanent, and allowing firms to choose the amount to take in order to protect other credits, ensures that viable businesses are able to weather downturns and protects U.S. jobs. Keep Capital Gains / Dividend Rates Low Keeping rates low permanently boosts individual savings and provides incentives for Americans and small businesses to make investments that create jobs.
Reform Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax Allowing manufacturers to use their existing credits, and then ending the AMT altogether, preserves jobs and provides for significant capital reinvestment to create new ones. Expand Start-Up Deduction Start-up deductions incentivize innovative Americans to start their own businesses. Increasing the deduction from $5,000 to $20,000 and making it permanent encourages the entrepreneurs of tomorrow to start creating jobs today.
TORT
REFORM
Product
liability
judgments
are
often
excessive,
and
lawsuit
abuse
costs
jobs
and
drives
up
prices
for
all.
In
the
United
States,
7,800
tort
cases
are
filed
in
state
courts
each
day,
according
to
the
Pacific
Institute,
and
the
United
States
has
the
highest
tort
costs
in
the
world.
To
ensure
that
our
legal
system
does
not
work
against
U.S.
companies
to
the
advantage
of
foreign
competitors,
and
so
that
our
tort
system
produces
justice,
not
profits,
Chris
Lees
Manufacturing
for
Tomorrow
agenda
will
establish
national
uniformity
in
product
liability
law
that:
Makes
the
Loser
Pay
for
Costs
of
Litigation
According
to
the
Manhattan
Institute
for
Policy
Research,
the
direct
costs
of
tort
litigation
was
$247
billion
in
2006,
or
about
$825
per
person
in
the
United
States.
Businesses
are
regularly
overwhelmed
with
frivolous
lawsuits
that
they
must
settle
if
they
hope
to
avoid
crippling
legal
costs.
Almost
every
economist
who
has
studied
loser
pays
predicts
that
it
would,
if
adopted,
reduce
the
number
of
low-merit
lawsuits.
Establishes
a
Reasonable
Statute
of
Limitations
Statutes
of
limitations
can
vary
widely
based
upon
the
seriousness
of
the
perceived
offense,
and
could
range
anywhere
from
one
to
10
years
or
more.
Establishing
a
reasonable
statute
of
limitations
ensures
that
businesses
will
not
have
to
endure
expensive
legal
costs
for
years
before
a
suit
is
actually
filed
and
can
put
those
resources
towards
product
development
and
job
creation.
Caps
Punitive
Damages
Awards
for
punitive
damages
must
be
more
in
line
with
compensatory
damages
to
put
an
end
to
the
out-of-control,
punitive
damages
awards
we
have
seen
in
recent
years.
Skyrocketing
punitive
damages
have
driven
up
costs
for
consumers
and
put
companies
and
workers
out
of
business.
Placing
a
reasonable
limit
on
punitive
damages
ensures
our
long-term
economic
prosperity
and
helps
keep
jobs
in
America.
Source: Tillinghast-Towers Perrin, U.S. Tort Costs and Cross Border Perspectives
Increase the Manufacturing Extension Partnership MEP is an essential program of regional centers that assist smaller, U.S.-based manufacturing companies in identifying and adopting new technologies aimed at increasing productivity, improving their economic competitiveness, and enhancing their technological capabilities. Increases the authorization level from $131.8 million to $250 million. Expand the Market Development Cooperator Program MDCP provides important financial and technical assistance from the International Trade Administration to support projects that enhance the global competitiveness of small- and medium-sized U.S. manufacturers. Increase the authorization from $2 million to $50 million. Increase for U.S. Trade Development Agency With a mission to promote economic growth in developing and middle income countries, the USTDA helps U.S. businesses export their products, which in turn creates U.S.-based jobs. Increases its budget from $50 billion to $100 billion. 8
Double Export-Import Bank Financing As the official export credit agency of the United States, Ex- Im assists in financing the export of U.S. goods and services to international markets, primarily for U.S. small businesses. Doubling the financing will enhance its ability to turn export opportunities into real sales that result in more U.S. jobs. Simplify Duty Drawback Ensure that U.S. manufacturers are not charged U.S. import duties for merchandise, which is ultimately resold to and consumed in another nation. Duty drawback allows the refund of duties paid on imports that are subsequently exported by a manufacturer, which improves international competitiveness. New Markets Explore new programs or grants that will promote U.S.-made exports to promising new markets such as China and Korea.
The
International
Trade
Commission
estimates
that
implementation
of
these
agreements
would
increase
U.S.
exports
by
more
than
1
percent,
resulting
in
more
than
250,000
jobs.
CUSTOMS
REFORM
U.S.
manufacturers
face
the
growing
problem
of
counterfeiting
and
piracy
of
their
intellectual
property
(IP).
To
ensure
that
we
are
adequately
protecting
manufacturers
and
consumers
alike,
Chris
Lees
Manufacturing
for
Tomorrow
agenda
will:
Border
Seizures
of
Counterfeit
and
Pirated
Goods
Promote
Coordination
Between
Customs
and
Border
Patrol
(CBP)
and
Rights
Holders
Allow
CBP
to
share
identifying
information
with
trademark
owners
in
order
to
assist
in
making
a
determination
about
whether
a
product
is
counterfeit
or
genuine.
Authorize
CBP
to
disclose
to
trademark
owners
a
detailed
description
and
photographs
of
the
goods
being
detained,
and
explicitly
state
that
such
authorizations
do
not
violate
the
Trade
Source:
CBP,
ICE
and
Congressional
Research
Service
Secrets
Act.
Enhance Enforcement Capabilities of CBP Streamline the development of an IP database and study the creation of a trusted partners list to expedite customs processes and ensure resources are spent on enforcement against lawbreakers.
Streamline Complaints Ensure that the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has the resources necessary to adjudicate intellectual property infringements in a timely manner. Lengthy ITC adjudications tie up resources that can more productively be used for R&D, job creation, and other job-creating activities.
10