Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.GreatPlainsExaminer.com
June 2012
' W: ,, + A ' Rep. Rick Berg is among 65 freshmen lawmakers urging leaders in the U.S. House to consider legislation that includes provisions banned under rules that were intended to halt congressional earmark spending.
'f
f-
direct taxpayer money to benefit the same lobbyists and special interests.
Others, however, note that earmarks represent only a small fraction of overall government spending. Former Sen. Byron Dorgan, for example, told But on April20, Berg joined 65 other freshmen CNN in 2010 that it's "a complete charade" to focus on eliminating earmarks, as opposed to bigger in the House in signing a letter to House Speaker John Boehner and House Majority Leader Eric ticket government spending. Cantor asking for fast action on the Miscellaneous "You can get rid of every.single earinark," DorTariff Bill (MTB). The MTB is a collection of gan said at the time, "it's not going to change one requests for reduced or suspended tariflS on cerrain cent in federal spending." foreign imporrs. The lawmakers wrote that the MTB bill has been stalled due to concerns that the 'limited tariff benefits' are prohibited under House rules that ban earmarks.
Nonetheless, Berg supporred the GOP ban as a candidate and as a congressman. Accorrung to a November 2010 arricle in the Bismarck Tribune, Berg said he supporrs the ban because he wants to "change business as usual in Washingron.".
Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., and Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo.- rvyo opponents of earmarksare promoting legislation that would let companies submit their duty-suspension proposals directly to the International Trade Commission rather than going thro~ members of Congress. 'We have a win-win, biparrisan solution that
"As fiscal conservatives, ~e appreciate those concerns," the letter stated. "However, we believe it is an error to view duty suspension bills in that manner. Unlike spending earmarks, as they are sometimes erroneously characterized, a duty suspension included in the MTB is available to any U.S. manufacturer- including small businesses - imporring the covered product because it is not available domestically."
The letter prompted an arricle in Politico, a W ashingron-based politics publication, that starred: "Hypocrisy alert: House Republican freshmen are begging their leaders to bring back a cerrain type of earmark so that they can help companies back home in an election year." There is no doubt that the tariffbreaks are included in the earmark ban. According to GOP conference rules: "It is the policy of the House Republican Conference that no Member shall request a congressional earmark, limited tax benefit, or limited tariff benefit, as such terms have been described in the Rules of the House." The argument is that eliminating specific raiiffi creates tax benefits for some companies- providing cash for them at the expense of the federal treasury- much the same way an earmark does.
Others view them simply as tax cuts. And mark opponents have mixed responses to the lerret and to the tariflS issue in general. The Club for Growth, a fiscally consetvative organization that supporrs an earmark ban, hasn't condemned the letter. 'We don't have an official position on it," Club for Growth spokesman Barney Keller said. And
ear-
-julie Sobel is reporter for the National journal Hotline and a freelance writerfor the Great Plains Examiner.