Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vasil Penchev
vasildinev@gmail.com, vaspench@abv.bg http://www.scribd.com/vasil7penchev http://www.wprdpress.com/vasil7penchev CV: http://old-philosophy.issk-bas.org/CV/cvpdf/V.Penchev-CV-eng.pdf
The coherent The well-ordered superposition Measurement statistical ensemble Choice of unorderable of worlds states
The unit of that common measure is a qubit: That is: = | + | , where , are complex numbers such that: + = , and | , | are two orthogonal subspaces of Hilbert space normable to two orthonormal bases, e.g. two successive axes such as: , (+)
A qubit is isomorphic to a unit 3D ball, where | , | are represented as any two orthogonal great circles
0 1
Consequently quantum mechanics underlies and requires the identification of the coherent superposition of states before measuring with the statistical ensemble of worlds after measuring The so-called many-worlds interpretation is not more than an example of a much more general principle contradicting the prejudices of common sense That general principle called quantum invariance delivers the identity of coherent superposition and statistical ensemble in particular
The mapping of much into many is an identity and that of a coherent state into a statistical ensemble as well However quantum information or measurement is just that mapping turning out to be trivial, empty, or transparent
Content logical Do not content logical contradictions contradictions The probability of a single The probability of a single quite impossible world almost impossible world to occur is exactly zero to occur converges to zero The probability of any The probability of big collections of those is enough collections of exactly zero, too those can be nonzero Their impossibility is The impossibility of an logically necessary almost impossible world is empirical: It occurs with zero probability: However this is a fact but not a logical corollary Their impossibility is Their impossibility a priori separately is a posteriori
Spacetime
Reality
Almost impossible worlds Slightly possible worlds Possible worlds Very possible worlds The universe is dominated by poor by honest (keeping the laws) citizens (the almost impossible worlds). The breaches the laws (the quite impossible worlds) are being removed automatically, deprived of any chance or ... constitute all possible worlds
The integral probability for the thing to be within the well < 1, e.g. = 0,7
The integral probability for the thing to be out of the well >0, e.g. = 0,3
A quantum anything, e.g. an electron A potential well
Position
The integral probability for the thing to be within the well < 1, e.g. = 0,7
=1
The integral probability for the thing to be out of the well >0, e.g. = 0,3
=0
A classical body
Classical correlations The violation of Bells inequalities World 1 World 2 A sufficient condition for:
Quantum correlations
State 2
State 1
Quantum system 2
Quantum system 1
World 2
World 1
Quantum system 2
Quantum system 1
State 2
Each qubit is for two identical State 1 qubits: the one for the world, the other for the state Simultaneous correlation of a pair of conjugates
World 2
Some other quantum system State 2
Reality 100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
Communism
Space-time
Entanglement depends only on the nonorthogonality of any Hilbert spaces associated with any quantum things anywhere
Minkowski space One might say that entanglement is implemented by the mediation of the universe as a whole Entanglement does not depend on the distance Entanglement is action at any distance (i.e. that action at a distance in classical physics)
Stage 4: Being
The set is exactly equal to the sum of its elements The interactions between the elements are exactly zero The set is more than the sum of its elements The interactions between the elements are more than zero The sum of the elements is exactly zero and any element as well The set is exactly equal to the interactions between the elements. Mathematically it is an set of empty sets. Physically it is an entangled vacuum. Logically it is a set of almost impossible worlds It can be also interpreted as an empty set with some nonzero possibility to be chosen: Indeed, can an empty set be chosen due to the axiom of choice? Obviously, it should be able to
h - the Planck constant t time, - frequency Any element of entangled nothing: However the interpretation of is quite dark
is , quantum information, i.e. the quantity of much (for probability) per a unit of many (for time) =
Thus: Its being is not actual since it is nothing However: It can act just as anything from reality Furthermore: It is physically the most power force forming reality
Dark modality
Said metaphorically, that modality of an almost impossible world can be called dark It is an allusion to the concepts of dark matter or dark energy in physics recently: There it designates very powerful physical action originating from some missing or unknown source, as if from the physical nonbeing Analogically the term of dark modality leads to that action, which comes from nonbeing or from the transcendent. Nevertheless it can be founded scientifically
End
References:
DeWitt, Bryce and John Wheeler (eds.) 1968. The EverettWheeler Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Battelle Rencontres: 1967 Lectures in Mathematics and Physics. New York: W.A.Benjamin. Everett III Hugh1957. Relative state Formulation of Quantum Mechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics. Vol. 29, No 3 (July 1957), 454-462. Kochen, Simon and Ernst Specker 1968. The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics. 17 (1): 59-87. Neumann, Johan von 1932. Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Berlin: Verlag von Julius Springer.