Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Randomized Evaluation of Long
term anticoagulant therapY
Dabigatran Compared to Warfarin in 18,113 Patients
with Atrial Fibrillation at Risk of Stroke
Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke
• AF responsible for 1/6 of all strokes
• Warfarin reduces stroke in AF by 64%
– significant increase in intracranial and other hemorrhage
– Difficult to use
• Only 50% of eligible patients receive warfarin
• An alternative treatment is needed
Dabigatran
Dabigatran Etexilate, a prodrug, is rapidly
converted to dabigatran
6.5% bioavailability, 80% excreted by kidney
Halflife of 1217 hours
Phase 2 data identified 220 mg daily and 150 mg
BID as viable doses
RELY: A Noninferiority Trial
Atrial fibrillation
≥1 Risk Factor
Absence of contra-
indications
951 centers in 44 countries
ROBE=Prospective Randomized
pen Trial with Blinded R
djudication of Events.
open Blinded
Performed December 2005March 2009
Median Follow up 2.0 years
Follow up 99.9% complete
Mean TTR = 64% (patients on warfarin)
Baseline Characteristics
Characteristic Dabigatran 110 Dabigatran 150
Warfarin
mg mg
Randomized 6015 6076 6022
Mean age (years) 71.4 71.5 71.6
Male (%) 64.3 63.2 63.3
CHADS2 score 2.1 2.2 2.1
(mean)
01 (%) 32.6 32.2 30.9
2 (%) 34.7 35.2 37.0
3+ (%) 32.7 32.6 32.1
Prior stroke/TIA (%) 19.9 20.3 19.8
Prior MI (%) 16.8 16.9 16.1
CHF (%) 32.2 31.8 31.9
Baseline ASA (%) 40.0 38.7 40.6
Warfarin Naïve (%) 49.9 49.8 51.4
Permanent Discontinuation
# at Risk Year 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
D110 6015 5336 5026 3950 2491 1176
D150 6076 5329 5015 3955 2528 1172
0.4
Dabigatran150
Dabigatran110
0.2
Warfarin
0.1
0.0
Non-inferiority Superiority
p-value p-value
Margin = 1.46
D 110mg vs. D 150mg vs.
D 110mg D 150mg warfarin
Warfarin Warfarin
D 110 mg vs. D 150 mg vs.
D 110mg D 150mg warfarin
Warfarin Warfarin
14 12 45 0.31 0.26
Hemorrhagic <0.001 <0.001
0.1 %/yr 0.1 %/yr 0.4 %/yr 0.170.56 0.140.49
Stroke or Systemic Embolism
No. at Risk
0.05
0.03
0.02
Warfarin Dabigatran110
Dabigatran 150
0.01
0.0
0.02
Warfarin
0.01
Dabigatran150
Dabigatran110
0.0
Warfarin
0.01
Dabigatran110
0.0
Dabigatran150
D 110mg vs. D 150mg vs.
D 110mg D 150mg warfarin
Warfarin Warfarin
0.92 0.97
Hospitalization 19.4 % 20.2% 20.8 % 0.003 0.34
0.870.97 0.921.03
0.91 0.88
Death 3.8 % 3.6 % 4.1 % 0.13 0.05
0.801.03 0.771.00
Bleeding and Net Clinical Benefit
D D D 110mg vs. D 150mg vs.
warfarin
110mg 150mg Warfarin Warfarin
0.80 0.93
Major Bleeding 2.7 % 3.1 % 3.4 % 0.003 0.31
0.690.93 0.811.07
Life 0.68 0.81
Threatening 1.2 % 1.5 % 1.8 % <0.001 0.04
major 0.550.83 0.660.99
0.79 0.91
Minor Bleeding 13.2 % 14.8 % 16.4% <0.001 0.005
0.740.84 0.850.97
* stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, death and major bleed
Important Sites of Major Bleeding
D 110mg vs. D 150mg vs.
D 110mg D 150mg warfarin
Warfarin Warfarin
RR RR
Annual Annual Annual p p
95% CI 95% CI
rate rate rate
Gastro
1.10 1.50
intestinal 1.1 % 1.5 % 1.0 % 0.43 <0.001
0.861.41 1.191.89
(GI)
Major Bleed
0.85 0.87
(nonGI, 1.5 % 1.5 % 1.8 % 0.11 0.16
0.701.04 0.711.06
nonICH)
Major Bleeding
# at Risk Year 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
0.12
Warfarin
0.08
Dabigatran150
0.06
Dabigatran110
0.04
0.02
0.0
Dabigatran Dabigatran
D 150mg vs. D 110 mg
110mg 150mg
Number Number Relative Risk
p
rate/yr rate/yr 95% CI
Stroke and systemic 0.73
1.5% 1.1 % 0.005
embolism 0.580.91
Ischemic/unspecified 0.69
1.3 % 0.9 % 0.002
stroke 0.540.88
0.85
Hemorrhagic stroke 0.1% 0.1 % 0.67
0.391.83
1.16
Major Hemorrhage 2.7 % 3.1 % 0.05
1.001.34
1.36
GI Major Hemorrhage 1.1 % 1.5 % 0.007
1.091.70
0.98
Net Clinical Benefit 7.1 % 6.9 % 0.66
0.891.08
ALT or AST >3x ULN
0.04
# at Risk
Year 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
D110 6015 5860 5692 4601 2950 1394
D150 6076 5925 5759 4675 3034 1427
W 6022 5858 5708 4592 2906 1331
0.03
Cumulative Risk
Warfarin
0.02
Dabigatran110
Dabigatran150
0.01
0.0
Dabigatran 150 mg significantly reduced stoke
compared to warfarin with similar risk of major
bleeding
Dabigatran 110 mg had a similar rate of stroke as
warfarin with significantly reduced major bleeding
Both doses markedly reduced intracranial and life
threatening hemorrhage
Both doses are free of liver and other major toxicity,
although they increase dyspepsia and GI bleeding
Conclusions
Both Dabigatran doses offer advantages over
warfarin
Dabigatran 150 is more effective and dabigatran
110 has a better safety profile
The availability of two effective doses, with different
benefit risk profiles, creates the potential to tailor
therapy to individual patient characteristics