Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Maurice Dusseault
MBDCI
MBDCI
Common Symbols in RM
E, n: Youngs modulus, Poissons ratio f: Porosity (e.g. 0.25, or 25%) c, f,To: Cohesion, friction , tensile strength T, p, po: Temperature, pressure, initial pres. sv, sh: Vertical and horizontal stress shmin, sHMAX: Smallest, largest horizontal s1,s2,s3: Major, intermediate, minor stress r, g: Density, unit weight (g = r g) K, C: Bulk modulus, compressibility These are the most common symbols we use
MBDCI
Petroleum geomechanics deals with stress & pressure Effective stress: solid stress Pressure is in the fluid phase To assess the effects of ', p, T, C Rock properties are needed
Deformation
sa axial stress
A
Fa sa A
MBDCI
REG. TIPO
Borehole seismic
3-D Seismic
SVS-337
MBDCI
How many rock types must I define and test for a reasonable, useful Geomechanics Analysis?
MBDCI
How can I determine field rock behavior from limited quantity, questionable quality core? How do I cope with massive heterogeneity? What about anisotropy (e.g.: shales)? Can I test shale realistically in the laboratory? Are laboratory results representative? How many tests do I need? I have no core (or bad core)! What do I do? How many rock types to test (see diagram)? And so on and so forth
MBDCI
ER-EO
ER-EO
REG. TIPO
ER-EO C-3
B-SUP
B-SUP
B-6/9
B-6/9
C-4
C-5 C-6
C-7
B-6/9
B-6/9
SMI
C-1 C-2 C-3 C-4 C-5 C-6 C-7 GUASARE SVS-337
GUAS
C-7
C-6 C-7
GUASARE
SVS-30
MBDCI
What is a GMU?
Geo-Mechanics Unit Nature is too complex to fully model Simplification needed A GMU is a single unit for design and modelling purposes 1 GMU = 1 set of mechanical properties GMU selected from logs, cores, judgment
Log data
Core data
GMU 1 GMU 2
GMU 7 GMU 8
MBDCI
Rocks are heterogeneous, anisotropic, etc For analysis, we divide systems into GMUs
Includes
TOO FEW?
TOO MANY?
MBDCI
An adequate data base must exist The GMU* is properly matched to the data base, for example, using the following:
lithology Similar depth of burial and geological age Similar granulometry and porosity Estimate of anisotropy (eg: shales and laminates) Correlations based on geophysical properties Use of a matched analog is advised in cases where core cannot be obtained economically
*GMU = geomechanical unit
Similar
MBDCI UNCERTAINTY
70 of Athabasca Even sandstone reservoirs show am great variability,Oilsands, especially f = 30%, So distances = 0.8, > as 1,000,000 vertically, and properties can change over small ascP a North of Fort McMurray, Alta few millimeters. Clearly, simplifications are needed for analysis.
MBDCI
MBDCI
MBDCI
Joints and fractures can be at scales of mm to several meters Large f core: 115 mm Core plugs: 20-35 mm If joints dominate, small-scale core tests are indicators only This issue of scale enters into all Petroleum Geomechanics analyses
1m
Machu Picchu, Peru, Inca Stonecraft
MBDCI
Scale of Discontinuities
Laboratory specimen (intact) A tunnel in a rock mass
Rock vs Rock mass --Intact rock
1-D Measuring Rock Properties
70-200 mm
--Single discontinuities
--Two discontinuities
--Several disc.
--Rockmass
20-30 m
MBDCI
Rocks are heterogeneous at all scales (microns to kilometers) In granular media, macroscopic stresses are transmitted through grain contact forces (fn, fs)
MBDCI
Very high porosity materials (e.g.: diatomite) Materials containing viscous oil with gas in solution (expansion e.g.: oil sands) Highly fractured materials such as fractured quartz-illite shales Highly heterogeneous layered material from great depth (core breaks apart at each layer, referred to as disking)
MBDCI
v
1-D Measuring Rock Properties
cylindrical specimen
h = 0
h = 0
MBDCI
Axially
Core has expanded from 120.7mm to 127mm diameter and is now acting like a piston in a cylinder
90-91 mm
95 mm
89 mm
Corrugated surface characteristic of thinlybedded and laminated fine-grained sands of variable oil saturation
Oil-poor to oilfree silty sands, expansion much less than other material
PVC liner
127 mm
Oil sand
Cores separate readily along cracks which form between zones of differing expansion potential
Observed Expansions of 89mm Core: Ironstone 89 mm Basal clays, clayey silts 89-91 mm Oil-poor to oil-free silty sands 90-93 mm Fine-grained oil-rich sand 91-95 mm Coarse-grained oil-rich sand 94-95 mm
MBDCI
MBDCI
Oil sands core from the Faja del Orinoco, depth of about 900 m. Massive core expansion from gas exsolution.
MBDCI
MBDCI
T po Sg D
MBDCI
Peace River
In geomechanics, because of massive uncertainly and scale issues, we exploit whatever data sources we can. We try to regularly update our MEMs with new logs, new core, new seismic data, better geological models, and other information. Also, remember that the properties can change, especially with large , p, or T.
MBDCI
These materials respond radically different to stress: one flows, the other fractures. How might we incorporate such behavior in our testing and modeling for a natural gas storage cavern? Original specimen - Post-test appearance
MBDCI
Inherent Anisotropy
planes Oriented minerals (clays usually) Oriented microcracks, joints, fissures Close alternation of thin beds of different inherent stiffness (laminated or schistose) Imbricated grains Different stresses = anisotropic response Anisotropic grain contact fabric, etc.
stiffer less stiff
MBDCI
Stiffness Anisotropy
Apparent axial stiffness - M
M s
L L
L
Vertical core
30
60
90
Bedding inclination
30
60
90
MBDCI
E3
1-D Measuring Rock Properties
The nature of the grain-to-grain contacts and the overall porosity govern the stiffness of porous SS
MBDCI
Issues to Remember
Natural lithological heterogeneity Wide range of properties (e.g.: compressibility or Chalk vs. low-f limestone) Scatter of experimental data Log data lab test correlations (variance) Core damage and quality control Issues of scale (especially in fractured rocks) Representativeness and GMU delineation We must cope with all of these sources of uncertainty