Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ADNAN REHMAT
If I give you a bag of 1-Kg soil taken from an under construction site and ask you the following questions.
1. What is the most basic classification of soil? 2. What are the methods of soil gradation or grain size distribution?
3. How do you define the soil types? Clay, Silt, Sand, Gravel or cobble and boulder
4. Calculate D10, D30 and D60 of this soil using the sieve analysis?
SOIL CONSISTENCE
Soil consistence is a physical property to describe the resistance of a soil to mechanical stresses or manipulations at various moisture contents OR Soil consistence provides a means of describing the degree and kind of cohesion and adhesion between the soil particles as related to the resistance of the soil to deform or rupture.
Since the consistency varies with moisture content and clay minerals, the consistence can be described as dry consistency, moist consistency, and wet consistency.
Consistency that is evaluated includes rupture resistance and stickiness. The rupture resistance is a field measure of the ability of the soil to withstand an applied stress or pressure as applied using the thumb and forefinger.
3
SOIL STRENGTH
4.75 mm (No. 4) 2.36 mm (No. 8) 1.18 mm (No. 16) 600 m (No. 30) 300 m (No. 50) 150 m (No. 100) 75 m (No. 200)
5
Purpose: ( Grain size Analysis) This test is performed to determine the percentage of different grain sizes contained within a soil. The mechanical or sieve analysis is performed to determine the distribution of the coarser, larger-sized particles, and the hydrometer method is used to determine the distribution of the finer particles. Significance:
The distribution of different grain sizes affects the engineering properties of soil.
Grain size analysis provides the grain size distribution, and it is required in classifying the soil.
6
Cohesive soils
Clay Silt
0.002
Gravel
Cobble
Boulder
sieve shaker
soil/water suspension
Sieve Analysis
Hydrometer Analysis
Sieve Analyses
10
Sieve Analysis
11
Sieves larger than the #4 sieve are designated by the size of the openings in the sieve
12
Smaller sieves are numbered according to the number of openings per inch
1inch
# 10 sieve
13
Coarse Aggregate
Dry the sample in an oven to a constant mass, and then allow cooling to room temperature. Record the total dry mass of the sample to the nearest gram. Minimum mass of samples required in each sieve sizes from 9.5mm to 75mm are as shown below
14
Sieving procedure
(1) Write down the weight of each sieve as well as the bottom pan to be used in the analysis.
(2) Record the weight of the given dry soil sample.
(3) Make sure that all the sieves are clean, and assemble them in the ascending order of sieve numbers (#4 sieve at top and #200 sieve at bottom). Place the pan below #200 sieve. Carefully pour the soil sample into the top sieve and place the cap over it.
(4) Place the sieve stack in the mechanical shaker and shake for 10 minutes.
(5) Remove the stack from the shaker and carefully weigh and record the weight of each sieve with its retained soil. In addition, remember to weigh and record the weight of the 15 bottom pan with its retained fine soil.
16
17
Data Analysis:
(1) Obtain the mass of soil retained on each sieve by subtracting the weight of the empty sieve from the mass of the sieve + retained soil, and record this mass as the weight retained on the data sheet. The sum of these retained masses should be approximately equals the initial mass of the soil sample. A loss of more than two percent is unsatisfactory. (2) Calculate the percent retained on each sieve by dividing the weight retained on each sieve by the original sample mass.
(3) Calculate the percent passing (or percent finer) by starting with 100 percent and subtracting the percent retained on each sieve as a cumulative procedure.
18
19
20
% Finer
60 40 20 0 0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
10
100
22
if %fines < 5% suffix is either W or P if %fines > 12% suffix is either M or C if 5% < %fines < 12% Dual symbols are used
23
100 80
% Finer
60 40 20 0 0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
10
100
Grading curves
100 80
% Finer
60 40 20 0 0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
10
100
25
Grading curves
100 80
% Finer
60 40 20 0 0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
10
100
26
Grading curves
100 80
% Finer
60 40 20 0 0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
10
100
Grading curves
100 80
% Finer
60 40 20 0 0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
10
100
Grading curves
100 80
% Finer
60 40 20 0 0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
10
100
100
80 hydrometer
% Passing
sieve
20
D 30
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
100 80
% Finer
60 40 20 0 0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
10
100
D90 = 3 mm
31
32
Atterberg Limits
Border line water contents, separating the different states of a fine grained soil
water content
Shrinkage limit
Plastic limit
Liquid limit
brittlesolid
semisolid
plastic
liquid
33
Purpose: This lab is performed to determine the plastic and liquid limits of a fine grained soil. The Atterberg limits are based on the moisture content of the soil. The plastic limit: is the moisture content that defines where the soil changes from a semisolid to a plastic (flexible) state. The liquid limit: is the moisture content that defines where the soil changes from a plastic to a viscous fluid state. The plasticity index of a soil is the numerical difference between its liquid and plastic limits
34
35
36
The liquid limit (LL) is arbitrarily defined as the water content, in percent, at which a pat of soil in a standard cup and cut by a groove of standard dimensions will flow together at the base of the groove for a distance of 12 mm under the impact of 25 blows in the devise. The cup being dropped 10 mm in a standard liquid limit apparatus operated at a rate of two shocks per second.
37
Atterberg Limits
Liquid Limit (wL or LL):
Clay flows like liquid when w > LL
39
LL Test Procedure
Place approximately 100 grams of prepared soil in the evaporating dish and add 15 to 20 ml of water and mix water thoroughly with the soil . Place mixture in the cup over the spot where the cup rests on the base and spread into place with as few strokes as possible to a depth of 10 mm.
40
LL Test Procedure
Cut groove in soil paste with standard grooving tool
41
LL Test Procedure
Turn the crank to raise and drop the cup twice per second until the two sides of the grooved sample come in contact at the bottom of the groove for a distance of 12.5 mm.(1/2 inch)
42
43
44
45
LL Test Procedure
Obtain water content for each test Plot water content versus number of blows on semi-log paper
46
LL Test Results
Interpolate LL water content at 25 blows
Log N 25
47
Calculation
The moisture content and corresponding number of blows for the two liquid limit determinations is used to calculate the liquid limit (wL) at 25 blows. Adjust the moisture content of the sample by dividing by a denominator selected from the following chart:
48
Calculation
Calculate the liquid limit for each test and average the results as shown in the following example. Test 1 2 Blows 19 31 Moisture 33.79 31.50 Test 1: WL(25 blows)= = 32.6% Test 2: WL (25 blows)= = 32.4%
49
PI, %
16
Liquid Limit, %
50
PI, %
Liquid Limit, %
50
51
PI, %
Liquid Limit, %
50
52
Plastic Limit
The minimum water content at which a soil will just begin to crumble when it is rolled into a thread of approximately 3 mm in diameter.
53
54
55
56
1. Calculate the water content of each of the plastic limit moisture cans after they have been in the oven for at least 16 hours. 2. Compute the average of the water contents to determine the plastic limit, PL.
57
58
PL
LL
PI = LL - PL
plastic (remoldable)
59
Plasticity Chart
Low plasticity Intermediate plasticity High plasticity Very high plasticity Extremely high plasticity
Compaction Test
Standard and Modified Proctor test
61
Soil is air dried, pulverized & passed thru #4 sieve. Separated into 4 to 6 samples. Adjust the water content of each sample by adding water. Using the proctor mould (1/30th cubic foot) place & compact soil in 3 layers. Each layer should receive 25 drops of the compaction hammer. After the last layer, use a straight edge to trim the excess soil leveling to the top of the mould. Determine the weight of the mould with the compacted moist soil. Extrude from mould and collect a sample for water content determination. Repeat for each sample over a range of moisture contents. After collecting all pertinent weights, calculate dry density and plot vs. water content
62
63
Dynamic Compaction
Take 4.5 to 5.5Kg of soil and mix thoroughly with the required water (OMC) Fix the extension Collar and the base plate to the mould, Insert the spacer disc over the base, and place the filter paper over the spacer disc. Compact the mix soil in the mould either using light compaction or heavy compaction.
Light Compaction: - Compact the soil in 3 equal layers, each layer being given 55 blows by the 2.6Kg rammer Heavy Compaction: - Compact the soil in 5 equal layers, each layer being given 55 blows by the 4.89Kg rammer
Remove the collar and trim off the soil Turn the mould upside down and remove the base plate and the spacer disc Weigh the mould with compacted soil and determine the bulk 64 density and dry density
65
Light Compaction
Calculate the weight of the wet soil at the required water content to give desired density when occupying standard specimen volume in the mould from the expression W = Desired dry density * ( 1+w ) V W = Weight of wet soil w = Desired Water Content V = Volume of Specimen in the mould = 2250cm3 Take the weight W (calculated as above) of the mix soil and place it in the mould Place a filter paper and the displacer disc on the top of soil. Keep the mould assembly in static loading frame and compact by pressing the displacer disc till the level of disc reaches the top of the mould. Keep the load for some time and then release the load, remove the displacer
66
The test may be conducted for soaked as well as unsoaked conditions, if the sample is soaked, (for both light and heavy compactions), put a filter paper on the top of the soil and place the adjustable stem and perforated plate on the top of filter paper. Put annular weights to produce a surcharge equal to weight of base material and pavement expected in actual construction, each 2.5kg weight is equivalent to 7cm construction. A minimum of 2 weights should be used Immerse the mould assembly and weights in a tank of water and soak it for 96hours and remove the mould for compaction test. Observations and recordings for light compaction
Dry density gm/cc Moulding water Content Wet weight of the compacted soil, gm Period of soaking 96hrs (4days)
67
68
CBR
Interpretation and Recording
If the initial portion of the curve (load vs Penetration) is concave upwards, apply correction by drawing a tangent to the curve at the point of greatest slope and shift the origin. Find and record the correct load reading corresponding to each penetration. CBR = * 100 PT = Corrected test load corresponding to the chosen penetration from the load penetration curve PS = Standard load for the same penetration
69
The CBR values are usually calculated for penetration of 2.5mm and 5mm. Generally the CBR value of 2.5mm will be grater than that at 5mm and in such a case the former (2.5mm CBR value) should be taken as a design CBR. If CBR for 5mm exceeds that for 2.5mm, the test shall be repeated. If Identical results follow, the CBR corresponding to 5mm penetration should be taken for design.
70