Professional Documents
Culture Documents
o
+
=
ln (1 ) pu p d
t
=
( )
+ ln .6(1.05) (.4).95
.0833
= 11.94%
16
Lecture 14: Derivatives Theory (Part 1)
Risk Neutral Valuation Approach
- Suppose r = 5%. Then the risk neutral
probability (q) is q = (e
rt
d)/(u-d) = .5417.
- The value of the call option is:
0
( , 0)
(1 ) ( , 0)
.9958(.5417(5)) $2.70.
r t
qMax uS X
C e
q Max dS X
o
| |
=
|
+
\ .
= =
17
Lecture 14: Derivatives Theory (Part 1)
Risk Neutral Valuation Approach
- Using risk neutral valuation, the value
of an otherwise identical put option is:
0
( , 0)
(1 ) ( , 0)
.9958(.4583(5)) $2.28.
r t
qMax X uS
P e
q Max X dS
o
| |
=
|
+
\ .
= =
18
Lecture 14: Derivatives Theory (Part 1)
Risk Neutral Valuation Approach
Replicating Portfolio Approach (Calls)
- Suppose we form a portfolio consisting of A shares of
(non-dividend paying) stock and $B in riskless bonds.
o The initial cost of forming such a portfolio is
$( ). S B A +
- After one period, the value of a call option replicating
portfolio in the up state is $( )
u
uS iB c A + = and in the
down state it is worth $( ) .
d
dS iB c A + =
- By setting
u d
c c
uS dS
A =
and
( )
d u
uc dc
B
i u d
, the payoffs on
this portfolio at nodes u and d replicate the call payoffs.
19
Lecture 14: Derivatives Theory (Part 1)
Recall our previous numerical example. If u =1.05 and d
=0.95, then the date ot values for S
u
, S
d
, c
u
, and c
d
are $105,
$95, $5, and $0 respectively:
S
u
= $105
c
u
= $5
S
= $100
S
d
= $95
c
d
= $0
20
Lecture 14: Derivatives Theory (Part 1)
Replicating Portfolio Approach (Calls)
Replicating Portfolio Approach (Calls)
Lets input the values from our previous numerical
example:
A = = =
= = =
= A + = =
5
0.5, and
10
1.05(0) .95(5)
47.30;
( ) 1.0042(0.10)
0.50(100) 47.30 $2.70.
u d
d u
c c
uS dS
uc dc
B
i u d
c S B
21
Lecture 14: Derivatives Theory (Part 1)
Replicating Portfolio Approach (Puts)
- Suppose we form a portfolio consisting of A shares of
(non-dividend paying) stock and $B in riskless bonds.
o The initial cost of forming such a portfolio is
$( ). S B A +
- After one period, the value of a put option replicating
portfolio in the up state is $( )
u
uS iB p A + = and in the
down state it is worth $( ) .
d
dS iB p A + =
- By setting
u d
p p
uS dS
A =
and
( )
d u
up dp
B
i u d
, the payoffs on
this portfolio at nodes u and d replicate the call payoffs.
22
Lecture 14: Derivatives Theory (Part 1)
23
Lecture 14: Derivatives Theory (Part 1)
Recall our previous numerical example. If u =1.05 and d
=0.95, then the date ot values for S
u
, S
d
, p
u
, and p
d
are $105,
$95, $0, and $5 respectively:
S
u
= $105
p
u
= $0
S
= $100
S
d
= $95
p
d
= $5
Replicating Portfolio Approach (Puts)
Lets input the values from our previous numerical
example:
A = = =
= = =
= A + = + =
5
0.5, and
10
1.05(5) .95(0)
52.28;
( ) 1.0042(0.10)
0.50(100) 52.28 $2.28.
u d
d u
p p
uS dS
up dp
B
i u d
p S B
24
Lecture 14: Derivatives Theory (Part 1)
Replicating Portfolio Approach (Puts)
Binomial Tree for a One-Step Call Option
25
Lecture 14: Derivatives Theory (Part 1)
Binomial Tree for a One-Step Put Option
26
Lecture 14: Derivatives Theory (Part 1)
We now derive an important relationship between the
price of a European put option P
0
and the price of an
otherwise identical European call C
0
. Consider the
following two portfolios:
Portfolio A: one European call option plus cash of $Xe
-
rT
.
Portfolio B: one European put option plus one share.
Both portfolios are worth Max(S
T
, X) at expiration of
the options. This is easily seen from the following
table:
S
T
X S
T
>X
Portfolio A Max(S
T
- X, 0) + X = X Max(S
T
- X, 0) + X = S
T
Portfolio B Max(X - S
T
, 0) + S
T
= X Max(X - S
T
, 0) + S
T
= S
T
Put-Call Parity
27
Lecture 14: Derivatives Theory (Part 1)
Put-Call Parity
European options cannot be exercised
prior to the expiration date; therefore, the
portfolios must have identical values today;
i.e.,
C
0
+ Xe
-rT
= P
0
+ S
0
.
This equation represents the put-call parity
relationship, aka the "Fundamental
Theorem of Financial Engineering".
The payoff on any derivative or primary
security can synthetically created by forming a
portfolio of other derivatives and/or primary
securities.
28
Lecture 14: Derivatives Theory (Part 1)
Put-Call Parity
If put-call parity doesnt hold, there are
arbitrage opportunities.
Suppose S
0
= $31, X=$30, r = 10%, T
= 3 months, C
0
= $3, and P
0
= $2.25.
Portfolio A Value: C
0
+ Xe
-rT
= 3+30e
-.1(.25)
= 32.26.
Portfolio B Value: P
0
+ S
0
= 2.25 + 31 =
33.25.
29
Lecture 14: Derivatives Theory (Part 1)
Implications of adding a Time
Step
- Now suppose that we add another time-step; i.e., time
to expiration is now 2 years rather than 1 year. This
results in the following binomial tree:
$100
$95
$105
$110.25
$99.75
$90.25
30
Lecture 14: Derivatives Theory (Part 1)
Since uuS
= $110.25, udS
= $99.75, and ddS
= $90.25,
this implies that
c
uu
= Max[110.25-100,0] =$10.25 and p
uu
=Max[100-
110.25,0]
= $0,
c
ud
= Max[99.75-100,0] = $0 and p
ud
=Max[100-99.75,0] =
$0.25, and
c
dd
= Max[90.25-100,0] =$0 and p
dd
= Max[100-90.25,0] =
$9.75.
Since the risk neutral probability of an up move is
.5418 and the interest rate is 5%, this implies the
following prices for c
u
, p
u
, c
d
, p
d
, c, and p:
c
u
= e
-.05
[(.5418)10.25 + (.4582)0] = $5.53 and p
u
= e
-
.05
[(.5418)0+ (.4582)0.25] = $0.11,
c
d
= 0 and p
d
= e
-.05
[(.5418).11+ (.4582)9.75] = $4.58,
c = e
-.05
[(.5418)5.53] = $2.98 and p = e
-.05
[(.5418).11+
(.4582)4.58] = $2.15.
31
Lecture 14: Derivatives Theory (Part 1)
Implications of adding a Time
Step
Binomial Tree for a Two-Step Call Option
32
Lecture 14: Derivatives Theory (Part 1)
Binomial Tree for a Two-Step Put Option
33
Lecture 14: Derivatives Theory (Part 1)