Humanitarian intervention is threat or use of force by a state, group of
states, or international organization primarily for the purpose of protecting the nationals of the target state from widespread deprivations of internationally recognized human rights (Murphy 1996: 1112).
Humanitarian intervention should be understood to encompass non- consensual, non-forcible methods, namely intervention undertaken without military force to alleviate mass human suffering within sovereign borders (Scheffer 1992: 266).
International intervention is the transgression of a units realm of jurisdiction, conducted by other units in an order, acting singly or collectively. Interventions are always transformative; they are transgressions to reconfigure identities, institutions, and practices. (Reus- Smith 2013: 1059)
Fig. 1: US and Humanitarian Intervention in Libya Concluding Questions Conceptualization of Human Rights Accountability of Multilateral Organizations Inherent contradiction in the framework of humantarian intervention; sees all states as sovereign. HI as a concept of modernity?
Bibliography Donnelly, J. (1992): Human rights, humanitarian crisis, and humanitarian intervention. In: International Journal, 48, 607. Edkins, J. (2003): Humanitarianism, Humanity, Human. In: Journal of Human Rights 2(2), pp. 253-258. Inayatullah, N. (2008): Why do some people think they know what is good for others? In: Edkins, J. and Maja Zehfuss (eds) Global Politics: A New Introduction. London and New York: Routledge). Keene, E. (2013): International Hierarchy And The Origins Of The Modern Practice Of Intervention. In: Review of International Studies 39, 10771090 Reus-Smith, C. (2013): The Concept of Intervention. In: Review of International Studies 39, 10571076 Scheffer, D. (1992): Toward a Modern Doctrine of Humanitarian Intervention. In: University of Toledo Law Review 23, pp 253-293. Murphy, S.D. (1996): Humanitarian Intervention: The UN in an Evolving World Order. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.