Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Morphological Markers
• Recessive in nature
• Mutations - deleterious phenotype
• Problems with epistasis, pleiotrophy,
incomplete penetrence
• Influenced by environment
• Transitory phenotype
• Difficult to combine
Characteristics of Ideal Polymorphic
Markers
• Co-dominant expression
• Nondestructive assay
• Complete penetrance
• Early onset of phenotypic expression
• High polymorphism
• Random distribution throughout the
genome
• Assay can be automated
3 Methods of Detection
• Restriction fragment length
polymorphism and Southern
blotting (RFLP)
• Polymerase chain reaction
(PCR)
• Sequence information
Southern blotting
• Isolate DNA
• Digest DNA w/ restriction enzyme
• Size fractionate DNA
• Denature DNA
• Blot SS DNA to membrane
Methodology
• Prepare a probe
– Label
– Denature
• Hybridize probe with membrane
• Rinse
• Autoradiography
Disadvantages:
• The technique is laborious
• Time-consuming
• Expensive
• May use isotope
Hypervariable Sequences -
VNTRs - Minisatellites
Some VNTRs detect
polymorphisms at single
specific loci.
Other VNTRs detect many bands,
making them more useful for
forensics.
Microsatellites
• Advantages
– Easy to detect via PCR
– Lots of polymorphism
– Co-dominant in nature
• Disadvantage
– Initial identification,DNA
sequence information necessary
Others
• AFLPs
• RAPDs
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms
(SNPs)
SNPs
• 2/3 C → T
• Coding and non-coding regions
• Sequence information required
• High through-put analysis
Nonpolymorphic Markers
• ESTs (expressed sequence tags)
• STSs (sequence tagged sites)
Conclusions
• Many types of molecular markers
available
• Type(s) chosen for use will depend on
many factors
• Dominant or co-dominant, co-dominant
preferable
Conclusions, cont.
• Now, markers where there is sequence
information are preferred to anonymous
markers, for sharing, PCR
• Polymorphism is necessary for genetic
mapping, not for physical mapping
Conclusion