Aging theories try to explain developmental processes in the context of natural selection Patterns of aging across species Give theoretical predictions that can be experimental tested. Aging is a byproduct of natural selection Has no adaptive traits mutations in a population accumulate because there is no evolutionary mechanism to remove detrimental effects seen only in old members.
Aging theories try to explain developmental processes in the context of natural selection Patterns of aging across species Give theoretical predictions that can be experimental tested. Aging is a byproduct of natural selection Has no adaptive traits mutations in a population accumulate because there is no evolutionary mechanism to remove detrimental effects seen only in old members.
Aging theories try to explain developmental processes in the context of natural selection Patterns of aging across species Give theoretical predictions that can be experimental tested. Aging is a byproduct of natural selection Has no adaptive traits mutations in a population accumulate because there is no evolutionary mechanism to remove detrimental effects seen only in old members.
Senescence Aging and Darwins Evolutionary Theory Aging theories try to explain developmental processes in the context of natural selection Patterns of aging across species Give theoretical predictions that can be experimental tested. Initial Theories August Weismann (1882 & 1891) There is an evolutionary advantage for the species (not the individual) to have a limited life span. Older individuals negative selection of older members of species so that they cannot compete for food and resources Life span would be dependant of the number of cell generations that is the norm for a specific species Hayflick (1961) cellular senescence Suggested that resources were invested for the germ line as opposed to the soma Kirkwood 1977 disposable soma theory Contemporary Theories of Aging Mutation Accumulation Theory Peter Medawar (1952)
Antagonistic Pleiotropy George C Williams (1957) Mutation Accumulation Theory Aging is a byproduct of natural selection Has no adaptive traits Mutations in a population accumulate because there is no evolutionary mechanism to remove detrimental effects seen only in old members Reproduction is age dependant Deleterious genes expressed young are selected against to maintain reproductive fitness Deleterious genes expressed later in life are neutral and are passed on to future generations
Mechanisms 3 categories 1) gradual and appear late in life (cellular and metabolic damage- oxidative damage, DNA mutations, telomere shortening) 2) linked to young adulthood (cellular senescence and caloric restriction) 3) external mechanisms (infections and pathogens) Antagonistic Pleiotropy Genes are beneficial early but not later in life and are called pleiotropic genes. Is based on 2 assumptions May have an effect on several genes (pleiotropy) Effects fitness in an antagonistic way Explains reproductive costs Maximizes vigor in youth at a cost at older ages Can explain age-related diseases However, these genes will stay in the reproductive pool even though they have deleterious effects later in life
Examples: Cellular senescence versus cancer Hormones used to promote reproductive health can cause cancer later in life (i.e. estrogen)
The differences between the major theories is that in one (accumulation of mutations), deleterious genes are passively retained, whereas in the other (antagonistic pleiotropy), deleterious genes are actively selected for. Paradoxical Antagonistic Pleiotropy Harmful at younger ages but beneficial at older Disposable Soma Theory Kirkwood and Holiday (1979) Proposes that molecular and cellular damage accumulates in the soma to cause aging. This is the result of maintenance of reproductive fitness at the expense of the soma as one ages. A set of genes are antagonistically pleiotropic. These genes repair and maintain genetic integrity early on but accumulate mutations and increasingly fail to repair genetic systems as one ages.