Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summary
Solving problems
Industry in SOCIETY - POLITICS
Society is inherently
conservative and
seeks to set the
limits of research
activity
4
pays well
It has its
disadvantages
Prospective participants
must be given adequate
information on both the
possible risks and the
potential benefits of their
involvement to allow them
to make informed decisions
6
Ethical Issues
Justification for the
research
Access to
participants/Privacy
Informed consent
Potential harm
7
Autonomy
The ethical principle of
autonomy means that
each person should be
given the respect, time,
and opportunity
necessary to make his or
her own decisions.
Prospective participants
must be given the
information they will need
to decide to enter a study
or not to participate.
Vulnerable participants
Potentially vulnerable participants
such as children, the elderly, the
mentally ill may be incapable of
understanding information that
would enable them to make an
informed decision about study
participation.
Consequently, careful
consideration of their situation
and needs is required, and extra
care must be taken to protect
them.
For example, how will you assess
the diminished capacity of an
elderly individual, who will be the
guardian, and how and when will
you involve another individual as
guardian in the process?
10
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
The participants
The participants may not
have the experience or
educational background in
order to fully understand the
implications of the research
They may be swayed
because of their respect of
and trust in the researcher
who stands as an authority
figure
12
Peer pressure
The participants
may be subject to
social pressure of
their peer group
This is particularly
prevalent in
research groups
13
15
Contact Information
Give the names of people who can
answer questions about the
research; include the principal
investigator.
If the researcher is a student, include
the names and phone numbers of
the principal investigator and,
where applicable, the chair of the
school ethical committee for
questions.
Furnish the contact name of a
neutral third party who can explain
the rights of research participants
if the participant has any
questions.
16
Withdrawal
Always stress the fact that
participation is voluntary and that
the participant can withdraw at any
time
State that refusing to participate will
involve no penalty or decrease in
benefits to which the participant is
otherwise entitled.
Emphasize that the individual may
discontinue participation at any time
without penalty or loss of benefits.
If there are limitations or risks
involved in withdrawal, such as a
danger to the participant's well
being, these must also be clearly
explained.
17
19
Deception or concealment
Fully informed consent cannot be obtained in
some kinds of research without the
possibility that the results may be biased
In those circumstances where a
methodological requirement may
necessitates the use of concealment or
deception, the researcher has a special
responsibility
1. to determine whether the use of such
techniques is justified by the study's
prospective scientific, educational, or
applied value
2. whether alternative procedures are
available that do not use concealment or
deception
3. that the participants are provided with
sufficient explanation as soon as possible.
These issues should be explored before
undertaking the research with colleagues,
supervisor(s) and the school/departmental
ethics committee.
20
Risk assessment
Research is by nature
uncertain.
The researcher may not be
fully aware of the possible
hazards involved in the
proposed research.
RISK
Perceived directly by
the participants own
senses or experience
e.g. such as driving a car
Virtual risk
that is not known or
cannot be known,
or where there are
different opinions
22
Consent
Form
Might take
the following
form
Research design
Most research is sponsored
It is ethical behaviour for a
researcher
to use resources efficiently
and effectively
to work hard
to ensure the well-being of
all colleagues and
participants
24
25
Possible action
Fail to reject
Ho
Reject
Ho
26
Communalism
Universalism
Disinterestedness
Originality
Scepticism
28
Respect for:
Well-being
Autonomy
Fairness
Interest group 1
Best outcome
Best outcome
Best outcome
Interest group 2
Best outcome
Best outcome
Best outcome
Interest group 3
Best outcome
Best outcome
Best outcome
Interest group 4
Best outcome
Best outcome
Best outcome
29
Communalism
One of the Mertonian principles of
science is communalism that
the results of research are public
knowledge, freely available to all
Research to provide public
knowledge, freely available to all
But what about
secret government research?
secret commercial research?
Who owns the results - patents ?
Secrecy
32
Whistle-blowing
Researchers are in a privileged
position
They may come across
information about wrong-doing or
danger to the public
The reporting of this information
may go against any confidentiality
agreement
The reporting of such information
is likely to damage their career
The Public Disclosure Act 1998
protects certain classes of
workers from the consequences
of whistle-blowing
33
Confidentiality
Confidentiality of
electronically stored
participant information.
Appropriate selection and
use of tools for analysis
of the primary data
34
Universalism
There are no privileged
sources of scientific
knowledge
Race, sex, politics ?
Specialism ?
Authority ?
But certain classes and
ethnic groups are
under-represented in
research.
35
Disinteredness
Science is done for its own
sake
How impersonal is research
in practice ?
Research is competitive, not
just in the search for
funding but also for
status.
High achieving
researchers tend to be
highly ambitious?
Personal feuds are rife in
academia ? For example
in disputes over priority ?
36
38
Originality
Science is the discovery of
the unknown
Plagiarism ?
Publication of the same
results in multiple
journals ?
Routine stampcollecting surveys ?
39
Sceptical
Is sceptical of given
opinions
Challenges accepted
views
40
It is a social activity
carried out by groups of
competing/cooperating/communicating
scientists
41
controversy
publication
sincerity
theory
experiment
person
knowledge
42
44
Ethical supervision
Non-coercive
Nurtures the students
confidence and skills
Permissive
Does not use the student just
as a technician or assistant
but allows the student to
develop the project in new
ways
Not jealous of the students
success but allows the student
to take ownership of their
project and get the credit for it
45
PUBLICATIONS
Are how the world
sees you.
Determine whether
you get funding for
further research or
not!
Determine whether
you get promoted or
not!!
Determine whether
you keep your job or
not!!!
47
48
49
Ghost Authorship
Absence of Authors
Professional writers ( Should be
acknowledged)
Hierarchical / political / personal
reasons
50
When to publish?
There is intense pressure
to publish early and
often
For career progression
For getting new grants
For getting tenure
For establishing
priority/primacy in an
area of research
51
52
TACTIC 1
Maximise number of
publications.
Waste of resources
and distorts
publication output.
In U.S.A., U.K.
universities up to
early 1990s and still
applies in Germany,
India, China.
53
54
Some senior
scientists are
intolerant of criticism
and
dangerous to cross.
56
PLAGIARISM
Plagiarism is dishonesty.
The research may be excellent
but it wasnt done by the
author of the paper.
No point in trying to plagiarise
published work.
Plagiarism mostly involves
unpublished theses.
Difficult to detect unless
editor/referee familiar with
unpublished work in subject as
well as published work.
Sanctions seen as a default
option now.
57
58
An Introduction
to Research
Ethics
59