BP America- Driving Safety

Mike W. Thompson, CSP

Where BP Operates

oil
gas
chemicals
refining
market
positions

Objectives for Todays Session

Background/Context
Brief Overview of BP Group Functional
Standard for Personal Safety-Driving
Discuss BP E&P Segment Immersions Process
BP Onshore US BU Activities and Tools
Sustaining the Progress
Q&A

Driving Fatality Statistics

Driving and vehicle related fatalities are the
number one cause of fatalities in BP Group
(82% in 2003).
In E&P, 31 fatalities (9 within the OUSBU) over
the past two years, including 3 children.
In 2004, we have had 2 contractors and 2
members of the public die in driving and
vehicle-related incidents 3 in the US, 1 in
Algeria.

Driving Safety- Why the

Urgency?
We drive 56,863,834 miles per year (116 round trips to the
moon!)
73 Vehicle Incidents in 2003
3 of 22 HIPOS in 2003 were vehicle related
5 of 63 SORs in 2003 were vehicle related
Our driving performance places us in the bottom one-third of E&P
business units.

Severe Vehicle Incidents 2004 thru YTD

May 2005
30 Severe Vehicle Incidents 04-05 (20/30 in Operations; 28/30
Contractors)
Operations / Wells

67% of severe vehicle incidents occurred in

Operations

13% of 2004 HiPos are driving related (4

Incidents)

One 3rd Party Vehicle Fatality in OUSBU / Two in

Shelf

2004 TVAR = 1.21

2005 TVAR = 0.98

Assets

Two TUs (Arkoma and Canada) had 39% of the

severe vehicle incidents.

Hugoton had 3 HIPOs involving vehicle incidents

Two assets did not have any severe vehicle

incidents: Permian and South Louisiana

Companies Involved

21 companies (incl. BP) reported severe vehicle

incidents

76% of companies reported single incidents

Companies reporting 2 incidents

A & A Tank and Truck Co. (Arkoma)

Bob Dale (FTE) (Canada)

Flare Construction (Overthrust/Moxa)

Hodges Trucking Company (Arkoma)

Interventions

Developing contract language for high risk

& 100% use contractors

3rd Party Fatality Reviews - SET

Implemented Driving Standard

Targeted Transportation Sector Commitment

Sessions

U.S. Logistics - CVP

Objectives for Todays Session

Background/Context
Brief Overview of BP Group Functional
Standard for Personal Safety-Driving
Discuss BP E&P Segment Immersions Process
BP Onshore US BU Activities and Tools
Sustaining the Progress
Q&A

The Golden Rule for Driving Safety

All categories of vehicle, including self-propelled

mobile plant, must not be operated unless:

vehicle is fit for purpose, inspected and confirmed to be in safe working order

passenger number does not exceed manufacturers design specification for the
vehicle

loads are secure and do not exceed manufacturers design specifications or legal
limits for the vehicle

seat belts are installed and worn by all occupants

safety helmets are worn by riders and passengers of motorcycles, bicycles, quads,
snow-mobiles and similar types of vehicle

Drivers must not be authorised to operate the vehicle unless:

they are trained, certified and medically fit to operate the class of vehicle
they are not under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and are not suffering from
fatigue
they do not use hand-held cell phones and radios while driving (best practice is to
switch off all phones and two-way radios when driving)
OUSBU HSE Training

The Group Functional Standard Driving

Objectives

ha s
d
r
a
d
n
a
the
St
e
g
c
n
i
u
v
d
i
r
e
The D esigned to r ncy of
been d r and freque ents and
numbe related accidve safety
drivinges and impro ucing
fataliti ance by redch BP
performe risk to whi sed and
both thyees are exporm to
emplo tential for ha lic.
the po ers of the pub
memb lso protect y
It will aolder value b uential
shareh g the conseqed
reducin driving relat
cost ofnts.
accide

The new Standard

will:
Be the first of the BP
Group Functional HSSE
Standards
Help save lives, by
improving in areas that
have contributed to
driving related
fatalities in BP in the
past
Focus on improving:
Skill and competency
of the driver
Safety of the journey

The BP Driving Standard- A

Standard with 10 Elements
BP Driving Standard
Vehicle Requirements
1. The vehicle is fit for purpose, well maintained with seatbelts
2. The number of passengers not exceed spec for the vehicle
3. Loads are secure

Driver Requirements
4. They are licensed, trained, and medically fit
5. They are appropriately rested and alert
6. They do not use a mobile phone while operating the vehicle
7. In high risk countries journey management plans in place
8. Seatbelts worn by all occupants
9. Not under the influence of alcohol or drugs
10. Safety helmets worn by rider and passengers of motorcycles
etc

Implementation Planning Overall Timeline

Function Accountabilities
Agree scope
Define standards
Create business case
Define measures
Review by Legal and HR
Obtain GCEM approval

Stage 1

Preparation and approval

May 2003 J uly 2003 Sept 2003
Standard
first
conceived

Edit and publish final S tandard

Communicate to Group Leadership
Develop baseline and gap analysis
tool, including plan and costs
Develop monitoring and online
training tool
Develop mechanism for exceptions
Contract template (legal)
Regional Implementation Workshops
Review implementation plans

Stage 2

Stage 3

Base line and gap analysis

J an 2004

Summit
Standard
FCG
Meeting Endorsement
Approved

Assist development of
Standard via RSLT
Network impact widely
Support implementation pilot
Communicate pending
approval of Driving Standard

Develop good practice toolbox

Identify vehicle and training suppliers
Develop communications packs
Develop DCT support tools
Facilitate lessons learned forum
Create leadership workshops and
toolbox
Monitor implementation quarterly

30st April 2004

Baseline and gap analysis completed.

Implementation plans submitted

Use tool to identify capabilities and

resources
Baseline level of compliance and
conduct gap analysis
Prioritise gaps and estimate costs
Submit plan of implementation

Segment Accountabilities

Implementation and monitoring

1st J an 2005

31st Dec 2007

Standard into force for

all BP employees and
vehicles

All contractors in
compliance

Implement standard
Run driver engagement workshops
Report implementation progress
Reflect intent of S tandard in transport
contracts
Share good practices
Leadership engagement and support
(ride-alongs etc)
Self-verification and monitoring

Engaging our Contractors

hall
Regions s
d
n
a
s
n
o
uncti
ard in
gments, F
e
S
s
s
the Stand
e
f
in
o
n
io
Bus
t
p
ompanies
do
C
a
P
e
-B
th
n
d
o
n
n
by all
recomme
usiness
e
b
P
B
f
o
bers of th
m
e
m
respect
re
d in
a
ployees
e Standar
m
th
e
g
e
s
in
o
d
h
n
w
me
anies
e. Recom s to non-BP Comp
c
r
o
f
k
r
o
w
es
f BP busin members of the
o
t
c
e
p
er
s
re
ion wheth
yees are
is
c
lo
e
p
d
m
e
e
h
e
y. T
r
whos
mandator
f a new o
o
is
n
e
io
c
r
it
o
d
f
n
work
ard a co
be made
d
l
il
n
a
w
t
S
y
n
is
a
,
to make th ract of a BP Comp
Functions
P
B
e
t
t
n
a
o
ri
prop
existing c
ith the ap
w
n
o
ti
a
lt
in consu
BP Legal.
including
n-BP
d by a no
te
p
e
c
c
a
ted into a
dard is
n
ra
o
ta
p
S
r
o
e
c
h
t
in
If
be
t
, it should
states tha
h
nd
ic
Company
h
w
t
n
nitoring a
me
o
e
m
re
,
g
g
a
in
n
t
e
ith
men
writt
will rest w
y for imple
rd
it
a
il
d
n
ib
s
a
t
n
S
o
y,
resp
ce to the
Compan
n
P
re
B
e
h
e
d
th
a
ith
auditing
nify
any, not w
p
m
o
C
all indem
h
P
s
-B
y
n
n
o
a
n
p
the
Com
the
e non-BP
th
t
a
th
y against
d
n
a
an
p
m
o
nt BP C
ce.
the releva
-complian
n
o
n
f
o
s
e
nc
conseque
rd
g Standa
in
iv
r
D
3
Page

Objectives for Todays Session

Background/Context
Brief Overview of BP Group Functional
Standard for Personal Safety-Driving
Discuss BP E&P Segment Immersions
Process
BP Onshore US BU Activities and Tools
Sustaining the Progress
Q&A

E&P Driving Safety Immersion

Intent and Objectives

Tony Hayward, GVP expectations of leadership

Make the program work

Make the program relevant to the local circumstance
Ensure everyone is included
Build personal competency and capability

Driving Safety Immersion Intent : Improve the competency

and capability of workforce to operate vehicles safely
Learning Phase April - July 2004

Create awareness and knowledge of driving risks and vehicle incident

causes
Share learnings from incidents

Practice Phase August - November 2004

Improve knowledge of safe driving by application of Onshore US BU
Driving Practice
Verify safe driving expectations are clear with workforce (bp and
contractor) and resources available

Testing Phase December 2004- February 2005

Provide assurance of competency in safe driving practices and Group
Driving Standard through testing and audit

Driving Safety Immersion

Whats Expected
Driving Safety

Tier 1 & 2 Leadership

IMMERSION

Phase 1
(Learning)

Attend Leadership Team

Roll Out
Introduce CD or
Video

April/July

Cascade to Teams
All Employees
Roll out session of Field
(PUL, AM, Wells Supv,OCM)
BU LT to review feedback
on Rollout

Field Operations/ Wells

Leadership
Organize Roll Out Session
for Field . (Use CDs or
videos and local examples
PUL, AM, OCM, HSE)
Ensure Expectations
around driving are clear
through use of Golden
Rule
Ensure that learning
message makes its way to
all workforce
Conduct Roll Out
Sessions for key
contractors
Feedback VDR roll out
plans to Driving Safety
Team

Driving Safety
Team
Roll out to
Leadership Team
Ongoing
activities to
include Immersion,
VDRs, and Group
Standard
Establish
workforce training
plans for approved
driving courses
(HSE +/- Driving
Safety Team)
Monitor
completion of
rollout plans (who,
target date,
completed date)
Analyze employee
feedback

Objectives for Todays Session

Background/Context
Brief Overview of BP Group Functional
Standard for Personal Safety-Driving
Discuss BP E&P Segment Immersions Process
BP Onshore US BU Activities and Tools
Sustaining the Progress
Q&A

Driving Safety Team

Members:
BU Champion:
Policky

Bryant

Chapman Team

Lead:

Bruce

Representatives:
OCs: Dave Rothbauer, Gary Munson, Dave McKenna,
Kurtis Peden
HSE: Duane Kortsha, Jerry Piper, Cheryl Metzler
Training & Development: Mike Thompson
Drilling/Wells: David Sims
Supply Chain Management: Fred Fitzhugh
Legal: Ken George

Gap Analysis Tool

Intent
To assess each element of the Driving Standard and
provides a comprehensive process for conducting a
baseline gap analysis and tracking the progress of
implementation going forward

Scope
The Tool captures the detailed gaps, actions and
resources which will inform the Implementation Plans it is not, in itself, an Implementation Plan

Format
Four Excel spreadsheets
One PowerPoint user training pack

Gap Analysis Tool - Summary

Dashboard

The summary spreadsheets present the data in a

user-friendly dashboard

BP Implementation Gap April

Analysis-Action Plan

May

June

July

Aug

Sept.

Oct

Nov

Dec

Element
1. Vehicle fit for
purpose

Retrofit/replace vehicles for ABS&Airbags

Assure manuf. specified vehicle maint schedules met and documented

2. No. of Passengers
3. Loads Secure
4. Driver Training
5. Fatigue/Tiredness
Training
6. Mobile Telephones
7.Journey Mgmt
8. Seatbelts
9. Alcohol/Drugs
10. Helmets

COMPLETE; Assure thru administrative follow-up

Assure loads, equipment and vehicle components are addressed
ID BP Drivers
and document

Conduct trng. for Prof. Drivers

Conduct and continue medical assessments

(Ongoing 3 yr. Freq.)

Continue trng. for non-Prof. Drivers

Develop trng. matls

ID Instructors

Conduct trng. for Prof. Drivers

COMPLETE; Assure thru administrative follow-up

N/A- OUSBU not operating in a High-Risk Classified Country;
OUSBU Driving Safety Practice encourages Journey Management.
COMPLETE; Assure thru administrative follow-up
COMPLETE; Assure thru administrative follow-up
COMPLETE; Assure thru administrative follow-up

6 April 2004

Driving Safety Practice Aligned

with Group Standard

Onshore US Driving Safety Practice- Attachments

Centralized Website for Driving

Safety Information

What Is A VDR?

A mechanical/electronic system which records and transmits to a

portal key driving performance information
A black box of sorts for vehicles to record (with set thresholds):
Location (via GPS)
Speed/RPMs
Harsh or rapid bumps, turns, acceleration and brakes
Impact/crash data
Seatbelt use
Trip duration/mileage

Three Options for Training

Option One - Basic Defensive Driving Training Professional Drivers
Option 2 - Basic Defensive Driving Training - NonProfessional Drivers
Option 3 - Advanced Defensive Driving
Training

Fatigue Training for Drivers

Fatigue is the bodys response to continued
Physical or Mental Activity or Sleep Loss
Fatigue results from:
Working for extended periods of time
Not getting enough sleep
Prolonged physical activity
Irregular work schedules
Poor physical and environmental
conditions

Driving Safety Day Survey Results

Driving Safety Immersion

Conducting an ASA

Management can demonstrate their

commitment to this Immersion and to
promoting Driving Safety through the ASA
process.
An example of a Driving Safety ASA courtesy
of San Juan North OC is available.
Micros oft Word
Document

(click on icon for sample ASA)

Objectives for Todays Session

Background/Context
Brief Overview of BP Group Functional
Standard for Personal Safety-Driving
Discuss BP E&P Segment Immersions Process
BP Onshore US BU Activities and Tools
Sustaining the Progress
Q&A

2005 Sustaining New Driving Safety

Standard

Purpose and Objectives

Recognise and reward
driving safety skills and
behaviours
Motivate BP workforce
drivers to achieve the
highest levels of
driving safety
performance
Build awareness and
understanding of safe
driving techniques and
behaviours

Regional and Final Events

Western Hem HV
12-13 Nov 2004

Europe
2-5 June 2005

Western Hem LV
1617 June 2005

Asia Pacific
7-9 July 2005
Africa, Middle East,
Russia and Caspian
1-3 Sep 2005

IDC Final
Cape Town
4-6 Nov 2005

Thank you for being a safe driver

Questions ?????

Arrive safely. Drive Safely.