In order to unearth activities or transactions that
present risks from a FCPA perspective, focus should be placed on relevant risk indicators. Certain signs may suggest that improper payment activity has occurred or may be occurring. The DOJ provides examples of such indicators, which it terms as red flags. Standing alone these red flags certainly do not prove the existence of illicit or improper activity. However, they may suggest the need for further inquiry and economic justification for the arrangements as well as greater vigilance and audit activity during the implementation stages.
Examples of red flags
Whether due diligence was performed in selecting agents Apparent lack of qualifications or resources on part of the agent to perform the services offered Whether the agent has been recommended by an official of the potential governmental customer History of corruption in countries the company does business that Transparency International has determined to be highly susceptible to corruption Unusual payment patterns or financial arrangements
Above market commissions paid in the
ordinary course of business and lack of proper authorization of such commissions Unusually high management fees, gifts and entertainment expenses Requests for payments inconsistent with the terms or purposes of underlying agreements Lack of standard invoices Lack of transparency in expenses or accounting records
Reasonable and bona fide expenditures
The FCPA provides that it shall not constitute a violation of the statute if (i) the payment, gift, offer, or promise of anything of value that was made, was lawful under the written laws and regulations of the foreign officials, political partys party officials, or candidates country (ii) the person charged can prove that the payment in question constituted a reasonable and bona fide expenditure, such as travel and lodging expense, and that it was directly related to (a) the promotion, demonstration, or explanation of products or services