Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Greek Letters
Greek Letters
Chapter 17
1
The Greeks are coming!
The Greeks are coming!
Parameters of SENSITIVITY
Delta =
Theta =
Gamma =
Vega =
Rho =
2
c = SN(d1) Ker(T t)N(d2)
p = Ker)T t)N(-d2) SN(-d1)
Notationally:
c = c(S; K; T-t; r; )
p = p(S; K; T-t; r; )
Once c and p are calculated, WHAT IF?
3
The GREEKS are measures of
sensitivity. The question is how
sensitive a positions value is to
changes in any of the variables that
contribute to the positions market
value.These variables are:
S, K, T-t, r and .
Each one of the Greek measures
indicates the change in the value of
the position as a result of a small
change in the corresponding variable.
Formally, the Greeks are partial 4
Delta =
In mathematical terms DELTA is the
first derivative of the options
premium with respect to S. As such,
Delta carries the units of the options
price; I.e., $ per share.
For a Call: (c)= c/S
For a Put: (p) = p/S
Results: (p) = (c) - 1
5
THETA
Theta measures are given by:
(c) = c/(T-t) (p) = p/(T-t)
$/1% change in .
(S) = 0. 8
RHO
Rho measures the sensitivity of the
options price to small changes in
the rate of interest.
(c) = c/r
(p)= p/r
Rho is in terms of $/%change of r.
(S) = 0.
9
Example:
S=100; K = 100; r = 8%; T-t =180
days;
11
Call Delta (See Figure 15.2, page 345)
Delta is the rate of change of the call
price with respect to the underlying
Call price
Slope =
C
A Stock price
12
THETA
Theta measures the sensitivity of the options
price to a small change in the time
remaining to expiration:
15
RHO
Rho measures the sensitivity of
the options price to small
changes in the rate of interest.
Hedge Ratio
The number of shares required to neutralize the portfolio
In the example:
Hedge ratio = 540/1,000 = .54
Notice that this is nothing other than
(c).
20
In the numerical example, Slide 9:
The hedge ratio: (c) = 0.6151
With 100 CBOE short calls:
n(S) = -(c)n(c;S).
n(c;S) = -10,000.
n(S) = -(.6151)[-10,000] = +6,151
shares The value of this portfolio is:
V = -10,000($10.3044) +
6,151($100)
V = $512,056 21
Suppose that the stock price rises
by $1.
SNEW = 100 + 1 = $101/share.
V = - 10,000($10.3044 + $.6151)
+6,151($101)
V = - 10,000($10.3044) +
6,151($100)
- 10,000($.6151) + $1(6,151)
22
V = $512,056 - $6,151 + $6,151
Suppose that the stock price falls
by $1.
SNEW = 100 - 1 = $99/share.
V = - 10,000($10.3044 - $.6151)
+6,151($99)
V = - 10,000($10.3044) +
6,151($100)
- 10,000( - $.6151) - $1(6,151)
delta- neutral.
Price/share: +$1 -$1
shares +$6,151 -
$6,151
calls +(-$6,151) -(-
$6,151)
Portfolio $0 24
$0
DELTA neutral position in the simple
case of put-stock portfolios.
Vportfolio = Sn(S) + pn(p;S)
(portfolio) = (S)n(S) + (p)n(p;S)
(portfolio) = 0 n(S) + (p)n(p;S) =
0.
n(S) = - n(p;S)(p)
Since the put delta is negative, then
the negative sign indicates that the
puts and the underlying asset must be
25
held in the same direction.
EXAMPLE: put stock portfolio.
We just bought 10 CBOE puts whose
delta is -$.70/share. Each put covers
100 shares. n(S) = -
n(p;S)(p).
(p) = -.70 and n(p) = 10.
n(p;S) = 1,000 shares.
n(S) = - 1,000(-.70) = 700.
The DELTA-neutral position consists of
the 10 long puts and 700 long shares.
26
Portfolio: The portfolio consisting of
10 long puts and 700 long shares is
delta- neutral.
Price/share: +$1 -$1
shares +$700 -$700
puts -$700 $700
Portfolio $0 $0
27
In the numerical example, Slide 9:
V = 10,000($6.4360 - .3849)
+3,849($101)
V = 10,000($6.4360 + $.3849)
+3,849($99)
delta- neutral.
Price/share: +$1 -$1
shares +$3,849 -
$3,849
calls +(-$3,849) -(-
$3,849)
Portfolio $0 31
$0
An extension:
calls, puts and the stock positio
Vportfolio = Sn(S) + cn(c;S) + pn(p;S)
portfolio = (S)n(S) + (c)n(c;S) +
(p)n(p;S).
But S = 1.
Thus, for delta-neutral portfolio:
portfolio = 0 and
32
EXAMPLE: We short 20 calls and 20
puts whose deltas are $.7/share and -
$.3/share, respectively. Every call and
every put covers 100 shares.
How many shares of the underlying
stock we must purchase in order to
create a delta-neutral position?
n(S) = -(c)n(c;S) + [-(p)]n(p;S).
n(S) = -(.7)(-2,000) [-.3](-2,000)
n(S) = 800.
33
Example continued
The portfolio consisting of 20 short
calls, 20 short puts and 800 long
shares is
delta- neutral.
Price/share: +$1 -$1
shares +$800 -$800
calls -$1,400 +
$1,400
Puts +$600 -$600
34
EXAMPLES
The put-call parity:
Long 100 shares of the underlying
stock,
long one put and short one call on this
stock is always delta-neutral:
(position)
= 100 + (p)n(p;S) + (c)n(c;S)
75 100 125 S
More negative
S S
delta-gamma-neutral.
52
53
54
55
VEGA
Vega measures the sensitivity of the options
market price to small changes in the
volatility of the underlying assets return.
(c) = c/
(p) = p/
56
57
58
59
60
RHO
Rho measures the sensitivity of the options
price to small changes in the rate of interest.
(c) = c/r
(p) = p/r
Rho is in terms of $/%change of r.
61
62
63
64
65
SUMMERY OF THE GREEKS
= (0.22)3,000+ (0.18)2,000
+ (0)5,000 + (0.34)(-10,000)
= $4,030.
= - $2,380.
70
= 4,030 a small change of the
oil price, say one cent per barrel, will
change the value of the above
portfolio by $40.30 in the same
direction.
= - 2,380 a small change in the
oil price, say one cent per barrel, will
change the delta by $23.80 in the
opposite direction.
Also, Gamma is negative when the
price per barrel moves away from
$48.57, the portfolio value will 71
A financial institution holds:
5,000 CBOE calls long; delta .4,
6,000 CBOE puts long; delta
-.7,
10,000 CBOE puts short; delta
-.5,
Long 100,000 shares
(portfolio) = (.4)500,000 +
(-.7)600,000
+(-.5)[-1,000,000]
72
GREEKS BASED STRATEGIES
Greeks based strategies are opened
and maintained in order to attain
a specific level of sensitivity.
Mostly, these strategies are set
to attain zero sensitivity. What
follows, is an example of
strategies that are:
1.Delta-neutral
2.Delta-Gamma-neutral
3.Delta-Gamma-Vega-Rho-neutral73
EXAMPLE:
The underlying asset is the a stock.
The options on this stock are
European.
S = $300; K = $300; T = 1yr; =
18%; r = 8%; q = 3%.
c = $28.25.
= .6245
= .0067
= .0109 74
DELTA-NEUTRAL
Short 100 calls. n0 = - 10,000; Long nS = 6,245
shares
Case A1: S increases from $300 to
$301.
Portfolio Initial Value New value Change
-100Calls - $282,500 - $288,800
- $6,300
6,245S $1,873,500 $1,879,745 $6,245
Error: -
$55
Case A2: S decreases from $300 to
$299.
75
Case B1: S increases from $300 to
$310.
Portfolio Initial Value New value Change
-100Calls - $282,500 - $348,100
- $65,600
6,245S $1,873,500 $1,935,950 $62,450
Error: -
$3,150
The point here is that Delta has changed
significantly and .6245 does not apply any more.
S = $300 $301 $310
= .6245 .6311 .6879.
We conclude that the delta-neutral portfolio must
76
Call #0 Call #1
S = $300 S = $300
K = $300 K = $305
T = 1yr T = 90 days
= 18% r = 8% q = 3%
c = $28.25 c = $10.02
= .6245 = .4952
= .0067 = .0148
= .0109 = .0059
= .0159 = .0034 77
A DELTA-GAMMA-NEUTRAL PORTFOILO
(portfolio) = 0: nS + n0(.6245) + n1(.4952) = 0
(portfolio)= 0: n0(.0067) + n1(.0148) = 0
Solution:
n0 = -10,000
n1 = - (-10,000)(.0067)/.0148 = 4,527
nS = - (-10,000)(.6245) (4,527)(.4952) = 4,003
Short the initial call : n0 = -10,000
Long 45.27 of call #1 n1 = 4,527
78
THE DELTA-GAMMA-NEUTRAL PORTFOLIO
Case A1: S increases from $300 to $301.
Portfolio Initial value New value Change
0) -10,000 - $282,500 - $288,800 -$6,300
1) 4,527 $45,360 $47,657 $2,297
S) 4,003 $1,200,900 $1,204,903 $4,003
Error: 0
Case B1: S increases from $300 to $310.
Portfolio Initial value New value Change
0) -10,000- $282,500 - $348,100 - $65,600
1) 4,527 $45,360 $70,930
$25,570
S) 4,003 $1,200,900 $1,240,930 $40,030
Error: 0
79
If we examine the exposure level to all parameters,
however, we observe that:
83
The DELTA-GAMMA-VEGA-RHO-
NEUTRAL-PORTFOLIO
In order to neutralize the portfolio to
all risk exposures, following the sale
of the initial call, we now determine
the portfolios holdings such that all
the portfolios sensitivity parameters
are zero simultaneously.
= 0 and = 0 and = 0 and =
0 simultaneously!
84
=0
nS+n0(.6245)+n1(.4954)+n2(.6398)+n3(.5931)
=0
=0
n0(.0067)+n1(.0148)+n2(.0138)+n3(.0100)
=0
=0
n0(.0109)+n1(.0059)+n2(.0055)+n3(.0080)
=0 85
The solution is:
Exact n
Short 100 CBOE calls #0; -10,000
Short 339 calls #1; -33,927
Long 265 calls #2; 26,534
Long 204 calls #3; 20,420
Short 6,234 shares. -6,234
86
Case D: S increases from $300 to $310
r increases from 8% to 9%
increases from 18%
to 24%
Portfolio Initial Value
New value
0) - 10,000 - $282,468 - $428,071
S) - 6,234 - $1,870,200 - $1,932,540
bid-ask spread.
The main problem for a market maker
who shorts calls is that the premium
received, not only may be lost, but
89
DYNAMIC DELTA - HEDGING
Recall: The profit profile of an
uncovered call is:
P/L At expiration
c
K ST
90
DYNAMIC DELTA - HEDGING
Recall: The profit profile of a
covered call is:
Strategy IFC At expiration
ST < K ST > K
Short c 0 -(ST K)
call
Long -St ST ST
stock
Total - St + c ST K
P/L ST - St + K - St91+
DYNAMIC DELTA - HEDGING
Recall: The profit profile of a covered
call is:
P/L At expiration
K St+ c
K ST
-St + c
92
DYNAMIC DELTA - HEDGING
The Dynamic Delta hedge is based on
the
impact of the time decay on the call
S
Delta. ln[ ] [r .5 ][T t]
t 2
Recalldthat: K
1
Tt
and
N(d1 ) (c) 93
DYNAMIC DELTA - HEDGING
Observe what happens to d1
when T-t 0.
N(d1) = (c) 0
94
DYNAMIC DELTA - HEDGING
The Dynamic hedge:
1.Write a call and simultaneously,
hedge the call by a long Delta
shares of the underlying asset. As
time goes by, adjust the number of
shares periodically.
Result: As the expiration date nears,
delta:
goes to 0 in which case you wind
up without any shares.
95
DYNAMIC DELTA - HEDGING
St : St < K St > K
(c): 0 1
Call: uncovered fully covered
n(S): 0 n(c;S) 1
96
Table 15.2 Simulation of Dynamic delta - hedging.(p.364)
Cost of
Stock Shares shares Cummulative
Interest
Week przce Delta purchased purchased cost cost
($000) ($000)
($000)
0 49.00 0.522 52,200 2,557.8 2,557.8
2.5
1 48.12 0.458 (6,400) (308.0) 2,252.3
2.2
2 47.37 0.400 (5,800) (274.7) 1,979.8
1.9
3 50.25 0.596 19,600 984.9 2,966.6
2.9
4 51.75 0.693 9,700 502.0 3,471.5
3.3
5 53.12 0.774 8,100 430.3 3,905.1
3.8
6 53.00 0.771 (300) (15.9) 3,893.0
3.7
7 51.87 0.706 (6,500) (337.2) 3,559.5
3.4
8 51.38 0.674 (3,200) (164.4) 3,398.5
3.3
9 53.00 0.787 11,300 598.9 4,000.7
3.8 97
Table 15.3 Simulation of dynamic Delta - hedging. (p. 365)
Cost of
Stock Shares shares Cumulative I
nterest
Week price Delta purchased purchased cost cost
($000) ($000) ($000)
0 49,00 0.522 52,200 2,557.8 557.8
2.5 1 49.75 0.568 4,600 228.9
2,789.2 2.7 2 52.00 0.705
13,700 712.4 3,504.3 3.4 3 50.00
0.579 (12,600) (630.0) 2,877.7 2.8
4 48.38 0.459 (12,000) (580.6) 2,299.9
2.2 5 48.25 0.443 (1,600) (77.2)
2,224.9 2.1 6 48.75 0.475 3,200 156.0
2,383.0 2.3 7 49.63 0.540 6,500
322.6 2,707.9 2.6 8 48.25 0.420
(12,000) (579.0) 2,131.5 2.1 9
48.25 0.410 (1,000) (48.2) 2,085.4
2.0 10 51.12 0.658 24,800 1,267.8
3,355.2 3.2 11 51.50 0.692 3,400
175.1 3,533.5 3.4 12 49.88 0.542
(15,000) (748.2) 2,788.7 2.7 13
49.88 0.538 (400) (20.0) 2,771.4
2.7 14 48.75 0.400 (13,800) (672.7)
2,101.4 2.0 15 47.50 0.236 (16,400)
(779.0) 1,324.4 1.3 16 48.00 0.261 2,500
120.0 1,445.7 1.4 17 9846.25