palliative chemotherapy G Liu, E Franssen, MI Fitch and E Warner Division of Oncology, Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Anggota kelompok;; 1.Daharani Centre, Canada.r 2.Muhammad 3.Fauzil Ansyori 4.Faisal 5.Erwin PURPOSE:
To assess patient preference for oral
versus intravenous (i.v.) palliative chemotherapy (CT). A strong preference would be an important quality-of-life issue. Patient and Method; A structured interviewer- administered scenario-based questionnaire evaluated incurable cancer patients who would be likely to receive palliative CT in the future. Using probability trade-offs, the preference for route of administration was evaluated against diminishing treatment response. RESULT: Of 103 assessable patients 92 preferred oral CT, 10 preferred i.v. CT, and One had no preference.
Of retain their initial preference
70% of patients were not willing to accept a lower response rate 74% were not willing to accept a shorter duration of response 99% of 39% wanted the specific treatment decision patients made primarily by their had a physicians prefere 38% primarily by nce themselves
22% shared equally.
Conclusion Patients with incurable cancer have a clear preference for oral CT, but are generally not willing to sacrifice efficacy for their preference. Important message Pasien harus mendapat informasi yang adekuat Pasien menginginkan pengobatan yang nyaman bagi mereka. Pengobatan yang teruji secara klinis yang dipilih pasien Keputusan terbanyak tetap pada dokter yang menangani. (40%) Perspektif manajer Rumahsakit Menyediakan informasi yang adekuat dan dikomunikasikan dengan baik Memperhatikan dan selalu meningkatkan tingkat kenyamanan pasien. Memberikan layanan yang berdasar bukti dan senantiasa mengikuti perkembangan.