SEMINAR ON

WRITTEN-POLE ELECTRIC
MOTORS
UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF: PROF. MR. D.K. JOSHI
PRESENTED BY: NEHA RAJPUT, TE 1st SHIFT
CONTENTS
1. Introduction : 1. Motor classification
2. Limitation of conventional technology
1. About Written-pole motors
2. Characteristics
3. Construction
4. Modes of operation
5. Merits and Demerits
6. Application
7. Experimental test
8. Case Study
9. Conclusion
10. Reference
 INTRODUCTION
Electrical motors are the backbone of the electrified society and are
responsible for 2/3rd of electrical energy generated.

Distribution system : 3 phase lines main feeders and heavily congested

areas and 1 phase lines laterals and rural areas.

Challenges faced in remote areas: higher cost for constructing 3 phase

service and low operating hours of loads.

Problem: motors have high starting current and motors of sizes greater than
15hp causes problem in the lines.

Hence the written pole motor, a new technology have been proposed which
eliminates the need of three phase power.
MOTOR FAMILY TREE
LIMITATION OF CONVENTIONAL
TECHNOLOGY

Draws excessive start-up current (inrush): 6-12 times their normal running
current during start-up .

Dependence of speed on no. of poles of rotor

speed = 120 X Frequency
No. of poles

Machine must have even no. of poles and deviating from this condition
will cause unstability at its rated speed.
ABOUT
Developed by the Precise Power Corporation of Bradenton, Florida with
the support from Electric Power Research Institute(EPRI).

Concept optimizes the magnetic geometry of rotor as operating speed of

machine varies.

It gets its name from a patented technology, which "writes" magnetic

poles on the rotor during start-up.

Available in sizes upto 100hp, and start and run without exceeding the
limits of distribution lines.
CHARACTERISTICS
Single-phase
Low starting current across-the-line
High efficiency
Reliable
Instant restart after momentary power interruption
Starts high inertia loads
Eliminates flicker & line sags
High power factor during start
High starting torque per amp
Simple design (No rotating windings)
Smooth (constant torque) start
CONSTRUCTION
ROTOR

Combination of induction, hysteresis and permanent magnet technology.

Made up of a high resistance rotor cageKey factor in limiting the

starting current of WPM and provides a considerable induction torque
during initial stage of starting.

It has a continuous layer of permanent magnetic ferrite material that covers

the rotor lamination stack.
CONTD
STATOR

Similar to a typical induction motor.

The stator lamination stack is constructed using low loss electrical steel
laminations.

Windings are similar in design and function to those used in a conventional

induction or synchronous motor.
CONTD
The unique feature:
EXCITATION WINDING

WPM makes use of a concentrated excitation winding located at one or

two points on the stator.

Contained within the stator structure and are located between the main
stator windings.

Designed to produce a magnetic field to fully magnetize the portion of the

rotors magnetic layer that is immediately across the air gap from it.

Responsible for maintaining the correct pole geometry in rotor.

MODES OF OPERATION
It employs one of the three modes of operation based on the rotational
speed of the machine:

START MODE

RUN MODE
TRANSITION
MODE
Start mode
Motor produces a large amount of hysteresis and induction torque which
helps to accelerate the motor to its rated speed.

Induction torque is produced in the machine by the rotating magnetic field

of the stator.

Hysteresis torque is developed

when the magnetic fields produced
by the stator current slightly
magnetize the ferrite material.
Transition mode

The excitation coil is turned on when the motor reaches 80%- 90% of
rated speed.

The powerful excitation coil starts writing poles to the ferrite layer as the
rotor rotates.

Magnetic layer can be magnetized into any desired configuration using

exciter winding while the motor is operating.
 Fig. 1 shows motor is in normal mode of operation. As the excitation had
not been turned on, the motor is running as an induction motor.

Fig. 2 and 3 shows the poles are written into the magnetic layer in the
anticlockwise direction as the rotor rotates in the clockwise direction.
CONTD
The size and no. of poles generated are dependent on the rotational speed
of the machine AND the frequency of signal given to exciter coil.

If the exciter has constant frequency then:

1. Lower speeds result in a larger number of smaller poles with shorter
spans.

2. Higher speeds result in a smaller number of larger poles with longer

spans.
Run mode
Excitation winding is turned off.

Magentic interlocking of rotor and

stator poles takes place.

The motor starts running at

synchronous speed until power is
cut-off.

If excessive torque is applied,

causing motor to pull out of
synchronism, it re-enters the
transition mode and re-accelerate
back to synchronism.
OPERATION DURING POWER
INTERRUPTION
MERITS
1. LOW STARTING CURRENT
These motors have starting currents comparable to conventional type:
one-fourth their size.
Reduces voltage sags no need of complex starters installation.
CONTD
2. ENERGY EEFICIENT, UNITY POWER FACTOR OPERATION
Reduces utility bills, while decreasing the electrical load on distribution
wiring, transformers, and starting contactors.
CONTD
CONTD
3. THREE-PHASE
PERFORMANCE
USING SINGLE-PHASE
POWER
WPM often go beyond 3-
phase performance
reducing starting current
requirements to levels below
that of 3-phase motors and
eliminates the need for
reactive power by unity
power factor operation.
OTHER MERITS AND DEMERITS
MERITS DEMERITS

3-phase applications Not a self-starting motor.

1. 1.

Simple construction Doesnt get activated until speed

2. is brought upto 80% of its design
2. speed.
Low temperature rise
3. Size is larger than a conventional
3. motor of same hp
High inertia starting Start-up and shut-down
4. characteristics of motor do not
allow it to be utilized for rapid on
Instantaneous restart 4.
and off operation.
5. capability
Not a familiar technology:
maintenance and repair work
Low operating cost 5.
6.
APPLICATIONS
1. GRAIN CLEANING
McLeod Harvester is a new approach to harvesting cereal corps. One
component is a stationary yard plant separates high protein chaff from
grain.
It also contains a rolling mill cracking seeds contained in chaff
The plant is powered with a 30hp, 1800 rpm WPM which eliminates the
requirement of 3-phase power.
Benefits: efficient and clean form of power, gradual starting of motor
reduces wear and tear on mechanical components, long term reliability.
Other applications

2.POTATO IRRIGATION 3. LAKE AERATION

4. GRAIN HANDLING 5. OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION

EXPERIMENTAL TEST
A test was conducted by Fleming- Mason Energy Corporation in June,1995
on Sheltowee Trail Country Clubs golf course irrigation system.

The Phase converter and 3-phase motor:

30hp, 240V Static Phase Converter and a
30hp,continuous duty, 3530 rpm 3-phase motor.

The Written-pole motor:

1-phase,30hp, continuous duty, 3600 rpm motor.
Motor is a high inertia external rotor design and
with ride through capabilities.
Fig.15. shows comparisons of nameplate
ratings of the motors.
 Operating Characteristics
When motors are used to operate on irrigation system, amount of heads
plays a major role.

Under light loads, motors not fully utilizing their HP ratings.

Running currents and PF vary with amount of water being pumped.

CONTD
Operating Efficiency
With WPM: adequate pressure can be maintained with 19 heads open.
With 3-phase motor: 15 heads can be operated and pressure is maintained.
With same no.of heads opened to each motor, a 2-foot bigger diameter and
better spray pattern was obtained with WPM.

Sheltowee Trails Assessment:

Two operational problem faced with WPM:
1. Spot watering while operating with pressure control.
2. When temperature dropped below 55 degrees, motor would shut itself off
soon after startup.
CASE STUDY
PAT TRASKS IRRIGATION:
Calculation of Pat Trasks irrigation cost reduction after converting from
propane fueled engine to a 60 Hp 1-phase WPM on one field of 110 acres
of alfalfa.

With propane-fueled engine:

Total watering time per crop = 384 Hours
At a fuel cost/hr of $6.50 = $2,496 per Crop
With Written-Pole motor:
Total watering time per crop = 288 Hours
At an electricity cost/hr of $2.60 = $748 per Crop
 In total, the Trask family pumped 2,300 hrs to irrigate about 275-300 acres
in 2003 at a consumption rate of 5 gals/hr of propane, costing $14,375.00.

Using the Written Pole motor to irrigate the same acres, the Trasks total
kW bill was $3,350.00 a savings of approximately 70%.
CONCLUSION
This unique product has applications virtually
anywhere that 3-phase power is either not
available, or is not economical to provide.

Has performance advantages over a

conventional induction motor including low
starting current, very high operating efficiency,
and excellent power factor.

It has the additional benefit of being able to ride

through brief service interruptions on 1-phase
power

Its allows one to operate much more efficiently

and at a lower starting current, offer a method
for powering high horsepower applications
where 1 phase power is available.
References
IEEE paper: Written Pole Motors- A practical solution to
Large HP Motor Needs? by David E. Smart.
IEEE Paper: Applications, Test Data and Case histories of
Single-phase Written-pole motors by Ronnie J. Barber and
Richard T. Morash
MERIDIUM POWER : SINGLE PHASE WRITTEN-POLE
MOTORS
PRECISE POWER CORPORATION: SINGLE PHASE WRITTEN-
POLE MOTOR